Archie didn't have books, they were comics.ausfatcat wrote:BTW didn't someone on this forum have a look at Archies books a while ago in relation to this??
Don't you remember Jughead and Veronica?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
an absolute disgrace of a comment....Bernard Shakey wrote:Archie didn't have books, they were comics.ausfatcat wrote:BTW didn't someone on this forum have a look at Archies books a while ago in relation to this??
Don't you remember Jughead and Veronica?
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
So Archie is at fault with the Linton Street development and he is the sole reason it didn't go ahead??Bernard Shakey wrote:So, St Fid is Archie's love child.
If you believe all Archie did was to the benefit of St Kilda Football Club I feel sorry for you .
I have no doubt the reason the Linton Street development didn't go ahead is because of Archie's inability to deal with women.
He may be an astute businessman, but when women are involved his record is abysmal.
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
Why would anyone rate a fan forum..it is what it is.....insignificant...St Fidelius wrote:So Archie is at fault with the Linton Street development and he is the sole reason it didn't go ahead??Bernard Shakey wrote:So, St Fid is Archie's love child.
If you believe all Archie did was to the benefit of St Kilda Football Club I feel sorry for you .
I have no doubt the reason the Linton Street development didn't go ahead is because of Archie's inability to deal with women.
He may be an astute businessman, but when women are involved his record is abysmal.
I am not Archie's "love child" but I believe he has done well with where we are at the moment and if it was not for him, maybe we would not be in this position.
Any wonder the couple of mangers I have spoken to at the Club recently say that they don't rate this site anymore and most now don't even bother to come on here....
Again, comments like yours are a disgrace
Damien (saintsational) started this forum with all good intentions, I believe he has now moved on because this site is not want he wanted and he could see that two years ago...bobmurray wrote:Why would anyone rate a fan forum..it is what it is.....insignificant...St Fidelius wrote:So Archie is at fault with the Linton Street development and he is the sole reason it didn't go ahead??Bernard Shakey wrote:So, St Fid is Archie's love child.
If you believe all Archie did was to the benefit of St Kilda Football Club I feel sorry for you .
I have no doubt the reason the Linton Street development didn't go ahead is because of Archie's inability to deal with women.
He may be an astute businessman, but when women are involved his record is abysmal.
I am not Archie's "love child" but I believe he has done well with where we are at the moment and if it was not for him, maybe we would not be in this position.
Any wonder the couple of mangers I have spoken to at the Club recently say that they don't rate this site anymore and most now don't even bother to come on here....
Again, comments like yours are a disgrace
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
Its a pity that some of the other malcontents on this forum don't follow Damian's lead and exit with grace, rather than hang around with their "Holier Than Thou"attitude.St Fidelius wrote:Damien (saintsational) started this forum with all good intentions, I believe he has now moved on because this site is not want he wanted and he could see that two years ago...bobmurray wrote:Why would anyone rate a fan forum..it is what it is.....insignificant...St Fidelius wrote:So Archie is at fault with the Linton Street development and he is the sole reason it didn't go ahead??Bernard Shakey wrote:So, St Fid is Archie's love child.
If you believe all Archie did was to the benefit of St Kilda Football Club I feel sorry for you .
I have no doubt the reason the Linton Street development didn't go ahead is because of Archie's inability to deal with women.
He may be an astute businessman, but when women are involved his record is abysmal.
I am not Archie's "love child" but I believe he has done well with where we are at the moment and if it was not for him, maybe we would not be in this position.
Any wonder the couple of mangers I have spoken to at the Club recently say that they don't rate this site anymore and most now don't even bother to come on here....
Again, comments like yours are a disgrace
A few years ago we had our coach reporting on this site from overseas with an update on the pre season camp...
This site has gone down hill and comments like Bernard Shakey does not help IMO
This site is turning to crap every week and is getting less popular by the day
Just my opinion
plugger has been here about 2 years....i see what you mean...St Fidelius wrote:Another example is when I mentioned to an Executive and a Manager of the Saints that I posted on Saintsatiional they just cringed....
THAT'S NOT A GOOD LOOK!
I now feel somewhat embarrassed to say to these Officials that I am a member of Saintsational and this should not be the case....
Yes, we have the right as supporters to voice our opinion..
but it has turned into a sh1tfight and most threads going over 2 pages can be ignored IMO
This site was a good one, but now it's just a shadow of what it was
Any wonder Saintsational (Damien) does not post anymore...
well then are you leaving this site?GrumpyOne wrote:[
Its a pity that some of the other malcontents on this forum don't follow Damian's lead and exit with grace, rather than hang around with their "Holier Than Thou"attitude.
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
I had a meeting with Archie and the head of Stratcorp just prior to Archie's departure in Stratcorps boardroom where they politely and rightfully sat me at the head of the table.ausfatcat wrote:BTW didn't someone on this forum have a look at Archies books a while ago in relation to this??
