The recycled ones

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
wallbanger
Club Player
Posts: 263
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005 10:38am
Location: Geelong

The recycled ones

Post: # 834646Post wallbanger »

Just a quick observation, one that annoyed me at the game and was backed up again by the statistics in this mornings paper.

Much had been made prior to the GF of the club's recent ability to draft or trade for 'quality' players from other clubs, and the manner in which RL had managed to forge them together with the homegrown talent into a great unit.

Collectively, I thought the group of 'other club rejects' were all amongst our worst players yesterday, and the statistics show that. Ray, King, Gardiner, Dempster, Schneider were all poor in my opinion. The only two who could hold there heads up were Dawson (solid without being spectacular) and Gram (if you put him in the same category), who was fantastic.

Is there a reason why these players were let go by their original clubs? Is there something to the theory that good players are not simply let go? I know that Bulldogs supporters saw Ray as fragile under the pressure of big games, something that has come out in this finals series.

Is it time to give that practice away, or now that we have got so close is this trade period the time to try and snare one or two established players to get us over the line?


Please...let's win a Premiership before GEELONG!!!! (O.k., so we've missed that opportunity...maybe let's win the next one before Geelong????)
FortiusQuoFidelius
Club Player
Posts: 641
Joined: Fri 19 Sep 2008 2:19pm
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: The recycled ones

Post: # 834705Post FortiusQuoFidelius »

wallbanger wrote:Just a quick observation, one that annoyed me at the game and was backed up again by the statistics in this mornings paper.

Much had been made prior to the GF of the club's recent ability to draft or trade for 'quality' players from other clubs, and the manner in which RL had managed to forge them together with the homegrown talent into a great unit.

Collectively, I thought the group of 'other club rejects' were all amongst our worst players yesterday, and the statistics show that. Ray, King, Gardiner, Dempster, Schneider were all poor in my opinion. The only two who could hold there heads up were Dawson (solid without being spectacular) and Gram (if you put him in the same category), who was fantastic.

Is there a reason why these players were let go by their original clubs? Is there something to the theory that good players are not simply let go? I know that Bulldogs supporters saw Ray as fragile under the pressure of big games, something that has come out in this finals series.

Is it time to give that practice away, or now that we have got so close is this trade period the time to try and snare one or two established players to get us over the line?
Proves there is a reason why their previous clubs let them go...


Winmar Sensational
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun 30 Aug 2009 10:56pm

Spot on

Post: # 834714Post Winmar Sensational »

Gardiner and King can probably be excused because of weather, they had a lot of hit outs. I think Kingy should now hang em up. Get McEvoy in and leave him in, mobile can take a grab and can push forward. There were some worrying signs from Ray early, Spider man actually could have won us the flag if he'd kicked straight, but playing in starvation corner he wasn't the worst. Dawson does more good than bad, but there is still something about him that makes me nervous. He shouldn't be number one in D, hopefully Goose still has some good footy in him. Gram proved a lot of people wrong, was very, very good.

Dempster is not much chop, I'd rather Gwilt, Armitage should play all year next year.


User avatar
mick13
Club Player
Posts: 1672
Joined: Sun 25 Nov 2007 5:51pm

Post: # 834742Post mick13 »

If Schneider kicked straight we'd be bowing down to him right now.


User avatar
Milton66
SS Life Member
Posts: 3521
Joined: Tue 19 May 2009 9:53pm
Location: None of your goddam business

Post: # 834757Post Milton66 »

All this thread proves is that there are idiots who are quick to turn on players to help justify the loss. :roll:


Hotel De Los Muertos: Your room is ready... Care to step inside?
User avatar
Offbe
Club Player
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2008 7:55pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: The recycled ones

Post: # 834758Post Offbe »

wallbanger wrote:Just a quick observation, one that annoyed me at the game and was backed up again by the statistics in this mornings paper.

Much had been made prior to the GF of the club's recent ability to draft or trade for 'quality' players from other clubs, and the manner in which RL had managed to forge them together with the homegrown talent into a great unit.

