Riewoldt allegation to be aired
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
- Moolie
- Club Player
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sat 05 Aug 2006 1:01pm
- Location: Shouting away at the dome, baby.
The stuff that has been spewing forth from Hinch's mouth is astounding. Especially now I read this. The hypocrisy is mind boggling.
http://www.hinch.net/articles_archive05 ... istake.htm
http://www.hinch.net/articles_archive05 ... istake.htm
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8395
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
So this Hinch guy admits to bonking a 15 year old girl who he claims was sexually over-active at the time then he supports the K.I.D. (the teenager who made all the allegations about St Kilda players), who seems to have the same symtoms, only on a much larger scale. His support of the K.I.D. was extensive and even included plenty of financial support, so what was in it for him? I shudder to think
This guy is in serious need of help !!
This guy is in serious need of help !!
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 198 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
Give him a break, he's just trying to pick up.Eastern wrote:So this Hinch guy admits to bonking a 15 year old girl who he claims was sexually over-active at the time then he supports the K.I.D. (the teenager who made all the allegations about St Kilda players), who seems to have the same symtoms, only on a much larger scale. His support of the K.I.D. was extensive and even included plenty of financial support, so what was in it for him? I shudder to think
This guy is in serious need of help !!
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
For all to see.Moolie wrote:The stuff that has been spewing forth from Hinch's mouth is astounding. Especially now I read this. The hypocrisy is mind boggling.
http://www.hinch.net/articles_archive05 ... istake.htm
Hinch is a self confessed statutory rapist.
Hinch used the "honest mistake" excuse.
Hinch has confessed to penetrating a CHILD sexually.
The man deserves to die for being a kiddie fiddler.
The man and 3AW are a disgrace for giving this self confessed child molester air time.
I am disgusted with 3AW and disgusted that this self confessed criminal hasn't paid for his sex crime against children.
Why aren't the rest of you outraged that this self confessed pervert is allowed to walk freely amongst us.
Hope you die in agony your filthy, disgusting, child molester.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
joffaboy wrote:For all to see.Moolie wrote:The stuff that has been spewing forth from Hinch's mouth is astounding. Especially now I read this. The hypocrisy is mind boggling.
http://www.hinch.net/articles_archive05 ... istake.htm
Hinch is a self confessed statutory rapist.
Hinch used the "honest mistake" excuse.
Hinch has confessed to penetrating a CHILD sexually.
The man deserves to die for being a kiddie fiddler.
The man and 3AW are a disgrace for giving this self confessed child molester air time.
I am disgusted with 3AW and disgusted that this self confessed criminal hasn't paid for his sex crime against children.
Why aren't the rest of you outraged that this self confessed pervert is allowed to walk freely amongst us.
Hope you die in agony your filthy, disgusting, child molester.
Great work Joffa , hopefully someone on here takes a look at the link and realise's what this GRUB is all about...An honest mistake my arse !!!
Jack Newnes happy to be a Saint !!!! PS and to hit a target !!!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Mon 30 Oct 2006 5:04pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Can't stand Hinch myself, but can't stand people who would wish anyone else to suffer from cancer regardless of their past mistakes or perceived mistakes.joffaboy wrote:For all to see.Moolie wrote:The stuff that has been spewing forth from Hinch's mouth is astounding. Especially now I read this. The hypocrisy is mind boggling.
http://www.hinch.net/articles_archive05 ... istake.htm
Hinch is a self confessed statutory rapist.
Hinch used the "honest mistake" excuse.
Hinch has confessed to penetrating a CHILD sexually.
The man deserves to die for being a kiddie fiddler.
The man and 3AW are a disgrace for giving this self confessed child molester air time.
I am disgusted with 3AW and disgusted that this self confessed criminal hasn't paid for his sex crime against children.
Why aren't the rest of you outraged that this self confessed pervert is allowed to walk freely amongst us.
Hope you die in agony your filthy, disgusting, child molester.
The guy admitted to hooking up with an underwear model at a party who he assumed incorrectly to be in her mid twenties. It is a defence, and quite rightly so, against Statutory Rape that a reasonable person would assume that the victim was over the legal age of consent. Why the fashion industry is allowed to use teenagers in highly sexualised positions is beyond me, but you can't tell me that there are not 15 year olds in the world that the average person would assume to be in their mid 20's. I myself have often seen a film actress in a movie and thought, she looks alright only to look up who she is and find that she is 16 or 17. Looks can be deceiving.
