Billy Cost Us The Game
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3950
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
- Has thanked: 372 times
- Been thanked: 214 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
As previously stated, to point the finger at one player is insane!!!!!
Nothing to see but rubbish post!!!!!
Nothing to see but rubbish post!!!!!
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
This response is symptomatic of why St Kilda has won just the one premiership in its history, that by one point in 1966.
The bounday throw in exposed a break down - firstly in that the opposition ruckman had an unimpeded contest on the ball.
The wider ramification is the protection of and defence of Longer - even to the extent of putting blame on Acres, Ross, Dunstan and Billings et al.
Simply, and no one answers this, in his 60 AFL games Longer's ruck competition has been BOG or near BOG in the far greater majority of those games - and, again, Ryder received 8 Coach's votes last weekend.
Longer has 60 AFL games, plus a number of games at the lower level, at 2 Clubs.
And still his opposition ruck competition dominate games aka Ryder.
So nothing has changed in 60 games (3 full seasons of AFL footy).
And still we persevere with him, at AFL level to boot!
And, in the process we "burn" Hickey, after his 2016 season (allowing for injury interruption in 2017, and being "rested" from the VFL prior to gaining AFL selection - so off an injury interrupted season then a 2 week "break" when continuity was the requirement).
These are the questions - and there are similar questions elsewhere in regards our selection bias and the deployment of players, including GOP triers aka our Captain (why didn't he assume responsibility for PA's most potent player in those circumstances?).
IF Longer is "only" 60 games into an AFL career, and at 24 is still developing, play him in the VFL to develop him - then play him at AFL level when his form warrants it and he is not a liability, a liability which sees his opposite number dominating games and results.
Romance does not win premierships.
Hard nosed, focused decisions do.
This side will ride or fall on Carlisle (and anyone else of his ilk we can attract), McCartin, Billings, Freeman, Dunstan, Acres, Goddard and Gresham plus the 2 First Round Draft picks in our keep for the 2018 season.
Plus the likes of Armitage and Steven.
And trust in the likes of White as a Second Round pick and some others who could not cement spots at their previous Clubs out performing the assessments of those other Clubs who let them go for the reasons they did.
Anyway, I have had enough of beating against a brick wall of adulation for honest triers who do not deliver the result in this competative competition.
The bounday throw in exposed a break down - firstly in that the opposition ruckman had an unimpeded contest on the ball.
The wider ramification is the protection of and defence of Longer - even to the extent of putting blame on Acres, Ross, Dunstan and Billings et al.
Simply, and no one answers this, in his 60 AFL games Longer's ruck competition has been BOG or near BOG in the far greater majority of those games - and, again, Ryder received 8 Coach's votes last weekend.
Longer has 60 AFL games, plus a number of games at the lower level, at 2 Clubs.
And still his opposition ruck competition dominate games aka Ryder.
So nothing has changed in 60 games (3 full seasons of AFL footy).
And still we persevere with him, at AFL level to boot!
And, in the process we "burn" Hickey, after his 2016 season (allowing for injury interruption in 2017, and being "rested" from the VFL prior to gaining AFL selection - so off an injury interrupted season then a 2 week "break" when continuity was the requirement).
These are the questions - and there are similar questions elsewhere in regards our selection bias and the deployment of players, including GOP triers aka our Captain (why didn't he assume responsibility for PA's most potent player in those circumstances?).
IF Longer is "only" 60 games into an AFL career, and at 24 is still developing, play him in the VFL to develop him - then play him at AFL level when his form warrants it and he is not a liability, a liability which sees his opposite number dominating games and results.
Romance does not win premierships.
Hard nosed, focused decisions do.
This side will ride or fall on Carlisle (and anyone else of his ilk we can attract), McCartin, Billings, Freeman, Dunstan, Acres, Goddard and Gresham plus the 2 First Round Draft picks in our keep for the 2018 season.
Plus the likes of Armitage and Steven.
And trust in the likes of White as a Second Round pick and some others who could not cement spots at their previous Clubs out performing the assessments of those other Clubs who let them go for the reasons they did.
