Mach thread: saints v bombers

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5786 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960640Post Ghost Like »

The_Dud wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 9:58pm Is Howard playing?
He is & Wright says, "Thank God!"


bergsone
SS Life Member
Posts: 2929
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008 4:56pm
Location: victoria
Has thanked: 265 times
Been thanked: 121 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960641Post bergsone »

The_Dud wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:10pm
saintkid wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:09pm
bergsone wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:01pm Should be the BIGGEST rev up of all time coming
Should NEVER have been needed at all this week.
No such thing as a ‘rev up’ or ‘spray’ anymore!
Well there should be


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960642Post Teflon »

The Fireman wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:04pm Even before the game we had posters worried about a game that we shouldn’t be worried about

Why? Because deep down we know how brittle this side is. Flashy players like butler gresh Higgins don’t like pressure
Displeasing
Correct
These guys are front runners
Jack likes getting out the back
Butler can’t even manage that
Jones - useless
Gresham - dumb footballer of headless chook variety
Marshall - invisible
Crouch - is he playing?
List goes on but just mistake after mistake


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14061
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2094 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960643Post The_Dud »

bergsone wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:11pm
The_Dud wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:10pm
saintkid wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:09pm
bergsone wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:01pm Should be the BIGGEST rev up of all time coming
Should NEVER have been needed at all this week.
No such thing as a ‘rev up’ or ‘spray’ anymore!
Well there should be
Amen


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
SaintWiki
Club Player
Posts: 549
Joined: Sun 07 Jan 2007 4:18pm
Location: Derby, West Kimberley WA
Has thanked: 828 times
Been thanked: 161 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960644Post SaintWiki »

bergsone wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:10pm
saintkid wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:09pm
bergsone wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:01pm Should be the BIGGEST rev up of all time coming
Should NEVER have been needed at all this week.
Agree there
yep


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4346
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1467 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960645Post cwrcyn »

This game is over. I should have stayed at home. Sick us serving up this garbage against this team. Makes me want to puke


User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10431
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 713 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960646Post desertsaint »

embarrassing effort on danny's day. i hope ratts gives them an old fashioned spray, bloody soft millenials.


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13330
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 680 times
Been thanked: 1966 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960647Post The Fireman »

Yep I think Ratten needs to wear this

Atm we look like dropping this game. How can he explain his way out of it ?


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5786 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960648Post Ghost Like »

At least Butler is getting to the ball to be criticised. Higgins is invisible, actually making Butler look dangerous.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17053
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3664 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960649Post skeptic »

I think what’s challenging is our lack of intent.

Players don’t know whether to take the game on or be unselfish.

Look at that certain goal Butler fluffed late in the second.

In what universe does he not get it and snap the goal immediately every time (other than ours). Instead he thought to pass, hesitated, backed up and came under pressure before stuffing up.

These guys just need to back themselves and take the game on.


bangaulegend
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2490
Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 546 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960650Post bangaulegend »

Doesn't look good but hopefully the guys can regroup & do it for Spud . Come on Saints you are so much better than that effort dig deep FFS


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960651Post Teflon »

Devilhead wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:03pm
desertsaint wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 9:59pm if the last week didnt tell us surely this week shows that we need that extra tall in coops instead of having two of butler and higgins. even more glaring every time we send members back in defence - which seems to be happening a lot.
Even bog standard footy supporters like us can see that the Match Committee are way off the mark with our forward structure

Time for them to fkn wake up
Can’t tell Brett
He just reverts to smalls up forward a week later
Can’t adjust is what it’s telling me
On this performance you could not mount an argument to re-sign him
It’s 2-3 more years in the wilderness
Get ruthless St Kilda
Be bold ffs don’t accept a few wins over mostly substandard opponents and rush to sign
Go to the market and make that known
But I fear we’ve backed ourselves into a corner here


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960652Post Wayne42 »

The team might come out after half time and blitz, but then again....


