30-14
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10504
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
30-14
The rot continues with a ridiculously biased free kick count. Also 7 forward 50 frees to the Giants in a close game shows the efforts of these clowns to get GWS over the line.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
- Location: Bentleigh East
- Has thanked: 273 times
- Been thanked: 638 times
Re: 30-14
Interesting comment. Please elaborate.Brunswicksainter wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 8:40am Normally I’d be livid about this; but, we were pretty undisciplined yesterday
I don't recall any undisciplined acts. No fifty metre penalties, no reports, no silly free kicks.
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6346
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1128 times
Re: 30-14
I agree - aside from the technicality of Hunter using his arms in the Centre Bounces (even though he was being scragged at the around the ground rucks) I did not see anything that I could say we were 'dirty' in our attack on the ball.Beno88 wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 9:01amInteresting comment. Please elaborate.Brunswicksainter wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 8:40am Normally I’d be livid about this; but, we were pretty undisciplined yesterday
I don't recall any undisciplined acts. No fifty metre penalties, no reports, no silly free kicks.
We even hand balled in most cases - rather than the NSW flick - rugby union style - that GWS were employing - it was effective in the wet for them and NOT called as a throw.
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
- Location: Bentleigh East
- Has thanked: 273 times
- Been thanked: 638 times
Re: 30-14
One.Sombersainter wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 9:47am Ben Long gives away a lot of free kicks and that was without the occasional over exuberant bump
That's both his average per game and how many he gave away yesterday.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 5:15pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: 30-14
According to the umpires we were very undisciplined in the ruckBeno88 wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 9:01amInteresting comment. Please elaborate.Brunswicksainter wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 8:40am Normally I’d be livid about this; but, we were pretty undisciplined yesterday
I don't recall any undisciplined acts. No fifty metre penalties, no reports, no silly free kicks.
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17047
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3663 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: 30-14
For me personally the game was just over officiated...
I hate incidental free kicks and the game was choke full of them both ways. 80minutes of actual game time (in play) and 44 free kicks in that. More than one every two minutes
Just let them play FFS. Call the really obvious ones and STFU. Nobody comes to watch umpires decide matches
I hate incidental free kicks and the game was choke full of them both ways. 80minutes of actual game time (in play) and 44 free kicks in that. More than one every two minutes
Just let them play FFS. Call the really obvious ones and STFU. Nobody comes to watch umpires decide matches
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23154
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9103 times
- Been thanked: 3948 times
Re: 30-14
Several ??? I would say about 15 or 16.Peanut Farm wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 9:45am The ruck infringements were ridiculous. Ben Long was unlucky and there were several dubious frees against us.
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5786 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: 30-14
I'm not sure undisciplined is the correct word. Perhaps, silly & panicked may explain why our players were caught out holding handfuls of jumper. An easy decision for even the worst umpire.Brunswicksainter wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 8:40am Normally I’d be livid about this; but, we were pretty undisciplined yesterday
We did get caught out in body work by stronger players, that's an area we can improve on. Then those frees against will not be a factor.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
Re: 30-14
I thought the umpiring was pretty poor and one-sided from all umpires yesterday. I was particularly aggrieved the they missed (or at least I hope they did) Nick Hayne deliberately tripping a player while we were taking a free. It was disgraceful - should've been a 50 mp.
With that said, a few of our defenders need to watch the jumper holding - they will pay those every time.
With that said, a few of our defenders need to watch the jumper holding - they will pay those every time.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14059
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: 30-14
It appears McKernan doesn't know how to contest a stoppage without grabbing a handful of the opposition ruckman's jumper! Lucky he didn't get pinged more.
4 goals gifted to us from the umps, some people are never happy!
4 goals gifted to us from the umps, some people are never happy!
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10504
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
- Location: Bentleigh East
- Has thanked: 273 times
- Been thanked: 638 times
Re: 30-14
Two goals from free kicks.
Membrey in the second quarter for a hold which was pretty blatant. The other the Butler goal at the end, 50/50 free.
One goal from a fifty metre penalty, which was 100% correct.
GWS received 7 frees inside 50, to our 2.
