LDU
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12736
- Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2715 times
LDU
Rumours that we are into him?!
Can’t see how that would work - he is contracted - he is not a FA - we would need to give up a minimum first round selection
Which would be pick 5 right now
Most intelligent analysts suggest we need to hit the draft hard and rebuild.
Would you consider a 26yo gun for an 18yo pick 5?
Can’t see how that would work - he is contracted - he is not a FA - we would need to give up a minimum first round selection
Which would be pick 5 right now
Most intelligent analysts suggest we need to hit the draft hard and rebuild.
Would you consider a 26yo gun for an 18yo pick 5?
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19153
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: LDU
Probably not but it depends on the objective.
Management isn’t always good at thinking long term.
Hit the draft and try and recruit a free agent depending on who is available.
Pass.
Management isn’t always good at thinking long term.
Hit the draft and try and recruit a free agent depending on who is available.
Pass.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12098
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3705 times
- Been thanked: 2578 times
Re: LDU
Even if you just had LDU for 5 years, he's a known quantity . I keep saying that Ross is in a hurry
That's a 'sure thing' versus a 'maybe' in the draft
If Ross Lyon and our football department are serious about rebuilding organically for sustainable success, we wouldn't be doing this, but these guys aren't there for the future of St Kilda. They're looking after their job and their reputation
That's a 'sure thing' versus a 'maybe' in the draft
If Ross Lyon and our football department are serious about rebuilding organically for sustainable success, we wouldn't be doing this, but these guys aren't there for the future of St Kilda. They're looking after their job and their reputation
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: LDU
Would you consider a 26yo gun for an 18yo pick 5?
yep
(given current context)
yep
(given current context)
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
- WellardSaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8388
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
- Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
- Has thanked: 1910 times
- Been thanked: 887 times
Re: LDU
Tony74 posted on 5 Apr
That we'll go after LDU in 2026
He said 'LDU plus plus'
Maybe him plus at least 2 other RFAs and/or FAs
Use the search function.
Easy
That we'll go after LDU in 2026
He said 'LDU plus plus'
Maybe him plus at least 2 other RFAs and/or FAs
Use the search function.
Easy
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7223
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 516 times
Re: LDU
Why LDU for Howard? If we are going to head into the world of totally deranged fantasy, why not LDU for Bonner? Or Sharman?
If LDU is somehow available to play for another club in 2025, it won't be the Saints. The only time we have ever been able to trade A-grade players into our club was when Gehrig and Hamill wanted to play under Blight. As far as I can see, the only big name player who is a massive fan of RTB is Brad Hill, and we've already got him.
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10795
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 836 times
Re: LDU
Norf will be looking for a full forward.
A straight trade King for LDU.
If only to spare St Kilda supporters the angst of King's histrionics.
A straight trade King for LDU.
If only to spare St Kilda supporters the angst of King's histrionics.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7223
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 516 times
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3385
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
Re: LDU
the longer it goes the more it appears Battle will test FA market and as is the way will get a greater offer from elsewhere. North and Hawthorn are 2 sides screaming for big defenders.
If Battle wants to go to North and LDU genuinely wants to come to Stkilda surely something like Battle and 2nd round pick (likely in ealry 20's) for LDU North would have to consider on the basis next year he walks its on the basis of the formula.
They stuffed up on JHF so may take the bird in the hand.
Retain our top 5 pick also
If Battle wants to go to North and LDU genuinely wants to come to Stkilda surely something like Battle and 2nd round pick (likely in ealry 20's) for LDU North would have to consider on the basis next year he walks its on the basis of the formula.
They stuffed up on JHF so may take the bird in the hand.
Retain our top 5 pick also
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Wed 01 May 2024 11:58pm
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 108 times
Re: LDU
Unfortunately Battle is an unrestricted FA so if he wants to leave he can go anywhere and we are at the mercy of the compo. Best we might be able to hope for is North offer him enough for band one compo and we trade something like that pick plus our second for LDU. They get Battle and picks say 6 and 23 and we get LDU and keep our natural pick 5.older saint wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 10:05am the longer it goes the more it appears Battle will test FA market and as is the way will get a greater offer from elsewhere. North and Hawthorn are 2 sides screaming for big defenders.
