Our Ruck Issue!!!

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
footynut
Club Player
Posts: 629
Joined: Sun 05 Sep 2004 2:28am
Location: Ballarat
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556684Post footynut »

I see we have 2 options,

Option 1 drop Longer, give him an extended run at Sandy with some specific things to work on such as his spread from the contest, applying scoreboard pressure and marking. Select Hickey as a ruckman.

Option 2 drop Longer (as above and promote Holmes as he will give you better tap work, and most likely will able to gain 8-10 positions (same as Longer). I can't see how we loose.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556686Post plugger66 »

footynut wrote:I see we have 2 options,

Option 1 drop Longer, give him an extended run at Sandy with some specific things to work on such as his spread from the contest, applying scoreboard pressure and marking. Select Hickey as a ruckman.

Option 2 drop Longer (as above and promote Holmes as he will give you better tap work, and most likely will able to gain 8-10 positions (same as Longer). I can't see how we loose.

They aren't going to promote Holmes over Sinclair or Schneider. I think if Hickey is fit then its time for a change. Gawn had a very good game. Longer just fair and ducked his head when needed in the last 2 minutes.


Toy Saint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2203
Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
Location: Del Mar, California
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556691Post Toy Saint »

plugger66 wrote:
footynut wrote:I see we have 2 options,

Option 1 drop Longer, give him an extended run at Sandy with some specific things to work on such as his spread from the contest, applying scoreboard pressure and marking. Select Hickey as a ruckman.

Option 2 drop Longer (as above and promote Holmes as he will give you better tap work, and most likely will able to gain 8-10 positions (same as Longer). I can't see how we loose.

They aren't going to promote Holmes over Sinclair or Schneider. I think if Hickey is fit then its time for a change. Gawn had a very good game. Longer just fair and ducked his head when needed in the last 2 minutes.
I'm not even sure he was on the ground in the last 2 minutes, he had a bloodied nose at the end of the game


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556694Post plugger66 »

Toy Saint wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
footynut wrote:I see we have 2 options,

Option 1 drop Longer, give him an extended run at Sandy with some specific things to work on such as his spread from the contest, applying scoreboard pressure and marking. Select Hickey as a ruckman.

Option 2 drop Longer (as above and promote Holmes as he will give you better tap work, and most likely will able to gain 8-10 positions (same as Longer). I can't see how we loose.

They aren't going to promote Holmes over Sinclair or Schneider. I think if Hickey is fit then its time for a change. Gawn had a very good game. Longer just fair and ducked his head when needed in the last 2 minutes.
I'm not even sure he was on the ground in the last 2 minutes, he had a bloodied nose at the end of the game

Well it was close to the last 2 minutes. It was a sitter that needed to be taken.


Stephen Theodore
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2154
Joined: Mon 06 Aug 2007 1:53pm
Location: SE Queensland
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556696Post Stephen Theodore »

I don't see any changes, I think coaching staff are happy with Longer, otherwise change would've been made weeks ago.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10513
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1345 times

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556698Post CURLY »

Longer played well and is only going to improve.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556700Post dragit »

He didn't squib IMO, just clearly misjudged how close the Melbourne players were and decided to spoil.

But he's doing very little outside of being competitive at ruck contests.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556701Post plugger66 »

CURLY wrote:Longer played well and is only going to improve.

And Hickey isn't. And Gawn killed him really.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10513
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1345 times

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556702Post CURLY »

plugger66 wrote:
CURLY wrote:Longer played well and is only going to improve.

And Hickey isn't. And Gawn killed him really.
No he didn't.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556706Post plugger66 »

CURLY wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
CURLY wrote:Longer played well and is only going to improve.

And Hickey isn't. And Gawn killed him really.
No he didn't.

Well I think he did and you think he didn't. I stand by the point that if Longer continues to play Hickey isn't improving. I think Hickey puts a hell of a lot more pressure on the opposition ruckman than Longer. At the opposition know Hickey may go forward and take a mark.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556707Post gringo »

dragit wrote:He didn't squib IMO, just clearly misjudged how close the Melbourne players were and decided to spoil.

But he's doing very little outside of being competitive at ruck contests.