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: 30-14
That is an interesting one as Hayne was the retaliated to a two handed shove in the chest from Battle if I recall correctly.suss wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 12:21pm I thought the umpiring was pretty poor and one-sided from all umpires yesterday. I was particularly aggrieved the they missed (or at least I hope they did) Nick Hayne deliberately tripping a player while we were taking a free. It was disgraceful - should've been a 50 mp.
With that said, a few of our defenders need to watch the jumper holding - they will pay those every time.
For me it was way over officiated, particularly for the conditions.
The ruck free against McKernan in the last was totally unnecessary.
Why pay a free kick when the action had no impact whatsoever on the contest or the opposition player?
I really believe if there is no impact or disadvantage it should be play on.
The other thing mentioned in this thread is the defenders & rucks grabbing handful of jumper, they will ping you every time and we have to be better.
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14059
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: 30-14
Going by the Curly definition that ANY goal kicked by the opposition within a minute of a free kick is a gift and blatant cheating...
3 in the 2nd quarter, Membrey free, 50m penalty, Higgins hitting the post
Butler in the last.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10504
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: 30-14
You mean the clear 50 that even umpire Foote would have paid. The goal to Higgins no one could tell either way but the goal umpire was adament. Membrey was as blatant as you get after missing so many to get one was a relief and Butlers you need to learn the rules.The_Dud wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 3:03pmGoing by the Curly definition that ANY goal kicked by the opposition within a minute of a free kick is a gift and blatant cheating...
3 in the 2nd quarter, Membrey free, 50m penalty, Higgins hitting the post
Butler in the last.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14059
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: 30-14
Good post.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 1:20pmThat is an interesting one as Hayne was the retaliated to a two handed shove in the chest from Battle if I recall correctly.suss wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 12:21pm I thought the umpiring was pretty poor and one-sided from all umpires yesterday. I was particularly aggrieved the they missed (or at least I hope they did) Nick Hayne deliberately tripping a player while we were taking a free. It was disgraceful - should've been a 50 mp.
With that said, a few of our defenders need to watch the jumper holding - they will pay those every time.
For me it was way over officiated, particularly for the conditions.
The ruck free against McKernan in the last was totally unnecessary.
Why pay a free kick when the action had no impact whatsoever on the contest or the opposition player?
I really believe if there is no impact or disadvantage it should be play on.
The other thing mentioned in this thread is the defenders & rucks grabbing handful of jumper, they will ping you every time and we have to be better.
Yep, Battle shoved him in the chest while on the ground just before Hayne tripped him - get on with it boys.
You've got to have a bit of leeway in the wet and slippery conditions.
If the umpire sees you grab a handful of jumper and then stretch it out, you've made it way too easy for them to pay a free against you, no use complaining, don't infringe next time!
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14059
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: 30-14
Haha, I could have written that answer for youCURLY wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 3:07pmYou mean the clear 50 that even umpire Foote would have paid. The goal to Higgins no one could tell either way but the goal umpire was adament. Membrey was as blatant as you get after missing so many to get one was a relief and Butlers you need to learn the rules.The_Dud wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 3:03pmGoing by the Curly definition that ANY goal kicked by the opposition within a minute of a free kick is a gift and blatant cheating...
3 in the 2nd quarter, Membrey free, 50m penalty, Higgins hitting the post
Butler in the last.
"EVERY free we get is 100% legit, and EVERY free against is blatant cheating!!"
Facts
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10504
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: 30-14
The_Dud wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 3:11pmHaha, I could have written that answer for youCURLY wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 3:07pmYou mean the clear 50 that even umpire Foote would have paid. The goal to Higgins no one could tell either way but the goal umpire was adament. Membrey was as blatant as you get after missing so many to get one was a relief and Butlers you need to learn the rules.The_Dud wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 3:03pmGoing by the Curly definition that ANY goal kicked by the opposition within a minute of a free kick is a gift and blatant cheating...
3 in the 2nd quarter, Membrey free, 50m penalty, Higgins hitting the post
Butler in the last.
"EVERY free we get is 100% legit, and EVERY free against is blatant cheating!!"
