Thomas says he would not give up a first round draft pick

barks4eva · Post: # 466340Post **barks4eva** » Sun 30 Sep 2007 1:50pm

Apparently on SEN, I'm reliably informed Grant Thomas made the comment that he would not give a first round pick for Judd

Considering HE gave up pick 6 AND a second round pick 31 as if pick 6 wasn't enough

for Barry Brooks, does anyone still take this fool seriously?

plugger66 · Post: # 466342Post **plugger66** » Sun 30 Sep 2007 1:52pm

barks4eva wrote:Apparently on SEN, I'm reliably informed Grant Thomas made the comment that he would not give a first round pick for Judd

Considering HE gave up pick 6 AND a second round pick 31 as if pick 6 wasn't enough for Barry Brooks, does anyone still take this fool seriously?

Good to see you have gotten over GT. You have real problems please deal with them.

SaintBot · Post: # 466343Post **SaintBot** » Sun 30 Sep 2007 1:53pm

http://www.saintsational.com/forum/view ... c&start=50

after a 'good' start to his media career GT began to screw around...since the pavlich claim he has been the laughing stock of the media world

Saints Premiers 2008 · Sun 30 Sep 2007 1:55pm

barks4eva wrote:Apparently on SEN, I'm reliably informed Grant Thomas made the comment that he would not give a first round pick for Judd

Considering HE gave up pick 6 AND a second round pick 31 as if pick 6 wasn't enough for Barry Brooks, does anyone still take this fool seriously?

answer this

why continue with this chirade of ... crap?

its okay to be passionate...but this is ....crap

Solar · Post: # 466346Post **Solar** » Sun 30 Sep 2007 1:55pm

barks4eva wrote:Apparently on SEN, I'm reliably informed Grant Thomas made the comment that he would not give a first round pick for Judd

Considering HE gave up pick 6 AND a second round pick 31 as if pick 6 wasn't enough for Barry Brooks, does anyone still take this fool seriously?

yep for the best drafted ruckman from the draft the year before, which is seen as the best draft in a long time. Was highly rated at the time when he was drafted (pick 15) and would have gone top 5 if that 2001 draft didn't contain the likes of ball, judd, hodge, bartel etc.

Hindsight is a lovely thing!

bigcarl · Post: # 466349Post **bigcarl** » Sun 30 Sep 2007 1:56pm

barks4eva wrote:Apparently on SEN, I'm reliably informed Grant Thomas made the comment that he would not give a first round pick for Judd

Considering HE gave up pick 6 AND a second round pick 31 as if pick 6 wasn't enough for Barry Brooks, does anyone still take this fool seriously?

that's our last successful coach you're talking about.

vacuous space · Sun 30 Sep 2007 1:56pm

Didn't he say he wouldn't deal our first round pick for Frawley?

bigcarl · Post: # 466352Post **bigcarl** » Sun 30 Sep 2007 1:59pm

vacuous space wrote:Didn't he say he wouldn't deal our first round pick for Frawley?

did you misquote him barks?

St Fidelius · Sun 30 Sep 2007 2:02pm

Saints Premiers 2006 wrote:
barks4eva wrote:Apparently on SEN, I'm reliably informed Grant Thomas made the comment that he would not give a first round pick for Judd

Considering HE gave up pick 6 AND a second round pick 31 as if pick 6 wasn't enough for Barry Brooks, does anyone still take this fool seriously?
answer this

why continue with this chirade of ... crap?

its okay to be passionate...but this is ....crap

Yep totally agree with you SP 2006

One wonders just who the "fool" the OP was referring to

So the OP has been "reliably informed"

How about some facts???

St.Kenny · Post: # 466370Post **St.Kenny** » Sun 30 Sep 2007 2:19pm

Everyone knows that you are really Capuano you vindictive petty minded bitch..............get a life !!!!!!!!!

barks4eva · Post: # 466380Post **barks4eva** » Sun 30 Sep 2007 2:33pm

bigcarl wrote:
barks4eva wrote:Apparently on SEN, I'm reliably informed Grant Thomas made the comment that he would not give a first round pick for Judd

Considering HE gave up pick 6 AND a second round pick 31 as if pick 6 wasn't enough for Barry Brooks, does anyone still take this fool seriously?
that's our last successful coach you're talking about.

Successful coach

Under Thomas we finished

15th
11th?
3rd
4th
8th

and this is regarded by you as successful

FAIR DINKUM

get a clue

The only successful coaches and I REPEAT the ONLY successful coaches are PREMIERSHIP coaches

now go and polish yourself off to the streak video, yoo fair dinkum GT doll worshipper

Saints Premiers 2008 · Sun 30 Sep 2007 2:36pm

St.Kenny wrote:Everyone knows that you are really Capuano you vindictive petty minded bitch..............get a life !!!!!!!!!

what?

St Fidelius · Sun 30 Sep 2007 2:40pm

The FACT is most on here are NOT "GT doll worshippers"

but we are not obsessed with hatred like you appear to be.

