Who should win and why
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9054
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
Who should win and why
One of the pieces of luck that contributes to a premiership team in any year is the quality of the opposition in that year. Our teams of 2004 and 2009 were both of significantly higher quality that either of the two teams competing today, or the last two premiers for that matter. In 2004, we caught the cusp of one of the great teams of all time - Brisbane. They were on their way down, as Port showed in the GF but, at home, still a formidable foe. We finished third that year, and needed to have finished second to avoid two interstate finals. Last year, Richmond also finished third and, despite more interstate teams in the final 8 (5) than in 2004 (4), they avoided all interstate clashes. Luck. In 2009, we managed to catch another of the great AFl teams - Geelong - this time in the midst of their reign. Despite that, our early inaccuracy, a point that was called a goal and a missed free, conspired against us. Perhaps even more so, a champion who played although he was injured ruined our hopes. Richmond found that out again last week. We were not good enough to make the finals during Hawthorn's recent great years, but that's the only solace.
Neither of today's finalists have anywhere near the overall skill level of those Brisbane, Geelong or Hawthorn teams but, you can only play the opposition that you have - not the one that might be.In almost all of the grand finals that I have watched (I used to enjoy watching non Saints GFs once - alas, not anymore), the team with the best backline has triumphed. There are, as always, exceptions to this rule, not least of all the Saints team of 1971. In my book, the best measure of backline ascendancy is the number of contested marks taken, especially in close games. No greater evidence of that can be seen in the last few seconds of the 2005 GF or, indeed, the 1966 GF. Throughout the year, Richmond has had the best backline (as they did in 2017). However, they are out and the next best is West Coast. So despite the home state advantage, which isn't as strong in a GF as in earlier finals because of the ticketing system, West Coast should win. Having said that, and although it pains me to say it, I have great admiration for Nathan Buckley in the way he has rebuilt his team in such a short period. He has churned many (some good ball getters) who butcher the ball and has now a reasonably skilled team. But, I don't think they will be good enough.
Neither of today's finalists have anywhere near the overall skill level of those Brisbane, Geelong or Hawthorn teams but, you can only play the opposition that you have - not the one that might be.In almost all of the grand finals that I have watched (I used to enjoy watching non Saints GFs once - alas, not anymore), the team with the best backline has triumphed. There are, as always, exceptions to this rule, not least of all the Saints team of 1971. In my book, the best measure of backline ascendancy is the number of contested marks taken, especially in close games. No greater evidence of that can be seen in the last few seconds of the 2005 GF or, indeed, the 1966 GF. Throughout the year, Richmond has had the best backline (as they did in 2017). However, they are out and the next best is West Coast. So despite the home state advantage, which isn't as strong in a GF as in earlier finals because of the ticketing system, West Coast should win. Having said that, and although it pains me to say it, I have great admiration for Nathan Buckley in the way he has rebuilt his team in such a short period. He has churned many (some good ball getters) who butcher the ball and has now a reasonably skilled team. But, I don't think they will be good enough.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12099
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3705 times
- Been thanked: 2578 times
Re: Who should win and why
Who gives a f*** and f*** their supporters and f*** both teams and their power clubs
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19154
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Who should win and why
If the filth get the next goal, it’s game over..
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19154
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Who should win and why
That’s why they were such classic GFs.
Jamie Cripps is a terrible player.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- BenLong#21
- Club Player
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat 04 Aug 2018 5:15pm
- Has thanked: 96 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19154
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10505
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: Who should win and why
Umpires have given Collingwood the lead they are so biased.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14060
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: Who should win and why
*facepalm*
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14060
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: Who should win and why
Umps didn’t pay the obviously blocking free for Collingwood that lead to the mark and winning goal for WCE.
The game was umpired great.
You and your constant ridiculous umpiring conspiracies are absolutely pathetic.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- Saint 58
- Club Player
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Thu 02 Nov 2006 11:10am
- Location: Anywhere the Saints are playing in Melbourne
- Has thanked: 252 times
- Been thanked: 104 times
Re: Who should win and why
Yeeeeeeeesssssssssss !!!!!!!
Fxxx you Collingwood
Fxxx you Buckley
Now we get Harvey to our coaching panel
Bring on The Trade Period
Bring on the Draft
Bring on 2019
Gooooo Saints !!!!!
Fxxx you Collingwood
Fxxx you Buckley
Now we get Harvey to our coaching panel
Bring on The Trade Period
Bring on the Draft
Bring on 2019
Gooooo Saints !!!!!
What you do for others will define your life.
[Football isn't everything ... it's the ONLY thing]
[Football isn't everything ... it's the ONLY thing]
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17048
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3663 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Who should win and why
Wheeew what a game.
Happy with the outcome, thought the umpires were brilliant.
The lesson again is about class and competing
Happy with the outcome, thought the umpires were brilliant.
The lesson again is about class and competing
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19154
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Who should win and why
I really really feel sorry for Eddy and his two boys.....
Not....
Not....
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23157
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9106 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Who should win and why
Hahahaha.
f*** you Eddie.
f*** you Collingwood.
Now you pricks know how we felt in 2010.
f*** you Eddie.
f*** you Collingwood.
Now you pricks know how we felt in 2010.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14060
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: Who should win and why
Gotta say, I haven’t laughed as hard as I did watching the Pies banner fall apart in a long time!
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Fri 01 May 2015 1:32pm
- Has thanked: 22 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Who should win and why
LMFAO
Eat a dick Eddie!!
Go Eagles!!!
Revenge for 2010 with the replay debacle that should have been extra time instead ...is complete!!!!
I FEEL INCREDIBLE!!
Eat a dick Eddie!!
Go Eagles!!!
Revenge for 2010 with the replay debacle that should have been extra time instead ...is complete!!!!
I FEEL INCREDIBLE!!
- BenLong#21
- Club Player
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Sat 04 Aug 2018 5:15pm
- Has thanked: 96 times
- Been thanked: 66 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10505
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: Who should win and why
Forget the holding the ball on Howe and so many missed the balls against Collingwood.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10505
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: Who should win and why
I think the umpires ran through the Pies banner.
Anyway justice is served for the umpiring v GWS.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19154
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Who should win and why
That’s not very nice..
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23157
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9106 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: Who should win and why
Their banner blew apart, lost the toss and then the game.
Brilliant trifector.
That f***ed banner was a bad omen.
Brilliant trifector.
That f***ed banner was a bad omen.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17048
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3663 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19154
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Who should win and why
Long trip home for the Americans..oh,well...
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.