Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
Too suggest that Joey is not a tagger and yet has done a descent job in the last two weeks reeks of ignorance IMO...
Yes grant it he was not a tagger before this but he has done a reasonable job to date...
To merely make a comment that "he is not a tagger" is a stupid remark when you consider his last couple of games....
I suggest that some posters look at games and player roles in the future
Again, you can only notice this when at the game and from reports Joey was tagging Harvey last week.
and the game prior he smashed Bell
enough said IMO
You're not making much sense to me, but I will try and explain why.
Joey tagged Bell well yes, but he did retire one week later, so was hardly in top form.
Joey did tag B Harvey for about a quarter and a half and got smashed, Harvey was BOG by a fair way. Mini then went on to him and slowed him somewhat, he was still probably their only winner on the night.
IMO this does not make him a tagger.
His second half free wheeling was much better, which is his natural role.
And I watch the game and the players roles within it quite closely......
Your suggestion that Bell retired because "he was hardly in top form" is pathetic IMO...
an average of about 22 possessions and over 3 tackles a match for the season, and for you to say he was "hardly in top form"...
Yeah of course not and I guess that's why RL placed Joey on him after the first quarter...
Gee, you are a flowering bullshyting nightmare!!!
I do gather you are kidding???
Ball is rated #4 in stats for Fremantle this year.....
Yep Ball was hardly in top form
Yep RL must be a moron for even suggesting that he should be tagged....
Yep clueless
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
Too suggest that Joey is not a tagger and yet has done a descent job in the last two weeks reeks of ignorance IMO...
Yes grant it he was not a tagger before this but he has done a reasonable job to date...
To merely make a comment that "he is not a tagger" is a stupid remark when you consider his last couple of games....
I suggest that some posters look at games and player roles in the future
Again, you can only notice this when at the game and from reports Joey was tagging Harvey last week.
and the game prior he smashed Bell
enough said IMO
You're not making much sense to me, but I will try and explain why.
Joey tagged Bell well yes, but he did retire one week later, so was hardly in top form.
Joey did tag B Harvey for about a quarter and a half and got smashed, Harvey was BOG by a fair way. Mini then went on to him and slowed him somewhat, he was still probably their only winner on the night.
IMO this does not make him a tagger.
His second half free wheeling was much better, which is his natural role.
And I watch the game and the players roles within it quite closely......
Your suggestion that Bell retired because "he was hardly in top form" is pathetic IMO...
an average of about 22 possessions and over 3 tackles a match for the season, and for you to say he was "hardly in top form"...
Yeah of course not and I guess that's why RL placed Joey on him after the first quarter...
Gee, you are a flowering bullshyting nightmare!!!
I do gather you are kidding???
Ball is rated #4 in stats for Fremantle this year.....
Yep Ball was hardly in top form
Yep RL must be a moron for even suggesting that he should be tagged....
Yep clueless
I have no problem in you arguing your case, but if you keep spamming insults I will forward it to the mods.
As for your argument are you talking Ball or Bell I am confused.
All i said was tagging Bell at this stage of his career is not something of note. Also the stats you quote for Bell are in a team that is third bottom having won two games
He had a shocker tagging Harvey which you still haven't acknowledged.
I don't think he is a tagger, and this OPINION does not make me clueless.