At the ground he worked really hard today. Was putting pressure on and took a couple of strong grabs. He has the 6th most hit outs in the league so is doing something right. People are obsessed with something that isn't that big an issue. Hickey can play too but Longer has the spot for now.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10513
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1345 times

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556709Post CURLY »

plugger66 wrote:
CURLY wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
CURLY wrote:Longer played well and is only going to improve.

And Hickey isn't. And Gawn killed him really.
No he didn't.

Well I think he did and you think he didn't. I stand by the point that if Longer continues to play Hickey isn't improving. I think Hickey puts a hell of a lot more pressure on the opposition ruckman than Longer. At the opposition know Hickey may go forward and take a mark.
Amazed the Richardson doesn't agree with you.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556710Post plugger66 »

gringo wrote:
dragit wrote:He didn't squib IMO, just clearly misjudged how close the Melbourne players were and decided to spoil.

But he's doing very little outside of being competitive at ruck contests.

At the ground he worked really hard today. Was putting pressure on and took a couple of strong grabs. He has the 6th most hit outs in the league so is doing something right. People are obsessed with something that isn't that big an issue. Hickey can play too but Longer has the spot for now.

People are obsessed with hit outs. Is there a more irrelevant stat in the AFL?


Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556713Post Bunk_Moreland »

gringo wrote:
dragit wrote:He didn't squib IMO, just clearly misjudged how close the Melbourne players were and decided to spoil.

But he's doing very little outside of being competitive at ruck contests.

At the ground he worked really hard today. Was putting pressure on and took a couple of strong grabs. He has the 6th most hit outs in the league so is doing something right. People are obsessed with something that isn't that big an issue. Hickey can play too but Longer has the spot for now.
Longer was very good today around the ground. If you were at the game you would have seen that


You are garbage - Enough said
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556714Post plugger66 »

CURLY wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
CURLY wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
CURLY wrote:Longer played well and is only going to improve.

And Hickey isn't. And Gawn killed him really.
No he didn't.

Well I think he did and you think he didn't. I stand by the point that if Longer continues to play Hickey isn't improving. I think Hickey puts a hell of a lot more pressure on the opposition ruckman than Longer. At the opposition know Hickey may go forward and take a mark.
Amazed the Richardson doesn't agree with you.

Obviously he doesn't. I will make sure from now on everyone posts on topics that only agree with Richo.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10513
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1345 times

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556716Post CURLY »

plugger66 wrote:
gringo wrote:
dragit wrote:He didn't squib IMO, just clearly misjudged how close the Melbourne players were and decided to spoil.

But he's doing very little outside of being competitive at ruck contests.

At the ground he worked really hard today. Was putting pressure on and took a couple of strong grabs. He has the 6th most hit outs in the league so is doing something right. People are obsessed with something that isn't that big an issue. Hickey can play too but Longer has the spot for now.

People are obsessed with hit outs. Is there a more irrelevant stat in the AFL?
If hit outs don't count let's just not play a ruck man at all. Longer gives us so much more at every contest.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556717Post SainterK »

Longer was good early, but faded.

Like a few others.

In regards to the ruck, I just want hickey to have a turn to prove his worth, be it seniors or sandy


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556718Post plugger66 »

CURLY wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
gringo wrote:
dragit wrote:He didn't squib IMO, just clearly misjudged how close the Melbourne players were and decided to spoil.

But he's doing very little outside of being competitive at ruck contests.

At the ground he worked really hard today. Was putting pressure on and took a couple of strong grabs. He has the 6th most hit outs in the league so is doing something right. People are obsessed with something that isn't that big an issue. Hickey can play too but Longer has the spot for now.

People are obsessed with hit outs. Is there a more irrelevant stat in the AFL?
If hit outs don't count let's just not play a ruck man at all. Longer gives us so much more at every contest.
Did I say we should do that? Max would have just grabbed the ball and handballed to his players. Its a very silly idea.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556719Post saynta »

plugger66 wrote:
footynut wrote:I see we have 2 options,

Option 1 drop Longer, give him an extended run at Sandy with some specific things to work on such as his spread from the contest, applying scoreboard pressure and marking. Select Hickey as a ruckman.

Option 2 drop Longer (as above and promote Holmes as he will give you better tap work, and most likely will able to gain 8-10 positions (same as Longer). I can't see how we loose.

