Windhager

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
repta
Club Player
Posts: 747
Joined: Thu 06 Dec 2007 3:14pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 118 times

Windhager

Post: # 2063345Post repta »

Windhager has been OK this year but not as good as last year. Others have dropped off far more than he has therefore has probably run a bit under the radar. He has been OK and deserved his spot. But not a standout.

Last year he was doing tagging roles and run with roles. This year not so much.

Today was a great example.
Q1 - 1 handball 1 tackle
Q2. - 5 disposals no tackles

At half time Windhager given the tagging role of Harley Reid
Q3 5 disposals 4 tackles 4 clearances.
Q4 7 disposals 3 tackles 2 clearances

Harley down had 3 possessions). No clearances after being completely dominant in the first half.

Well done Windhager. I hope that you have more tagging roles.

The game needs to be learnt. One way is to shut out great players.


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14060
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2093 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063352Post The_Dud »

Won us the game


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063356Post saynta »

The_Dud wrote: Sat 01 Jun 2024 11:23pm Won us the game
Yes he did,


Killa
Club Player
Posts: 1039
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2021 10:27am
Been thanked: 381 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063365Post Killa »

And at quarter time Steele had not touched the ball

Plus Ross only touched it 6 times all game - and Webster who I assume was on Cripps, had it 7 times all game

These players being among our most experienced

Windhager stood up in the second half

So, as a run with player, has he done Ross and Steele out of their jobs?

And the “small defender” remains a problem


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2721 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063368Post B.M »

First half he was across HB - has no idea how to play there

Is an inside mid/tagger

We had an AA hb playing as an inside mid and Windhager playing hb

They had 1 bull mid capable of being damaging - we put our smallest, most offensive mid to him.
All week to plan - and come up with that?!
Are you fkn serious


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063369Post saynta »

Killa wrote: Sat 01 Jun 2024 11:38pm And at quarter time Steele had not touched the ball

Plus Ross only touched it 6 times all game - and Webster who I assume was on Cripps, had it 7 times all game

These players being among our most experienced

Windhager stood up in the second half

So, as a run with player, has he done Ross and Steele out of their jobs?

And the “small defender” remains a problem
Hmmm. Interesting. Food for thought.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2721 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063372Post B.M »

Webster was on Ryan - kept falling over

Ross was on a wing - as you would put an inside mid with average disposal in that role!


Banger9798
SS Life Member
Posts: 2787
Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 784 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063373Post Banger9798 »

B.M wrote: Sat 01 Jun 2024 11:45pm Webster was on Ryan - kept falling over

Ross was on a wing - as you would put an inside mid with average disposal in that role!
It's insane.
Were we trying to lose?


The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063374Post saynta »

Banger9798 wrote: Sat 01 Jun 2024 11:49pm
B.M wrote: Sat 01 Jun 2024 11:45pm Webster was on Ryan - kept falling over

Ross was on a wing - as you would put an inside mid with average disposal in that role!
It's insane.
Were we trying to lose?
Maybe. Not as far fetched as it sounds.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063379Post bigcarl »

Tagging seems to bring out the best in him where he not only beats his opponent, but wins a lot of his own ball as well.

Who was it he did a job on against Pies? De Goey?


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2721 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063380Post B.M »

It was Daicos

Ross had DeGoey

Surprise- we put our inside mids inside with roles - we perform well


User avatar
mbogo
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2499
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:40pm
Location: Hogwarts
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063381Post mbogo »

Nick Daicos .. beat him clearly all day


This is a team game and there is no room for individuals who think they are above walking through the fire.
StPeter
Club Player
Posts: 1304
Joined: Thu 22 Jun 2006 4:03pm
Location: StKilda East
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 233 times
Contact:

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063395Post StPeter »

It has been obvious to me for at least 3 seasons now, that Windhager plays his best when given a tagger/run-with role.
He has been found wanting when tried in other positions, especially half-back. Why do they persist in trying him there?


Killa
Club Player
Posts: 1039
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2021 10:27am
Been thanked: 381 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063421Post Killa »

And there is the knock I have always had on Webster

He loses his feet in a game where you need to stay on your feet

Plus, being left footed, his disposal has the grace left footers seem to have - except where do they finish up?

From TV coverage (and the rubbish which is commentary) who our back 6/7 were was unknown as was who they were responsible for

We know Howard, Willie and Battle were back there

Plus Webster, Wanganeen-Milera and Bonner

So that is 6, allowing for any interchanges

And it was their “smalls” who got shots on goal


User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9054
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 353 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063440Post perfectionist »

Jack Steele was on Reid in the first quarter and kept him quiet. Steele was released in the second quarter and Dow went to Reid. Worked alright most of the time until WC had a dominant period at the centre bounce and Reid, being untagged and alone on the defensive side of the ball up, capitalised. Windhager had been poor until then. Whilst he can get to the fall of the ball, he is not strong enough to break free and his handball skills not good enough from a pack to set others running. He is a lot better when he doesn't actually get the ball but prevents someone who could hurt us getting it as well. That's what he did in the third quarter. He was helped by the fact that Reid lost concentration after the sling of Wilson. You could see it on his face. Windhager capitalised and got kicks himself. One thing about tagging a good player is that they take you to the ball. The other winning "move" in the last quarter was the injury to King. We kicked 5 goals in the last having kicked 7 in the first three.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2721 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063458Post B.M »

Steele was getting tagged by Dom Sheed from the first bounce

Simpson said so in his presser

Kept Steele to 18 touches (zero in the First) which Simpson was happy with.

