Gardiner, Gilbert, Milne, Goose?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
sainters man
- Club Player
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Mon 24 Mar 2008 7:43pm
- Location: Mornington
I agree wirh plugger.plugger66 wrote:That is exactly what will happen if all are fit. Like you I find it hard to see who will be dropped for Milne. Whoever it is will be stiff. One I cant see it being is Baker as they no where near like for like. Baker has a huge role to play on a sides smallest forward and I see no logical replacement for him if he isnt in the side.kaos theory wrote:how could goose get in atm?
The maximum would be 3 changes. ...and that is a stretch...
therefore assuming gilbo & milne are right:
- Gardy
- Gilbo
- Milne
Out:
- King (if suspented) or McEvoy
- Raph
- ????
Gardiner for King
Gilbo for Raph (if fit)
Mabye an unlucky Jimmy Gwilt for Milne (if fit).
Dont know about the Jimmy dropping though. Raph needs a spell in the two's. The kid can play and we saw that at the end of last year but seems to have fallen back on his old habits. Needs to get back his decisiveness and a bit more desperation. Did some good things yesterday but generally was very dissapointing.
We cant drop Baker against a team like Carlton. You stop Carltons midfield and Fevola will have a hissy fit (as usual) and the team implodes.
We need Baker to negate Judd (or Stevens) and the young mids of Carlton will get crushed by Lenny and Luke Ball and Dal.
I dont know who misses out for tiprat.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
-
Leo.J
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3127
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2005 8:29pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 72 times
http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/tr-s ... t=TA&st=FAclaystreet wrote:He have away 2 free kicks all dayLeo.J wrote:If Blake could stop giving away stupid frees, he wouldn't be in doubt in my mind, even then he's pretty safe IMO.
BJ gave away 4 lets get rid of him
Blakes frees against usually result in opposition goals...
-
3rd generation saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006 8:34am
- Location: Jurassic Park
-
sunsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
could that possibley be due to the fact he is a backman???Leo.J wrote:http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/tr-s ... t=TA&st=FAclaystreet wrote:He have away 2 free kicks all dayLeo.J wrote:If Blake could stop giving away stupid frees, he wouldn't be in doubt in my mind, even then he's pretty safe IMO.
BJ gave away 4 lets get rid of him
Blakes frees against usually result in opposition goals...
Seeya
*************
*************
-
Leo.J
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3127
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2005 8:29pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 72 times
Of course it is!sunsaint wrote:could that possibley be due to the fact he is a backman???Leo.J wrote:http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/tr-s ... t=TA&st=FAclaystreet wrote:He have away 2 free kicks all dayLeo.J wrote:If Blake could stop giving away stupid frees, he wouldn't be in doubt in my mind, even then he's pretty safe IMO.
BJ gave away 4 lets get rid of him
Blakes frees against usually result in opposition goals...
And thats my point that while Blake gives us flexibilty down back, and he usualy gets the job done, he is a liabilty when it comes to frees against, has been for years.
Btw look at the other guys high up on that list...they are onballers.
-
The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14061
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1315 times
- Been thanked: 2094 times
