Changes v Demons
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1338 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Changes v Demons
Out: Kent, Patton
In: Geary, Steven (if ready to go) otherwise maybe Joyce (Battle to play forward and Bruce to chop out Marshall)
In: Geary, Steven (if ready to go) otherwise maybe Joyce (Battle to play forward and Bruce to chop out Marshall)
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Mon 05 Apr 2004 1:49pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Changes v Demons
Out: Kent (managed) , McKenzie (concussion) , Patton (stiff and maybe not)
In: Steven, Geary, Hind
Melbourne can be exposed by pace and run, all three ins provide that.
Patton very stiff and safe if Steven isn't picked.
In: Steven, Geary, Hind
Melbourne can be exposed by pace and run, all three ins provide that.
Patton very stiff and safe if Steven isn't picked.
- avid
- Club Player
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Tue 11 Mar 2008 1:54am
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 95 times
Re: Changes v Demons
McKenzie might be injured. Kent looks the most vulnerable. Parker hasn't won many possessions (but lots of 'forward pressure acts', apparently). Clark hasn't quite settled in.
They're the only possible droppings, I'd think.
Paton played a great second half.
They're the only possible droppings, I'd think.
Paton played a great second half.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 878
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Changes v Demons
I don’t think we’ll see Battle go forward permanently again. The club value him, but that forward line is just waiting for King to come in. You can’t really play Bruce, Membrey, King and Battle.Jacks Back wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 11:50pm Out: Kent, Patton
In: Geary, Steven (if ready to go) otherwise maybe Joyce (Battle to play forward and Bruce to chop out Marshall)
Unless there’s a trade or massive injury, I think Battle will be a backman going forward
- mightysainters
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:21pm
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: Changes v Demons
They are slow and spread terribly, need to expose this with genuine foot speed
IN: Steven Hind Geary
OUT: McKenzie Patton Clarke
IN: Steven Hind Geary
OUT: McKenzie Patton Clarke
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17047
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3663 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Changes v Demons
I agree but it wouldn’t surprise me if he turns into something of a swing man from time to time. Might float down in a game where say Bruce is well held to mix it upThe_President wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 6:13amI don’t think we’ll see Battle go forward permanently again. The club value him, but that forward line is just waiting for King to come in. You can’t really play Bruce, Membrey, King and Battle.Jacks Back wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 11:50pm Out: Kent, Patton
In: Geary, Steven (if ready to go) otherwise maybe Joyce (Battle to play forward and Bruce to chop out Marshall)
Unless there’s a trade or massive injury, I think Battle will be a backman going forward
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1223
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 1:18pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 570 times
- Been thanked: 109 times
- samuraisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5938
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
- Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
- Has thanked: 861 times
- Been thanked: 801 times
Re: Changes v Demons
In: Geary, Steven, Hind.
Out: DMac (inj) Parker (inj), Kent.
I would play a second ruckman (Longer) too, but I can't see the selection committee agreeing.
I think with the ongoing health concerns with Dylan, along with the imminent retirement of N Brown, Big Jake's back operation and Logan Austin's shoulder (?) injury, Battle will play down back for the forseeable future. We are certainly pretty skinny down back now.
Mad Max will probably inherit the role we had earmarked for Paddy if he doesn't come good.
Out: DMac (inj) Parker (inj), Kent.
I would play a second ruckman (Longer) too, but I can't see the selection committee agreeing.
I think with the ongoing health concerns with Dylan, along with the imminent retirement of N Brown, Big Jake's back operation and Logan Austin's shoulder (?) injury, Battle will play down back for the forseeable future. We are certainly pretty skinny down back now.
Mad Max will probably inherit the role we had earmarked for Paddy if he doesn't come good.
Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 224 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
Re: Changes v Demons
Agreed - and better a backman going forward than a forward going backward!The_President wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 6:13amI don’t think we’ll see Battle go forward permanently again. The club value him, but that forward line is just waiting for King to come in. You can’t really play Bruce, Membrey, King and Battle.Jacks Back wrote: ↑Mon 15 Apr 2019 11:50pm Out: Kent, Patton
In: Geary, Steven (if ready to go) otherwise maybe Joyce (Battle to play forward and Bruce to chop out Marshall)
Unless there’s a trade or massive injury, I think Battle will be a backman going forward
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 224 times
- Been thanked: 344 times
Re: Changes v Demons
I wonder if Dunstan will come back in to try and negate their mids. I'm ambivalent - suspect he needs a confidence boost by being given more responsibility/recognition. On the other hand feel like hunter (who'd prob make way) is really learning a lot on the job. Got thrown around a lot last week but - like others (Inc Marshall at the start) got straight back up and on with the job.
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Changes v Demons
Can't see the need for a lot of changes, even though Hind and Dunstan tore it up on the weekend. However, barely saw Clark, seems an obvious out for Steven if he is ready (our midfield is so one paced without him). Dunstan would be great in a shut down role, but I don't think we need a defensive mindset against the Dees. Dmac looked shaky (as he has all season so far) and looks like he could do with a re-set for Geary.
