We should trade Gram

plugger66 · Post: # 1009711Post **plugger66** » Mon 04 Oct 2010 3:52pm

Quixote wrote:
plugger66 wrote:No we shouldnt.
For the right price - yes, we should.

We lack pace so we get rid of someone with pace. Makes no sense. As for the right price nearly everyone is tradable but that odes usually happen.

kaos theory · Mon 04 Oct 2010 7:29pm

Unbelievable!

I come home from work and see some of our fans have lost the plot....(not unusual, though).

Why not trade goddard and Rooey while we are at it?

FFS he has been injuried in both GFs. Can't some of you people process that? You seem to have the memory capabilities of small insects.

Last yr he should have won the norm smith medal in the gf. This yr he has been out with a long term injury.

We need more run & carry players that can kick goals, not less.

Again, he's been out for most of this yr, and hasn't been able to get consistency, with a good pre-season, he will be fine...

saintsRrising · Mon 04 Oct 2010 7:32pm

Quixote wrote:

Thoughts.

Yes put him in for surgery again and fix him up.
We need another pacey mid.

IluvHarvey · Mon 04 Oct 2010 7:43pm

Why stop at Gram.
I think Fisher should go too
You can throw in Dal and Joey.

Yep I can see it now Premiers 2011.

SydneySainter · Tue 05 Oct 2010 12:04am

Brooks, Watts and Lovett. Keep our first round pick, as our club just can't seem to get the right trade for them.

Winmar · Post: # 1010421Post **Winmar** » Tue 05 Oct 2010 12:25am

When fit he's one of the few players who give real drive through the middle. Let him get back into shape and hang onto him, I say.

PJ · Post: # 1010423Post PJ » Tue 05 Oct 2010 12:31am

One question for mine would be - does the have OP?

I hope his current predicament is only transitory and he can recover to full pace.

Teflon · Post: # 1010428Post **Teflon** » Tue 05 Oct 2010 12:36am

twitter rumour is hes on the table.....gotta give to get.....we can cover him imo - even with the great GF game last year....

BAM! (shhhh) · Tue 05 Oct 2010 10:17am

smasherini wrote:NO.
We need time to re asses without knee jerk reactios.

I haven't especially thought this through, but I'm going to disagree and say we should build an entirely new game plan revolving on knee-jerk reactions.

It may be worth throwing out the entire list as well, but we may want to not stop and ensure we don't think about that one first.

SainterK · Post: # 1010601Post **SainterK** » Tue 05 Oct 2010 10:45am

Teflon wrote:twitter rumour is hes on the table.....gotta give to get.....we can cover him imo - even with the great GF game last year....

I saw that, rumour is his already been told his on the table...wonder if clubs would be interested?

I don't like this time of year

saintspremiers · Tue 05 Oct 2010 4:06pm

Keep Gram, when fit, he's awesome.

Yes, we need more with run and carry, and we need players that can find targets also.

ace · Post: # 1010985Post **ace** » Tue 05 Oct 2010 5:29pm

When trading you should always use kilograms, never grams.

mbogo · Post: # 1011001Post **mbogo** » Tue 05 Oct 2010 5:53pm

We probably should NOT trade anyone of our top 10!

starsign · Post: # 1011105Post **starsign** » Tue 05 Oct 2010 7:33pm

what worries me over this whole discussion is ...
I really thought we were over playing injured players

and for effsake in a bloody GF replay when he was obviously hampered in the first one???

someones head should roll over this one surely , but Grammies ...I'm not so sure

we certainly are desperate for another one or two with some pace , and if we can trade like for like with maybe a bit more youth and upside well then I'm tending to think why not??

But who was kidding who with his selection last Sat??

We should trade Gram

Re: We should trade Gram