The non holding the ball free
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8584
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1534 times
Re: The non holding the ball free
There was a similar incident in the same quarter with the same two players which also wasn't paid. Butler gave him a serve that time as well. I think it was a different umpire.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
SaintDippa
- Club Player
- Posts: 875
- Joined: Sun 20 Aug 2006 10:28pm
- Location: Mean Streets of Ringwood North
- Has thanked: 187 times
- Been thanked: 116 times
Re: The non holding the ball free
Interesting discussion on HTB.
What do peoples think about this one?
If we have it deep in our F50 why tackle, hold on then create a stoppage? Why not tackle to ground, release the tackle and force the defender to make a play. If the defender doesn't get rid of the footy in a second then tackle again and get the HTB.
I'd argue the percentages of a turnover is in the catch then release rather than a stoppage that is a defence outnumber and clearance to 60m out.
What do peoples think about this one?
If we have it deep in our F50 why tackle, hold on then create a stoppage? Why not tackle to ground, release the tackle and force the defender to make a play. If the defender doesn't get rid of the footy in a second then tackle again and get the HTB.
I'd argue the percentages of a turnover is in the catch then release rather than a stoppage that is a defence outnumber and clearance to 60m out.