Saints vs Port. Game thread

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19160
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951716Post SaintPav »

What was the 50 for?

Huge penalty in context of the result.

The AFL need to get rid of these types of penalties.

The time does not fit the crime!


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13329
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 680 times
Been thanked: 1966 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951718Post The Fireman »

Long is improving every game as I predicted


User avatar
Sainter_Dad
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6347
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
Has thanked: 263 times
Been thanked: 1128 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951719Post Sainter_Dad »

SaintPav wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:20pm What was the 50 for?
And yet there is no forum that we can get a legitimate answer to this question.


“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”

― Aristophanes

If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951720Post Wayne42 »

devil saint wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:16pm Really hoping for a dry MCG next week. Tonight hasn’t inspired any confidence in our ability to handle wet conditions.
We might get belted by Melbourne next week, whatever the conditions, that's my concern.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13329
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 680 times
Been thanked: 1966 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951721Post The Fireman »

Teflon wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:20pm
The Fireman wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:19pm
Teflon wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:15pm
The_Dud wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:08pm
spert wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:07pm
Jacks Back wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:06pm Gresham 0.3
Higgins 1.3
King 2.2
Butler Unsighted
Membrey useless- let Allir dominate
100%
Membrey just doesn’t trouble scoreboard
Butler doesnt trouble scoreboard
No wonder we look 1 dimensional so often
If King or Higgins don’t kick a bag or straight
We gone
Funny about that
One bad game and those blokes appear ordinary…lol.
Yet next week they can set the world on fire

Fickle ?
Or factual?
I prefer the latter
Your preferences still appear fickle
In other words when these blokes cut loose next week don’t go jumping on the bandwagon
Last edited by The Fireman on Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:23pm, edited 1 time in total.


Bruce G McAbee
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2192
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2015 7:09pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 201 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951722Post Bruce G McAbee »

Banger9798 wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:12pm Any one of those points go through as a goal and we win, harsh to criticise Ratten , he can't kick it for them.
4 shots in last 5mins all of which gettable and Higgins poster....on a dry track we would have thrashed them.
Huge game next week.
Any injuries?
Injuries won't matter,Melbourne will kill us next week because we played in 88% humidity.
Port will lose Friday night to the Bulldogs for the same reason.
Game should have been played in late June or early July with both teams having a bye the following week.


Think of me long enough to make a memory.
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19160
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951723Post SaintPav »

Our backline held up considering.

Our forwards let us down and the on ballers had a bad night. Port looks much more desperate and they left it too late in the game.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5939
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951728Post samuraisaint »

Banger9798 wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:12pm Any one of those points go through as a goal and we win, harsh to criticise Ratten , he can't kick it for them.
4 shots in last 5mins all of which gettable and Higgins poster....on a dry track we would have thrashed them.
Huge game next week.
Any injuries?
We have only beaten them once in 10 years.
Tonight we wouldn't have beaten them anywhere. They were better than us.
I'm not making excuses for tonight. The one goal loss to Adelaide in Cairns last season was the difference between us playing finals and missing.
4.18 is terrible. If we miss finals marginally, this game will be the one.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19160
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951730Post SaintPav »

Port our our bogey team or what.

It’s a pathetic record.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13329
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 680 times
Been thanked: 1966 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951731Post The Fireman »

SaintPav wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:25pm Our backline held up considering.

Our forwards let us down and the on ballers had a bad night. Port looks much more desperate and they left it too late in the game.
There ya go
Spot on


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6611
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1340 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951734Post Jacks Back »

SaintPav wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:20pm What was the 50 for?

Huge penalty in context of the result.

The AFL need to get rid of these types of penalties.

The time does not fit the crime!
Steele ran past too close in the protected area.


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
terry smith rules
SS Life Member
Posts: 2540
Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
Location: Abiding
Has thanked: 173 times
Been thanked: 385 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951745Post terry smith rules »

Jacks Back wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:30pm
SaintPav wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:20pm What was the 50 for?

Huge penalty in context of the result.

The AFL need to get rid of these types of penalties.

The time does not fit the crime!
Steele ran past too close in the protected area.
Correct, but shortly after a port player jogged past a saint in the middle of the ground and no 50. Consistency none


" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."

— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
BadRossco
Club Player
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:14pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 81 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951746Post BadRossco »

Some umpiring decisions didn’t help but that does not explain our poor kicking for goal and a number of dumb decisions by our players. Howard being the worst culprit but Webster and Long can be guilty of the same thing


seano1
Club Player
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon 22 Sep 2008 7:10pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 64 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951749Post seano1 »

King is looking totally over rated …..fitness levels still a concern even plugger would pretend to chase backmen when they were running off with the pill …. King just shrugs his shoulders and walks . If hes not seeing an analyst he should


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951752Post Teflon »

The Fireman wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:22pm
Teflon wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:20pm
The Fireman wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:19pm
Teflon wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:15pm
The_Dud wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:08pm
spert wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:07pm
Jacks Back wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:06pm Gresham 0.3
Higgins 1.3
King 2.2
Butler Unsighted
Membrey useless- let Allir dominate
100%
Membrey just doesn’t trouble scoreboard
Butler doesnt trouble scoreboard
No wonder we look 1 dimensional so often
If King or Higgins don’t kick a bag or straight
We gone
Funny about that
One bad game and those blokes appear ordinary…lol.
Yet next week they can set the world on fire

Fickle ?
Or factual?
I prefer the latter
Your preferences still appear fickle
In other words when these blokes cut loose next week don’t go jumping on the bandwagon
If these blokes cut loose next week and we still miss finals by a game cause they cost us THiS game I’ll still call it while you downhill skii ….
Again 1:15 after quarter time and you’re trying to defend that s***????
If thats the standard I know why we have 1 flag..


