Stanley in the 22

Bernard Shakey · Fri 13 Aug 2010 10:11pm

plugger66 wrote:
GoTheTorp wrote:As per my mail a week ago that i posted back then.

He was always going to play.
Hilarious.

Yes and I got it right yesterday.

plugger66 · Post: # 971563Post **plugger66** » Fri 13 Aug 2010 10:16pm

Bernard Shakey wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
GoTheTorp wrote:As per my mail a week ago that i posted back then.

He was always going to play.
Hilarious.
Yes and I got it right yesterday.

Yes I got it right on Monday and got it completely wrong yesterday but apparently the word was he was playing and it was obvious.

Bernard Shakey · Fri 13 Aug 2010 10:32pm

plugger66 wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
GoTheTorp wrote:As per my mail a week ago that i posted back then.

He was always going to play.
Hilarious.
Yes and I got it right yesterday.
Yes I got it right on Monday and got it completely wrong yesterday but apparently the word was he was playing and it was obvious.

Sorry, but on Monday you named half the Sandy team including "Stanlet" and said it would finally be Pattison for Gardiner.

plugger66 · Post: # 971573Post **plugger66** » Fri 13 Aug 2010 10:36pm

Bernard Shakey wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
GoTheTorp wrote:As per my mail a week ago that i posted back then.

He was always going to play.
Hilarious.
Yes and I got it right yesterday.
Yes I got it right on Monday and got it completely wrong yesterday but apparently the word was he was playing and it was obvious.
Sorry, but on Monday you named half the Sandy team including "Stanlet" and said it would finally be Pattison for Gardiner.

What are you actually talking about. Named one on Monday and admitted I got it wrong yesterday. better than some saying they are in the know and it was obvious. By the way how many has Joey missed lately?

Teflon · Post: # 971576Post **Teflon** » Fri 13 Aug 2010 10:52pm

Good move.

Stanleys speed for fwd pressure in the back half could be really telling....

IMHO IF Kosi plays a good game, settles in ruck and is able to drift fwd and become dangerous......we just might have found a set up that gives us the best of both worlds....

IF Kosi could hold down second ruck.....alongside Gardiner......Stanley up fwd next to Roo still provides a lead up option but importantly some serious pace to hassle defenders.....

Bernard Shakey · Fri 13 Aug 2010 10:55pm

Sorry about that chief, I stuffed up with your Guess post yesterday.

Anyway Thinline was right, but stuffed up by saying it would probably be Pattison.

Joey is due for a rest and I reckon it's next week.

Stanley deserves a game and I hope he grabs it by the scruff of the neck and wrings it for all it's worth.

mohannair · Post: # 971584Post **mohannair** » Fri 13 Aug 2010 11:04pm

WaggaSaint wrote:Ok, I'm going to ask a possibly dumb question - can Rhys ruck?

I know he's light bodied and all, but he's very athletic. Good jump etc. I don't know that much about him, other than (as it's bloody obvious), he's quick...

Yes he can.

Also we can put Blakey into ruck. I still remember his game against the Hawks in 08 where he rucked & also kicked few goals to get that "upset" win.

stinger · Post: # 971586Post **stinger** » Fri 13 Aug 2010 11:26pm

WaggaSaint wrote:Ok, I'm going to ask a possibly dumb question - can Rhys ruck?

I know he's light bodied and all, but he's very athletic. Good jump etc. I don't know that much about him, other than (as it's bloody obvious), he's quick...

yes he can...but still very raw in the ruck....

GoTheTorp · Post: # 971588Post **GoTheTorp** » Fri 13 Aug 2010 11:27pm

Bernard Shakey wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
GoTheTorp wrote:As per my mail a week ago that i posted back then.

He was always going to play.
Hilarious.

Typical tugger33 reply, what a loser, you know zero china, so back to your sandpit

i dont care if you want the info or not, your just a petty child and prove it over and over. I have nothing to prove, i offer some info that i sometimes receive, take it or leave it, no need for childish replies, it means zero to me and possible most other posters as well. Best i just shut up and dont relay anything i may know or find out ok? oh little one..

saintnick12 · Fri 13 Aug 2010 11:37pm

Teflon wrote:Good move.

Stanleys speed for fwd pressure in the back half could be really telling....

IMHO IF Kosi plays a good game, settles in ruck and is able to drift fwd and become dangerous......we just might have found a set up that gives us the best of both worlds....

