Dylan Shiel

[Raph Goat Clarke]

Raph 'The greatest of All Time' Clarke is not the whisperer.

Contracts mean stuff all these days.

[Moods]

One big issue is GWS don't have a first round pick (Deledio) and also have draft penalties (Whitfield) so I think there is a genuine possibility they will be open to negotiating.

Ironically their list profile is now at risk of getting old so I would not be surprised to see them trade a decent player out.

At the moment it looks like they should trade out Patton for a first round draft pick and retire Mummy.

Will be interesting to see what they do....

Why would they trade out Patton?

I thought Patton was very poor in the Prelim.

They already have Cameron and that Himmelberg fella looks ok as well.

How many tall fwds do you actually need these days?

When they played 3 tall fwds they were easy to beat and too predictable.

...They also have Zach Sproule - who could be anything.....

http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Rati ... ch-SPROULE

If they trade any of their tall fwds out it should be Cameron. Doesn't stand up in big games. Patton more versatile as can be used as a 2nd ruck. Patton was very good this year. Cameron average...again

[Con Gorozidis]

One big issue is GWS don't have a first round pick (Deledio) and also have draft penalties (Whitfield) so I think there is a genuine possibility they will be open to negotiating.

Ironically their list profile is now at risk of getting old so I would not be surprised to see them trade a decent player out.

At the moment it looks like they should trade out Patton for a first round draft pick and retire Mummy.

Will be interesting to see what they do....

Why would they trade out Patton?

I thought Patton was very poor in the Prelim.

They already have Cameron and that Himmelberg fella looks ok as well.

How many tall fwds do you actually need these days?

When they played 3 tall fwds they were easy to beat and too predictable.

...They also have Zach Sproule - who could be anything.....

http://www.aflplayerratings.com.au/Rati ... ch-SPROULE

If they trade any of their tall fwds out it should be Cameron. Doesn't stand up in big games. Patton more versatile as can be used as a 2nd ruck. Patton was very good this year. Cameron average...again

Yep.
Cameron certainly not the all conquering star he looked like five years ago.

[parkeysainter]

I have scoured the net as best I could and I have read nothing about the Saints chasing Shiel. It seems this trade whisperer fella is the only one that is talking about it.

Oh well, I wish it was still true.

[darylcowie]

If we are going to be talking pie in the sky stuff.

Then how about, Hickey plus 7 & 8 for Shiel?

The Giants score a ruckman they desperately need, we trade our two first rounders and in return we get a gun midfielder.

Probably will never happen in a million years but ......everyone's a winner with that trade I reckon.

Lets throw in Bllings as well.

No offence but your comment is ridiculous and quite frankly mildly insulting.

If we were to make a play for Shiel it would cost us big time.

He is a proven midfield gun and very much a required player for the Giants.

So getting him is almost impossible in my view. But if the impossible were to happen, the Giants would quite rightly want a big ticket.

So at least two first rounders and Hickey.

At the moment Hickey is surplus to our needs and can't get a game. He is hardly the class of Jack Billings and never will be.

So Hickey and two first rounders would get it done in my view. We would be paying overs but we would have no choice if we want quality.

Two first round drafts picks are enough which was my point. I don't think Hickey is surplus to our needs. What if Longer goes down on Holmes?

Interesting that you found that 'mildly' insulting but more interesting that you admitted it.

Hardly insulting compared to what's posted on here.

But I apologise for offending you.

RUOK?

What if Longer goes down on Holmes?

Did you vote no?

[The_President]

I have scoured the net as best I could and I have read nothing about the Saints chasing Shiel. It seems this trade whisperer fella is the only one that is talking about it.

Oh well, I wish it was still true.

I'd love it if it were true. Alas.

Quick, strong, aggressive, clean, skilled. Ticks many boxes.

[SaintPav]

If we are going to be talking pie in the sky stuff.

Then how about, Hickey plus 7 & 8 for Shiel?

The Giants score a ruckman they desperately need, we trade our two first rounders and in return we get a gun midfielder.

