Nathan Freeman
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Nathan Freeman
it is sad and telling that the intelligent poster gets the boot in a two person tango
whereas the antagonist gets away with it
its been happening for a while so who brought it to the attention of the mod THIS time
whereas the antagonist gets away with it
its been happening for a while so who brought it to the attention of the mod THIS time
Seeya
*************
*************
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5786 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Nathan Freeman
That / this is a ridiculously sad joke.The_Dud wrote: ↑Wed 26 May 2021 3:02pm3 strikes (over 17 odd years) and you're out unfortunately.asiu wrote: ↑Wed 26 May 2021 2:40pm he didn’t get the axe
just a weeks holiday
<1 week ban for commenting negatively and extensively on another poster>
he should get the axe for voting Tory butt
on the other matter ,
bringing someone’s mum into things
has a long history of not ending positively
out with mumism
came the cry from the peanut gallery
Again, a person should only say what they are prepared to say to a stranger in a pub, that should be the measurement.
If it's anything more, then line them up in public but I suspect many would shy away from that.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19154
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2030 times
Re: Nathan Freeman
So says the paragon of virtue.
Highly contestable who the antagonist was.
I like Joffa, but he’s no choir boy and he gave as good as he got. Both gave as good as they got.
A few passive aggressive and trolling types on here who get away with murder.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1223
- Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2011 1:18pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 570 times
- Been thanked: 109 times
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17047
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3663 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: Nathan Freeman
Joffa Burns is a long term and valued contributor of this forum.
I understand he broke the rules but a permanent over this is surely ridiculous bordering on outrageous
Banning is supposed to be for trolls and agree with him or not, JB is a Saints man through and through and his contributions to this forum are predominantly club based.
If this is a permanent ban, it’s a big step towards destroying the fabric of this forum
I understand he broke the rules but a permanent over this is surely ridiculous bordering on outrageous
Banning is supposed to be for trolls and agree with him or not, JB is a Saints man through and through and his contributions to this forum are predominantly club based.
If this is a permanent ban, it’s a big step towards destroying the fabric of this forum
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: Nathan Freeman
Just do a Ted & come back under a different aliasskeptic wrote: ↑Wed 26 May 2021 10:26pm Joffa Burns is a long term and valued contributor of this forum.
I understand he broke the rules but a permanent over this is surely ridiculous bordering on outrageous
Banning is supposed to be for trolls and agree with him or not, JB is a Saints man through and through and his contributions to this forum are predominantly club based.
If this is a permanent ban, it’s a big step towards destroying the fabric of this forum
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Nathan Freeman
having been subject to 2x Id erase** - ments
(by a younger mob of nods in older times)
it was the contacts/info stored in my PM’s
that was the biggest loss
MAYBE : in this new regime of old becomes new
... there’s , an opportunity given to clean out the office desk
**
total ... all words written , out of the top ten in ‘when joined’ ... no trace
of my brilliance
left on site
Score
7 of them
2 of me
(i upset em ... guilty)
ahhhhhhhhh , the good old days.
(by a younger mob of nods in older times)
it was the contacts/info stored in my PM’s
that was the biggest loss
MAYBE : in this new regime of old becomes new
... there’s , an opportunity given to clean out the office desk
**
total ... all words written , out of the top ten in ‘when joined’ ... no trace
of my brilliance
left on site
Score
7 of them
2 of me
(i upset em ... guilty)
ahhhhhhhhh , the good old days.
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Nathan Freeman
and then
Believe It or NOT
old mate Hang Em High
led the charge to get me reinstated
him ‘n GrumpyOne nearly became friends over it
lol
took em a long time !!!
like 6-9 months
before management relented
the old days were a blast
... the wild west on steroids
Believe It or NOT
old mate Hang Em High
led the charge to get me reinstated
him ‘n GrumpyOne nearly became friends over it
lol
took em a long time !!!
like 6-9 months
before management relented
the old days were a blast
... the wild west on steroids
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10504
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: Nathan Freeman
Have to agree. Don't think he/she should be banned. In no way do I take anything said on this site personally would be shocked if anyone did.Ghost Like wrote: ↑Wed 26 May 2021 7:23pmThat / this is a ridiculously sad joke.The_Dud wrote: ↑Wed 26 May 2021 3:02pm3 strikes (over 17 odd years) and you're out unfortunately.asiu wrote: ↑Wed 26 May 2021 2:40pm he didn’t get the axe
just a weeks holiday
<1 week ban for commenting negatively and extensively on another poster>
he should get the axe for voting Tory butt
on the other matter ,
bringing someone’s mum into things
has a long history of not ending positively
out with mumism
came the cry from the peanut gallery
Again, a person should only say what they are prepared to say to a stranger in a pub, that should be the measurement.
If it's anything more, then line them up in public but I suspect many would shy away from that.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Nathan Freeman
Good onya Curly
the last say should be yours
maybe that should be the new reporting rule
the last say should be yours
maybe that should be the new reporting rule
Seeya
*************
*************
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10504
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1344 times
Re: Nathan Freeman
I've never reported anyone. Don't really see why you would. It's all just banter.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL