We are now paying the price of poor list management

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
rodgerfox
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 327 times

Post: # 463324Post rodgerfox »

fonz_#15 wrote:and another of footballs myths rodger, is how st.kilda can be dudded by everything (injury, draw, tribunal etc), before some of there blind supporters will accept that the team is not good enough.
I see your point, and to an extent it is true.

However it cannot be denied that we have had worse injuries than anyone over a 4 year period.

What also cannot be denied, is that the last 7 or 8 Grand Finalists have been healthy. No one has succeeded whilst missing several important players.

We had a good draw this year - well, as good as you could hope for for a Melbourne club (except Collingwood).

If you don't think that Geelong, Adelaide, Port, Sydney, West Coast, Freo and Brisbane have a massive advantage by playing real home games, against real away teams, you are delusional.

When we play 'home' games, it's more often than not against teams that play at the ground just as much as we do.

That is a massive advantage.

Even when the clubs mentioned above have been battlers, they've been hard to beat at home.

Melbourne clubs don't get that.

When you consider we missed the finals by 1 game to Adelaide, it is almost the difference. Consider that in 06 Sydney pipped us by % for a top 4 spot, then consider they played 11 games at the SCG, compared to our 'home' games, a couple of which are actually against teams who are tenants of that same ground.

One thing that is for sure, is that it aint going to change. That's the way the AFL is. Like or lump it.

However using the old fashioned theory of 'if you're good enough it doesn't matter' is naive.

In the AFL these days, being good enough takes a backseat to a good draw, and to luck (or good management) with injuries.
Last edited by rodgerfox on Tue 25 Sep 2007 3:18pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7223
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 516 times

Post: # 463329Post meher baba »

As I have posted before, the polarisation between different groups is such that there doesn't seem to be any point in continuing the discussion.

BTW, just out of interest, have a look at this baker's dozen of household names (NOT) of the AFL.

Josh Thewlis
Josh Willoughby
Andrew Ericksen
Tim Schmidt
Mathew Davis
Heath James
David Spriggs
Ryan Brabazon
Mathew Laidlaw
Jesse White
Peter Faulks
Daniel Currie
Daniel O'Keeffe

What have they all got in common? That's right, you guessed it, they were all drafted over the past 5 seasons by a team (the Swans) that has had the following results in that time: PF (2003), SF (2004), Premiership winner (2005), runner up (2006) and EF (2007).

But who cares about how they went? I want heads to roll - coaches, recruitment staff, entire board! Imagine wasting a dozen draft picks on that lot!!!

(Bloody armchair experts. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: )


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10507
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1345 times

Post: # 463357Post CURLY »

Does anyone honestly beleive we traded for Watts because of his dad because that is by far the most ridiculous things ive heard only a tool would think this let alone post it.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 463401Post plugger66 »

rodgerfox wrote:
fonz_#15 wrote:and another of footballs myths rodger, is how st.kilda can be dudded by everything (injury, draw, tribunal etc), before some of there blind supporters will accept that the team is not good enough.
I see your point, and to an extent it is true.

However it cannot be denied that we have had worse injuries than anyone over a 4 year period.

What also cannot be denied, is that the last 7 or 8 Grand Finalists have been healthy. No one has succeeded whilst missing several important players.

We had a good draw this year - well, as good as you could hope for for a Melbourne club (except Collingwood).

If you don't think that Geelong, Adelaide, Port, Sydney, West Coast, Freo and Brisbane have a massive advantage by playing real home games, against real away teams, you are delusional.

When we play 'home' games, it's more often than not against teams that play at the ground just as much as we do.

That is a massive advantage.

Even when the clubs mentioned above have been battlers, they've been hard to beat at home.

Melbourne clubs don't get that.

When you consider we missed the finals by 1 game to Adelaide, it is almost the difference. Consider that in 06 Sydney pipped us by % for a top 4 spot, then consider they played 11 games at the SCG, compared to our 'home' games, a couple of which are actually against teams who are tenants of that same ground.

One thing that is for sure, is that it aint going to change. That's the way the AFL is. Like or lump it.

However using the old fashioned theory of 'if you're good enough it doesn't matter' is naive.

In the AFL these days, being good enough takes a backseat to a good draw, and to luck (or good management) with injuries.
No point about even worrying about home ground advantage. It is never going change because it is impossible to change so that can never be used as an excuse. Injuries are not an excuse either if they can be helped by better management which I think ours could have.


User avatar
Dan Warna
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12846
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:56am
Location: melbourne

Post: # 463407Post Dan Warna »

CURLY wrote:Does anyone honestly beleive we traded for Watts because of his dad because that is by far the most ridiculous things ive heard only a tool would think this let alone post it.
yep it seems most of the trades we did were for players generally under 22 with big tickets who would play 5 to 10 years for st kilda.

I remember troy chaplin being bagged mercilessly on this forum and its quite possible he is going to play in GF...

no use wondering what GT would have/should have done, but it seems that some of kids just aren't being given suitable development.


Bewaire krime, da krimson bolt is comeing to yure nayborhood to smach krime

SHUT UP KRIME!
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 463412Post plugger66 »

Dan Warna wrote:
CURLY wrote:Does anyone honestly beleive we traded for Watts because of his dad because that is by far the most ridiculous things ive heard only a tool would think this let alone post it.
yep it seems most of the trades we did were for players generally under 22 with big tickets who would play 5 to 10 years for st kilda.

I remember troy chaplin being bagged mercilessly on this forum and its quite possible he is going to play in GF...

no use wondering what GT would have/should have done, but it seems that some of kids just aren't being given suitable development.
And some are just not good enough. Hope I am wrong on Watts but is very slow and no development will fix that.


User avatar
rodgerfox
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 327 times

Post: # 463419Post rodgerfox »

plugger66 wrote:
No point about even worrying about home ground advantage. It is never going change because it is impossible to change so that can never be used as an excuse. Injuries are not an excuse either if they can be helped by better management which I think ours could have.

Whether or not people use it as an excuse, it's a massive reason for the results of the AFL over the past decade.


Post Reply