Collectively, I thought the group of 'other club rejects' were all amongst our worst players yesterday, and the statistics show that. Ray, King, Gardiner, Dempster, Schneider were all poor in my opinion. The only two who could hold there heads up were Dawson (solid without being spectacular) and Gram (if you put him in the same category), who was fantastic.

Is there a reason why these players were let go by their original clubs? Is there something to the theory that good players are not simply let go? I know that Bulldogs supporters saw Ray as fragile under the pressure of big games, something that has come out in this finals series.

Is it time to give that practice away, or now that we have got so close is this trade period the time to try and snare one or two established players to get us over the line?
That is all very harsh man. We wouldn't even have got to a Grand Final unless those guys were in the team. I will forgive your comments because I know your heart hurts (like mine) from yesterday and you are just lashing out trying to find scapegoats.


wallbanger
Club Player
Posts: 263
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005 10:38am
Location: Geelong

Post: # 835459Post wallbanger »

"If Schneider had've kicked straight we'd be bowing to him"....hmmmm, yeah, we'd have a premiership Cup too that WE DON"T HAVE. He didn't kick straight, that was the problem.

I'm not here to hang players or try and justify the loss - the reason for it was simple, we didn't kick straight. To bury your head in the sand and have the attitude "well we dominated all year and made the Grand Final and should've won it" is ridiculous IMO. If I was looking for scapegoats there'd be others I'd be having a go at first, but that's not the answer either.

Yes, I am angry and pissed off and suffering the brunt of ridicule as we all probably are from idiotic Geelong supporters - and yes, the strength of my loyalty to this club is tested again, and of course, like every time before and like every one of us on here, we will continue to support them next year and the year after that in the hope and knowledge that one day we will get there - and how sweet that day will be.

The point of the post was that these recycled players were amongst the worst performed on the biggest day - which was one of the main reason why they were brought to the club, because of finals experience. You would have to say that was pretty much the deciding factor for putting Dempster into the team.

The question now becomes - do we try and top up again, or do we instead turn the focus to Geary, Steven, Lynch and the likes to ensure we make it again in 2010?


Please...let's win a Premiership before GEELONG!!!! (O.k., so we've missed that opportunity...maybe let's win the next one before Geelong????)
User avatar
Milton66
SS Life Member
Posts: 3521
Joined: Tue 19 May 2009 9:53pm
Location: None of your goddam business

Post: # 835464Post Milton66 »

Why the F*** would people care what opposition supporters say? :roll:

Harden up people. No one can give it to you today. It's not as if we lost by 10 goals.


Hotel De Los Muertos: Your room is ready... Care to step inside?
spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9151
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 438 times

Post: # 835564Post spert »

Stuff the theories -we lost and it wasn't just bad kicking for goal as that was only one of many reasons. A few of our players have no overdrive gear and it was needed in the last quarter..you could see the Cats just willing themselves a bit harder, which in a close game makes a big difference.


User avatar
marksnsparks
Club Player
Posts: 506
Joined: Sat 28 Jul 2007 8:09pm
Location: Mentone

Post: # 835590Post marksnsparks »

Jeez people, we had a 23-3 season and these 'rejects' were instrumental in getting us there.

Lets not throw the baby out with the bathwater. As someone else said, we lost because we couldn't kick straight. In every other way we kicked Geelong's arse.

Let's not hit the panic button. As many home grown players were poor on Saturday IMHO.


saintly_safes
Club Player
Posts: 684
Joined: Sat 26 Jul 2008 9:44pm

Post: # 835638Post saintly_safes »

spert wrote:Stuff the theories -we lost and it wasn't just bad kicking for goal as that was only one of many reasons. A few of our players have no overdrive gear and it was needed in the last quarter..you could see the Cats just willing themselves a bit harder, which in a close game makes a big difference.
I totally agree, they had the will & beleif in themselves when it really counted & we didnt .


Post Reply