In true Steel style, getting tagged - still got his hands dirty with game high 15 tackles


loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4673
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 518 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063558Post loris »

Windhager was mainly playing extra man (7 backs) across back half during first half. He only picked up an actual player when either Bonner or Nasiah left their player to advance the ball through the centre or were having a rest on the pine. Plus he went onto Ryan briefly when Webster was off the ground for a period (Jimmy went down the race to get some attention). So Windhager was more a loose player in defense, not permanently positioned as a half back flanker.
I was at the game - you don’t pick up such nuances off TV. Obviously the commentators didn’t pick it up also.

I assume he was played in the back half to try and have a harder bodied player to pick up smalls - missing Stocker there folks!!


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12765
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2721 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063559Post B.M »

Just a thought?!

Wouldn’t Sinclair be a bit better in that role?

Given he is an AA half back!

And Windy be a bit more suited to the midfield- as he has played his best footy there!


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063562Post bigcarl »

saynta wrote: Sat 01 Jun 2024 11:55pm
Banger9798 wrote: Sat 01 Jun 2024 11:49pm
B.M wrote: Sat 01 Jun 2024 11:45pm Webster was on Ryan - kept falling over

Ross was on a wing - as you would put an inside mid with average disposal in that role!
It's insane.
Were we trying to lose?
Maybe. Not as far fetched as it sounds.
Ross will be furious that his tanking plans have come unstuck. 😂


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12109
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3711 times
Been thanked: 2580 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063571Post Scollop »

perfectionist wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 9:34am Jack Steele was on Reid in the first quarter and kept him quiet. Steele was released in the second quarter and Dow went to Reid. Worked alright most of the time until WC had a dominant period at the centre bounce and Reid, being untagged and alone on the defensive side of the ball up, capitalised. Windhager had been poor until then. Whilst he can get to the fall of the ball, he is not strong enough to break free and his handball skills not good enough from a pack to set others running. He is a lot better when he doesn't actually get the ball but prevents someone who could hurt us getting it as well. That's what he did in the third quarter. He was helped by the fact that Reid lost concentration after the sling of Wilson. You could see it on his face. Windhager capitalised and got kicks himself. One thing about tagging a good player is that they take you to the ball. The other winning "move" in the last quarter was the injury to King. We kicked 5 goals in the last having kicked 7 in the first three.
Good observations

David King said in the closing minute or just after the final siren...that "Windhager was the difference. He won them the match"

The sheople listened and voted accordingly

It's interesting how many times people take their cues (look up the word if you don't understand what I mean) from commentators. Obviously...it's easier than thinking for yourself


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23164
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9113 times
Been thanked: 3951 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063574Post saynta »

bigcarl wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:35pm
saynta wrote: Sat 01 Jun 2024 11:55pm
Banger9798 wrote: Sat 01 Jun 2024 11:49pm
B.M wrote: Sat 01 Jun 2024 11:45pm Webster was on Ryan - kept falling over

Ross was on a wing - as you would put an inside mid with average disposal in that role!
It's insane.
Were we trying to lose?
Maybe. Not as far fetched as it sounds.
Ross will be furious that his tanking plans have come unstuck. 😂

:wink: :wink: :wink: 8-) :D .. Yep, took his eyes off the ball and let his assistants have a free run for once.


nostalgicsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1078
Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
Has thanked: 64 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063575Post nostalgicsaint »

Scollop wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:45pm
perfectionist wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 9:34am Jack Steele was on Reid in the first quarter and kept him quiet. Steele was released in the second quarter and Dow went to Reid. Worked alright most of the time until WC had a dominant period at the centre bounce and Reid, being untagged and alone on the defensive side of the ball up, capitalised. Windhager had been poor until then. Whilst he can get to the fall of the ball, he is not strong enough to break free and his handball skills not good enough from a pack to set others running. He is a lot better when he doesn't actually get the ball but prevents someone who could hurt us getting it as well. That's what he did in the third quarter. He was helped by the fact that Reid lost concentration after the sling of Wilson. You could see it on his face. Windhager capitalised and got kicks himself. One thing about tagging a good player is that they take you to the ball. The other winning "move" in the last quarter was the injury to King. We kicked 5 goals in the last having kicked 7 in the first three.
Good observations

David King said in the closing minute or just after the final siren...that "Windhager was the difference. He won them the match"

The sheople listened and voted accordingly

It's interesting how many times people take their cues (look up the word if you don't understand what I mean) from commentators. Obviously...it's easier than thinking for yourself
Interesting take.