The reason why he is allowed to walk around among us is because he didn't break the law. No matter how much I detest someone, or dislike how they conduct their business, to wish death upon them, particularly from a disease like cancer is hideously wrong.
If at first you don't succeed, sky diving is not for you.
- InkerSaint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm
Which only makes him a hypocrite, then.The_Merchant wrote:The reason why he is allowed to walk around among us is because he didn't break the law. No matter how much I detest someone, or dislike how they conduct their business, to wish death upon them, particularly from a disease like cancer is hideously wrong.
"... You want to pose a threat to the opposition in as many ways as you can, both defensively and offensively. We've got a responsibility to explore all those possibilities - and we will."
statutory rape is against the law. The girl was 15.The_Merchant wrote:[The reason why he is allowed to walk around among us is because he didn't break the law. No matter how much I detest someone, or dislike how they conduct their business, to wish death upon them, particularly from a disease like cancer is hideously wrong.
You do the maths.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5535
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 484 times
- Contact:
Not wanting to defend the slime that is Derryn Hinch but surely there must be leeway if you genuinely had no idea that she is below the age of consent...and she portrays herself as over the legal age...for example a lingerie model.joffaboy wrote:statutory rape is against the law. The girl was 15.The_Merchant wrote:[The reason why he is allowed to walk around among us is because he didn't break the law. No matter how much I detest someone, or dislike how they conduct their business, to wish death upon them, particularly from a disease like cancer is hideously wrong.
You do the maths.
I suppose, though, that someone as unattractive as Hinch should have smelled a rat when a stunning, young, lingerie model agreed to go to bed with him...My theory is that if something is too good to be true it usually is!
The whole point of my agenda is to point out the rampant hypocricy of this holier than thou halfwit.Life Long Saint wrote:Not wanting to defend the slime that is Derryn Hinch but surely there must be leeway if you genuinely had no idea that she is below the age of consent...and she portrays herself as over the legal age...for example a lingerie model.joffaboy wrote:statutory rape is against the law. The girl was 15.The_Merchant wrote:[The reason why he is allowed to walk around among us is because he didn't break the law. No matter how much I detest someone, or dislike how they conduct their business, to wish death upon them, particularly from a disease like cancer is hideously wrong.
You do the maths.
I suppose, though, that someone as unattractive as Hinch should have smelled a rat when a stunning, young, lingerie model agreed to go to bed with him...My theory is that if something is too good to be true it usually is!
Your statement about mittigating circumstances may be true (however ignorance is not a defence under the law in most circumstances).
Even if it was an "Ãnnocent" mistake, how much mud would stick to HINCH CHARGED WITH STATUTORY RAPE headlines?
How woudl he look even if tested in court and found not guilty. A 27 y.o. man sexually penetrating a 15 y.o. child?
Apparently the double standard is acceptable to Hinch. He can attack footballers for having sex with a LEGAL woman and deride them for thinking that she was 19, but he reckons he thought the 15 y.o. he had his way with was 25
Now that is stretching credibility to huge lengths.
Consentual sex with a minor is statutory rape. This should have been tested in court and Hinch held accountable for his actions.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5535
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 484 times
- Contact:
Of course the double standards is acceptable to Hinch as it is with nearly all of these Talkback Twits.
They're only in it for the ratings and always at someone else's expense.
As long as they've got an audience, they'll keep doing it...
Which makes the solution crystal clear.
Unfortunately, I think that we are in the minority here as most people seem to like this sort of media.
It's why rags like the Woman's Day and New Idea sell so well. People seem to be so interested in the personal lives and scandals of famous people.
I don't get it...Never have...Never will.
They're only in it for the ratings and always at someone else's expense.
As long as they've got an audience, they'll keep doing it...
Which makes the solution crystal clear.
Unfortunately, I think that we are in the minority here as most people seem to like this sort of media.
It's why rags like the Woman's Day and New Idea sell so well. People seem to be so interested in the personal lives and scandals of famous people.
I don't get it...Never have...Never will.
I think Bolt ios a tosser (Hinch honourable - pfft ) but this goes to the heart of Hich the hypocrite kiddie fiddler and confessed statutory rapist.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hinch: call the cops now
Andrew Bolt
23mar05
DERRYN Hinch, hunter of pedophiles, now says he once slept with a
15-year-old himself.
But don't worry, he reassured on 3AW last Thursday -- he thought she was 25,
and when he found the truth the next day, he dropped her.
