Dees are desperate to win Ball

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 849060Post plugger66 »

Moccha wrote:
GeorgeYoung27 wrote:
I still find it strange Ball was offered a 3 yr contract .....though we dont know the content (of course) . Irrelevant now anyway.

It seems the assessment of Ball ( by the Saints ) is that he will never get back to being the player we need for the future . So its bye bye BALL.

The sooner its over and done with the better.......
Greg Denham said on SEN this morning that RL made a new offer to LB in their meeting before the draft deadline, which Ball rejected. That would explain why Ross when he came out and was interviewed he said the contract was now off the table.
Well then F*** off!
Im pretty sure he wants to.


User avatar
Eastern
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14357
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
Location: 3132
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 849064Post Eastern »

GeorgeYoung27 wrote:
I still find it strange Ball was offered a 3 yr contract .....though we dont know the content (of course) . Irrelevant now anyway.

It seems the assessment of Ball ( by the Saints ) is that he will never get back to being the player we need for the future . So its bye bye BALL.

The sooner its over and done with the better.......
Greg Denham said on SEN this morning that RL made a new offer to LB in their meeting before the draft deadline, which Ball rejected. That would explain why Ross when he came out and was interviewed he said the contract was now off the table.
Now, I wonder where Greg Denham got this info from. He seems to be very good friends with a Mr Connors :roll: !!


NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!

Image
User avatar
saintbrat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 44575
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
Location: saints zone
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 188 times

Post: # 849130Post saintbrat »

new teams in the mix-
anyone basicly
But Richmond and Port
http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,865 ... 11,00.html
has he actually done this...
Ball - famously taken at pick one ahead of Luke Hodge and Chris Judd in the 2001 national draft - has walked out on the Saints after failing to secure a move to Collingwood in the trade period.
last official word was he was still considering..............

BUt none are offering to take him first pick. :( sad for Luke to come to this.
Last edited by saintbrat on Thu 15 Oct 2009 11:18am, edited 1 time in total.


StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
Image
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12799
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 812 times
Been thanked: 434 times

Post: # 849135Post Mr Magic »

As far as I remember, Hodge went at Pick #1, Ball at #2.

I may be wrong on this one, but I don't think so. :roll:


AnythingsPossibleSaints
SS Life Member
Posts: 3152
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
Location: Next to what's next to me.
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Post: # 849169Post AnythingsPossibleSaints »

smilk wrote:
undecided wrote:Wasn't it just yesterday that they said they were not going to use any of their first four picks to get him.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx
I get the feeling that what they said in the first instance is most likely to be the truth (that they wouldn't use any of their first 4 picks on him.) I reckon that they might have realised that they let the "cat out of the bag" by saying so, though, which is why they then came out the next day and said they could even use their no.11 pick to get him, which I highly doubt is true. I think that's about as true as them denying "tanking" at all this year.
It would have been music to other club's ears to have heard what they said the first day (especially Collingwood's) and they might have then been thinking they'd do all they could to convince Luke to enter the National Draft. Melbourne probably then realised that they'd "showed their hand" and what they said on the second day was probably "damage control", to try and get those other clubs to lose interest and not convince him to enter the National draft.


YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 849181Post SainterK »

Melbourne and Richmond are not such bad moves for Luke, when you consider what it is he is aspiring to...


User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10800
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 837 times

Post: # 849183Post ace »

Mr Magic wrote:As far as I remember, Hodge went at Pick #1, Ball at #2.

I may be wrong on this one, but I don't think so. :roll:
Correct, and Chris Judd went at 3, Graham Polak went at 4, Xavier Clarke went at 5, Ashley Sampi went at 6, David Hale went at 7 and Jimmy Bartel went at 8.

What did we get. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
Post Reply