Umpires
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- kosifantutti23
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Fri 26 Sep 2008 12:55am
- Location: Horgen
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Another bulls*** decision, and another first against St Kilda. Maybe, as per Lenny's 'extraordinary MRP review' earlier this season, it was a 'concerned member of the public' who phoned in (wearing a black and white scarf)???kosifantutti23 wrote:When a field umpire signals all clear and a goal umpire signals a goal, isn't that it?
Who butted in and said it wasn't a goal? He would not have had a good a view as the goal umpire.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 12:29am
- Location: everywhere
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 74 times
I couldn't work that out at all - the goal umpire was in perfect position and should have told everyone else to p#ss off. That's what he is paid to do.By the way I think it was toucheddegruch wrote:Another bulls*** decision, and another first against St Kilda. Maybe, as per Lenny's 'extraordinary MRP review' earlier this season, it was a 'concerned member of the public' who phoned in (wearing a black and white scarf)???kosifantutti23 wrote:When a field umpire signals all clear and a goal umpire signals a goal, isn't that it?
Who butted in and said it wasn't a goal? He would not have had a good a view as the goal umpire.
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Looked touched to me too...but that doesn't matter, the umpire in the best position made the call, which should stand...where did the mysterious reversal originate? One of the commentators claimed "If the AFL are now using some kind of technology to influence decisions, we'd sure like to know about it". Ditto what he said.derby Street wrote:I couldn't work that out at all - the goal umpire was in perfect position and should have told everyone else to p#ss off. That's what he is paid to do.By the way I think it was toucheddegruch wrote:Another bulls*** decision, and another first against St Kilda. Maybe, as per Lenny's 'extraordinary MRP review' earlier this season, it was a 'concerned member of the public' who phoned in (wearing a black and white scarf)???kosifantutti23 wrote:When a field umpire signals all clear and a goal umpire signals a goal, isn't that it?
Who butted in and said it wasn't a goal? He would not have had a good a view as the goal umpire.
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9054
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9054
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
They'd all run into each other...it'd be like the Keystone Cops.perfectionist wrote:Apparently he thought so. I was on the wing and couldn't tell either way. Just why we don't have four goal umpires (in finals at least) remains a mystery.degruch wrote:In a better position than the goal umpire?perfectionist wrote:Boundary umpire.
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9054
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
If it is right who cares who signals it. I bet we wish a boundary umpire had said something in the Gf last year. Anyway the umpiring was good.perfectionist wrote:Apparently he thought so. I was on the wing and couldn't tell either way. Just why we don't have four goal umpires (in finals at least) remains a mystery.degruch wrote:In a better position than the goal umpire?perfectionist wrote:Boundary umpire.
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
They don't seem to interject much against St Kilda. Well, now that the standard has been set, I look forward to every umpire and official on the ground holding a conference post score to work out what should be awarded.plugger66 wrote:If it is right who cares who signals it. I bet we wish a boundary umpire had said something in the Gf last year. Anyway the umpiring was good.perfectionist wrote:Apparently he thought so. I was on the wing and couldn't tell either way. Just why we don't have four goal umpires (in finals at least) remains a mystery.degruch wrote:In a better position than the goal umpire?perfectionist wrote:Boundary umpire.
I think it is because the AFL hate us. It makes sense.degruch wrote:They don't seem to interject much against St Kilda. Well, now that the standard has been set, I look forward to every umpire and official on the ground holding a conference post score to work out what should be awarded.plugger66 wrote:If it is right who cares who signals it. I bet we wish a boundary umpire had said something in the Gf last year. Anyway the umpiring was good.perfectionist wrote:Apparently he thought so. I was on the wing and couldn't tell either way. Just why we don't have four goal umpires (in finals at least) remains a mystery.degruch wrote:In a better position than the goal umpire?perfectionist wrote:Boundary umpire.
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
You know it. Strange fact though, isn't it. Please share your tiny thoughts?plugger66 wrote:I think it is because the AFL hate us. It makes sense.degruch wrote:They don't seem to interject much against St Kilda. Well, now that the standard has been set, I look forward to every umpire and official on the ground holding a conference post score to work out what should be awarded.plugger66 wrote:If it is right who cares who signals it. I bet we wish a boundary umpire had said something in the Gf last year. Anyway the umpiring was good.perfectionist wrote:Apparently he thought so. I was on the wing and couldn't tell either way. Just why we don't have four goal umpires (in finals at least) remains a mystery.degruch wrote:In a better position than the goal umpire?perfectionist wrote:Boundary umpire.
There is nothing to say. It would be obvious they would rather a WB side limp into a final and the worst GF ever than have 2 great sides fight out a great GF. It makes sense.degruch wrote:You know it. Strange fact though, isn't it. Please share your tiny thoughts?plugger66 wrote:I think it is because the AFL hate us. It makes sense.degruch wrote:They don't seem to interject much against St Kilda. Well, now that the standard has been set, I look forward to every umpire and official on the ground holding a conference post score to work out what should be awarded.plugger66 wrote:If it is right who cares who signals it. I bet we wish a boundary umpire had said something in the Gf last year. Anyway the umpiring was good.perfectionist wrote:Apparently he thought so. I was on the wing and couldn't tell either way. Just why we don't have four goal umpires (in finals at least) remains a mystery.degruch wrote:In a better position than the goal umpire?perfectionist wrote:Boundary umpire.
