Jackson Ferguson
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Jackson Ferguson
Time to fast track him.
Sures hes skinny and light and he will get beaten. Remember Zac v Rocca for the hawks. Who cares. We lack a tall back. This guy is our man.
Sure we might lose some games and goals. Big whoops! Simpkin ia absolutely a HUGE positive. GIlbo and Dempster cant play on talls. Blake is treading water and has been for 2 years.
Lets bite the bullet. Lose some games and get this guy on the road to AFL footy.
Sure some f_head will say hes a rookie and cant play. But no doubt a LTI will come along pretty soon.
Sures hes skinny and light and he will get beaten. Remember Zac v Rocca for the hawks. Who cares. We lack a tall back. This guy is our man.
Sure we might lose some games and goals. Big whoops! Simpkin ia absolutely a HUGE positive. GIlbo and Dempster cant play on talls. Blake is treading water and has been for 2 years.
Lets bite the bullet. Lose some games and get this guy on the road to AFL footy.
Sure some f_head will say hes a rookie and cant play. But no doubt a LTI will come along pretty soon.
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Jackson Ferguson
If someone does come along and say he's a rookie and can't play, which is true, why does that make them a f_head?Con Gorozidis wrote:Time to fast track him.
Sures hes skinny and light and he will get beaten. Remember Zac v Rocca for the hawks. Who cares. We lack a tall back. This guy is our man.
Sure we might lose some games and goals. Big whoops! Simpkin ia absolutely a HUGE positive. GIlbo and Dempster cant play on talls. Blake is treading water and has been for 2 years.
Lets bite the bullet. Lose some games and get this guy on the road to AFL footy.
Sure some f_head will say hes a rookie and cant play. But no doubt a LTI will come along pretty soon.
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Jackson Ferguson
funny.Dr Spaceman wrote:If someone does come along and say he's a rookie and can't play, which is true, why does that make them a f_head?Con Gorozidis wrote:Time to fast track him.
Sures hes skinny and light and he will get beaten. Remember Zac v Rocca for the hawks. Who cares. We lack a tall back. This guy is our man.
Sure we might lose some games and goals. Big whoops! Simpkin ia absolutely a HUGE positive. GIlbo and Dempster cant play on talls. Blake is treading water and has been for 2 years.
Lets bite the bullet. Lose some games and get this guy on the road to AFL footy.
Sure some f_head will say hes a rookie and cant play. But no doubt a LTI will come along pretty soon.
Re: Jackson Ferguson
He is still a while away, but i have watched him at Sandy a couple of times this year and like what i see. He does need to get more weight behind him.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Jackson Ferguson
just chuck him in i reckon. has a bit of dustin fletcher about him.ando051 wrote:He is still a while away, but i have watched him at Sandy a couple of times this year and like what i see. He does need to get more weight behind him.
id rather be developing Jacko than treading water with the blake. So we lose 1%. big whoops. better upside.
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Jackson Ferguson
The f_heads do have a good point thoughCon Gorozidis wrote:just chuck him in i reckon. has a bit of dustin fletcher about him.ando051 wrote:He is still a while away, but i have watched him at Sandy a couple of times this year and like what i see. He does need to get more weight behind him.
id rather be developing Jacko than treading water with the blake. So we lose 1%. big whoops. better upside.
Re: Jackson Ferguson
He's only a rookie so at the moment he can't play...Con Gorozidis wrote:Time to fast track him.
Sures hes skinny and light and he will get beaten. Remember Zac v Rocca for the hawks. Who cares. We lack a tall back. This guy is our man.
Sure we might lose some games and goals. Big whoops! Simpkin ia absolutely a HUGE positive. GIlbo and Dempster cant play on talls. Blake is treading water and has been for 2 years.
Lets bite the bullet. Lose some games and get this guy on the road to AFL footy.
Sure some f_head will say hes a rookie and cant play. But no doubt a LTI will come along pretty soon.
FQF
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Jackson Ferguson
True. But id be shocked if we go through the entire season without a single LTI.Dr Spaceman wrote:The f_heads do have a good point thoughCon Gorozidis wrote:just chuck him in i reckon. has a bit of dustin fletcher about him.ando051 wrote:He is still a while away, but i have watched him at Sandy a couple of times this year and like what i see. He does need to get more weight behind him.
id rather be developing Jacko than treading water with the blake. So we lose 1%. big whoops. better upside.