All Australian team - as it happens

wasaintsfan · Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:32pm

jarrah... pffft goddards was cleaner higher and just sexier

as for franklins goal... pavs goal in the last against geelong round 3
screaming outa the midfield 60 out... owned it

milnes goal was the sexiest though

Thinline · Post: # 987084Post **Thinline** » Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:33pm

plugger66 wrote:
Thinline wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
skeptic wrote:plugger are you just going to bait ppl all night...

ur the ultimate killjoy/downer
No I am 100% thinking they have nearly every position right. Tell me with is incorrect in your opinion. Lenny or Joey were always going to be bench players. I would have gone with Lenny but unless I am watching a different game of footy why does it matter?
It's never been more a 22 person game but there's no doubt there's a natural enough prestige attached to AA starting 18.

Would have thought that was abundantly clear.
How many AA has Lenny got?

03, 05, 09 isn't it? So what?

plugger66 · Post: # 987086Post **plugger66** » Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:33pm

wasaintsfan wrote:jarrah... pffft goddards was cleaner higher and just sexier

as for franklins goal... pavs goal in the last against geelong round 3
screaming outa the midfield 60 out... owned it

milnes goal was the sexiest though

We continue to get the poor end of every deal.

wasaintsfan · Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:34pm

plugger66 wrote:
wasaintsfan wrote:jarrah... pffft goddards was cleaner higher and just sexier

as for franklins goal... pavs goal in the last against geelong round 3
screaming outa the midfield 60 out... owned it

milnes goal was the sexiest though
We continue to get the poor end of every deal.

yes we do because we are freo and all

PakenhamSaint · Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:34pm

HF: Didak, Franklin, Chapman.

saint vince · Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:34pm

HAlf forwards

Didak franklin Chapman

skeptic · Post: # 987091Post **skeptic** » Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:34pm

plugger66 wrote:
saint vince wrote:
wasaintsfan wrote:softest midfield ever!!!!! not one hard onballer
Hodge and Selwood aren't to bad in the hardness department.
But they dont play for us.

Forgive me if I misinterpreted this comment as sarcastic and pointless... if ur argument was rose coloured glasses pumping up Saints players u could have just said it

plugger66 · Post: # 987094Post **plugger66** » Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:35pm

Thinline wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Thinline wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
skeptic wrote:plugger are you just going to bait ppl all night...

ur the ultimate killjoy/downer
No I am 100% thinking they have nearly every position right. Tell me with is incorrect in your opinion. Lenny or Joey were always going to be bench players. I would have gone with Lenny but unless I am watching a different game of footy why does it matter?
It's never been more a 22 person game but there's no doubt there's a natural enough prestige attached to AA starting 18.

Would have thought that was abundantly clear.
How many AA has Lenny got?
03, 05, 09 isn't it? So what?

When was he on the bench?

saint vince · Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:36pm

How the fudge did this thread just turn into a shoot fight??????

P66 you never fail to achieve what you set out to do.

Thinline · Post: # 987097Post **Thinline** » Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:36pm

plugger66 wrote:
wasaintsfan wrote:jarrah... pffft goddards was cleaner higher and just sexier

as for franklins goal... pavs goal in the last against geelong round 3
screaming outa the midfield 60 out... owned it

milnes goal was the sexiest though
We continue to get the poor end of every deal.

How could you possibly come to that conclusion based on that particular post?

wasaintsfan · Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:37pm

Thinline wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
wasaintsfan wrote:jarrah... pffft goddards was cleaner higher and just sexier

as for franklins goal... pavs goal in the last against geelong round 3
screaming outa the midfield 60 out... owned it

milnes goal was the sexiest though
We continue to get the poor end of every deal.
How could you possibly come to that conclusion based on that particular post?

shhh thinline he thinks hes on the dockerland website!!!!!

Thinline · Post: # 987099Post **Thinline** » Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:38pm

plugger66 wrote:
When was he on the bench?

Def not last year. But he's a better player this year.

Am I entitled to that perfectly reasonable view? Or is that representative of too much Saintly bias for you?

wasaintsfan · Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:38pm

oh and wouldve had pav over franklin when the games on the line pav always picks up the pieces for the dockers!!!! great player

maybe push franklin to the bench or flank

plugger66 · Post: # 987102Post **plugger66** » Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:38pm

Thinline wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
wasaintsfan wrote:jarrah... pffft goddards was cleaner higher and just sexier

as for franklins goal... pavs goal in the last against geelong round 3
screaming outa the midfield 60 out... owned it

milnes goal was the sexiest though
We continue to get the poor end of every deal.
How could you possibly come to that conclusion based on that particular post?