Anyway, I have had enough of beating against a brick wall of adulation for honest triers who do not deliver the result in this competative competition.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3950
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
- Has thanked: 372 times
- Been thanked: 214 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
Playing Hickey is not a hard nosed decision in any shape or form, Hickey 2017 is not Hickey 2016, so that selection would be romantic in itself, at present Billy is the man and Tom had a chance to change that but couldn't!!!!!
As I have stated for a long time, let him bang the door down, then play him if he can do that!!!!!
Only trouble for Tom is, 'the door airnt made of tissue paper', but hey, on current form Tom would either miss or break a toe trying to kick it in!!!!!
As I have stated for a long time, let him bang the door down, then play him if he can do that!!!!!
Only trouble for Tom is, 'the door airnt made of tissue paper', but hey, on current form Tom would either miss or break a toe trying to kick it in!!!!!
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23163
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9112 times
- Been thanked: 3951 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
Bernard Shakey wrote:Having watched the game three times, I'm staggered nobody has commented on the elephant in the room.
Billy Longer cost us the game. All he needed to do was contest that last ruck contest. He didn't. We lost!
The ball was thrown in short. Although that particularly puny maggot had been doing that all day.
Billy should have taken note.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Sun 08 May 2016 8:02pm
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
Your claim that longer makes the opposition ruxkmen the best player on the ground is interesting, seeing as hickey without fail has lost to every ruxkmen he faced (bar a nicnat-less west coast) without fail, where as longer has completely lost by my count 4 matches (Ryder, Darcy, Witts, Goldstein).To the top wrote:This response is symptomatic of why St Kilda has won just the one premiership in its history, that by one point in 1966.
The bounday throw in exposed a break down - firstly in that the opposition ruckman had an unimpeded contest on the ball.
The wider ramification is the protection of and defence of Longer - even to the extent of putting blame on Acres, Ross, Dunstan and Billings et al.
Simply, and no one answers this, in his 60 AFL games Longer's ruck competition has been BOG or near BOG in the far greater majority of those games - and, again, Ryder received 8 Coach's votes last weekend.
Longer has 60 AFL games, plus a number of games at the lower level, at 2 Clubs.
And still his opposition ruck competition dominate games aka Ryder.
So nothing has changed in 60 games (3 full seasons of AFL footy).
And still we persevere with him, at AFL level to boot!
And, in the process we "burn" Hickey, after his 2016 season (allowing for injury interruption in 2017, and being "rested" from the VFL prior to gaining AFL selection - so off an injury interrupted season then a 2 week "break" when continuity was the requirement).
These are the questions - and there are similar questions elsewhere in regards our selection bias and the deployment of players, including GOP triers aka our Captain (why didn't he assume responsibility for PA's most potent player in those circumstances?).
IF Longer is "only" 60 games into an AFL career, and at 24 is still developing, play him in the VFL to develop him - then play him at AFL level when his form warrants it and he is not a liability, a liability which sees his opposite number dominating games and results.
Romance does not win premierships.
Hard nosed, focused decisions do.
This side will ride or fall on Carlisle (and anyone else of his ilk we can attract), McCartin, Billings, Freeman, Dunstan, Acres, Goddard and Gresham plus the 2 First Round Draft picks in our keep for the 2018 season.
Plus the likes of Armitage and Steven.
And trust in the likes of White as a Second Round pick and some others who could not cement spots at their previous Clubs out performing the assessments of those other Clubs who let them go for the reasons they did.
Anyway, I have had enough of beating against a brick wall of adulation for honest triers who do not deliver the result in this competative competition.
Fortius quo Fidelius means Strength through Loyalty. . . I think
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9373
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 662 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3950
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
- Has thanked: 372 times
- Been thanked: 214 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
Also Bulldogs and Richmond as well as other games!!!!!thejiggingsaint wrote:Longer was good against Mumford.
Hickey has been good in which games this year?????
Has not kicked the door down or even leant on it, for that matter!!!!!
That my point!!!!!
'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving
We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!
The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Sat 10 Jun 2017 2:01pm
- Has thanked: 35 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
How about blaming everyone on the team? Mistackling, poor conversions etc. Its like blaming Roo for missing the goal in the Granny. Team efforts create team wins or losses.
