Mitch Clark

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479777Post Bunk_Moreland »

stinger wrote:
Eastern wrote:I see him as a 'High Risk-High Reward' type of player. There is no doubting his ability, but as many have pointed out he has had plenty of issues with his body, not to mention his depression. There is also the issue of whether he is motivated, or even wants to resume his career A lot to weigh up for us or anyone looking at him !!
enough is enough...no more drunks, rapists, drug addicts, morons, rejects, retirees or head cases.....recruit kids....and more kids...


you can control depression...you can't cure it.....

I tend to agree, that it is a risk.

The last sentence is iteresting, and very true. But if it can be controlled, would it be any different to say McCartin and his Type A diabetes? That can be controlled but not cured.

Mental illness should not be looked upon any different to other illnesses especially if it can be controlled properly.

In saying that, why would he want to come to St.Kilda? Surely he would get picked up by Melbourne if he wanted to come back. And how playing with the Saints next year help his depression?

They certainly aint helping mine.


You are garbage - Enough said
User avatar
Rosco
Club Player
Posts: 1937
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2011 5:40pm
Location: Hughesdale

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479778Post Rosco »

8856brother wrote:
Moods wrote:Too risky. We've taken that many gambles in the last 6-7 years on players, and as far as I can tell only one has paid off (Gardner) and even he took awhile, and never returned to AA form or close to it.

I wish him all the best in his battle for depression but I'm with Stinger on this one.
If he comes via PSD there is no risk. It's a win win situation. If it doesn't work out well so be it. It's just one spot on the list and a bit of cash we actually need to use somewhere.
A spot on the list is risking something though


User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479780Post Dr Spaceman »

Bunk_Moreland wrote: I tend to agree, that it is a risk.

The last sentence is iteresting, and very true. But if it can be controlled, would it be any different to say McCartin and his Type A diabetes? That can be controlled but not cured.

Mental illness should not be looked upon any different to other illnesses especially if it can be controlled properly.

In saying that, why would he want to come to St.Kilda? Surely he would get picked up by Melbourne if he wanted to come back. And how playing with the Saints next year help his depression?

They certainly aint helping mine.
I suppose where it's different is that we can potentially make Clark's condition worse by our actions.

For example, if we weren't selecting him in the seniors though he thought he deserved it. Or if things weren't working out and we had to delist him. That could lead to his problems once again occuring or spiralling out of control. And if that happened and he had to leave the club we would own some of those problems for the rest of his life. Same as if we had taken on Cousins and then had to cut him down the track due to his problems etc. It's far too easy to simply say we can pick these guys up and simply delist them if it doesn't work out.

That may sound harsh, and it may sound unlikely. But to me that's the reality of the situation.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18653
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 872 times

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479787Post bigcarl »

Bunk_Moreland wrote:Mental illness should not be looked upon any different to other illnesses especially if it can be controlled properly.
Exactly.


thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9373
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 662 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479789Post thejiggingsaint »

I've an open mind about this one. I remember being highly sceptical of the decision to recruit Michael Gardiner in 2008, and that project yielded us plenty of positives. On the other hand, there was Andrew Lovett............. so maybe we're best to stick with recruiting the best young kids we can get our mitts on! An interesting and thought provoking post though.


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479796Post FQF »

Dr Spaceman wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote: I tend to agree, that it is a risk.

The last sentence is iteresting, and very true. But if it can be controlled, would it be any different to say McCartin and his Type A diabetes? That can be controlled but not cured.

Mental illness should not be looked upon any different to other illnesses especially if it can be controlled properly.

In saying that, why would he want to come to St.Kilda? Surely he would get picked up by Melbourne if he wanted to come back. And how playing with the Saints next year help his depression?

They certainly aint helping mine.
I suppose where it's different is that we can potentially make Clark's condition worse by our actions.

For example, if we weren't selecting him in the seniors though he thought he deserved it. Or if things weren't working out and we had to delist him. That could lead to his problems once again occuring or spiralling out of control. And if that happened and he had to leave the club we would own some of those problems for the rest of his life. Same as if we had taken on Cousins and then had to cut him down the track due to his problems etc. It's far too easy to simply say we can pick these guys up and simply delist them if it doesn't work out.

That may sound harsh, and it may sound unlikely. But to me that's the reality of the situation.
What you say is true, but it cannot realistically be a consideration - not in football and not in most things.

You get to a point where you need to trust the player's own judgment and if they believe that they can withstand the rigours of the system (which inevitably entails injury, poor form etc.) then the club need not be overly pious in thinking about what might happen to him in the long run. That should not be confused with us doing due diligence on whether we believe he is currently sufficiently healthy.

