Me too…bigred wrote:Agree pretty much.saint75 wrote:Seriously, for a team that made the GF, you seriously have to ask some questions about the comments on our players in the media and by people on this board. You all need to wake up a bit. We were carrying quite a few injuries but unlike the Bulldogs and other teams, we don't use it as excuses.saintly wrote:well according to SEN to night. The saints will not be trading anyone. or maybe noone is interested in our players?
a sad and sorry state, if noone wants to even ask about players.
The reason no one is enquiring about our players is because all bar a few are signed up. Really, some on here need to get some serious perspective. A GF loss DOES NOT mean that all our players are shot and not fit to play footy at the highest level!
I'm not surprised that we are not trading this year. We have a bunch of delistings anyway. We have rookie list room and will use all draft pick bar maybe the last one.
We still have positives on our list. f*** sake, you don't make two GF's in a row without a decent list. Delistings will be interesting, as will next years game plan.
A couple of our rooks will be better after another preseason.
Although I don't think we should delist McQualter and Peake, I would prefer to see Geary/Miles/Steven/Armitage replace them in the side next year, for decent patches… for 6-7 games in a row. It must be deflating to be dropped quicker than others consistently.