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17053
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3664 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960653Post skeptic »

Ghost Like wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:14pm At least Butler is getting to the ball to be criticised. Higgins is invisible, actually making Butler look dangerous.
Yeah I kind of agree. He’s made a few really bad decisions but Butler has turned out and is trying to make things happen. He’s running to the right spots and has almost been damaging.

I’m not going to praise him per’se... but he’s not where I’d swing the axe first


SunnyErnie
Club Player
Posts: 1029
Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2022 6:05pm
Has thanked: 195 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960654Post SunnyErnie »

desertsaint wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:12pm embarrassing effort on danny's day. i hope ratts gives them an old fashioned spray, bloody soft millenials.
I hope Ratts takes full responsibility for this debacle and resigns. As I have been saying since last year, he does not have the nous of the modern day greats. He is a coach right out of the 1980’s.


St Kilda should never trade with Essendon and Sydney ever again!!!

NeXus
User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5878
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 615 times
Been thanked: 460 times
Contact:

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960655Post samoht »

Hind 16 possessions to HT. He couldn't manage that over a whole game with us.


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5786 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960656Post Ghost Like »

Marshall doesn't need to go to Bali to cut zeroes off his contract. He cannot get close to it.

Jones & Gresham need to do the simple, both do not help their team mates, they love the football bling. Selfish footballers.


User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8395
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1913 times
Been thanked: 890 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960657Post WellardSaint »

The club can't do a Sainter of the Day for this week.
If they're fair dimkum


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14061
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1315 times
Been thanked: 2094 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960658Post The_Dud »

skeptic wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:15pm
Ghost Like wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:14pm At least Butler is getting to the ball to be criticised. Higgins is invisible, actually making Butler look dangerous.
Yeah I kind of agree. He’s made a few really bad decisions but Butler has turned out and is trying to make things happen. He’s running to the right spots and has almost been damaging.

I’m not going to praise him per’se... but he’s not where I’d swing the axe first
Why did he refuse to kick the easy goal from 25 out??


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
BadRossco
Club Player
Posts: 535
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:14pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 81 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960659Post BadRossco »

Lot of slow second rate players out there and all wearing the same colours, can’t continue to go with Butler and Higgins hard to pick which one to drop both maybe a good option. I could see this result coming despite most on this site expecting an easy win but again the poor skills and decision making of our plodders is letting us down, Westcoast must be looking forward to playing us and the other sides looking for a percentage boost.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960660Post Teflon »

skeptic wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:14pm I think what’s challenging is our lack of intent.

Players don’t know whether to take the game on or be unselfish.

Look at that certain goal Butler fluffed late in the second.

In what universe does he not get it and snap the goal immediately every time (other than ours). Instead he thought to pass, hesitated, backed up and came under pressure before stuffing up.

These guys just need to back themselves and take the game on.
What????????
Players don’t know when to take game on????
Butler Higgins Gresham ……we’ve run ourselves into trouble all night “taking the game on”
They need some bloody composure
Bombers walking the ball length of ground
Short kicking through our zone with ease
We have no plan b at all
Been found out by a crap side yet again !!


“Yeah….nah””
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10517
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1345 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960661Post CURLY »

First option football. Don’t bounce the ball when you have a team mate 30 meters clear in front of you. Inside 40 kick the goal not try to baulk and be fancy.

Don’t zone off.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960662Post Wayne42 »

samoht wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 10:17pm Hind 16 possessions to HT. He couldn't manage that over a whole game with us.
We never played him at half back, we weren't smart enough.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
1966
Club Player
Posts: 513
Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:46pm
Been thanked: 80 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960663Post 1966 »

Test of character here.
If they serve up another half like the first then it’s year over and big changes needed.
Lack of effort is never acceptable.


User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8395
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1960664Post Devilhead »

I am hoping come end of the game someone give us forumites a spray for not having belief because we end up winning ..... can't see it happening though

Good teams don't lose to s*** teams

Huge wake up call coming up


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
Post Reply