If Battle wants to go to North and LDU genuinely wants to come to Stkilda surely something like Battle and 2nd round pick (likely in ealry 20's) for LDU North would have to consider on the basis next year he walks its on the basis of the formula.
They stuffed up on JHF so may take the bird in the hand.
Retain our top 5 pick also
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6346
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1128 times
Re: LDU
What is LDU's motivation for coming to St Kilda?????
So he can become the whipping boy of SaintSational??
So he can become the whipping boy of SaintSational??
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 10:39am
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: LDU
North will not trade for Battle, the only way they would go after him is as a free agent.
The problem we have is that if Battle does go as a free agent and we receive fairly high compo for him we will be restricted in looking for Free Agents ourselves as it would water down the compo.
If North want to trade LDU, which makes no sense given they are trying to build through the draft, they will be looking for two first rounders minimum. We cannot afford to pay that. I can see no way that LDU comes to the Saints next year beyond crippling our draft hand and salary cap.
The problem we have is that if Battle does go as a free agent and we receive fairly high compo for him we will be restricted in looking for Free Agents ourselves as it would water down the compo.
If North want to trade LDU, which makes no sense given they are trying to build through the draft, they will be looking for two first rounders minimum. We cannot afford to pay that. I can see no way that LDU comes to the Saints next year beyond crippling our draft hand and salary cap.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Mon 22 Apr 2024 7:03pm
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Re: LDU
Apparently North are mad on Trainor and have already floated the idea of trading out Pick 1 with other clubs. If we end up with 2 x early draft picks we might be able to work something to move up the order and pick up LDU.
As TDTL mentioned the club are keen to off load Howard, so perhaps North or another club assists with buying into the LDU trade.
Otherwise it will be a wait until 2025 when LDU becomes a UFA, if we are really interested and are willing to pay big $$$.
As TDTL mentioned the club are keen to off load Howard, so perhaps North or another club assists with buying into the LDU trade.
Otherwise it will be a wait until 2025 when LDU becomes a UFA, if we are really interested and are willing to pay big $$$.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 791
- Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2022 3:22pm
- Has thanked: 87 times
- Been thanked: 145 times
Re: LDU
If LDU is 26 as stated in this thread, then he's going to be over 30 by the time North could possibly be contenders. In that time, they're going to have to pay Sheezel, Wardlaw & McKertcher (who will be stars) a fortune. They also desperately need key defenders because they haven't got any, in fact any good defenders at all.SinCitySainter wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 1:21pm North will not trade for Battle, the only way they would go after him is as a free agent.
The problem we have is that if Battle does go as a free agent and we receive fairly high compo for him we will be restricted in looking for Free Agents ourselves as it would water down the compo.
If North want to trade LDU, which makes no sense given they are trying to build through the draft, they will be looking for two first rounders minimum. We cannot afford to pay that. I can see no way that LDU comes to the Saints next year beyond crippling our draft hand and salary cap.
I think that makes getting LDU in a trade possible, particularly if he decides he wants to go.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3385
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
Re: LDU
UFA is correct however there have been plenty of examples of players and clubs negotiating deals or wanting to look after existing club, such as when Dangerfield went to Geelong and even the fudged "non trade" with Gresham.St Dave wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 11:39amUnfortunately Battle is an unrestricted FA so if he wants to leave he can go anywhere and we are at the mercy of the compo. Best we might be able to hope for is North offer him enough for band one compo and we trade something like that pick plus our second for LDU. They get Battle and picks say 6 and 23 and we get LDU and keep our natural pick 5.older saint wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 10:05am the longer it goes the more it appears Battle will test FA market and as is the way will get a greater offer from elsewhere. North and Hawthorn are 2 sides screaming for big defenders.
