Let's get behind Tom Lee today

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19157
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474120Post SaintPav »

Tom had a go but he looks a bit slow and his skills aren't great.

He's the type who would have done ok with good delivery in the 70s and 80s.

But the club should persist and keep playing him.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474124Post stinger »

6621104 wrote:Not the future, time to go!
yep...not an fl footballer...waste of a pick...list clogger now....unfortunately


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474230Post BigMart »

He made one very poor effort. It was unacceptable from a commitment to the contest standard.

Should have played his last game


User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474277Post savatage »

He needs to get stuck into the weights room & get his endurance way up. He basically needs to finish the season without requiring another set of operations & just kill himself with gym work & extra fitness sessions.

He just gets brushed aside WAY too easily for an AFL footballer & it eats away at his confidence on field. I've seen him do some very good things where it's apparent that he does have a football brain - but he's just not getting close to it at AFL level.

Definitely needs to stop being thrown into the ruck, that's not doing anyone any favours.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474290Post gringo »

BigMart wrote:He made one very poor effort. It was unacceptable from a commitment to the contest standard.

Should have played his last game

You really love to over state things Mart. I thought he was actually showing good signs, his marks were sticking and he was getting into the right spots. If I was a coach I would think there was a bit to work with. Writing off guys with under 30 games experience will either make you look foolish when they come good or just look like you fired off early anyway. Most players don't make it so if I wrote off that everyone but the select few that show brilliant signs from day one i would look like what I was saying had merit. I don't exactly know what you are trying to achieve but it looks like you want a few to fire back at you so you can knuckle down to a bout of horn clashing.


fingers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4642
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2005 11:17am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474455Post fingers »

Poor kid has missed the last 2 pre-seasons and has played a total of 13 games.

I'd like all of us to be a little more patient.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474458Post dragit »

gringo wrote:
BigMart wrote:He made one very poor effort. It was unacceptable from a commitment to the contest standard.

Should have played his last game

You really love to over state things Mart. I thought he was actually showing good signs, his marks were sticking and he was getting into the right spots. If I was a coach I would think there was a bit to work with. Writing off guys with under 30 games experience will either make you look foolish when they come good or just look like you fired off early anyway. Most players don't make it so if I wrote off that everyone but the select few that show brilliant signs from day one i would look like what I was saying had merit. I don't exactly know what you are trying to achieve but it looks like you want a few to fire back at you so you can knuckle down to a bout of horn clashing.
It's comedy… As Mart suggested, his posts work better if you read them in a Ron Burgundy voice

Image
"Lee made one poor effort, so he should be de-listed??!!"


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474472Post gringo »

dragit wrote:
gringo wrote:
BigMart wrote:He made one very poor effort. It was unacceptable from a commitment to the contest standard.

Should have played his last game

You really love to over state things Mart. I thought he was actually showing good signs, his marks were sticking and he was getting into the right spots. If I was a coach I would think there was a bit to work with. Writing off guys with under 30 games experience will either make you look foolish when they come good or just look like you fired off early anyway. Most players don't make it so if I wrote off that everyone but the select few that show brilliant signs from day one i would look like what I was saying had merit. I don't exactly know what you are trying to achieve but it looks like you want a few to fire back at you so you can knuckle down to a bout of horn clashing.
It's comedy… As Mart suggested, his posts work better if you read them in a Ron Burgundy voice

Image
"Lee made one poor effort, so he should be de-listed??!!"
Hey -that works.


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474498Post BigMart »

Hey,

Whatever it takes for you to convince yourself something.

I think you know how good Tom is Folks.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19157
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474507Post SaintPav »

BigMart wrote:Hey,

Whatever it takes for you to convince yourself something.

I think you know how good Tom is Folks.
You're becoming a bit of a troll in your old age BM.

It's very obvious what you are trying to do...it's becoming tedious.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
evo
Club Player
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 11:19pm
Location: Wimmera
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474512Post evo »

BM dislikes anyone called Tom.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474515Post plugger66 »

evo wrote:BM dislikes anyone called Tom.

Is it Tom Cripps?


User avatar
MC Gusto
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6084
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474521Post MC Gusto »

I dunno guys. Reckon mart and the coach are in agreement on Lee....