Excuse me, but would Hinch meekly accept that excuse from any one else?
Or would he be shouting for police to at least interview the offender before
we accept it was, as I suspect, an honest mistake? Yes, let's demand the
investigation I think Hinch would want if it didn't involve him.
Something about Hinch's look-at-me revelations on his drive show doesn't
quite gell with me, and seems even offensive.
Hinch was editorialising over the Orbost teacher who was made to quit for
having committed a sexual offence on a minor -- his then girlfriend, aged
15 -- when he was 20. The man's sister has revealed what that offence was --
a consensual groping of a breast.
It was then that Hinch announced that he sympathised with the teacher
because as a 30-year-old ``I was guilty of a similar crime''.
It seems he'd met an underwear model at a party thrown by Molly Meldrum.
``We went out together days later'' -- presumably when he was sober and the
lighting good -- and ``we ended up in bed''.
Only the next day, Hinch says, did he realise from her prattle she was just
15, and not the 25 he'd assumed.
That's some misjudgment, to mistake a 15-year-old for a woman 10 years
older, but I must assume Hinch was indeed fooled both at Meldrum's party and
on the date.
After all, Hinch is an honourable man. But it's wrong for him to claim his
was ``a similar crime'' to that of the teacher. In fact, it's an insult to
the teacher.
Compare and contrast. The teacher was then just 20 when he broke the law.
Hinch was 30 -- and worldly. The teacher just fondled a breast. Hinch had
sex. The teacher was with his girlfriend. Hinch was with some girl he
dropped the next day. Little comparison as far as I'm concerned.
I know I sound harsh, given that, as I say, Hinch is an honourable man. I'm
also aware that the statute of limitations makes prosecution seemingly
impossible. But I do note that Hinch this year wrote: ``The depressing, even
ignorant, news was in Australia,
where a report showed that almost 25 per cent of those adults surveyed did
not condemn sex between a 14-year-old girl and an adult. They did not see
that as sexual abuse.''
Hinch then saw sex with a minor as inexcusably bad. Why accept excuses now?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hinch: call the cops now
Andrew Bolt
23mar05
DERRYN Hinch, hunter of pedophiles, now says he once slept with a
15-year-old himself.
But don't worry, he reassured on 3AW last Thursday -- he thought she was 25,
and when he found the truth the next day, he dropped her.
Excuse me, but would Hinch meekly accept that excuse from any one else?
Or would he be shouting for police to at least interview the offender before
we accept it was, as I suspect, an honest mistake? Yes, let's demand the
investigation I think Hinch would want if it didn't involve him.
Something about Hinch's look-at-me revelations on his drive show doesn't
quite gell with me, and seems even offensive.
Hinch was editorialising over the Orbost teacher who was made to quit for
having committed a sexual offence on a minor -- his then girlfriend, aged
15 -- when he was 20. The man's sister has revealed what that offence was --
a consensual groping of a breast.
It was then that Hinch announced that he sympathised with the teacher
because as a 30-year-old ``I was guilty of a similar crime''.
It seems he'd met an underwear model at a party thrown by Molly Meldrum.
``We went out together days later'' -- presumably when he was sober and the
lighting good -- and ``we ended up in bed''.
Only the next day, Hinch says, did he realise from her prattle she was just
15, and not the 25 he'd assumed.
That's some misjudgment, to mistake a 15-year-old for a woman 10 years
older, but I must assume Hinch was indeed fooled both at Meldrum's party and
on the date.
After all, Hinch is an honourable man. But it's wrong for him to claim his
was ``a similar crime'' to that of the teacher. In fact, it's an insult to
the teacher.
Compare and contrast. The teacher was then just 20 when he broke the law.
Hinch was 30 -- and worldly. The teacher just fondled a breast. Hinch had
sex. The teacher was with his girlfriend. Hinch was with some girl he
dropped the next day. Little comparison as far as I'm concerned.
I know I sound harsh, given that, as I say, Hinch is an honourable man. I'm
also aware that the statute of limitations makes prosecution seemingly
impossible. But I do note that Hinch this year wrote: ``The depressing, even
ignorant, news was in Australia,
where a report showed that almost 25 per cent of those adults surveyed did
not condemn sex between a 14-year-old girl and an adult. They did not see
that as sexual abuse.''
Hinch then saw sex with a minor as inexcusably bad. Why accept excuses now?