They aren't going to promote Holmes over Sinclair or Schneider. I think if Hickey is fit then its time for a change. Gawn had a very good game. Longer just fair and ducked his head when needed in the last 2 minutes.
He got a smack in the head.
, when he should have got a free kick


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556720Post plugger66 »

saynta wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
footynut wrote:I see we have 2 options,

Option 1 drop Longer, give him an extended run at Sandy with some specific things to work on such as his spread from the contest, applying scoreboard pressure and marking. Select Hickey as a ruckman.

Option 2 drop Longer (as above and promote Holmes as he will give you better tap work, and most likely will able to gain 8-10 positions (same as Longer). I can't see how we loose.

They aren't going to promote Holmes over Sinclair or Schneider. I think if Hickey is fit then its time for a change. Gawn had a very good game. Longer just fair and ducked his head when needed in the last 2 minutes.
He got a smack in the head.
, when he should have got a free kick

Maybe but that wasn't the one I was talking about.


Toy Saint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2203
Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
Location: Del Mar, California
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556723Post Toy Saint »

plugger66 wrote:
gringo wrote:
dragit wrote:He didn't squib IMO, just clearly misjudged how close the Melbourne players were and decided to spoil.

But he's doing very little outside of being competitive at ruck contests.

At the ground he worked really hard today. Was putting pressure on and took a couple of strong grabs. He has the 6th most hit outs in the league so is doing something right. People are obsessed with something that isn't that big an issue. Hickey can play too but Longer has the spot for now.

People are obsessed with hit outs. Is there a more irrelevant stat in the AFL?
Hey Plugger, I'd love to agree with you, but we looked awefull when Longer was off the bench, and Essendon got smashed without a ruckman. You can't live with them, but you can't get my without them


Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11354
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1349 times
Been thanked: 462 times

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556724Post Sainternist »

Is Billy becoming the new whipping boy? Geez, apart from dropping that mark, he wasn't that bad. But yes, Hickey is a far better player. As Plugger mentioned, fitness is his issue.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
stjay
Club Player
Posts: 397
Joined: Tue 12 May 2015 2:50pm

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556725Post stjay »

footynut wrote:I see we have 2 options,

Option 1 drop Longer, give him an extended run at Sandy with some specific things to work on such as his spread from the contest, applying scoreboard pressure and marking. Select Hickey as a ruckman.

Option 2 drop Longer (as above and promote Holmes as he will give you better tap work, and most likely will able to gain 8-10 positions (same as Longer). I can't see how we loose.
Longer won't be dropped until Hickey gains some form - I hope it's soon.
Reckon Longer actually causes a team imbalance. At least if Bruce is going to ruck, the switch of Bruce for Hickey is more likely to work.
On top of that, a mobile ruckman, working around the ground, racking up possessions and slotting the occasional goal is a far better proposition - which is Hickey.
Longer's stats show he was beaten in the ruck but I am willing to bet the actual story, in terms of hitouts to advantage, was far worse.
I can't back that with stats only the keen eye of somone who watched his performance intently.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556726Post plugger66 »

Toy Saint wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
gringo wrote:
dragit wrote:He didn't squib IMO, just clearly misjudged how close the Melbourne players were and decided to spoil.

But he's doing very little outside of being competitive at ruck contests.

At the ground he worked really hard today. Was putting pressure on and took a couple of strong grabs. He has the 6th most hit outs in the league so is doing something right. People are obsessed with something that isn't that big an issue. Hickey can play too but Longer has the spot for now.

People are obsessed with hit outs. Is there a more irrelevant stat in the AFL?
Hey Plugger, I'd love to agree with you, but we looked awefull when Longer was off the bench, and Essendon got smashed without a ruckman. You can't live with them, but you can't get my without them

Don't want to get by without one. That would be suicide.


Hemi Baxter
Club Player
Posts: 347
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2011 5:22pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Our Ruck Issue!!!

Post: # 1556727Post Hemi Baxter »

SainterK wrote:Longer was good early, but faded.

Like a few others.

In regards to the ruck, I just want hickey to have a turn to prove his worth, be it seniors or sandy
Couldn't agree more. As he tired Gawn lept higher and got to contests first. Longer battled well and didn't give up but, however improbable it may seem I'd also like to see a change and one that would fit with our philosophy of taking the game on.


Post Reply