MRP findings

SainterK · Post: # 1374043Post **SainterK** » Mon 12 Aug 2013 3:16pm

Adam Schneider can accept reprimand, rough conduct on Brent Guerra.

Cyril Rioli cleared contact Jarryn Geary - force used was below that required to constitute a report.

Cyril is lucky IMO, chicken wing tackles are not on

kosifantutti · Mon 12 Aug 2013 6:22pm

What did Schneider do? When did it happen?

plugger66 · Post: # 1374118Post **plugger66** » Mon 12 Aug 2013 6:26pm

kosifantutti wrote:What did Schneider do? When did it happen?

On Friday night.

oh when the · Mon 12 Aug 2013 7:04pm

they never miss us

saintbrat · Post: # 1374138Post **saintbrat** » Mon 12 Aug 2013 7:18pm

Fletcher up to 20 weeks - he would be past 400 if he hadn't been so rough

plugger66 · Post: # 1374142Post **plugger66** » Mon 12 Aug 2013 7:21pm

oh when the wrote:they never miss us

We have had bugger all reports this year. No wonder we think we hard done by if we think we have had a bad run with the tribunal this year. Even some of the sides we have played the following weeks have had players out who you could claim were pretty unlucky.

CURLY · Post: # 1374143Post **CURLY** » Mon 12 Aug 2013 7:22pm

Fletchers is a joke and I can't even describe Browns.

plugger66 · Post: # 1374145Post **plugger66** » Mon 12 Aug 2013 7:25pm

CURLY wrote:Fletchers is a joke and I can't even describe Browns.

Do you really think they should have got more? Both seem about right to me. I notice in the last few games we have had more frees than our opposition. I also notice we still arent winning. And not many threads on umpires lately. I suppose its time for you to join in the MRP rubbish.

CURLY · Post: # 1374151Post **CURLY** » Mon 12 Aug 2013 7:36pm

I commented on the umpires Friday night they where again poor. Only been a few games they've cost us though.

If Browns act was deliberate which they think it was utter should have been 10 otherwise nothing. Fletchers again did he touch his face?

plugger66 · Post: # 1374152Post **plugger66** » Mon 12 Aug 2013 7:40pm

CURLY wrote:I commented on the umpires Friday night they where again poor. Only been a few games they've cost us though.

If Browns act was deliberate which they think it was utter should have been 10 otherwise nothing. Fletchers again did he touch his face?

The MRP said fletcher did touch his face. They get to see it probably just a bit more times than you. Brown did a stupid thing and under the points gets 2 weeks. Thats how the system works.

By the way if the umpires cost us few games this year then if we get an even run next year you must think we will win a fair few more games.

CURLY · Post: # 1374153Post **CURLY** » Mon 12 Aug 2013 7:41pm

plugger66 wrote:
CURLY wrote:I commented on the umpires Friday night they where again poor. Only been a few games they've cost us though.

If Browns act was deliberate which they think it was utter should have been 10 otherwise nothing. Fletchers again did he touch his face?

The MRP said fletcher did touch his face. They get to see it probably just a bit more times than you. Brown did a stupid thing and under the points gets 2 weeks. Thats how the system works.

By the way if the umpires cost us few games this year then if we get an even run next year you must think we will win a fair few more games.

Perhaps we will it would help.

kosifantutti · Mon 12 Aug 2013 8:24pm

Did Schneider actually hit him in the head? Seems to me he hit his head on Minchington's knee.

saintbrat · Post: # 1374653Post **saintbrat** » Tue 13 Aug 2013 7:55pm

ST KILDA forward Adam Schneider will be be eligible for selection for this Saturday’s match against the Sydney Swans after accepting a reprimand from the Match Review Panel.

Schneider was charged with a level one offence for engaging in rough conduct with Brent Guerra during the third-quarter of the Saints round 20 clash with Hawthorn.

http://www.saints.com.au/news/2013-08-1 ... -reprimand

kosifantutti · Tue 13 Aug 2013 11:02pm

saintbrat wrote:
ST KILDA forward Adam Schneider will be be eligible for selection for this Saturday’s match against the Sydney Swans after accepting a reprimand from the Match Review Panel.

Schneider was charged with a level one offence for engaging in rough conduct with Brent Guerra during the third-quarter of the Saints round 20 clash with Hawthorn.
http://www.saints.com.au/news/2013-08-1 ... -reprimand

Should have challenged on a technicality. It wasn't in the third quarter, it was the fourth.

stinger · Post: # 1374935Post **stinger** » Wed 14 Aug 2013 2:03pm

CURLY wrote:I commented on the umpires Friday night they where again poor. Only been a few games they've cost us though.

If Browns act was deliberate which they think it was utter should have been 10 otherwise nothing. Fletchers again did he touch his face?

the maggots are obviously trying to even up the figures so that they don't look too bad at seasons end...but only after we complained .....still crap though.....

bergholt · Post: # 1374937Post **bergholt** » Wed 14 Aug 2013 2:07pm

stinger wrote:the maggots are obviously trying to even up the figures so that they don't look too bad at seasons end...but only after we complained .....still crap though.....

If they don't give us frees then they're biased. If they do give us frees then they're just evening the score. Sounds like the umpires can't win with you.

AP Erebus · Post: # 1374977Post **AP Erebus** » Wed 14 Aug 2013 3:58pm

When I first saw it I thought he was a gonna.

Fortunately, I was wrong.

SainterK · Post: # 1383509Post **SainterK** » Mon 02 Sep 2013 5:37pm

Joey gets a week for a hit on Crowley...

plugger66 · Post: # 1383513Post **plugger66** » Mon 02 Sep 2013 5:50pm

SainterK wrote:Joey gets a week for a hit on Crowley...

He loves get suspended in the last round of the year.

saintbrat · Post: # 1383571Post **saintbrat** » Mon 02 Sep 2013 6:43pm

SainterK wrote:Joey gets a week for a hit on Crowley...

He must'nt like playing rd 1-2nd year in a row

noob · Post: # 1383590Post **noob** » Mon 02 Sep 2013 7:19pm

Saw the incident. Laughable. Was more a block/sheppard than anything else. More than anything Crowley should get fined for the delayed reaction.

CURLY · Post: # 1383610Post **CURLY** » Mon 02 Sep 2013 7:49pm

Piss take surely thought last years was bad but this is riduculous.

gringo · Post: # 1383630Post **gringo** » Mon 02 Sep 2013 8:25pm

What about the jumper punch that took Rooey face with it? They are s***.

dragit · Post: # 1383646Post **dragit** » Mon 02 Sep 2013 9:12pm

I know they contested and lost last year when Montagna "bowled" over Walker… but surely they'll have another go and contest this one…

http://www.afl.com.au/video/2013-09-02/ ... l-round-23

The Matt Maguire one was very soft too… Johnson should have been cited for acting.

Also the Melksham one… Jackson initiates the contact doesn't he…?

#confused.

gringo · Post: # 1383653Post **gringo** » Mon 02 Sep 2013 9:25pm

dragit wrote:I know they contested and lost last year when Montagna "bowled" over Walker… but surely they'll have another go and contest this one…

http://www.afl.com.au/video/2013-09-02/ ... l-round-23

The Matt Maguire one was very soft too… Johnson should have been cited for acting.

Also the Melksham one… Jackson initiates the contact doesn't he…?

#confused.

that melksham one was hilarious an idiot gets in his face he pushes him away and he head but down into Melksham and hurts himself. Jackson should be cited for looking like a dick head. Johnson is always dropping to the ground at any opportunity. Montagna you can't even see what's happened except Crowley looks like he's staging.

MRP findings

MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings

Re: MRP findings