- lewdogs
- Club Player
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue 17 Jun 2008 2:11pm
- Has thanked: 107 times
- Been thanked: 182 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
Billy is meant to be in the team for his ruck work... yet with the game on the line he went to pieces. Hate to point the finger but he was shocking, culminating in that last insipid play. Get any type of hand on the ball and we win. Really makes my blood boil.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1096
- Joined: Fri 28 Nov 2014 5:33pm
- Has thanked: 331 times
- Been thanked: 268 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
Its pretty simple really.Proph3t of egan wrote:Your claim that longer makes the opposition ruxkmen the best player on the ground is interesting, seeing as hickey without fail has lost to every ruxkmen he faced (bar a nicnat-less west coast) without fail, where as longer has completely lost by my count 4 matches (Ryder, Darcy, Witts, Goldstein).To the top wrote:This response is symptomatic of why St Kilda has won just the one premiership in its history, that by one point in 1966.
The bounday throw in exposed a break down - firstly in that the opposition ruckman had an unimpeded contest on the ball.
The wider ramification is the protection of and defence of Longer - even to the extent of putting blame on Acres, Ross, Dunstan and Billings et al.
Simply, and no one answers this, in his 60 AFL games Longer's ruck competition has been BOG or near BOG in the far greater majority of those games - and, again, Ryder received 8 Coach's votes last weekend.
Longer has 60 AFL games, plus a number of games at the lower level, at 2 Clubs.
And still his opposition ruck competition dominate games aka Ryder.
So nothing has changed in 60 games (3 full seasons of AFL footy).
And still we persevere with him, at AFL level to boot!
And, in the process we "burn" Hickey, after his 2016 season (allowing for injury interruption in 2017, and being "rested" from the VFL prior to gaining AFL selection - so off an injury interrupted season then a 2 week "break" when continuity was the requirement).
These are the questions - and there are similar questions elsewhere in regards our selection bias and the deployment of players, including GOP triers aka our Captain (why didn't he assume responsibility for PA's most potent player in those circumstances?).
IF Longer is "only" 60 games into an AFL career, and at 24 is still developing, play him in the VFL to develop him - then play him at AFL level when his form warrants it and he is not a liability, a liability which sees his opposite number dominating games and results.
Romance does not win premierships.
Hard nosed, focused decisions do.
This side will ride or fall on Carlisle (and anyone else of his ilk we can attract), McCartin, Billings, Freeman, Dunstan, Acres, Goddard and Gresham plus the 2 First Round Draft picks in our keep for the 2018 season.
Plus the likes of Armitage and Steven.
And trust in the likes of White as a Second Round pick and some others who could not cement spots at their previous Clubs out performing the assessments of those other Clubs who let them go for the reasons they did.
Anyway, I have had enough of beating against a brick wall of adulation for honest triers who do not deliver the result in this competative competition.
Neither Hickey, Holmes or Pierce have knocked the selection door down. Gifting games to players who havent earned it is not the way to go. Really simple - If Tom wants the opportunity - then grab it with both hands son! Thats what Richo has asked for. This notion that the coaches select players who are of less value than an equivalent running around in the Dev Squad or the two's is illogical isnt it?.
During the year, Billing, Dunstan, Paddy, Geary and about 10 others have taken turns to be the whipping boy. A few weeks ago Acres was the answer , now he is complicit in the Power loss. Fact is he and a few others got outplayed with a set play by two blokes (Ryder / Gray) both around 30 yo with 200 plus games behind them - no real surprise there - it happens. Perhaps with a few more leaders on the ground i.e. reiwoldt, Joey, Gilbert perhaps they would have been on to it who knows.
Point is that developing teams and developing players struggle with consistency, playing injured , experience etc. Just have to be a little patient and have some faith in YOUR team.
With a bit more composure in front of goal, Saints could have been top 4 and everyone happy. So we arent far way. Look out in 2018!
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5878
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
If Longer can be traded, we should consider it.
He has a big heart and what he is offering is physicality - which (the odds are) will logically wane over time, as he gets older and more battered. So he may not follow the developmental path you'd expect with young ruckmen, who do possess football ability.