IF Kosi could hold down second ruck.....alongside Gardiner......Stanley up fwd next to Roo still provides a lead up option but importantly some serious pace to hassle defenders.....

I like this, though that would mean no spot for McEvoy who I think has earned his place this year. He looked good drifting forward last week too. It would be unlucky for him if he got dropped for Gardiner and Stanley kept his place (Much as I like Stanley). Having said that, Ross will do whatever he thinks will work best - regardless. And we'll just have to trust him on that.

GoTheTorp · Post: # 971600Post **GoTheTorp** » Fri 13 Aug 2010 11:45pm

plugger66 wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
GoTheTorp wrote:As per my mail a week ago that i posted back then.

He was always going to play.
Hilarious.
Yes and I got it right yesterday.
Yes I got it right on Monday and got it completely wrong yesterday but apparently the word was he was playing and it was obvious.
Sorry, but on Monday you named half the Sandy team including "Stanlet" and said it would finally be Pattison for Gardiner.
What are you actually talking about. Named one on Monday and admitted I got it wrong yesterday. better than some saying they are in the know and it was obvious. By the way how many has Joey missed lately?

Hey tugger33 never said i was in the know but heres my post from last Sunday that 1: never claimed i was in the know and 2: never wavered from my original post

http://www.saintsational.com/forum/view ... hp?t=63875

thanks and kiss kiss good night..

emmdee · Post: # 971654Post **emmdee** » Sat 14 Aug 2010 8:28am

is this the first game Stanley has played with Roo in the side? if so it may give him a better chance to take some grabs up forward with less pressure from defenders .......will be interesting to see how/where Ross plays him

plugger66 · Post: # 971655Post **plugger66** » Sat 14 Aug 2010 9:00am

GoTheTorp wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
GoTheTorp wrote:As per my mail a week ago that i posted back then.

He was always going to play.
Hilarious.
Yes and I got it right yesterday.
Yes I got it right on Monday and got it completely wrong yesterday but apparently the word was he was playing and it was obvious.
Sorry, but on Monday you named half the Sandy team including "Stanlet" and said it would finally be Pattison for Gardiner.
What are you actually talking about. Named one on Monday and admitted I got it wrong yesterday. better than some saying they are in the know and it was obvious. By the way how many has Joey missed lately?
Hey tugger33 never said i was in the know but heres my post from last Sunday that 1: never claimed i was in the know and 2: never wavered from my original post

http://www.saintsational.com/forum/view ... hp?t=63875

thanks and kiss kiss good night..

Even more hilarous.

GoTheTorp · Post: # 971658Post **GoTheTorp** » Sat 14 Aug 2010 9:17am

plugger66 wrote:
GoTheTorp wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
GoTheTorp wrote:As per my mail a week ago that i posted back then.

He was always going to play.
Hilarious.
Yes and I got it right yesterday.
Yes I got it right on Monday and got it completely wrong yesterday but apparently the word was he was playing and it was obvious.
Sorry, but on Monday you named half the Sandy team including "Stanlet" and said it would finally be Pattison for Gardiner.
What are you actually talking about. Named one on Monday and admitted I got it wrong yesterday. better than some saying they are in the know and it was obvious. By the way how many has Joey missed lately?
Hey tugger33 never said i was in the know but heres my post from last Sunday that 1: never claimed i was in the know and 2: never wavered from my original post

http://www.saintsational.com/forum/view ... hp?t=63875

thanks and kiss kiss good night..
Even more hilarous.

Yes you are

Solar · Post: # 971804Post **Solar** » Sat 14 Aug 2010 7:08pm

couple of thoughts

No way blake will ruck unless we lose a ruck to injury or the game is similar to last week and over at quarter time.

Stanley rucks very similar to ryder, good spring and does his best work once the ball hits the ground. Would be useful in spurts.

Big challenge for macca and kosi as the kanga's two rucks are VERY good.

Good team, no reason why the structures should not stand up. Need to win the hard ball gets, clearances, tackles and move it quickly.

stinger · Post: # 971831Post **stinger** » Sat 14 Aug 2010 7:54pm

emmdee wrote:is this the first game Stanley has played with Roo in the side? if so it may give him a better chance to take some grabs up forward with less pressure from defenders .......will be interesting to see how/where Ross plays him

they played together in one or two of the preseason games .....