Facts
You can't argue our frees though they were so blatant the GWS player asked to be pinned. Look at Jack Steele getting pinned for a perfect tackle. How is that even close to a free.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10504
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: 30-14
Ok so you can trip a player now.The_Dud wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 3:08pmGood post.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 1:20pmThat is an interesting one as Hayne was the retaliated to a two handed shove in the chest from Battle if I recall correctly.suss wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 12:21pm I thought the umpiring was pretty poor and one-sided from all umpires yesterday. I was particularly aggrieved the they missed (or at least I hope they did) Nick Hayne deliberately tripping a player while we were taking a free. It was disgraceful - should've been a 50 mp.
With that said, a few of our defenders need to watch the jumper holding - they will pay those every time.
For me it was way over officiated, particularly for the conditions.
The ruck free against McKernan in the last was totally unnecessary.
Why pay a free kick when the action had no impact whatsoever on the contest or the opposition player?
I really believe if there is no impact or disadvantage it should be play on.
The other thing mentioned in this thread is the defenders & rucks grabbing handful of jumper, they will ping you every time and we have to be better.
Yep, Battle shoved him in the chest while on the ground just before Hayne tripped him - get on with it boys.
You've got to have a bit of leeway in the wet and slippery conditions.
If the umpire sees you grab a handful of jumper and then stretch it out, you've made it way too easy for them to pay a free against you, no use complaining, don't infringe next time!
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12798
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 810 times
- Been thanked: 433 times
Re: 30-14
Thanks for this.The_Dud wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 3:08pmGood post.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 1:20pmThat is an interesting one as Hayne was the retaliated to a two handed shove in the chest from Battle if I recall correctly.suss wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 12:21pm I thought the umpiring was pretty poor and one-sided from all umpires yesterday. I was particularly aggrieved the they missed (or at least I hope they did) Nick Hayne deliberately tripping a player while we were taking a free. It was disgraceful - should've been a 50 mp.
With that said, a few of our defenders need to watch the jumper holding - they will pay those every time.
For me it was way over officiated, particularly for the conditions.
The ruck free against McKernan in the last was totally unnecessary.
Why pay a free kick when the action had no impact whatsoever on the contest or the opposition player?
I really believe if there is no impact or disadvantage it should be play on.
The other thing mentioned in this thread is the defenders & rucks grabbing handful of jumper, they will ping you every time and we have to be better.
Yep, Battle shoved him in the chest while on the ground just before Hayne tripped him - get on with it boys.
You've got to have a bit of leeway in the wet and slippery conditions.
If the umpire sees you grab a handful of jumper and then stretch it out, you've made it way too easy for them to pay a free against you, no use complaining, don't infringe next time!
Would you please point me to the directive from the Rules Committee to the Umpiring fraternity that 'retaliation' is no longer to be punished.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14059
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2093 times
Re: 30-14
Steele hit a GWS player in the chin with a half hearted punch with no free paid. Can you hit players in the face now?CURLY wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 3:16pmOk so you can trip a player now.The_Dud wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 3:08pmGood post.Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 1:20pmThat is an interesting one as Hayne was the retaliated to a two handed shove in the chest from Battle if I recall correctly.suss wrote: ↑Mon 22 Mar 2021 12:21pm I thought the umpiring was pretty poor and one-sided from all umpires yesterday. I was particularly aggrieved the they missed (or at least I hope they did) Nick Hayne deliberately tripping a player while we were taking a free. It was disgraceful - should've been a 50 mp.
With that said, a few of our defenders need to watch the jumper holding - they will pay those every time.
For me it was way over officiated, particularly for the conditions.
The ruck free against McKernan in the last was totally unnecessary.
Why pay a free kick when the action had no impact whatsoever on the contest or the opposition player?
I really believe if there is no impact or disadvantage it should be play on.
The other thing mentioned in this thread is the defenders & rucks grabbing handful of jumper, they will ping you every time and we have to be better.
Yep, Battle shoved him in the chest while on the ground just before Hayne tripped him - get on with it boys.
You've got to have a bit of leeway in the wet and slippery conditions.
If the umpire sees you grab a handful of jumper and then stretch it out, you've made it way too easy for them to pay a free against you, no use complaining, don't infringe next time!
Maybe if you had more feel for the game you'd understand better the kinds of things that happen on the field.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.