He has a big heart and what he is offering is physicality - which (the odds are) will logically wane over time, as he gets older and more battered. So he may not follow the developmental path you'd expect with young ruckmen, who do possess football ability.
Last edited by samoht on Wed 02 Aug 2017 10:57am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1096
- Joined: Fri 28 Nov 2014 5:33pm
- Has thanked: 331 times
- Been thanked: 268 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
who rucks?samoht wrote:If Longer can be traded, we should consider it.
He has a big heart and what he is offering is physicality - which (the odds are) will logically wane over time, as he gets older and more battered.
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5878
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
Marshall and a pinch hitter, crossy66?
We need quality midfielders - if we get a second round pick for Billy, I'd take it (which we could then combine with other picks to get a quality midfielder across).
We need quality midfielders - if we get a second round pick for Billy, I'd take it (which we could then combine with other picks to get a quality midfielder across).
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1096
- Joined: Fri 28 Nov 2014 5:33pm
- Has thanked: 331 times
- Been thanked: 268 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
Marshall looks a great prospect Sam, particularly around the ground. atm though he is more a KP player and hasnt shown much in the ruck at VFL level this year though.samoht wrote:Marshall and a pinch hitter, crossy66?
We need quality midfielders - if we get a second round pick for Billy, I'd take it (which we could then combine with other picks to get a quality midfielder across).
But on the other point you are spot on .More elite mids, a goal kicking coach and away we go!
- samuraisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5939
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
- Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 801 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
As I have said before, I am probably more in the Hickey camp than the Longer camp at present, but kicking 2.12 plus who knows how many out of bounds on the full, and other bombs to no-one in particular inside-50 up until a second before 3/4 time did us absolutely no favours whatsoever, and meant that it was our conversion that ultimately cost us. I think the competition between Billy and Tom is ultimately a good thing.
Having said that Longer probably could have made way for Marshall, Holmes or even trying Pierce again this week based on form - I think it is universally acknowledged that Ryder had a day out last week - and the week before against Sydney where young Naismith dominated.
Bad timing that McEvoy picked last weekend to play a blinder too, although it is pertinent to acknowledge that he is 28 and playing in a very good team. We need to back Hickey and Longer in long term and develop both of them. I don't want them to go elsewhere and start dominating in season or two.
Having said that Longer probably could have made way for Marshall, Holmes or even trying Pierce again this week based on form - I think it is universally acknowledged that Ryder had a day out last week - and the week before against Sydney where young Naismith dominated.
Bad timing that McEvoy picked last weekend to play a blinder too, although it is pertinent to acknowledge that he is 28 and playing in a very good team. We need to back Hickey and Longer in long term and develop both of them. I don't want them to go elsewhere and start dominating in season or two.
Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2010 11:35am
- Been thanked: 1215 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
Billy got a knock in the first half and although he didn't have concussion he wasn't taking in instructions. Bit concerning really given his earlier run of concussions previously. Coaches and runners were passing on tactics and he was basically forgetting them immediately. Doesn't mean an excuse but perhaps a reason. Cleared fully for this week.
- samuraisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5939
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
- Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
- Has thanked: 862 times
- Been thanked: 801 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
Thanks Tony! I noticed Bruce spent an extended period in the ruck last week. Is this why #1 was named as an emergency this week?tony74 wrote:Billy got a knock in the first half and although he didn't have concussion he wasn't taking in instructions. Bit concerning really given his earlier run of concussions previously. Coaches and runners were passing on tactics and he was basically forgetting them immediately. Doesn't mean an excuse but perhaps a reason. Cleared fully for this week.
Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2002
- Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2010 11:35am
- Been thanked: 1215 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 857
- Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 117 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
.[/quote]
Your claim that longer makes the opposition ruxkmen the best player on the ground is interesting, seeing as hickey without fail has lost to every ruxkmen he faced (bar a nicnat-less west coast) without fail, where as longer has completely lost by my count 4 matches (Ryder, Darcy, Witts, Goldstein).[/quote]
Shall we add;
Adelaide: Sam Jacobs huge 25 disposal, 37 hit out game for Adelaide, (although Billy was able to gather 16 possessions, albeit just the one actual kick)
Carlton: Matthew Kreuzer's 19 possession game that helped keep the blues in the game against Longer's 6 disposal 32 hit out game........