If Battle wants to go to North and LDU genuinely wants to come to Stkilda surely something like Battle and 2nd round pick (likely in ealry 20's) for LDU North would have to consider on the basis next year he walks its on the basis of the formula.
They stuffed up on JHF so may take the bird in the hand.
Retain our top 5 pick also
Not sure he wants to leave but the $$$ will probably see him go.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 685
- Joined: Mon 15 May 2017 7:18pm
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
Re: LDU
There isn’t really any free agents left that we are a realistic to go for besides Jarrod Berry and Bailey Banfield. So wouldn’t stress to much about that.SinCitySainter wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 1:21pm North will not trade for Battle, the only way they would go after him is as a free agent.
The problem we have is that if Battle does go as a free agent and we receive fairly high compo for him we will be restricted in looking for Free Agents ourselves as it would water down the compo.
If North want to trade LDU, which makes no sense given they are trying to build through the draft, they will be looking for two first rounders minimum. We cannot afford to pay that. I can see no way that LDU comes to the Saints next year beyond crippling our draft hand and salary cap.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Wed 01 May 2024 11:58pm
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 108 times
Re: LDU
No leaving player is going to care about what deal their old club gets out of it, they will want their new club to be as strong as possible so ideally want their new club to give up as little as possible.older saint wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 2:25pmUFA is correct however there have been plenty of examples of players and clubs negotiating deals or wanting to look after existing club, such as when Dangerfield went to Geelong and even the fudged "non trade" with Gresham.St Dave wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 11:39amUnfortunately Battle is an unrestricted FA so if he wants to leave he can go anywhere and we are at the mercy of the compo. Best we might be able to hope for is North offer him enough for band one compo and we trade something like that pick plus our second for LDU. They get Battle and picks say 6 and 23 and we get LDU and keep our natural pick 5.older saint wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 10:05am the longer it goes the more it appears Battle will test FA market and as is the way will get a greater offer from elsewhere. North and Hawthorn are 2 sides screaming for big defenders.
If Battle wants to go to North and LDU genuinely wants to come to Stkilda surely something like Battle and 2nd round pick (likely in ealry 20's) for LDU North would have to consider on the basis next year he walks its on the basis of the formula.
They stuffed up on JHF so may take the bird in the hand.
Retain our top 5 pick also
Not sure he wants to leave but the $$$ will probably see him go.
Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't Gresham a restricted free agent? That basically forced the bombers hand, they had to offer enough to make us happy with the compo, otherwise we just match and force a trade. The same thing that North would do to us next year if we are going down the free agency route.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3385
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
Re: LDU
History says there are examples where they have - Dangerfield the most well known could have walked to Geelong for a late first round compo but Adelaide worked out a trade which got more in for them and allowed Geelong and Dangerfield to structure a ocntract to suit them over years as opposed to having to front end to get greater compo. It is all about clubs wanting best compensation and well as receiving club wanting flexibility with cap .St Dave wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 2:43pmNo leaving player is going to care about what deal their old club gets out of it, they will want their new club to be as strong as possible so ideally want their new club to give up as little as possible.older saint wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 2:25pmUFA is correct however there have been plenty of examples of players and clubs negotiating deals or wanting to look after existing club, such as when Dangerfield went to Geelong and even the fudged "non trade" with Gresham.St Dave wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 11:39amUnfortunately Battle is an unrestricted FA so if he wants to leave he can go anywhere and we are at the mercy of the compo. Best we might be able to hope for is North offer him enough for band one compo and we trade something like that pick plus our second for LDU. They get Battle and picks say 6 and 23 and we get LDU and keep our natural pick 5.older saint wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 10:05am the longer it goes the more it appears Battle will test FA market and as is the way will get a greater offer from elsewhere. North and Hawthorn are 2 sides screaming for big defenders.
If Battle wants to go to North and LDU genuinely wants to come to Stkilda surely something like Battle and 2nd round pick (likely in ealry 20's) for LDU North would have to consider on the basis next year he walks its on the basis of the formula.
They stuffed up on JHF so may take the bird in the hand.