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Fair point LLS, but go through his blogs and you'll see he's quite prepared to pot Sam, who he has presumably never met, as someone who took advantage of KD knowing she was a "kid".Life Long Saint wrote:Not wanting to defend the slime that is Derryn Hinch but surely there must be leeway if you genuinely had no idea that she is below the age of consent...and she portrays herself as over the legal age...for example a lingerie model.joffaboy wrote:statutory rape is against the law. The girl was 15.The_Merchant wrote:[The reason why he is allowed to walk around among us is because he didn't break the law. No matter how much I detest someone, or dislike how they conduct their business, to wish death upon them, particularly from a disease like cancer is hideously wrong.
You do the maths.
I suppose, though, that someone as unattractive as Hinch should have smelled a rat when a stunning, young, lingerie model agreed to go to bed with him...My theory is that if something is too good to be true it usually is!
So it seems it's ok for him to say he did nothing wrong coz the girl looked older but it's not ok for our players.
That qualifies, IMO, as hypocrisy.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5535
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 484 times
- Contact:
I am not saying that he is not a hypocrite...on the contrary...This whole tirade from him stinks of hypocrisy but my last post said that this behaviour is to be expected from these talkback twits.Dr Spaceman wrote:Fair point LLS, but go through his blogs and you'll see he's quite prepared to pot Sam, who he has presumably never met, as someone who took advantage of KD knowing she was a "kid".
So it seems it's ok for him to say he did nothing wrong coz the girl looked older but it's not ok for our players.
That qualifies, IMO, as hypocrisy.
Doesn't make it right, of course!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
Spot on - it's more magazine that newspaper. It's a tabloid rag aimed at imbeciles that's not even useful as toilet paper.SainterK wrote:It's official, Herald Sun is just a glossy mag.
People have to now realise it's not personal attack against St Kilda, they are just trending towards being a publication that love to make news rather than break it....
Exhibit A
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/entertainme ... 6002072792
Roses and an item that looks suspiciously like a new mattress have been delivered to Shane Warne's Brighton mansion ahead of Liz Hurley's arrival, as workers erect screens to keep out prying eyes.
Umm hello, who do you think the prying eyes are HS, did you hide in the rubbish bin and stalk them all day to get that 'news'
Goodness me
Nick telling this woman to f off is now the second biggest story on their website. This newspaper's obsession with our football club is now at mindboggling levels.
Shouldn't that be headlined "The shame of St Kilda football club supporter Shane"?suss wrote:This newspaper's obsession with our football club is now at mindboggling levels.SainterK wrote: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/entertainme ... 6002072792
Roses and an item that looks suspiciously like a new mattress have been delivered to Shane Warne's Brighton mansion ahead of Liz Hurley's arrival, as workers erect screens to keep out prying eyes.
Umm hello, who do you think the prying eyes are HS, did you hide in the rubbish bin and stalk them all day to get that 'news'
Goodness me
Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Mon 30 Oct 2006 5:04pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
I am not trying to defend the character of the man, nor his hypocrisy. As I said in my earlier post, I personally cannot stand him and disagree with a lot of the things that come out of his mouth.joffaboy wrote:The whole point of my agenda is to point out the rampant hypocricy of this holier than thou halfwit.Life Long Saint wrote:Not wanting to defend the slime that is Derryn Hinch but surely there must be leeway if you genuinely had no idea that she is below the age of consent...and she portrays herself as over the legal age...for example a lingerie model.joffaboy wrote:statutory rape is against the law. The girl was 15.The_Merchant wrote:[The reason why he is allowed to walk around among us is because he didn't break the law. No matter how much I detest someone, or dislike how they conduct their business, to wish death upon them, particularly from a disease like cancer is hideously wrong.
You do the maths.
I suppose, though, that someone as unattractive as Hinch should have smelled a rat when a stunning, young, lingerie model agreed to go to bed with him...My theory is that if something is too good to be true it usually is!
Your statement about mittigating circumstances may be true (however ignorance is not a defence under the law in most circumstances).
Even if it was an "Ãnnocent" mistake, how much mud would stick to HINCH CHARGED WITH STATUTORY RAPE headlines?
How woudl he look even if tested in court and found not guilty. A 27 y.o. man sexually penetrating a 15 y.o. child?
Apparently the double standard is acceptable to Hinch. He can attack footballers for having sex with a LEGAL woman and deride them for thinking that she was 19, but he reckons he thought the 15 y.o. he had his way with was 25
Now that is stretching credibility to huge lengths.