If we compare players, Witts and Longer have nearly identical profiles and averages for the season however, Witts averages 5 more disposals.
I'm not sure how people rate Witts now but the stats are there..
Your claim that longer makes the opposition ruxkmen the best player on the ground is interesting, seeing as hickey without fail has lost to every ruxkmen he faced (bar a nicnat-less west coast) without fail, where as longer has completely lost by my count 4 matches (Ryder, Darcy, Witts, Goldstein).[/quote]
Shall we add;
Adelaide: Sam Jacobs huge 25 disposal, 37 hit out game for Adelaide, (although Billy was able to gather 16 possessions, albeit just the one actual kick)
Carlton: Matthew Kreuzer's 19 possession game that helped keep the blues in the game against Longer's 6 disposal 32 hit out game........
If we compare players, Witts and Longer have nearly identical profiles and averages for the season however, Witts averages 5 more disposals.
I'm not sure how people rate Witts now but the stats are there..
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 518 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
I noticed a couple of matches ago, Although I can't recall now which match it was, Longer got an accidental hit to the head in a contest, nothing hard or severe. It didn't get umps attention at the time, nor did any teammates seem concerned. Billy was shaking his head, as if trying to clear himself of blurred vision, for quite a few seconds and didn't follow the play, just stood around for a short time.Trainers didn't come out to him.samuraisaint wrote:Thanks Tony! I noticed Bruce spent an extended period in the ruck last week. Is this why #1 was named as an emergency this week?tony74 wrote:Billy got a knock in the first half and although he didn't have concussion he wasn't taking in instructions. Bit concerning really given his earlier run of concussions previously. Coaches and runners were passing on tactics and he was basically forgetting them immediately. Doesn't mean an excuse but perhaps a reason. Cleared fully for this week.
At the next few, boundary throw-ins you courld see Billy furiously blinking. as if trying to focus. It was obvious that he had become inconvenienced by the previous innocuous hit to the head. I thought at the time, due to his continual absences with effects of concussions last season, why doesn't he get checked by trainers when he gets a bump to the head, no matter how inconsequential it seems? If I could see it on TV, surely trainers could pick it up.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
I find it disturbing that we left him out there if that's the case.tony74 wrote:Billy got a knock in the first half and although he didn't have concussion he wasn't taking in instructions. Bit concerning really given his earlier run of concussions previously. Coaches and runners were passing on tactics and he was basically forgetting them immediately. Doesn't mean an excuse but perhaps a reason. Cleared fully for this week.
Although most weeks I give Billy instructions that he totally ignores.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1340 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
So one rule for the number one pick but another for a ruckman just because they don't want to play Tommy or, heaven forbid, Holmes?kosifantutti wrote:I find it disturbing that we left him out there if that's the case.tony74 wrote:Billy got a knock in the first half and although he didn't have concussion he wasn't taking in instructions. Bit concerning really given his earlier run of concussions previously. Coaches and runners were passing on tactics and he was basically forgetting them immediately. Doesn't mean an excuse but perhaps a reason. Cleared fully for this week.
Although most weeks I give Billy instructions that he totally ignores.
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Fri 18 May 2007 11:13am
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: Billy Cost Us The Game
Well that's what's likley to happen when you only have 1 ruck in the side compared to three big forwards, Billy passed the test to Be fit for this week... what's so hard to understandJacks Back wrote:So one rule for the number one pick but another for a ruckman just because they don't want to play Tommy or, heaven forbid, Holmes?kosifantutti wrote:I find it disturbing that we left him out there if that's the case.tony74 wrote:Billy got a knock in the first half and although he didn't have concussion he wasn't taking in instructions. Bit concerning really given his earlier run of concussions previously. Coaches and runners were passing on tactics and he was basically forgetting them immediately. Doesn't mean an excuse but perhaps a reason. Cleared fully for this week.
Although most weeks I give Billy instructions that he totally ignores.
And the president said " I did not have sex with that woman"
And our former president said " Football is like golf"
Go Sainters !!!!!
And our former president said " Football is like golf"
Go Sainters !!!!!