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Sainter_Dad
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6347
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
Has thanked: 263 times
Been thanked: 1128 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951756Post Sainter_Dad »

Jacks Back wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:30pm
SaintPav wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:20pm What was the 50 for?

Huge penalty in context of the result.

The AFL need to get rid of these types of penalties.

The time does not fit the crime!
Steele ran past too close in the protected area.
Technically - maybe - but Steele was already in the protected zone and continued running forward to exit - he did not turn to interrupt the play - and was 'with' a Port player.
As I say - technically - but as previously stated - happens all the time and is not called - and then for it to 'gift' them a goal in the conditions WAS a bit rough.
Last edited by Sainter_Dad on Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:38pm, edited 1 time in total.


“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”

― Aristophanes

If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
User avatar
SaintDippa
Club Player
Posts: 875
Joined: Sun 20 Aug 2006 10:28pm
Location: Mean Streets of Ringwood North
Has thanked: 187 times
Been thanked: 116 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951757Post SaintDippa »

Ratts needs to get serious and demand changes to Max and Higgins kicking technique. The flaws needs correcting now.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951758Post Teflon »

samuraisaint wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:28pm
Banger9798 wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:12pm Any one of those points go through as a goal and we win, harsh to criticise Ratten , he can't kick it for them.
4 shots in last 5mins all of which gettable and Higgins poster....on a dry track we would have thrashed them.
Huge game next week.
Any injuries?
We have only beaten them once in 10 years.
Tonight we wouldn't have beaten them anywhere. They were better than us.
I'm not making excuses for tonight. The one goal loss to Adelaide in Cairns last season was the difference between us playing finals and missing.
4.18 is terrible. If we miss finals marginally, this game will be the one.
Nail. Head.


“Yeah….nah””
Bruce G McAbee
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2192
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2015 7:09pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 201 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951762Post Bruce G McAbee »

By the way, the last 2 games we have kicked 14.35.


Think of me long enough to make a memory.
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951764Post Teflon »

Bruce G McAbee wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:41pm By the way, the last 2 games we have kicked 14.35.
Geezus


“Yeah….nah””
Killa
Club Player
Posts: 1039
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2021 10:27am
Been thanked: 381 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951765Post Killa »

Not only kicking for goal.

The number of hack kicks - which all fell to the advantage of Port Adelaide including gifting them possessions in space in conditions where space was gold and which eventually won them the game.

There will be plenty of work to be done off watching the replays of this game.

Particularly the scoreboard outcome from the first quarter dominance (when we really should have iced the game)

And some players will be nervous.

We will see what Billings and Jones bring tomorrow - and Clark the week after.

Plus Marshall back

At least Geelong is at Docklands - and really a must win game to restore some reputation in the competition.

As are Adelaide and North Melbourne leading into the bye

From there it is 50/50

We have Brisbane, Geelong and Sydney twice - and getting some wins there is vital to our 2022 prospects.

You play finals to win them - and games such as tonight are instructive in assessing which players are capable of delivering and which players place their teammates under undue pressure.


User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1078 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951768Post Impatient Sainter »

I have to say as an AFL prime free to air TV, that game was a shocking spectacle win or lose. What Muppet in the AFL thought it would be a good idea to schedule a night game in Cains at the end of their wet season.

I'm happy Cairns gets to see some footy, but surely later in the year during the dry season would be a smarter option.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951770Post Teflon »

BadRossco wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:35pm Some umpiring decisions didn’t help but that does not explain our poor kicking for goal and a number of dumb decisions by our players. Howard being the worst culprit but Webster and Long can be guilty of the same thing
Why would you let Howard ever kick out?
I’d have liked to see Ratten try something in that game you could feel the train wreck coming
Throw Sinclair on the ball ????
Long up forward??
**** sub Campbell inject Lienert ….they did it???
No imagination but doesn’t excuse utterly pathetic goal kicking


“Yeah….nah””
Killa
Club Player
Posts: 1039
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2021 10:27am
Been thanked: 381 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951773Post Killa »

And just to add, if anyone wonders why we persevere with Hannebery, tonight was instructive.

We hope and trust they can get Hannebery back onto the park across the second half of the season.


Lennylegs
Club Player
Posts: 228
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2020 8:14pm
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 161 times

Re: Saints vs Port. Game thread

Post: # 1951775Post Lennylegs »

SaintDippa wrote: Sat 30 Apr 2022 11:38pm Ratts needs to get serious and demand changes to Max and Higgins kicking technique. The flaws needs correcting now.
The lack of momentum in both their run ups is so bloody obvious. They never truly get their heads over the ball when they make contact. Lean way too far back.

Easily fixed and should've been rectified by now. Basic s#!t


Post Reply