But B4e, did your meeting allay some/all of the fears you had with teh decisions and/or the decision making process?barks4eva wrote:I had a meeting with Archie and the head of Stratcorp just prior to Archie's departure in Stratcorps boardroom where they politely and rightfully sat me at the head of the table.ausfatcat wrote:BTW didn't someone on this forum have a look at Archies books a while ago in relation to this??
I secretly taped this meeting, so if anyone is interested in the very private and confidential information that was revealed to me in good faith, I will be making copies available to anyone interested for the bargain price of $19.95 including steak knives and wait, there's more, I will even throw in a personally signed private message from Michael Rix.
Seriously,
1. Yes, I did secretly tape this meeting
2. Yes, there was some interesting info revealed
3. No, the $19.95 offer is not for real
4. Please NO PM's from anyone wanting to know anything about this, I will not reply
Was the meeting a desperate attempt by you to get Michael Rix back?barks4eva wrote:I had a meeting with Archie and the head of Stratcorp just prior to Archie's departure in Stratcorps boardroom where they politely and rightfully sat me at the head of the table.ausfatcat wrote:BTW didn't someone on this forum have a look at Archies books a while ago in relation to this??
I secretly taped this meeting, so if anyone is interested in the very private and confidential information that was revealed to me in good faith, I will be making copies available to anyone interested for the bargain price of $19.95 including steak knives and wait, there's more, I will even throw in a personally signed private message from Michael Rix.
Seriously,
1. Yes, I did secretly tape this meeting
2. Yes, there was some interesting info revealed
3. No, the $19.95 offer is not for real
4. Please NO PM's from anyone wanting to know anything about this, I will not reply
Apparently started going downhill 4 years ago. Have no idea what coincided with though.bobmurray wrote:plugger has been here about 2 years....i see what you mean...St Fidelius wrote:Another example is when I mentioned to an Executive and a Manager of the Saints that I posted on Saintsatiional they just cringed....
THAT'S NOT A GOOD LOOK!
I now feel somewhat embarrassed to say to these Officials that I am a member of Saintsational and this should not be the case....
Yes, we have the right as supporters to voice our opinion..
but it has turned into a sh1tfight and most threads going over 2 pages can be ignored IMO
This site was a good one, but now it's just a shadow of what it was
Any wonder Saintsational (Damien) does not post anymore...
It may have been unintentional, but the wording of the post above begs other questions.Legendary wrote:Members of the St Kilda football club made representations to the new Kingston Council after they were elected earleir this year, but these talks left them feeling that the position was unchanged ... and that it made far better sense to proceed with Seaford.
This is fact.
The club did re-explore the option of Moorabbin, but we have a far better deal at Seaford and that's where we are going.
Members of the club = those appointed in positions to make these decisions and represent the club - i.e. the club's board and administration staff.casey scorp wrote:
It may have been unintentional, but the wording of the post above begs other questions.
"Members ...made representations to the new Kingston Council"
Was that an unofficial approach by a group of "members" as distinct from the club itself?
"The club did re-explore the option of Moorabbin..."
Did the club re-explore the option of Moorabbin with the Council itself?
What else to do with a weekend when there's no AFL matches in town!Seaford_Saint wrote:Ahh Casey Scorp...... from reading the thread, it's good to see you invested another full weekend in trying to hold back the tide of inevitablity.... I hope it was a fruitful and rewarding experience.
Yes, I think they made the right decision for two reasons - one a strategic football reason, and the other a strategic non-football reason:plugger66 wrote:There is no debate about where will be training in the future. Its Seaford as the club has stated. You are the only one debating it. Just one question. Do you think it was a good move for Melbourne to move to Casy to train there on some occasions?
Why would anyone support a club because they train in the area? No one watches training for a start.casey scorp wrote:Yes, I think they made the right decision for two reasons - one a strategic football reason, and the other a strategic non-football reason:plugger66 wrote:There is no debate about where will be training in the future. Its Seaford as the club has stated. You are the only one debating it. Just one question. Do you think it was a good move for Melbourne to move to Casy to train there on some occasions?
* they have been nomadic for the last 25 years with no summer training base and a crap winter base at Junction Oval, so Casey Fields provides stability and facilities for MFC over summer and on occasions through the season
* they have not had a defined geographic support base for decades, and the particular characteristics of their demographic support base meant that the clubs supporters would eventually die out, or at least go into severe decline. The establishment of a base, and a strong community program in Casey, means that the club will get the opportunity to develop a whole new support base from the kids who grow up in Casey - the most populous Council in Victoria with rampant growth for another 30 years. It will take a generation, but with the population of Casey growing from today's 240,000 to an ultimate population of 450,000 to 500,000, together with additional growth in Cardinia, and with an obviously very co-operative working relationship with the Council in delivering the community program, MFC looks likely to reap substantial benefits (particularly as MFC's on-field performance is likely to improve dramatically over the next 5-10 years as the early draft picks mature, and this will increase the appeal to young impressionable kids).
It's not the training that draws people in - it's the community program.plugger66 wrote:Why would anyone support a club because they train in the area? No one watches training for a start.