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Of course it does. Seems to be a lot of scoring discrepancies against St Kilda, all clubs, any time of the year, any season. How odd.plugger66 wrote:There is nothing to say. It would be obvious they would rather a WB side limp into a final and the worst GF ever than have 2 great sides fight out a great GF. It makes sense.degruch wrote:You know it. Strange fact though, isn't it. Please share your tiny thoughts?plugger66 wrote:I think it is because the AFL hate us. It makes sense.degruch wrote:They don't seem to interject much against St Kilda. Well, now that the standard has been set, I look forward to every umpire and official on the ground holding a conference post score to work out what should be awarded.plugger66 wrote:If it is right who cares who signals it. I bet we wish a boundary umpire had said something in the Gf last year. Anyway the umpiring was good.perfectionist wrote:Apparently he thought so. I was on the wing and couldn't tell either way. Just why we don't have four goal umpires (in finals at least) remains a mystery.degruch wrote:In a better position than the goal umpire?perfectionist wrote:Boundary umpire.
Must be great watching footy with that attitude. You really should enjoy the GF next week. I prefer to think we start level next Saturday level.degruch wrote:Of course it does. Seems to be a lot of scoring discrepancies against St Kilda, all clubs, any time of the year, any season. How odd.plugger66 wrote:There is nothing to say. It would be obvious they would rather a WB side limp into a final and the worst GF ever than have 2 great sides fight out a great GF. It makes sense.degruch wrote:You know it. Strange fact though, isn't it. Please share your tiny thoughts?plugger66 wrote:I think it is because the AFL hate us. It makes sense.degruch wrote:They don't seem to interject much against St Kilda. Well, now that the standard has been set, I look forward to every umpire and official on the ground holding a conference post score to work out what should be awarded.plugger66 wrote:If it is right who cares who signals it. I bet we wish a boundary umpire had said something in the Gf last year. Anyway the umpiring was good.perfectionist wrote:Apparently he thought so. I was on the wing and couldn't tell either way. Just why we don't have four goal umpires (in finals at least) remains a mystery.degruch wrote:In a better position than the goal umpire?perfectionist wrote:Boundary umpire.
Last edited by plugger66 on Sun 19 Sep 2010 1:03am, edited 1 time in total.
- kosifantutti23
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Fri 26 Sep 2008 12:55am
- Location: Horgen
kosifantutti23 wrote:When a field umpire signals all clear and a goal umpire signals a goal, isn't that it?
from12.1.5 Goal Umpire to Judge Goal or Behind
(a) The goal Umpire shall decide whether a Goal or Behind has
been scored but may, before deciding, consult with the field or
boundary Umpires. The decision of the goal Umpire shall be
final.
http://www.afl.com.au/Portals/0/afl_doc ... l_2008.pdf
Furtius Quo Rdelious
- saintnick12
- Club Player
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:08pm
Interesting that there were no frees to us in our most dominant part of the game in the early to mid third qtr. So we did our best work without any assistance from the umpires.sRaf wrote:
Even though it was 14 to 21, I never really felt the umpiring leaned to one side. We got some that weren't there and so did they. They did well to let it go.
Overall, a pretty decently umpired game.
Opps, missed that one to us at the start. Still, good to see
"At the end of the day, a coach and a fitness adviser doesn't make a good football team, they're not the only ones who got us to two Grand Finals." Lenny Hayes. 27/9/2011.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Fri 01 Aug 2008 1:14pm
I think the umpiring early was appalling. They seemed to put the whistle away when blatant obvious free kicks should have been paid to us.
One of the most obvious, was when Rooey was being wrestled, arms chopped and had his head almost pulled off, as the ball was in flight & heading towards him and his opponant- and it wasn't paid!
What's more, the ch10 Bulldogs fans in the box were saying he played for it! -and they whinged whenever we recieved a rare, but deserved free.
On the otherhand, if anything in blue was anywhere near the ball, they suddenly found the whistle again
We could overcome the lop-sided umpiring this week, but if this unproffessional form of umpiring is present next week ...I shudder to think.
One of the most obvious, was when Rooey was being wrestled, arms chopped and had his head almost pulled off, as the ball was in flight & heading towards him and his opponant- and it wasn't paid!
What's more, the ch10 Bulldogs fans in the box were saying he played for it! -and they whinged whenever we recieved a rare, but deserved free.
On the otherhand, if anything in blue was anywhere near the ball, they suddenly found the whistle again
We could overcome the lop-sided umpiring this week, but if this unproffessional form of umpiring is present next week ...I shudder to think.
Proudly Brainwashed since 1972
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Interesting, the goal had already been awarded...so, a new rule is born!kosifantutti23 wrote:kosifantutti23 wrote:When a field umpire signals all clear and a goal umpire signals a goal, isn't that it?
from12.1.5 Goal Umpire to Judge Goal or Behind
(a) The goal Umpire shall decide whether a Goal or Behind has
been scored but may, before deciding, consult with the field or
boundary Umpires. The decision of the goal Umpire shall be
final.
http://www.afl.com.au/Portals/0/afl_doc ... l_2008.pdf