Nathan Brown- opinions please

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1654896Post BigMart »

Disagree


SemperFidelis
SS Life Member
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
Has thanked: 419 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1654897Post SemperFidelis »

SaintPav wrote:All I know is that he was scum of the earth 6 months ago and now he's a great bloke.
No visible tatts. Appears to have all of his teeth. Not ditched under Bucks' scorched earth d/head obliteration policy.

And TALL.

I can grow to love him, Pav.


Always loyal
User avatar
shrodes
SS Life Member
Posts: 3102
Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 793 times
Been thanked: 438 times

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1654899Post shrodes »

SemperFidelis wrote:
SaintPav wrote:All I know is that he was scum of the earth 6 months ago and now he's a great bloke.
No visible tatts. Appears to have all of his teeth. Not ditched under Bucks' scorched earth d/head obliteration policy.

And TALL.

I can grow to love him, Pav.
And his interviews have been nothing but humble and demonstrating good attitude. Can't ask for much more in a recruit.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1654917Post saintspremiers »

BigMart wrote:Disagree
Just an FYI.

If you press the "Quote" button it helps for us to understand what post you are referencing to


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1654924Post BigMart »

I reckon you're smart enough to work it out... not cryptic or difficult?! ....I'm giving you some credit, perhaps I shouldn't?...

Maybe if people are that simple that they can't follow a conversation, I'll have to?..

Question
If you're in a group, when you make comment or retort, do you have to preface that by repeating the comment you're referencing?


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1654948Post dragit »

BigMart wrote:Question
If you're in a group, when you make comment or retort, do you have to preface that by repeating the comment you're referencing?
The difference is… in a normal conversion in a room people can look at each other when they are talking, you don't have that option when chatting in a forum so you quote a person you are talking to.

It's just a basic, minimum level of courtesy and that is why it is part of the rules of this place… the fact that you refuse just confirms a lack of respect for others in this community.

Imagine if everyone else refused to quote too, the place wouldn't function.

Pure arrogance.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17048
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3663 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1654961Post skeptic »

The measure of Nathan Brown will be how he does in close games.

It's easy to look good with a dominant midfield or a well functioning defence

Equally, key defenders get a really bad wrap for being beaten when the team is smashed. A Jack Riewoldt gets pristine delivery and hence gets off the lead...
It's very easy in that scenario for a defender to look rubbish and they get judged harshly.

How Brown does in an even contest will be his measure


6621104
Club Player
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 8:33pm
Location: not victoria
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 79 times

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1655202Post 6621104 »

BigMart wrote:Disagree
I disagree with your disagrrement


the invisible and the non existent look very much alike
maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5026
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1655214Post maverick »

6621104 wrote:
BigMart wrote:Disagree
I disagree with your disagrrement
I disagree with the disagreement if the disagreement


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23157
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9106 times
Been thanked: 3948 times

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1655220Post saynta »

Collingwood were right.
He's cooked.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1655232Post Con Gorozidis »

Ordinary player.
His brother also wasn't very good either.


User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1655240Post Enrico_Misso »

Showed nothing tonight.
Dempster will be back in next week.


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
SemperFidelis
SS Life Member
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
Has thanked: 419 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1655247Post SemperFidelis »

I am surprised the comments on him are so harsh; he was far from our worst and definitely prevented a bigger blowout.

And given it was like a Bangkok sauna in there I reckon he covered a fair bit of ground for a big bloke.

Happy to reserve judgment for a few more weeks.


Always loyal
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1655258Post BigMart »

Stephen Silvagni wouldn't have defended well in that game

The midfield was badly beaten, turnovers were horrendous and

But agree he was outpointed a bit

Carlisle was worse imo

He didn't even go near his opponent, the kid beat him, Watts and Hogan

Jake was crap, Nath was not good either

It is one game though


The OtherThommo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5062
Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2005 2:30am
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1655266Post The OtherThommo »

SemperFidelis wrote:I am surprised the comments on him are so harsh; he was far from our worst and definitely prevented a bigger blowout.

And given it was like a Bangkok sauna in there I reckon he covered a fair bit of ground for a big bloke.

Happy to reserve judgment for a few more weeks.
With ya, Semp. Neither Carlisle not Brown were the problem. People need to look at the 4 around them (whomever the 4 may have been at different times), and the complete lack of midfield contribution after 1/4 time.

Standing in the Victory Room at 3/4 time, an associate looked at his device and said the possession count for the 3rd 1/4 was 140+ to 70 odd.

Nathan Brown could have been Superman, but he couldn't resist that sort of imbalance.

We whipped through the performances of the Leadership Group post game - oh dear!

Just watched Richo's post game summary - 2nd 1/4 1.6 to 7 straight.

I'd prefer Mav to ditch 'Mav's World', and spend more time on set shot practice. Blokes with years (min 5) of consistent performances might just be able to cope with distractions like PR efforts, but our performance today suggests some aren't coping as we would hope.

Very dangerous, getting ahead of yourself.


'I have no new illusions, and I have no old illusions' - Vladimir Putin, Geneva, June 2021
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1655300Post Wayne42 »

Buckley didn't seem to care that Brown left the Pies, even if it meant he had no Key Defenders.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3637
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 492 times
Been thanked: 316 times

Re: Nathan Brown- opinions please

Post: # 1655356Post saintbob »

Pulled out twice in the 2nd quarter, when he just had to go and his one on one work was absolutely appalling.


Post Reply