Still waiting for some FACTS about your original post

barks4eva · Post: # 466389Post **barks4eva** » Sun 30 Sep 2007 2:47pm

Saints Premiers 2006 wrote:answer this

why continue with this chirade of ... crap?

its okay to be passionate...but this is ....crap

answer this

why continue with " Saints Premiers 2006 "

its okay to be passionate...but this is ....crap

Anyway anyone with a clue knows that the only good thing to come out of the 2006 season was that we exited out the scum sucking parasite that currently is suing the St.Kilda football club, the very same megalomaniacal, svengali snakeoil salesman who sent our list into decline through his sheer numbnut buffoonery

maybe try changing your nic to West Coast Premiers 2006 >

plugger66 · Post: # 466391Post **plugger66** » Sun 30 Sep 2007 2:49pm

barks4eva wrote:
Saints Premiers 2006 wrote:answer this

why continue with this chirade of ... crap?

its okay to be passionate...but this is ....crap
answer this

why continue with " Saints Premiers 2006 "

its okay to be passionate...but this is ....crap

Anyway anyone with a clue knows that the only good thing to come out of the 2006 season was that we exited out the scum sucking parasite that currently is suing the St.Kilda football club, the very same megalomaniacal, svengali snakeoil salesman who sent our list into decline through his sheer numbnut buffoonery

maybe try changing your nic to West Coast Premiers 2006 >

Very intelligent post again. You never fail.

The Peanut · Post: # 466396Post **The Peanut** » Sun 30 Sep 2007 2:54pm

barks4eva wrote: ... the very same megalomaniacal, svengali snakeoil salesman who sent our list into decline through his sheer numbnut buffoonery

St Fidelius · Sun 30 Sep 2007 2:56pm

barks4eva wrote:
answer this

why continue with " Saints Premiers 2006 "

its okay to be passionate...but this is ....crap

Anyway anyone with a clue knows that the only good thing to come out of the 2006 season was that we exited out the scum sucking parasite that currently is suing the St.Kilda football club, the very same megalomaniacal, svengali snakeoil salesman who sent our list into decline through his sheer numbnut buffoonery

maybe try changing your nic to West Coast Premiers 2006 >

You must have a poor memory about Saints Premiers 2006...

It has already been answered a couple of times and yet it still hasn't sunk in...

Beekay · Post: # 466402Post **Beekay** » Sun 30 Sep 2007 3:03pm

bigcarl wrote: that's our last successful coach you're talking about.

That really is sad.

Sad in so many ways.

Saints Premiers 2008 · Sun 30 Sep 2007 3:48pm

barks4eva wrote:
Saints Premiers 2006 wrote:answer this

why continue with this chirade of ... crap?

its okay to be passionate...but this is ....crap
answer this

why continue with " Saints Premiers 2006 "

its okay to be passionate...but this is ....crap

Anyway anyone with a clue knows that the only good thing to come out of the 2006 season was that we exited out the scum sucking parasite that currently is suing the St.Kilda football club, the very same megalomaniacal, svengali snakeoil salesman who sent our list into decline through his sheer numbnut buffoonery

maybe try changing your nic to West Coast Premiers 2006 >

okay...maybe i am too lazy to sign up again...and my ego wont let me have a post count in single digits again???

hey capuano...face it...you were s***...

but then again you have had 5 years of built up tension in hope that one day you get gt in a dark alleyway...

saint66au · Post: # 466428Post **saint66au** » Sun 30 Sep 2007 4:02pm

Barks..hey..do us all a favour..can you, just to prove you can do it, post something, ANYTHING that you cant twist around to blame or sledge GT.

I'm not saying your opinions are are right or wrong, they are your opinions and you are entitled to them, but right now you are proving to be a one-trick pony. Anyone who only turns up when they get a chance to pot a coach or player rapidly becomes very very boring.

st_Trav_ofWA · Sun 30 Sep 2007 4:45pm

who gives a fariy wrinkle what GT would do with pick nine .. he doesnt have it !!!!
as each day passes GT's relevance to this club fades the sooner some ppl realise this the better

St DAC · Post: # 466457Post **St DAC** » Sun 30 Sep 2007 4:56pm

Ain't that the truth!

Winmarvellous · Sun 30 Sep 2007 5:01pm

Who's GT? Isn't Ross the boss in charge. Get on or f*ck off. Pretty simple

Iratedebate · Sun 30 Sep 2007 5:09pm

that's our last successful coach you're talking about.

Successful you say, some people are easily pleased. We will be classed as a success when we put a second premiership cup in the cabinet, and only then.

Oh When the Saints · Sun 30 Sep 2007 5:19pm

St. Kenny, that comment is abusive ... do it again and you will be banned.

There is another thread on the topic of Frawley/first round selections.
http://www.saintsational.com/forum/view ... c&start=50

Plus we've heard before the views expressed here, and some of barks4eva's language is out of line.

Thread locked - for repetition, abusive posts and baiting.

Thomas says he would not give up a first round draft pick

Thomas says he would not give up a first round draft pick

Re: Thomas says he would not give up a first round draft pic

Re: Thomas says he would not give up a first round draft pic

Re: Thomas says he would not give up a first round draft pic

Re: Thomas says he would not give up a first round draft pic

Re: Thomas says he would not give up a first round draft pic

Re: Thomas says he would not give up a first round draft pic

Re: Thomas says he would not give up a first round draft pic

Re: Thomas says he would not give up a first round draft pic

Re: Thomas says he would not give up a first round draft pic

Re: Thomas says he would not give up a first round draft pic

Re: Thomas says he would not give up a first round draft pic

Re: Thomas says he would not give up a first round draft pic