McEvoy dropped - what a disgrace

On the Ball · Thu 26 Jun 2008 6:57pm

One of the best kids in the draft and they don't even give him consecutive matches. Where's the incentive.

Otiman · Post: # 594659Post **Otiman** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:00pm

A better playing is coming back from injury.

The football club is about developing footballers as well as winning games.

NO chance that we could play McEvoy, Koschitzke, and King all in the same side.

St.Kenny · Post: # 594661Post **St.Kenny** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:05pm

cramped in the last quarter, Would be fitness issues.

plugger66 · Post: # 594662Post **plugger66** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:13pm

St.Kenny wrote:cramped in the last quarter, Would be fitness issues.

Nothing to do with fitness. Kosi is back so a tall had to go.

m_m · Post: # 594663Post **m_m** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:14pm

had a terrible debut

6 touches
0 hit-outs (ruckman)
0.1 goals

didn't exactly cement his spot in the team did he

bergsone · Post: # 594664Post **bergsone** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:15pm

WithMcintosh out for nth was looking forward to seeing a king mcenvoy combination in the ruck,with kosi playing forward ,as i believe we need a big target forward.Interested to see where this leaves M Gardiner when he is ready to return

plugger66 · Post: # 594666Post **plugger66** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:17pm

m_m wrote:had a terrible debut

6 touches
0 hit-outs (ruckman)
0.1 goals

didn't exactly cement his spot in the team did he

I think it is bad enough that I am always on this site but how much of a loser must you be going on another clubs site. I would suggest that you try to get some sort of life because at the moment you obviously dont have one.

m_m · Post: # 594668Post **m_m** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:22pm

plugger66 wrote:
m_m wrote:had a terrible debut

6 touches
0 hit-outs (ruckman)
0.1 goals

didn't exactly cement his spot in the team did he
I think it is bad enough that I am always on this site but how much of a loser must you be going on another clubs site. I would suggest that you try to get some sort of life because at the moment you obviously dont have one.

oh sorry, i must be the first person to post on an opposition forum

no life, you dont know me

saintbrat · Post: # 594669Post **saintbrat** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:23pm

Ben's had a taste now and I think his replacement will do ok, has a bit of form,
Ben will now continue to grow and develop,

plugger66 · Post: # 594670Post **plugger66** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:25pm

m_m wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
m_m wrote:had a terrible debut

6 touches
0 hit-outs (ruckman)
0.1 goals

didn't exactly cement his spot in the team did he
I think it is bad enough that I am always on this site but how much of a loser must you be going on another clubs site. I would suggest that you try to get some sort of life because at the moment you obviously dont have one.
oh sorry, i must be the first person to post on an opposition forum

no life, you dont know me

Your side has been picked why dont you go on your site and discuss that. Or would you rather comment on a club you do not follow. Now that does show you are a loser with no life.

m_m · Post: # 594673Post **m_m** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:29pm

plugger66 wrote:
m_m wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
m_m wrote:had a terrible debut

6 touches
0 hit-outs (ruckman)
0.1 goals

didn't exactly cement his spot in the team did he
I think it is bad enough that I am always on this site but how much of a loser must you be going on another clubs site. I would suggest that you try to get some sort of life because at the moment you obviously dont have one.
oh sorry, i must be the first person to post on an opposition forum

no life, you dont know me
Your side has been picked why dont you go on your site and discuss that. Or would you rather comment on a club you do not follow. Now that does show you are a loser with no life.

whatever you reckon mate

how bout section 2a?

Buckets · Post: # 594675Post **Buckets** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:30pm

Otiman wrote:A better playing is coming back from injury.

The football club is about developing footballers as well as winning games.

NO chance that we could play McEvoy, Koschitzke, and King all in the same side.

How is it that we play Kosi King and Gards all in the same team when fit????
Where is the consistency? I would have thought he could have benefited from a match against the Roos as they are lacking their No.1 Ruckman.

plugger66 · Post: # 594678Post **plugger66** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:32pm

m_m wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
m_m wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
m_m wrote:had a terrible debut

6 touches
0 hit-outs (ruckman)
0.1 goals

didn't exactly cement his spot in the team did he
I think it is bad enough that I am always on this site but how much of a loser must you be going on another clubs site. I would suggest that you try to get some sort of life because at the moment you obviously dont have one.
oh sorry, i must be the first person to post on an opposition forum

no life, you dont know me
Your side has been picked why dont you go on your site and discuss that. Or would you rather comment on a club you do not follow. Now that does show you are a loser with no life.
whatever you reckon mate

how bout section 2a?