Out: Clark, Dmac.
In: Steven (or if not available, Hind), Geary.
Out: Clark, Dmac.
In: Steven (or if not available, Hind), Geary.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23154
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9105 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1872
- Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2016 11:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 269 times
Re: Changes v Demons
Hard to change a winning team but gears and stuvo will play if fit. So that means ar least two leave. Dmac concussion is a two weeks rest automatically I thought so gears comes in for him. Hunter or Sinclair for stuvo. I'd give Sinclair a break as he seems a little off this year and killing it at VFL will boost his confidence.
I'd also drop Paton for hind. Nothing wrong with Paton but we needs speed and hind has it in spades apparently.
I'd also drop Paton for hind. Nothing wrong with Paton but we needs speed and hind has it in spades apparently.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1874
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 10:38pm
- Location: In a laundrette, San Francisco USA
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 54 times
- Otiman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8773
- Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
- Location: Elsewhere
- Has thanked: 203 times
- Been thanked: 658 times
Re: Changes v Demons
I think Dmac was lucky to keep his spot against the hawks, but played with effort like his career was on the line. Stepped up with Geary absent. Deserves his spot this week but may miss with the concussion hanging over him.
Young, Hind, White all pushing for selection. A fit Steven is first picked every week.
I'd still have Pierce over Longer until he can prove match fitness in the VFL.
No more than 2 unforced omissions after a win.
Out: McKenzie, Kent
In: Geary, Pierce
Steven if fit comes in for ???. Hard to pick a midfielder that should be dropped. Possibly Paton could make way.
Parker next game will be telling if he needs a stint in the VFL for a few weeks.
Young, Hind, White all pushing for selection. A fit Steven is first picked every week.
I'd still have Pierce over Longer until he can prove match fitness in the VFL.
No more than 2 unforced omissions after a win.
Out: McKenzie, Kent
In: Geary, Pierce
Steven if fit comes in for ???. Hard to pick a midfielder that should be dropped. Possibly Paton could make way.
Parker next game will be telling if he needs a stint in the VFL for a few weeks.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
Re: Changes v Demons
Well that would make us a slower unit....
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Changes v Demons
See how he comes up from his ankle injury, may be a good time to give him a rest...like for like would be Young?
- Otiman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8773
- Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
- Location: Elsewhere
- Has thanked: 203 times
- Been thanked: 658 times
Re: Changes v Demons
Slower and less agile, but definitely harder.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23154
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9105 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Changes v Demons
I don't know where Pierce was, but he didn't play for Sandy on the weekend . Injured? I don't know but I doubt he will be an in this week.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1457 times
- Been thanked: 1525 times
Re: Changes v Demons
Mackenzie injured so Geary straight back. If Parker fails fitness test Hind in. They won't change a winning team who all tried their darndest. Big assumption is JS needs more time to recover.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Changes v Demons
Marshall has cemented as our premier ruck.
So the "chop out" needs to be selected on the basis of what he brings to performance over and above a 20% "chop out" in the ruck.
Neither Longer nor Pierce bring the necessary.
My view is that we compromise until Carlisle is fit - having in mind Carlisle's efforts in the centre square v Melbourne last season.
IF Marshall is not fit, we have a problem confirmed by what Marshall is adding to team performance with his contributions.
So the "chop out" needs to be selected on the basis of what he brings to performance over and above a 20% "chop out" in the ruck.
Neither Longer nor Pierce bring the necessary.
My view is that we compromise until Carlisle is fit - having in mind Carlisle's efforts in the centre square v Melbourne last season.
IF Marshall is not fit, we have a problem confirmed by what Marshall is adding to team performance with his contributions.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23154
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9105 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Changes v Demons
Not sure the Dees will play both rucks this weekend. Would make then too slow,To the top wrote: ↑Tue 16 Apr 2019 6:31pm Marshall has cemented as our premier ruck.
So the "chop out" needs to be selected on the basis of what he brings to performance over and above a 20% "chop out" in the ruck.
Neither Longer nor Pierce bring the necessary.
My view is that we compromise until Carlisle is fit - having in mind Carlisle's efforts in the centre square v Melbourne last season.
IF Marshall is not fit, we have a problem confirmed by what Marshall is adding to team performance with his contributions.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Sun 04 Dec 2005 9:56pm
- Has thanked: 37 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Changes v Demons
Kent is probably on his last chance this weekend and he’s fortunate it’s against his old mob. He can be very clean with his execution however it’s been few and far between. In the past two weeks he’s drifted out of the game for extended periods and fumbled at critical moments.
Geary is a certain return as is Stuv if given the all clear. Paton and McKenzie will most likely be the omissions.
Hind would be a very useful addition on the wide expanses of the ‘G but I can’t see many changes to a winning combination. If Parker’s ankle doesn’t come up then Hind might get that chance.
Geary is a certain return as is Stuv if given the all clear. Paton and McKenzie will most likely be the omissions.
Hind would be a very useful addition on the wide expanses of the ‘G but I can’t see many changes to a winning combination. If Parker’s ankle doesn’t come up then Hind might get that chance.