I dont think I did. Just stating my opinion.

saint vince · Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:40pm

Forwards

Hall Riewoldt (the other one) LeCras

Thinline · Post: # 987105Post **Thinline** » Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:41pm

plugger66 wrote:
Thinline wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
wasaintsfan wrote:jarrah... pffft goddards was cleaner higher and just sexier

as for franklins goal... pavs goal in the last against geelong round 3
screaming outa the midfield 60 out... owned it

milnes goal was the sexiest though
We continue to get the poor end of every deal.
How could you possibly come to that conclusion based on that particular post?
I dont think I did. Just stating my opinion.

And what was your opinion?

That the poster's opinion that a fictitious category of 'sexiest' goal and mark was somehow indicative of St Kilda players getting a rough deal?

You're off your face aren't you!

chook23 · Post: # 987108Post **chook23** » Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:41pm

At it again plug

Happy to have your opinion but not allow others.

As I have said more and more are thinking it(you are a fool).......but you just prove it

plugger66 · Post: # 987110Post **plugger66** » Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:42pm

Thinline wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Thinline wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
wasaintsfan wrote:jarrah... pffft goddards was cleaner higher and just sexier

as for franklins goal... pavs goal in the last against geelong round 3
screaming outa the midfield 60 out... owned it

milnes goal was the sexiest though
We continue to get the poor end of every deal.
How could you possibly come to that conclusion based on that particular post?
I dont think I did. Just stating my opinion.
And what was your opinion?

That the poster's opinion that a fictitious category of 'sexiest' goal and mark was somehow indicative of St Kilda players getting a rough deal?

You're off your face aren't you!

Yep.

Thinline · Post: # 987111Post **Thinline** » Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:42pm

wasaintsfan wrote:oh and wouldve had pav over franklin when the games on the line pav always picks up the pieces for the dockers!!!! great player

maybe push franklin to the bench or flank

Tend to agree. I think all in all Pav's consistency outweighs Buddy's flashes of freakishness. Line ball, though.

Thinline · Post: # 987113Post **Thinline** » Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:43pm

plugger66 wrote:
Thinline wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Thinline wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
wasaintsfan wrote:jarrah... pffft goddards was cleaner higher and just sexier

as for franklins goal... pavs goal in the last against geelong round 3
screaming outa the midfield 60 out... owned it

milnes goal was the sexiest though
We continue to get the poor end of every deal.
How could you possibly come to that conclusion based on that particular post?
I dont think I did. Just stating my opinion.
And what was your opinion?

That the poster's opinion that a fictitious category of 'sexiest' goal and mark was somehow indicative of St Kilda players getting a rough deal?

You're off your face aren't you!
Yep.

Ha. Good for you.

Not on the MRP are you?

plugger66 · Post: # 987114Post **plugger66** » Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:44pm

Thinline wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Thinline wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Thinline wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
wasaintsfan wrote:jarrah... pffft goddards was cleaner higher and just sexier

as for franklins goal... pavs goal in the last against geelong round 3
screaming outa the midfield 60 out... owned it

milnes goal was the sexiest though
We continue to get the poor end of every deal.
How could you possibly come to that conclusion based on that particular post?
I dont think I did. Just stating my opinion.
And what was your opinion?

That the poster's opinion that a fictitious category of 'sexiest' goal and mark was somehow indicative of St Kilda players getting a rough deal?

You're off your face aren't you!
Yep.
Ha. Good for you.

Not on the MRP are you?

I hope not. i have been at the McKinnon sice 10am this morning.

Thinline · Post: # 987117Post **Thinline** » Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:45pm

Must be going well. So well that you're on here...

plugger66 · Post: # 987118Post **plugger66** » Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:47pm

Thinline wrote:Must be going well. So well that you're on here...

Sorry i would have thought 10 hours today on top of 15 hours yesterday would have been enough. I may post to much but I do give my other club a lot more than I reckon people on here give any club.

wasaintsfan · Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:48pm

pav kicked 3 less goals then franklin but

spent more time in the midfield(also was playing injured for a wile) and did the hard stuff when dockers needed some one to step up

hence why i think his goal screaming out of the midfield vs geelong round 3 was a much better goal then franklins

more pressure.. dodging through the "greatest team of all's" midfield like theyre the under 12s then from the centre square unloading a drop punt that easily clears the line

saint vince · Mon 13 Sep 2010 9:49pm

Alistair Clarkson is a knob. Taken over from BT has biggest clown of the night