Doesnt apply when it is true and you come from another club and should have better things to do with your life than go on another clubs forum.

m_m · Post: # 594679Post **m_m** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:34pm

i think you're a little upset bout big mac

stinger · Post: # 594682Post **stinger** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:36pm

m_m wrote:
no life, you dont know me

and we don't want to flowerknuckle...so flower off peanut.....

st_Trav_ofWA · Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:40pm

why do ppl read what the flog writes ?? he trying to stir you up so why not just ignore him and he will sulk off over to tankingcalrscum

bigcarl · Post: # 594688Post **bigcarl** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:47pm

m_m wrote:had a terrible debut

6 touches
0 hit-outs (ruckman)
0.1 goals

didn't exactly cement his spot in the team did he

he'll be a better ruckman than kruzer in a couple of years, so remember the name.

someone had to make way for kosi, but don't worry ... mac will be back.

saintsRrising · Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:57pm

Buckets wrote:

How is it that we play Kosi, King and Gards all in the same team when fit????
Where is the consistency? I would have thought he could have benefited from a match against the Roos as they are lacking their No.1 Ruckman.

Don' forget that Allen a tall forward is still in the team.

King, Kosi, Roo, Allen.........plus the shorter Charlie.

Stephen Theodore · Thu 26 Jun 2008 7:59pm

One tall too many, fair call I reckon

big_mac_evoy5 · Thu 26 Jun 2008 8:10pm

i think we should have left mcevoy in and left kosi out because he can play forward and he had a shot on goal was very straight unlike kosi it was stiff to miss. and kosi has a good mark. but so does mcevoy he took a pack mark in the 50 he can do it they need to put confidence into him and he will play better. i am glad they stuck with allen i think he will be a good player he can play back and forward well. but i would like to see him given another go at full-forward. he didn't have the best dilivery last week not many forwards did most of our goals came from players playing outside the forward 50 so i think they should have left mcevoy in for that reason also.

on another note eddy played well.

and at the game armitage stood out laying good tackles and was there when the game needed to be won he reminds of ball great player

saints11 · Post: # 594702Post **saints11** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 8:15pm

big_mac_evoy5 wrote:i think we should have left mcevoy in and left kosi out because he can play forward and he had a shot on goal was very straight unlike kosi it was stiff to miss. and kosi has a good mark. but so does mcevoy he took a pack mark in the 50 he can do it they need to put confidence into him and he will play better. i am glad they stuck with allen i think he will be a good player he can play back and forward well. but i would like to see him given another go at full-forward. he didn't have the best dilivery last week not many forwards did most of our goals came from players playing outside the forward 50 so i think they should have left mcevoy in for that reason also.

on another note eddy played well.

and at the game armitage stood out laying good tackles and was there when the game needed to be won he reminds of ball great player

exactly true

m_m · Post: # 594704Post **m_m** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 8:19pm

bigcarl wrote:
m_m wrote:had a terrible debut

6 touches
0 hit-outs (ruckman)
0.1 goals

didn't exactly cement his spot in the team did he
he'll be a better ruckman than kruzer in a couple of years, so remember the name.

someone had to make way for kosi, but don't worry ... mac will be back.

wouldn't bet on it

perfectionist · Thu 26 Jun 2008 8:21pm

m_m wrote:had a terrible debut

6 touches
0 hit-outs (ruckman)
0.1 goals

didn't exactly cement his spot in the team did he

And the list of debuts where the player gets 20 touches and ten goals is?

His debut was better than most. No. I'm no mindless cheerleader for blokes who have never played, as some were for McEvoy. However, his first game gave me much optimism. Number one point was that he was not out of his depth. Clearly, in today's football, he needs to train even harder and slim down a bit (comment: if you see current players in ordinary clothes, they look emaciated - a bit of a worry).

If, indeed, he is out because Kosi is in, then this will be the least worst thing that happens to him in his life.

m_m · Post: # 594711Post **m_m** » Thu 26 Jun 2008 8:27pm

mac>kreuz.......

perfectionist · Thu 26 Jun 2008 8:35pm

Moron!