#1 Ryder fan
6621104
Club Player
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 8:33pm
Location: not victoria
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 79 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474550Post 6621104 »

Lee is not a kid, number of AFL games aside. He may be able to get on the lead at VFL level but with the closer checking of the big league he cannot hold his marks and his ground game, whilst good is not why he is in the side. He cannot body players one on one, does not have the smarts to lead into space and his kicking has gone backwards. This may be fitness but that should be a worry. We gave him a go, he has not met the standard.


the invisible and the non existent look very much alike
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474557Post dragit »

6621104 wrote:Lee is not a kid, number of AFL games aside. He may be able to get on the lead at VFL level but with the closer checking of the big league he cannot hold his marks and his ground game, whilst good is not why he is in the side. He cannot body players one on one, does not have the smarts to lead into space and his kicking has gone backwards. This may be fitness but that should be a worry. We gave him a go, he has not met the standard.
He may not be a kid, but he came to us with a kid's body… the club said from day one that he would be a long term project as his body was miles behind AFL level.
I think people are kidding themselves if they think "we've given him a go" and will now be de-listed. He has plenty to work on, but is still our most promising key forward, so until we land a Tom Boyd guys like Lee & Stanley will be persisted with… hopefully one blossoms.
Pretty tough playing key forward in a side getting belted by 100 points most weeks, even Nick Riewoldt is battling for a kick the past few weeks.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474558Post gringo »

6621104 wrote:Lee is not a kid, number of AFL games aside. He may be able to get on the lead at VFL level but with the closer checking of the big league he cannot hold his marks and his ground game, whilst good is not why he is in the side. He cannot body players one on one, does not have the smarts to lead into space and his kicking has gone backwards. This may be fitness but that should be a worry. We gave him a go, he has not met the standard.

You are going to find that even mature guys with little experience need time, he might need 2 years development instead of 4 though so is still ahead of what a true kid would be. If we flick every player with an assessment made after 10 games it will be a long decade.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474617Post plugger66 »

gringo wrote:
6621104 wrote:Lee is not a kid, number of AFL games aside. He may be able to get on the lead at VFL level but with the closer checking of the big league he cannot hold his marks and his ground game, whilst good is not why he is in the side. He cannot body players one on one, does not have the smarts to lead into space and his kicking has gone backwards. This may be fitness but that should be a worry. We gave him a go, he has not met the standard.

You are going to find that even mature guys with little experience need time, he might need 2 years development instead of 4 though so is still ahead of what a true kid would be. If we flick every player with an assessment made after 10 games it will be a long decade.

Forget this games rubbish otherwise we shouldnt have got rid of Brad Howrd, Justin Sweeney and LJ Conners. Yep he will get another year because he cost us pick 12 but I would be a bit doubtfull he would if he cost pick 60. He gets one more year so he better show something. Its no one else's fault he is struggling so he is the only one who can prove the knockers wrong.


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1534 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474622Post kosifantutti »

plugger66 wrote:
gringo wrote:
6621104 wrote:Lee is not a kid, number of AFL games aside. He may be able to get on the lead at VFL level but with the closer checking of the big league he cannot hold his marks and his ground game, whilst good is not why he is in the side. He cannot body players one on one, does not have the smarts to lead into space and his kicking has gone backwards. This may be fitness but that should be a worry. We gave him a go, he has not met the standard.

You are going to find that even mature guys with little experience need time, he might need 2 years development instead of 4 though so is still ahead of what a true kid would be. If we flick every player with an assessment made after 10 games it will be a long decade.

Forget this games rubbish otherwise we shouldnt have got rid of Brad Howrd, Justin Sweeney and LJ Conners. Yep he will get another year because he cost us pick 12 but I would be a bit doubtfull he would if he cost pick 60. He gets one more year so he better show something. Its no one else's fault he is struggling so he is the only one who can prove the knockers wrong.
Not sure if you're serious. You know he didn't cost us pick 12.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474624Post plugger66 »

kosifantutti wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
gringo wrote:
6621104 wrote:Lee is not a kid, number of AFL games aside. He may be able to get on the lead at VFL level but with the closer checking of the big league he cannot hold his marks and his ground game, whilst good is not why he is in the side. He cannot body players one on one, does not have the smarts to lead into space and his kicking has gone backwards. This may be fitness but that should be a worry. We gave him a go, he has not met the standard.

