We spend 25 on Jacobs?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm
We spend 25 on Jacobs?
Happy or sad?
I vote happy.
30 games over two seasons and hates Adelaide so back to mummy.
We say hey hey hey call me maybe, he calls us and we get what should be a good player.
Thoughts?
I vote happy.
30 games over two seasons and hates Adelaide so back to mummy.
We say hey hey hey call me maybe, he calls us and we get what should be a good player.
Thoughts?
- Sick Nal Danto
- Club Player
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Wed 28 Sep 2011 3:00pm
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19160
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
Don't start posts.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
Oh ok. I will start a post on something that we probably will do.SaintPav wrote:Don't start posts.
Anyway. You are a wanker.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19160
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
The Redeemer wrote:Oh ok. I will start a post on something that we probably will do.SaintPav wrote:Don't start posts.
Anyway. You are a wanker.
You're dumb.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- WinnersOnly
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
Watch his Youtube highlights with him playing for Port in the SANFL he actually looks quite quick and is as quoted very good by foot. He would be a much much better selection than Roberton thats for sure!
SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
No comparison to Roberton. Roberton is a Sandgroper, so that automatically puts him in front does'nt it?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
I don't like his name. Sounds like they misspelt it and it was meant to be Robertson which is more normal.saint6709 wrote:roberton will go for pick 125 or some such so is a different animal
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
...and all the other rejects! Delist more guys so we can take Cameron Wood and Sam Iles as well!evo wrote:Take both of them !
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
Jacobs isn't good by foot. He turned over the ball via disposal more than anybody we had playing outside forward 50. More than most Port players as well. He's not a run and carry player either - he bounced the ball twice this year. He hasn't done particularly well in contested ball, uncontested ball, or really any area at all. I reckon he'll get through to North's second pick.WinnersOnly wrote:Watch his Youtube highlights with him playing for Port in the SANFL he actually looks quite quick and is as quoted very good by foot. He would be a much much better selection than Roberton thats for sure!
Yeah nah pleasing positive
- evo
- Club Player
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 11:19pm
- Location: Wimmera
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
They are not rejects, they were offered contracts by their clubs but have decided to return to Vic. Oh right! they are not 18 are they?bergholt wrote:...and all the other rejects! Delist more guys so we can take Cameron Wood and Sam Iles as well!evo wrote:Take both of them !
- Scoop
- Club Player
- Posts: 807
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29pm
- Location: On a New Street Corner
- Has thanked: 519 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
borderbarry wrote:No comparison to Roberton. Roberton is a Sandgroper, so that automatically puts him in front does'nt it?
I guess there's a fair bit of sand down Franston way.....
Extra! Extra! Read all about it......no I don't want to read about it anymore!!!
- Austinnn
- Club Player
- Posts: 1533
- Joined: Wed 22 Jun 2011 6:02pm
- Location: France
- Has thanked: 2 times
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
You know it's funny, I haven't visited Big Footy since I made that inquiry, not by choice just haven't bookmarked it yet, old habits are hard to break. After witnessing this little spat between the Redeemer and St Pav I have to ask; are they brothers? It sounds like sibling rivalry. They probably share a room. But at least Pav occasionally makes sense.dragit wrote:Hey Austinnn, come back from bigfooty... Pure kwality over here.
AAAnnnyway, my 2cents:
We already blew our cookies on Lee and Hickey, if we give up our top pick on Jacobs I will be disappointed frankly. We should be using those picks on young talent. But I suppose since we've got the pick right after that as well, it's probable that we'll take him and a kid.
I trust Bains and the rest of Team Pelican personally.
Just My Opinion
------------------------------------------------
You'll Never Walk Alone
------------------------------------------------
You'll Never Walk Alone
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
I actually have no idea where Pav gets dislike for me. It might be to do with my criticisms of McQualter or Dean Polo and how they were so fricking useless in their time at the club. Similarly Raph Clarke. I call a spade and spade and I have a following for it. Come follow me.Austinnn wrote:You know it's funny, I haven't visited Big Footy since I made that inquiry, not by choice just haven't bookmarked it yet, old habits are hard to break. After witnessing this little spat between the Redeemer and St Pav I have to ask; are they brothers? It sounds like sibling rivalry. They probably share a room. But at least Pav occasionally makes sense.dragit wrote:Hey Austinnn, come back from bigfooty... Pure kwality over here.
AAAnnnyway, my 2cents:
We already blew our cookies on Lee and Hickey, if we give up our top pick on Jacobs I will be disappointed frankly. We should be using those picks on young talent. But I suppose since we've got the pick right after that as well, it's probable that we'll take him and a kid.
I trust Bains and the rest of Team Pelican personally.
That being said what is wrong with getting all or Lee, Hickey and Jacobs plus some bloke at 25?
We would be getting a 21, 20, 20 and a probable 18 year old?
They have been through the system and looked good to varying degrees.
The problem is what exactly?
- Scoop
- Club Player
- Posts: 807
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29pm
- Location: On a New Street Corner
- Has thanked: 519 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
I believe we will......Austinnn wrote: We should be using those picks on young talent.
Extra! Extra! Read all about it......no I don't want to read about it anymore!!!
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
It will all depend on where we rate Jacobs. We may rate him pick 40 so he's no chance of coming to us. Or we may rate him the 25th best prospect in the draft however come our two picks there are two kids we rate higher. I don't believe he's any realistic chance of ending up with us TBH. Apart from making an enquiry with his manager during trade period we haven't been linked to him since. Pretty sure SW's was quoted recently saying we're only picking 18 Y/O's this draft.
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
Gone are the days of picking up a player that has nominated another club as his choice. Seems like too much of a risk if he really wants to be at another club - North.
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10799
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 837 times
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
borderbarry wrote:No comparison to Roberton. Roberton is a Sandgroper, so that automatically puts him in front does'nt it?
I don't mind Sangropers, I just wish we had less Womengropers disgracing themselves and the club whenever there is a slow news day.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10799
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 837 times
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
He certainly was approached by North who told him they would trade for him.dragit wrote:Gone are the days of picking up a player that has nominated another club as his choice. Seems like too much of a risk if he really wants to be at another club - North.
He then told Port he wanted to be traded to North.
Then North refused to engage in meaningful trade negotiations.
Pick 38 was not enough, they had to deal pick 15 and get then get Port to put pick 31 on the table and then some later draft pick swaps until a fair deal was obtained.
North refused to part with 15 so they mislead Jacobs into thinking they would trade for him.
What we don't know is what the most disgusting cheat among player agents is up to.
Has he told North you don't have to trade, you can take him at pick 38 because we will be poison to other victorian clubs.
Or is Jacobs prepared to deal with any club or at least some clubs from Melbourne.
He has been very unhappy playing for a bunch of losers who don't try at Port.
He wants out, back to Melbourne to live and a decent club with competent administration and a will to win.
I know his family will be delighted once he escapes from Port's clutches.
He may be unhappy to go to the Dogsh't, but he may be prepared to go to the Saints.
It is all a matter of is be willing to talk to St Kilda.
St Kilda certainly knows where his family lives after all he is a former Sandringham Dragon and Brighton Grammar boy.
Does anyone know if he has been contacted by St Kilda since the end of the trade period?
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
Re: We spend 25 on Jacobs?
the kid has talent, reminds me ALOT of a young Luke Hodge. If there isnt 2 better players come picks 25/26 you take him.