Retain our top 5 pick also
Not sure he wants to leave but the $$$ will probably see him go.
Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't Gresham a restricted free agent? That basically forced the bombers hand, they had to offer enough to make us happy with the compo, otherwise we just match and force a trade. The same thing that North would do to us next year if we are going down the free agency route.
Time will tell what will happen
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Wed 01 May 2024 11:58pm
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 108 times
Re: LDU
Just gave it a quick look and Dangerfield was also an RFA (per this Adelaide press release https://www.afc.com.au/news/423982/deal ... angerfield) so he didn't have any real say in what geelong had to pay. Instead of matching or accepting the pick 14 compo Adelaide took geelongs offer of pick 9 plus some other little bonuses.older saint wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 4:29pmHistory says there are examples where they have - Dangerfield the most well known could have walked to Geelong for a late first round compo but Adelaide worked out a trade which got more in for them and allowed Geelong and Dangerfield to structure a ocntract to suit them over years as opposed to having to front end to get greater compo. It is all about clubs wanting best compensation and well as receiving club wanting flexibility with cap .St Dave wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 2:43pmNo leaving player is going to care about what deal their old club gets out of it, they will want their new club to be as strong as possible so ideally want their new club to give up as little as possible.older saint wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 2:25pmUFA is correct however there have been plenty of examples of players and clubs negotiating deals or wanting to look after existing club, such as when Dangerfield went to Geelong and even the fudged "non trade" with Gresham.St Dave wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 11:39amUnfortunately Battle is an unrestricted FA so if he wants to leave he can go anywhere and we are at the mercy of the compo. Best we might be able to hope for is North offer him enough for band one compo and we trade something like that pick plus our second for LDU. They get Battle and picks say 6 and 23 and we get LDU and keep our natural pick 5.older saint wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 10:05am the longer it goes the more it appears Battle will test FA market and as is the way will get a greater offer from elsewhere. North and Hawthorn are 2 sides screaming for big defenders.
If Battle wants to go to North and LDU genuinely wants to come to Stkilda surely something like Battle and 2nd round pick (likely in ealry 20's) for LDU North would have to consider on the basis next year he walks its on the basis of the formula.
They stuffed up on JHF so may take the bird in the hand.
Retain our top 5 pick also
Not sure he wants to leave but the $$$ will probably see him go.
Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't Gresham a restricted free agent? That basically forced the bombers hand, they had to offer enough to make us happy with the compo, otherwise we just match and force a trade. The same thing that North would do to us next year if we are going down the free agency route.
Time will tell what will happen
- Otiman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8770
- Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
- Location: Elsewhere
- Has thanked: 203 times
- Been thanked: 654 times
Re: LDU
Going hard in the draft again this year means no trading for players. We don't have our own 2nd rounder so hope Adelaide doesn't finish the season strongly as we have theirs.
Then in 26 we go hard for FA and if there are players available to trade in we go then too.
The list management strategy is sound and makes sense. Delusions of grandeur last year would have tempted a few but glad we are sticking the course.
Then in 26 we go hard for FA and if there are players available to trade in we go then too.
The list management strategy is sound and makes sense. Delusions of grandeur last year would have tempted a few but glad we are sticking the course.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 10:39am
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Re: LDU
I would have thought that Cameron Zurhaar was one we would seriously look at unless he is already re-signed, which he could well be.Brunswicksainter wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 2:29pmThere isn’t really any free agents left that we are a realistic to go for besides Jarrod Berry and Bailey Banfield. So wouldn’t stress to much about that.SinCitySainter wrote: ↑Thu 06 Jun 2024 1:21pm North will not trade for Battle, the only way they would go after him is as a free agent.
The problem we have is that if Battle does go as a free agent and we receive fairly high compo for him we will be restricted in looking for Free Agents ourselves as it would water down the compo.
If North want to trade LDU, which makes no sense given they are trying to build through the draft, they will be looking for two first rounders minimum. We cannot afford to pay that. I can see no way that LDU comes to the Saints next year beyond crippling our draft hand and salary cap.