You are going to find that even mature guys with little experience need time, he might need 2 years development instead of 4 though so is still ahead of what a true kid would be. If we flick every player with an assessment made after 10 games it will be a long decade.

Forget this games rubbish otherwise we shouldnt have got rid of Brad Howrd, Justin Sweeney and LJ Conners. Yep he will get another year because he cost us pick 12 but I would be a bit doubtfull he would if he cost pick 60. He gets one more year so he better show something. Its no one else's fault he is struggling so he is the only one who can prove the knockers wrong.
Not sure if you're serious. You know he didn't cost us pick 12.

Well he did cost us pick 12. We also got more in return. he is pick 12 on the trade table though.


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1534 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474625Post kosifantutti »

I bought a coffee yesterday. I handed over a ten dollar note and got a five dollar note and two dollar note in change.

I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT COFFEE COST ME TEN DOLLARS!


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
SemperFidelis
SS Life Member
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
Has thanked: 419 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474633Post SemperFidelis »

kosifantutti wrote:I bought a coffee yesterday. I handed over a ten dollar note and got a five dollar note and two dollar note in change.

I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT COFFEE COST ME TEN DOLLARS!
Brilliant, Kosi. Just spat my coffee over the back page of the Hun in a cafe.

Then again, that's another public service performed.


Always loyal
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474636Post Con Gorozidis »

Tom needs to put on 5-7kg of muscle this summer or hes done for.
He has zero presence at all in the contest.
Even if you dont mark it or kick a goal we at least need someone down there who creates a contest. Right now the opposition can safely double team Rooey.

I would seriously look at John Butcher for next year. Who cares if he cant kick. We arent going to get a perfect key fwd who ticks all the boxes cheap . We just need someone who creates a contest and at least holds the ball up to prevent us getting smashed. Im talking a late pick - just like we used on Delaney.

Obviously we need another genuine gun key fwd (or two) but we are going to have to get them from the draft and they will take 3-4 years to come good after drafting.


PurpleHayes
Club Player
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011 9:17pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474642Post PurpleHayes »

Instead of Lee we could have had Kristian Jaksch..taken at pick 12.

He's played 4 games. Turns 20 this year. Hardly setting the world on fire.

If he was at the saints everyone would be saying how we'd wasted the draft pick anyway having hardly played a game!

Can't win on here unless every recruit is a gun....FFS.

What's even weirder is a fair few on here talking about recruiting Jaksch because he's a surplus tall at GWS.
What's Jaksch done to suggest he's any good? Be a first round draft pick?


FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474644Post FQF »

Con Gorozidis wrote:Tom needs to put on 5-7kg of muscle this summer or hes done for.
He has zero presence at all in the contest.
Even if you dont mark it or kick a goal we at least need someone down there who creates a contest. Right now the opposition can safely double team Rooey.

I would seriously look at John Butcher for next year. Who cares if he cant kick. We arent going to get a perfect key fwd who ticks all the boxes cheap . We just need someone who creates a contest and at least holds the ball up to prevent us getting smashed. Im talking a late pick - just like we used on Delaney.

Obviously we need another genuine gun key fwd (or two) but we are going to have to get them from the draft and they will take 3-4 years to come good after drafting.
I think that poor kicking can be remedied with concentrated training and teaching from an expert. The art of kicking for goal is woefully neglected at AFL clubs because those who land up on an AFL list are expected to have the skills to kick a goal. Regardless of whether that should be true, it clearly is not.

There is nothing inherent in a player's ability to line up and kick a set shot. It is entirely technique, training, muscle memory and confidence. If Butcher was identified as a good fit sans his goal-kicking ability, I'd be confident we could fix that.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Let's get behind Tom Lee today

Post: # 1474645Post dragit »

kosifantutti wrote:I bought a coffee yesterday. I handed over a ten dollar note and got a five dollar note and two dollar note in change.

I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT COFFEE COST ME TEN DOLLARS!
Post of the year…
I hope the coffee tasted good for ten bucks, what a rip off.
I haven't seen a two dollar note in ages btw.


Post Reply