saintkid wrote:I understand guys about the risk and possible heavy involvement of Watters but when it comes to a 23 year old as opposed to a raw talented 17 or 18 year old, the risk of getting a player not good enough should have been less through better evaluation processes. He needed to show more from day 1 at his age particularly for a pick 12. I find it hard to believe the correct level of due diligence was done on Lee at his stage of development and age.
You could well be right… for our sanity, it's probably worth looking at those picks a little more broadly…
Without starting another stoush with stinger…
For picks
12, 13, 37, 57 and cripps
We ended up with Lee, Hickey, Wright, White, Murdoch, Saunders
Still early days, but at the very least I think Hickey, Wright & Saunders are looking solid from that drafting period…
White, Lee & Murdoch aren't done yet either IMO.