List changes for '09.

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Post: # 521874Post saintsRrising »

Otiman wrote:Also forgot that we have #4 free this year. This means we have 2 spots free on the main list, and list management shouldn't be an issue for us, in regards to culling talent.

.
Jumper Numbers have nothing do do with the numbers of players that can be on our list.

Apart from Number 4 there are many other "vacant" numbers of "numbers" that have been worn by players in the past.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Top
User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8781
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 660 times

Post: # 521876Post Otiman »

At the moment we have no vacant numbers between 1 and 47 except for #4. Hence my using this as an indicator of list numbers.

It's easier than counting players :)


Top
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30098
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1235 times

Post: # 521884Post saintsRrising »

Otiman wrote:At the moment we have no vacant numbers between 1 and 47 except for #4. Hence my using this as an indicator of list numbers.

It's easier than counting players :)
We have had players play in numbers greater than 47. :wink:


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Top
User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8781
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 660 times

Post: # 521900Post Otiman »

saintsRrising wrote:
Otiman wrote:At the moment we have no vacant numbers between 1 and 47 except for #4. Hence my using this as an indicator of list numbers.

It's easier than counting players :)
We have had players play in numbers greater than 47. :wink:
Can you read? I said At the moment

Obviously if we had players with #95 and #49 i'd count them too.

It's just quite convenient that at the moment we have #1 to #47 (excluding #4) and 7 rookies.


Top
Post Reply

Return to “Saintsational Fan Forum”