Probably will never happen in a million years but ......everyone's a winner with that trade I reckon.

Lets throw in Bllings as well.

No offence but your comment is ridiculous and quite frankly mildly insulting.

If we were to make a play for Shiel it would cost us big time.

He is a proven midfield gun and very much a required player for the Giants.

So getting him is almost impossible in my view. But if the impossible were to happen, the Giants would quite rightly want a big ticket.

So at least two first rounders and Hickey.

At the moment Hickey is surplus to our needs and can't get a game. He is hardly the class of Jack Billings and never will be.

So Hickey and two first rounders would get it done in my view. We would be paying overs but we would have no choice if we want quality.

Two first round drafts picks are enough which was my point. I don't think Hickey is surplus to our needs. What if Longer goes down on Holmes?

Interesting that you found that 'mildly' insulting but more interesting that you admitted it.

Hardly insulting compared to what's posted on here.

But I apologise for offending you.

RUOK?

What if Longer goes down on Holmes?

Did you vote no?

Jaw dislocation means he would miss weeks and we'd be down a ruckman.

[damienc]

If we are going to be talking pie in the sky stuff.

Then how about, Hickey plus 7 & 8 for Shiel?

The Giants score a ruckman they desperately need, we trade our two first rounders and in return we get a gun midfielder.

Probably will never happen in a million years but ......everyone's a winner with that trade I reckon.

Lets throw in Bllings as well.

No offence but your comment is ridiculous and quite frankly mildly insulting.

If we were to make a play for Shiel it would cost us big time.

He is a proven midfield gun and very much a required player for the Giants.

So getting him is almost impossible in my view. But if the impossible were to happen, the Giants would quite rightly want a big ticket.

So at least two first rounders and Hickey.

At the moment Hickey is surplus to our needs and can't get a game. He is hardly the class of Jack Billings and never will be.

So Hickey and two first rounders would get it done in my view. We would be paying overs but we would have no choice if we want quality.

Two first round drafts picks are enough which was my point. I don't think Hickey is surplus to our needs. What if Longer goes down on Holmes?

Interesting that you found that 'mildly' insulting but more interesting that you admitted it.

Hardly insulting compared to what's posted on here.

But I apologise for offending you.

RUOK?

Very funny.

[saintbob]

Pick 7 - Lever

Pick 8 - Shiel

[BadRossco]

Only certainty is that our recruiters will not have the nerve to go to the draft so will trade our picks for anyone that can draw breath

[Con Gorozidis]

If we are going to be talking pie in the sky stuff.

Then how about, Hickey plus 7 & 8 for Shiel?

The Giants score a ruckman they desperately need, we trade our two first rounders and in return we get a gun midfielder.

Probably will never happen in a million years but ......everyone's a winner with that trade I reckon.

Lets throw in Bllings as well.

No offence but your comment is ridiculous and quite frankly mildly insulting.

If we were to make a play for Shiel it would cost us big time.

He is a proven midfield gun and very much a required player for the Giants.

So getting him is almost impossible in my view. But if the impossible were to happen, the Giants would quite rightly want a big ticket.

So at least two first rounders and Hickey.

At the moment Hickey is surplus to our needs and can't get a game. He is hardly the class of Jack Billings and never will be.

So Hickey and two first rounders would get it done in my view. We would be paying overs but we would have no choice if we want quality.

Two first round drafts picks are enough which was my point. I don't think Hickey is surplus to our needs. What if Longer goes down on Holmes?

Interesting that you found that 'mildly' insulting but more interesting that you admitted it.

Hardly insulting compared to what's posted on here.

But I apologise for offending you.

RUOK?

What if Longer goes down on Holmes?

Did you vote no?

Jaw dislocation means he would miss weeks and we'd be down a ruckman.

Made me laugh on the train...

[Francis Urquhart]

What if Longer goes down on Holmes?

You might well think that, Pav. I couldn't possibly comment.

F.U.