Mine.

The sign tackle occurred because he was frustrated and had lost concentration already due to the close checking he was receiving.


Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12109
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3711 times
Been thanked: 2580 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063582Post Scollop »

nostalgicsaint wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:50pm
Scollop wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:45pm
perfectionist wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 9:34am Jack Steele was on Reid in the first quarter and kept him quiet. Steele was released in the second quarter and Dow went to Reid. Worked alright most of the time until WC had a dominant period at the centre bounce and Reid, being untagged and alone on the defensive side of the ball up, capitalised. Windhager had been poor until then. Whilst he can get to the fall of the ball, he is not strong enough to break free and his handball skills not good enough from a pack to set others running. He is a lot better when he doesn't actually get the ball but prevents someone who could hurt us getting it as well. That's what he did in the third quarter. He was helped by the fact that Reid lost concentration after the sling of Wilson. You could see it on his face. Windhager capitalised and got kicks himself. One thing about tagging a good player is that they take you to the ball. The other winning "move" in the last quarter was the injury to King. We kicked 5 goals in the last having kicked 7 in the first three.
Good observations

David King said in the closing minute or just after the final siren...that "Windhager was the difference. He won them the match"

The sheople listened and voted accordingly

It's interesting how many times people take their cues (look up the word if you don't understand what I mean) from commentators. Obviously...it's easier than thinking for yourself
Interesting take.

Mine.

The sign tackle occurred because he was frustrated and had lost concentration already due to the close checking he was receiving.
The tackle occurred before half-time. Windhager wasn't on him at that stage

The changing of the magnets was after that


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063590Post bigcarl »

Scollop wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:57pm
nostalgicsaint wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:50pm
Scollop wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:45pm
perfectionist wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 9:34am Jack Steele was on Reid in the first quarter and kept him quiet. Steele was released in the second quarter and Dow went to Reid. Worked alright most of the time until WC had a dominant period at the centre bounce and Reid, being untagged and alone on the defensive side of the ball up, capitalised. Windhager had been poor until then. Whilst he can get to the fall of the ball, he is not strong enough to break free and his handball skills not good enough from a pack to set others running. He is a lot better when he doesn't actually get the ball but prevents someone who could hurt us getting it as well. That's what he did in the third quarter. He was helped by the fact that Reid lost concentration after the sling of Wilson. You could see it on his face. Windhager capitalised and got kicks himself. One thing about tagging a good player is that they take you to the ball. The other winning "move" in the last quarter was the injury to King. We kicked 5 goals in the last having kicked 7 in the first three.
Good observations

David King said in the closing minute or just after the final siren...that "Windhager was the difference. He won them the match"

The sheople listened and voted accordingly

It's interesting how many times people take their cues (look up the word if you don't understand what I mean) from commentators. Obviously...it's easier than thinking for yourself
Interesting take.

Mine.

The sign tackle occurred because he was frustrated and had lost concentration already due to the close checking he was receiving.
The tackle occurred before half-time. Windhager wasn't on him at that stage

The changing of the magnets was after that
You sure? I don’t think that’s right


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12109
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3711 times
Been thanked: 2580 times

Re: Windhager

Post: # 2063592Post Scollop »

bigcarl wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 7:02pm
Scollop wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:57pm
nostalgicsaint wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:50pm
Scollop wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 6:45pm
perfectionist wrote: Sun 02 Jun 2024 9:34am Jack Steele was on Reid in the first quarter and kept him quiet. Steele was released in the second quarter and Dow went to Reid. Worked alright most of the time until WC had a dominant period at the centre bounce and Reid, being untagged and alone on the defensive side of the ball up, capitalised. Windhager had been poor until then. Whilst he can get to the fall of the ball, he is not strong enough to break free and his handball skills not good enough from a pack to set others running. He is a lot better when he doesn't actually get the ball but prevents someone who could hurt us getting it as well. That's what he did in the third quarter. He was helped by the fact that Reid lost concentration after the sling of Wilson. You could see it on his face. Windhager capitalised and got kicks himself. One thing about tagging a good player is that they take you to the ball. The other winning "move" in the last quarter was the injury to King. We kicked 5 goals in the last having kicked 7 in the first three.
Good observations

David King said in the closing minute or just after the final siren...that "Windhager was the difference. He won them the match"

The sheople listened and voted accordingly

It's interesting how many times people take their cues (look up the word if you don't understand what I mean) from commentators. Obviously...it's easier than thinking for yourself
Interesting take.

Mine.

The sign tackle occurred because he was frustrated and had lost concentration already due to the close checking he was receiving.
The tackle occurred before half-time. Windhager wasn't on him at that stage

The changing of the magnets was after that
You sure? I don’t think that’s right
I'm sure

You can watch the replay. It happened just before half time. Also Simpson made mention of 'what he said to Harley' during the long break.


Post Reply