Consentual sex with a minor is statutory rape. This should have been tested in court and Hinch held accountable for his actions.
From a legal stand point, however, there would be several reasons why he could not be charged. I would suggest that finding the victim would be difficult after this amount of time without help from Hinch himself. There are some issues in regards to the length of time passed, although AFAIK there is not a specific statute of limitations in Victoria for sexual offences.
Then there is the issue of consent and age.
The Victorian law states:
(4) Consent is not a defence to a charge under subsection (1) unless at the
time of the alleged offence the child was aged 12 or older and-
(a) the accused satisfies the court on the balance of probabilities that
he or she believed on reasonable grounds that the child was aged 16 or
older;
I would suggest that the police if they investigated, would immediately dismiss the investigation on these grounds.
That is why he should not be charged. It does not excuse him from being a hypocrite, or a d!ckhead. I defended SG and DA on the same grounds when they were accused, even though she was over 16. I don't think a guy should have to ask for ID (kind of a mood breaker), however, that is provided he honestly thinks the girl is at least 18.
When Hinch was lambasting SG over the allegations he faced, I thought that there was an immense level of hypocrisy as SG's claims were almost identical to his, except that the girl was over 16 and therefore 'legal'. Hinch claims, however, that SG and DA knew that the girl was 16 and followed through anyway.
On his latest 'revelations' about Nick, it is pathetic and completely blown out of proportion. I would think that Ricky Nixon may come under the spotlight far more than Nick though.
If at first you don't succeed, sky diving is not for you.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
Why should/would Nixon come under the spotlight when he was doing his job - defending his players behaviour in the face of an opportunistic bogan with no manners.
Screw the old boiler. The world owes her nothing.
Screw the old boiler. The world owes her nothing.
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
- GrumpyOne
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8163
- Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2010 9:25am
- Location: Kicked out of the Coffee Shop, Settlement Pub, Cranbourne
Having been witness to Tricky Ricky in a foul mood, I reckon her account of the phone call would be accurate.Thinline wrote:Why should/would Nixon come under the spotlight when he was doing his job - defending his players behaviour in the face of an opportunistic bogan with no manners.
Screw the old boiler. The world owes her nothing.
Roo's language would be kindergarten acceptable compared to him.
Australia...... Live it like we stole it....... Because we did.
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
That's Ricky Nixon, not Richard Nixon, we're talking aboutGrumpyOne wrote:Having been witness to Tricky Ricky in a foul mood, I reckon her account of the phone call would be accurate.Thinline wrote:Why should/would Nixon come under the spotlight when he was doing his job - defending his players behaviour in the face of an opportunistic bogan with no manners.
Screw the old boiler. The world owes her nothing.
Roo's language would be kindergarten acceptable compared to him.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4951
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 497 times
Joffaboy - I agree that indeed Hinch is a vindictive hypocrite who obviously has a agenda against the saints, and loves dragging our biggest name through the mud.
But is your rant anymore vindictive than Hinches? Demanding that someone die a slow and painful death over the internet is what I would expect from 15yr old girls on facebook having a spat.
Would you demand that Gilbert die a slow painful death if it turned out that KD was actually 15yrs old when he started a relationship with her, despite all the evidence pointing to the fact that she was older? KD was only 1 year older than the age of consent after all.
Now I'm not having a crack at Gilbert - not at all. In many respects I actually sympathise with him. Putting aside Hinch's ridiculous rants about the saints, wishing someone dead from the terminal illness they suffer b/c you believe them to be a hypocrite is unbelievable. The internet is full off keyboard bullies and to read others join in with your rants pretty much sums up society today I reckon. If you feel that strongly why don't you ring him up on his radio show and say that to his face?
But is your rant anymore vindictive than Hinches? Demanding that someone die a slow and painful death over the internet is what I would expect from 15yr old girls on facebook having a spat.
Would you demand that Gilbert die a slow painful death if it turned out that KD was actually 15yrs old when he started a relationship with her, despite all the evidence pointing to the fact that she was older? KD was only 1 year older than the age of consent after all.
Now I'm not having a crack at Gilbert - not at all. In many respects I actually sympathise with him. Putting aside Hinch's ridiculous rants about the saints, wishing someone dead from the terminal illness they suffer b/c you believe them to be a hypocrite is unbelievable. The internet is full off keyboard bullies and to read others join in with your rants pretty much sums up society today I reckon. If you feel that strongly why don't you ring him up on his radio show and say that to his face?