Trout reviews our draft picks

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
parkeysainter
SS Life Member
Posts: 2696
Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am
Location: Brighton Beach Mansion
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Trout reviews our draft picks

Post: # 1708130Post parkeysainter »

http://m.saints.com.au/news/2017-11-27/ ... .mobileapp

Good job Trout and Co. Have to give it to them on some fine selections. A grade performance IMO, the best of the Richo era and better than the year we jagged Billings, Dunstan and Acres.


Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud

In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
chook23
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7396
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 156 times

Re: Trout reviews our draft picks

Post: # 1708133Post chook23 »

Way way to early to be making that call.......IMO


saint4life
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8190
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 630 times

Re: Trout reviews our draft picks

Post: # 1708165Post magnifisaint »

chook23 wrote:Way way to early to be making that call.......IMO
Stick with the chickens


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
User avatar
parkeysainter
SS Life Member
Posts: 2696
Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am
Location: Brighton Beach Mansion
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Re: Trout reviews our draft picks

Post: # 1708170Post parkeysainter »

chook23 wrote:Way way to early to be making that call.......IMO
I was more relating to draft day alone. I would be very suprised if Clark and Coffield and even Calavino don't make the grade.


Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud

In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
chook23
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7396
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 156 times

Re: Trout reviews our draft picks

Post: # 1708172Post chook23 »

magnifisaint wrote:
chook23 wrote:Way way to early to be making that call.......IMO
Stick with the chickens
you would know about the "poulets" going by your avatar....... :P


saint4life
User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Trout reviews our draft picks

Post: # 1708205Post Joffa Burns »

I'm a big believer in taking bets available talent at your pick and it certainly appears we have done so this draft.

Very excited at what the talent of Clark & Coffield bring and love the Claravino pick as he could develop to be the best of the bunch with those hands and his ability to take the intercept mark (JC mark II).

I also like that all of the mid sized players have pace and good footskills on their CV.

I will however make one point, all media experts and draft experts and player profiles refer to our picks as defenders who will move to midfield in time or defender recently turned mid in Clark. The only person referring to them as mids and not mid/defenders or defenders is Trout.
Now maybe Trout knows something no-one else knows, but it is this a little bit of spin from Trout? I'm guessing yes!

I'm more than happy that these guys were the best talent available, good kicks and good speed and will transform to mids over the next 3-4 years.


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8190
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 630 times

Re: Trout reviews our draft picks

Post: # 1708207Post magnifisaint »

chook23 wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
chook23 wrote:Way way to early to be making that call.......IMO
Stick with the chickens
you would know about the "poulets" going by your avatar....... :P
Love "feeding the chooks"


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8190
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 630 times

Re: Trout reviews our draft picks

Post: # 1708208Post magnifisaint »

Joffa Burns wrote:I'm a big believer in taking bets available talent at your pick and it certainly appears we have done so this draft.

Very excited at what the talent of Clark & Coffield bring and love the Claravino pick as he could develop to be the best of the bunch with those hands and his ability to take the intercept mark (JC mark II).

I also like that all of the mid sized players have pace and good footskills on their CV.

I will however make one point, all media experts and draft experts and player profiles refer to our picks as defenders who will move to midfield in time or defender recently turned mid in Clark. The only person referring to them as mids and not mid/defenders or defenders is Trout.
Now maybe Trout knows something no-one else knows, but it is this a little bit of spin from Trout? I'm guessing yes!

I'm more than happy that these guys were the best talent available, good kicks and good speed and will transform to mids over the next 3-4 years.
Because they are all elite, all these guys played midfield as juniors. At TAC level there aren't enough positions to play midfield so they play as attacking defenders.


In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in, they're eating the cats. They’re eating – they are eating the pets of the people that live there.
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10799
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 837 times

Re: Trout reviews our draft picks

Post: # 1708209Post ace »

Yep, we have picked some very good prospects.
Problem is so did 17 other rival teams.
You need to outperform those other 17 rivals regularly if you want to win a premiership.
Otherwise you are simply treading water.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5878
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 615 times
Been thanked: 460 times
Contact:

Re: Trout reviews our draft picks

Post: # 1708210Post samoht »

Nothing wrong with attacking defenders with skill sets - think Collingwood and the unstoppable run and rebound of Shaw, Thomas and Harry O' Brien in 2010 and 2011. Something to aim for, anyway - if they remain defenders.
The good thing is they all appear to have (from all reports) good defensive traits (intercept marking, etc) as well, in their repertoire.


Psychosaint66
Club Player
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri 10 Jul 2015 4:47am
Location: Toowong Private, Ward 66.
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: Trout reviews our draft picks

Post: # 1708268Post Psychosaint66 »

I'm disappointed. :( Don't know (or care) if he can play. I just want him on our list!!! Irving Mosquito. :D

Since when does a trout pass up on a mosquito???


Image Cute but psycho. Things even out.
User avatar
evertonfc
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7262
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 267 times
Contact:

Re: Trout reviews our draft picks

Post: # 1708301Post evertonfc »

I'd have selected Nathan Murphy and hoped Clavarino stuck around until our next pick.

Quite happy with Clavarino - he looks a really good prospect - but I suspect he would have been available at 46 given the impressive amount of talent available between those two picks.

If Clavarino had gone, I'd have taken dual All-Australian Sam Hayes over Ben Paton (I don't think Lewis Pearce will ever make it) because it seems to take 4-5 years to develop ruckmen these days and by the time he's ready, he'll be able to replace Longer/Hickey.

Hayes looked unbelievable value to me as a long-term prospect.

Still, Clavarino is a solid pick and Paton offers some run and dash. Just not sure we needed another of his type.


Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.

Image
User avatar
Drake Huggins
Club Player
Posts: 906
Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Trout reviews our draft picks

Post: # 1708359Post Drake Huggins »

As AR would say, "Pleasing". Clark, Coffield and Clavarino. The three Cs. Great pickups. At the risk of trotting out the old cliche, I can't believe Clavarino slipped that far. I reckon he's going to be a beauty.


"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
User avatar
BackFromUSA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4642
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:38am
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 508 times

Re: Trout reviews our draft picks

Post: # 1708367Post BackFromUSA »

Not a single Jack or Jake or Jade. A wasted draft.


AwayInUSA no longer ... have based myself back in Melbourne for a decade of Saintsational Success (with regular trips back to the USA)

"Saintsational Player Sponsor 2007 - 2018"
Post Reply