5. Montagna
4. Gwilt
3. Fisher
2. Goddard
1. No-one
VOTES vs Collingwood
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
cwrcyn
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4344
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1467 times
-
skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17049
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: VOTES vs Collingwood
He also was 1 of few that was prepared to to fight for the balldcstkfc wrote:Contested well and psychologically he seems better because you weren't expecting better.saintly wrote:what did pattison do?battye wrote:It's a tough one today, for the wrong reasons sadly...
5. Hayes
4. Pattison
3. Fisher
2. Riewoldt
1. Steven
-
St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
Re: VOTES vs Collingwood
and some on here want him dropped for next week and favour Mac instead...battye wrote:It's a tough one today, for the wrong reasons sadly...
5. Hayes
4. Pattison
3. Fisher
2. Riewoldt
1. Steven
Patto has some rubbish said towards him for his whole time with us and it really is unwarranted IMO
For me..
5. Joey
4. CJ
3. Patto
2. Geary
1. BJ
I voted for consistency Lenny went missing in the first half
Fisher was a loose man in defence and he played well but had no opponent
Patto was our best ruck for the day and continues to improve IMO
15 disposals and 11 hitouts...
Has Big Mac ever done that?
But some here want him dropped and replaced with Mac...
WHY
Last edited by St Fidelius on Sat 17 Jul 2010 8:20pm, edited 1 time in total.
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
-
Milan Faletic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
Calm down, no need for thatGoTheTorp wrote:Read the stats and weep d**khead we were a disgracesaintnick12 wrote:HilariousGoTheTorp wrote:5:Swan
4:Shaw
3:Ball
2:Pendlebury
1:Didak
STRENGTH THROUGH LOYALTY.
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
-
saintnick12
- Club Player
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:08pm
Even funnierGoTheTorp wrote:Read the stats and weep d**khead we were a disgracesaintnick12 wrote:HilariousGoTheTorp wrote:5:Swan
4:Shaw
3:Ball
2:Pendlebury
1:Didak
Nice personal attack as well"At the end of the day, a coach and a fitness adviser doesn't make a good football team, they're not the only ones who got us to two Grand Finals." Lenny Hayes. 27/9/2011.
-
Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11240
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
-
kosifantutti23
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Fri 26 Sep 2008 12:55am
- Location: Horgen
-
The Sainter
- Club Player
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Mon 12 Jul 2004 8:42pm
5 Goddard
4 Fisher
3 Montagna
2 Geary
1 Gardiner
Very hard to give votes today as we had so many passengers yet we still nearly had the same scoring shots as them. Gilbert's disposal lets him down badly at times as did Fisher's in the first half but Sam still put in a top effort. Gardiner got in because I had to put somebody there I guess
4 Fisher
3 Montagna
2 Geary
1 Gardiner
Very hard to give votes today as we had so many passengers yet we still nearly had the same scoring shots as them. Gilbert's disposal lets him down badly at times as did Fisher's in the first half but Sam still put in a top effort. Gardiner got in because I had to put somebody there I guess
-
saintnick12
- Club Player
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:08pm
Agree people can vote for whoever they want. However, putting the names of 5 Collingwood players is uncalled for...hence my comment earlier, and then the abuse that followed. (Still don't appreciate being called a d***head)SainterK wrote:5
4 Gwilt
3 Fisher
2 Joey
1 Lenny
Oh, and what's the go with people trying to disagree or influence votes, it's opinion.
"At the end of the day, a coach and a fitness adviser doesn't make a good football team, they're not the only ones who got us to two Grand Finals." Lenny Hayes. 27/9/2011.
Was totally unnecessary for anyone to call you a d***headsaintnick12 wrote:Agree people can vote for whoever they want. However, putting the names of 5 Collingwood players is uncalled for...hence my comment earlier, and then the abuse that followed. (Still don't appreciate being called a d***head)SainterK wrote:5
4 Gwilt
3 Fisher
2 Joey
1 Lenny
Oh, and what's the go with people trying to disagree or influence votes, it's opinion.
STRENGTH THROUGH LOYALTY.
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
Oh, I didn't see that post SN12...I was talking more the people who try to influence who we vote for St Kilda wise.saintnick12 wrote:Agree people can vote for whoever they want. However, putting the names of 5 Collingwood players is uncalled for...hence my comment earlier, and then the abuse that followed. (Still don't appreciate being called a d***head)SainterK wrote:5
4 Gwilt
3 Fisher
2 Joey
1 Lenny
Oh, and what's the go with people trying to disagree or influence votes, it's opinion.
-
saintnick12
- Club Player
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:08pm
-
spert
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9151
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 438 times
The whole team was flat, irrespective of how the Pies played. A few of our players had good possession counts, but much of it was innefective and junk possessions. As far as quality goes, it is hard to pick any Saint, but Fisher, Monty, Patto, Gwilt, Lenny maybe, though no one deserved any votes as even our best were below par.
-
saintnick12
- Club Player
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:08pm
It was certainly hard to give votes to anyone. It will be interesting to see how our coaches voted it when the B & F comes around.spert wrote:The whole team was flat, irrespective of how the Pies played. A few of our players had good possession counts, but much of it was innefective and junk possessions. As far as quality goes, it is hard to pick any Saint, but Fisher, Monty, Patto, Gwilt, Lenny maybe, though no one deserved any votes as even our best were below par.
"At the end of the day, a coach and a fitness adviser doesn't make a good football team, they're not the only ones who got us to two Grand Finals." Lenny Hayes. 27/9/2011.
-
borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
5. Montagna. Usual consistent game.
4, Goddard. Played well, not quite his usual standard.
3. Hayes. Same. Down a bit on normal game.
2.....Fisher. With 18 marks should have ranked higher, but several poor disposals early cost us dearly. Same with Gilbert,.
1. Geary. A gutsy game. WOuld have liked to give it to Jack Steven, our only multiple goal kicker, but he was not given enough game time.
4, Goddard. Played well, not quite his usual standard.
3. Hayes. Same. Down a bit on normal game.
2.....Fisher. With 18 marks should have ranked higher, but several poor disposals early cost us dearly. Same with Gilbert,.
1. Geary. A gutsy game. WOuld have liked to give it to Jack Steven, our only multiple goal kicker, but he was not given enough game time.
Re: VOTES vs Collingwood
Actually, Big Mac did better than that merely 1 week before, against the Lions, but yet was dropped... 16 disposals and a goal... Including a few strong contested marks...St Fidelius wrote:and some on here want him dropped for next week and favour Mac instead...battye wrote:It's a tough one today, for the wrong reasons sadly...
5. Hayes
4. Pattison
3. Fisher
2. Riewoldt
1. Steven
Patto has some rubbish said towards him for his whole time with us and it really is unwarranted IMO
For me..
5. Joey
4. CJ
3. Patto
2. Geary
1. BJ
I voted for consistency Lenny went missing in the first half
Fisher was a loose man in defence and he played well but had no opponent
Patto was our best ruck for the day and continues to improve IMO
15 disposals and 11 hitouts...
Has Big Mac ever done that?
But some here want him dropped and replaced with Mac...
WHY
Sure, Patto did him for hitouts, but the reality is they are of little significance...
I have nothing against Patto, but I dont really rate him either... But for some reason your seem to have a real dislike for Big Ben, which is unfair and unwarrented..
Clearly he is a talent and has more upside than Patto... Patto tries but will never be more than that, a trier... Ben could and should be a gun...