If everyone adopted the attitude you describe, then people would avoid forming relationships with such people out of fear that the relationship will go sour and worsen the condition. Companies might not employ such people for the same reasons.

So if the club believes he's good to go, and Clarke says he's good to go, we don't need to start getting into the what-ifs about his life post football if we land up delisting him.


Sobraz
SS Life Member
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu 29 Mar 2007 1:06pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479805Post Sobraz »

stinger wrote:
Eastern wrote:I see him as a 'High Risk-High Reward' type of player. There is no doubting his ability, but as many have pointed out he has had plenty of issues with his body, not to mention his depression. There is also the issue of whether he is motivated, or even wants to resume his career A lot to weigh up for us or anyone looking at him !!
enough is enough...no more drunks, rapists, drug addicts, morons, rejects, retirees or head cases.....recruit kids....and more kids...


you can control depression...you can't cure it.....
How can you possible relate depression or anxiety with rape?.. I'd hazard a guess there is an enormous % of current AFL players, very good, consistent ones, who are struggling, but managing such mental issues.

And wasn't Jack Darling a 'drunk head case', hence him slipping in the draft?.. Only mention it because you've state you would have picked him. Goes against what you just wrote.


thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9373
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 662 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479807Post thejiggingsaint »

At this moment, with the current state of self-belief felt in the squad, I'm wondering just how good a move it would be for either party?


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17048
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3664 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479809Post skeptic »

stinger wrote: you can control depression...you can't cure it.....
Coming from a mental health clinician with a masters degree and 10years experience... This is an incredibly ignorant post


thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9373
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 662 times
Been thanked: 498 times

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479813Post thejiggingsaint »

I just hope this young guy gets well. If by returning to the cauldron of AFL football and making a fist of it is seen as success then I wish him just that!


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479818Post plugger66 »

Rosco wrote:
8856brother wrote:
Moods wrote:Too risky. We've taken that many gambles in the last 6-7 years on players, and as far as I can tell only one has paid off (Gardner) and even he took awhile, and never returned to AA form or close to it.

I wish him all the best in his battle for depression but I'm with Stinger on this one.
If he comes via PSD there is no risk. It's a win win situation. If it doesn't work out well so be it. It's just one spot on the list and a bit of cash we actually need to use somewhere.
A spot on the list is risking something though

We have about 14 list cloggers as it is. Lets just use Ray for example. we can sign him and he plays roughly 10 games next season and does ok but is gone at the end of the year. We still dont win a game because of Ray. The option is to delist him for a spot for Clark. 2 things can happen. he doesnt play so we are 10 games short but still lose anyway or he plays and does as well as he did at melbourne. We syill dont win games because we arent good enough but its the follow years when the younger guys get experience that he comes into his own. With so many list cloggers and most likely finishing last either way its certainly worth the risk even if he doesnt play. As for depression its like all illness and injuries. Only a risk if you dont take your medication just as its a risk coming back from injury if you dont rehab as good as you should.


User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479820Post stinger »

skeptic wrote:
stinger wrote: you can control depression...you can't cure it.....
Coming from a mental health clinician with a masters degree and 10years experience... This is an incredibly ignorant post

...stop embarresing yourself.....i am more than familiar with depression......from a professional standpoint
of over twenty years.....as well as having close relatives with the illness.....


we are not taliking about such things as post natal depression...which of course can be cured....


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Stephen Theodore
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2154
Joined: Mon 06 Aug 2007 1:53pm
Location: SE Queensland
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479823Post Stephen Theodore »

Wink Wink, say no more, a Sainter he will be.


saintjake
Club Player
Posts: 1511
Joined: Sat 09 Feb 2008 1:49pm
Contact:

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479825Post saintjake »

This is all well and good.
But just like 4 others before me have asked. Has he even said he wants to return.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479831Post plugger66 »

saintjake wrote:This is all well and good.
But just like 4 others before me have asked. Has he even said he wants to return.

No but we also have no idea if Rooy is a good bloke but we all still comment.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479841Post Con Gorozidis »

In a heart beat if he was good to go and really wants to play.
But I dont think he is interested at all is he ?


FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479855Post FQF »

Stephen Theodore wrote:Wink Wink, say no more, a Sainter he will be.
Inside info?


Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479860Post Bunk_Moreland »

Dr Spaceman wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote: I tend to agree, that it is a risk.

The last sentence is iteresting, and very true. But if it can be controlled, would it be any different to say McCartin and his Type A diabetes? That can be controlled but not cured.

Mental illness should not be looked upon any different to other illnesses especially if it can be controlled properly.

In saying that, why would he want to come to St.Kilda? Surely he would get picked up by Melbourne if he wanted to come back. And how playing with the Saints next year help his depression?

They certainly aint helping mine.
I suppose where it's different is that we can potentially make Clark's condition worse by our actions.

For example, if we weren't selecting him in the seniors though he thought he deserved it. Or if things weren't working out and we had to delist him. That could lead to his problems once again occuring or spiralling out of control. And if that happened and he had to leave the club we would own some of those problems for the rest of his life. Same as if we had taken on Cousins and then had to cut him down the track due to his problems etc. It's far too easy to simply say we can pick these guys up and simply delist them if it doesn't work out.

That may sound harsh, and it may sound unlikely. But to me that's the reality of the situation.

Points well made Doc


You are garbage - Enough said
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479864Post stinger »

Sobraz wrote:
stinger wrote:
Eastern wrote:I see him as a 'High Risk-High Reward' type of player. There is no doubting his ability, but as many have pointed out he has had plenty of issues with his body, not to mention his depression. There is also the issue of whether he is motivated, or even wants to resume his career A lot to weigh up for us or anyone looking at him !!
enough is enough...no more drunks, rapists, drug addicts, morons, rejects, retirees or head cases.....recruit kids....and more kids...


you can control depression...you can't cure it.....
How can you possible relate depression or anxiety with rape?.. I'd hazard a guess there is an enormous % of current AFL players, very good, consistent ones, who are struggling, but managing such mental issues.

And wasn't Jack Darling a 'drunk head case', hence him slipping in the draft?.. Only mention it because you've state you would have picked him. Goes against what you just wrote.

no that's rubbish.....jack darling had some bad publicity...put out by the west ..to try and warn the southern state clubs off him...it was a red herring...and many on here said as much at the time...but it obviously worked....st trav wasn't fooled ..told us so at the time....
Last edited by stinger on Fri 11 Jul 2014 1:44pm, edited 1 time in total.


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479873Post Cairnsman »

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: is all I'm going to say ffs!


saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3638
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 492 times
Been thanked: 316 times

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479886Post saintbob »

Clark would have to come at a significantly lower cost than what he was paid at the Dees.
I'd rather chase younger key forwards like;

Boyd - who is apparently not happy with the lack of senior footy

Sam Reid- is another worth looking at, as I can't see how the swans will be keep all 3 (Tippett and Franklin) under the salary cap.

Day, Lynch, Dixon or May from the GC - one of who may get moved on to make room in the cap for GAJ's next contract.


bigballs
Club Player
Posts: 259
Joined: Sat 06 Jul 2013 1:08pm
Location: Country Victoria

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479890Post bigballs »

Should we get him.....absolutely not!!

Not worth the risk in my opinion.

Go for someone that we know is fit and healthy, both mentally and physically.

I wish him well if he wants to try playing AFL footy again, but if it was up to me, I wouldn't take him.


User avatar
Armoooo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7281
Joined: Sun 26 Nov 2006 2:28pm
Location: The Great South East
Contact:

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479907Post Armoooo »

stinger wrote:
skeptic wrote:
stinger wrote: you can control depression...you can't cure it.....
Coming from a mental health clinician with a masters degree and 10years experience... This is an incredibly ignorant post

...stop embarresing yourself.....i am more than familiar with depression......from a professional standpoint
of over twenty years.....as well as having close relatives with the illness.....


we are not taliking about such things as post natal depression...which of course can be cured....
Incredibly ignorant and arrogant post.

If you don't understand the complexities of mental illness keep it to yourself, it's people spouting nonsense like this that creates a stigma which further harms the individuals suffering from these conditions.

The developments that have been made over the last decade have been phenomenal and your comments would have been outdated even before then


ROBERT HARVEY A.K.A The Great Man, Banger, Harves, Ol' Man River...
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7934
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 548 times
Been thanked: 252 times

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479937Post bobmurray »

Clark should be advised not to do anything that could trigger his depression.

Playing in StKilda's forward line should at least come with a health warning.


How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ? :lol:
Zed
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2190
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
Location: by the seaside..
Has thanked: 36 times
Been thanked: 187 times

Re: Mitch Clark

Post: # 1479962Post Zed »

Can he even nominate for the draft given that he isnt on any list in any comp ? .. and if the answer is yes, why wouldn't he nominate for the main draft where everyone can have a go at picking him up.

This will probably bite me on the backside, but I dont think we will ever see him make an AFL comeback.


“If you want the rainbow you gotta put up with rain” Dolly Parton
Post Reply