Yep...SainterK wrote:Hmmm, well I guess I should of applied the 'if it gets past 4 pages it's one of those threads' theory before having a read....
Should look at the pictures for a quick scan also
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
No you haven't disclosed anything apart from the fact that you have accessed, and advised the world that you have accessed, information that you had no right to access.St Fidelius wrote:Hey saintspremiers....
On second thoughts...
I am looking forward to you calling me a FW face to face.....
Our Next and Only home game in the home and away season...
See you in round 21 and you can tell me face to face that I am a FW...
Looking forward to meeting you...
as for BS...
I have not comprised anything and what about getting a clue before you call another poster a disgrace :idea: :idea: :roll: :roll:
Fair Dinkum, there are some idiots on here....
again BS I have not disclosed anything and just why you have called me a disgrace deservers a warning IMO
Sorry but how do you know he's not entitled/supposed to see the information.Bernard Shakey wrote:No you haven't disclosed anything apart from the fact that you have accessed, and advised the world that you have accessed, information that you had no right to access.St Fidelius wrote:Hey saintspremiers....
On second thoughts...
I am looking forward to you calling me a FW face to face.....
Our Next and Only home game in the home and away season...
See you in round 21 and you can tell me face to face that I am a FW...
Looking forward to meeting you...
as for BS...
I have not comprised anything and what about getting a clue before you call another poster a disgrace
Fair Dinkum, there are some idiots on here....
again BS I have not disclosed anything and just why you have called me a disgrace deservers a warning IMO
As far as I'm concerned the OPI should be very interested in your activities. Pretty sad affair when coppers can just look up anything they like about anybody. You are still a disgrace.
It still doesn't excuse his threatening behaviour though.Mr Magic wrote:Sorry but how do you know he's not entitled/supposed to see the information.Bernard Shakey wrote:No you haven't disclosed anything apart from the fact that you have accessed, and advised the world that you have accessed, information that you had no right to access.St Fidelius wrote:Hey saintspremiers....
On second thoughts...
I am looking forward to you calling me a FW face to face.....
Our Next and Only home game in the home and away season...
See you in round 21 and you can tell me face to face that I am a FW...
Looking forward to meeting you...
as for BS...
I have not comprised anything and what about getting a clue before you call another poster a disgrace
Fair Dinkum, there are some idiots on here....
again BS I have not disclosed anything and just why you have called me a disgrace deservers a warning IMO
As far as I'm concerned the OPI should be very interested in your activities. Pretty sad affair when coppers can just look up anything they like about anybody. You are still a disgrace.
Maybe he's in a position to see it as part of his normal work?
You assume that he's not and then state it as a fact?
As far as I can determine,IluvHarvey wrote:It still doesn't excuse his threatening behaviour though.Mr Magic wrote:Sorry but how do you know he's not entitled/supposed to see the information.Bernard Shakey wrote:No you haven't disclosed anything apart from the fact that you have accessed, and advised the world that you have accessed, information that you had no right to access.St Fidelius wrote:Hey saintspremiers....
On second thoughts...
I am looking forward to you calling me a FW face to face.....
Our Next and Only home game in the home and away season...
See you in round 21 and you can tell me face to face that I am a FW...
Looking forward to meeting you...
as for BS...
I have not comprised anything and what about getting a clue before you call another poster a disgrace
Fair Dinkum, there are some idiots on here....
again BS I have not disclosed anything and just why you have called me a disgrace deservers a warning IMO
As far as I'm concerned the OPI should be very interested in your activities. Pretty sad affair when coppers can just look up anything they like about anybody. You are still a disgrace.
Maybe he's in a position to see it as part of his normal work?
You assume that he's not and then state it as a fact?
If it is part of his normal work, I can assure you he is not entitled to brag about it on a footy forum. I worked for forty years in an environment where I had information on just about every person in this country. If I had disclosed anything at all, I would have been instantly dismissed and subject to criminal charges. He is a disgrace.Mr Magic wrote:Sorry but how do you know he's not entitled/supposed to see the information.Bernard Shakey wrote:No you haven't disclosed anything apart from the fact that you have accessed, and advised the world that you have accessed, information that you had no right to access.St Fidelius wrote:Hey saintspremiers....
On second thoughts...
I am looking forward to you calling me a FW face to face.....
Our Next and Only home game in the home and away season...
See you in round 21 and you can tell me face to face that I am a FW...
Looking forward to meeting you...
as for BS...
I have not comprised anything and what about getting a clue before you call another poster a disgrace :idea: :idea: :roll: :roll:
Fair Dinkum, there are some idiots on here....
again BS I have not disclosed anything and just why you have called me a disgrace deservers a warning IMO
As far as I'm concerned the OPI should be very interested in your activities. Pretty sad affair when coppers can just look up anything they like about anybody. You are still a disgrace.
Maybe he's in a position to see it as part of his normal work?
You assume that he's not and then state it as a fact?
Well, as I have said all along I have not disclosed anything and for you call me a disgrace is worth a warning...Bernard Shakey wrote:No you haven't disclosed anything apart from the fact that you have accessed, and advised the world that you have accessed, information that you had no right to access.St Fidelius wrote:Hey saintspremiers....
On second thoughts...
I am looking forward to you calling me a FW face to face.....
Our Next and Only home game in the home and away season...
See you in round 21 and you can tell me face to face that I am a FW...
Looking forward to meeting you...
as for BS...
I have not comprised anything and what about getting a clue before you call another poster a disgrace
Fair Dinkum, there are some idiots on here....
again BS I have not disclosed anything and just why you have called me a disgrace deservers a warning IMO
As far as I'm concerned the OPI should be very interested in your activities. Pretty sad affair when coppers can just look up anything they like about anybody. You are still a disgrace.
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
To be nitpickyBernard Shakey wrote:If it is part of his normal work, I can assure you he is not entitled to brag about it on a footy forum. I worked for forty years in an environment where I had information on just about every person in this country. If I had disclosed anything at all, I would have been instantly dismissed and subject to criminal charges. He is a disgrace.Mr Magic wrote:Sorry but how do you know he's not entitled/supposed to see the information.Bernard Shakey wrote:No you haven't disclosed anything apart from the fact that you have accessed, and advised the world that you have accessed, information that you had no right to access.St Fidelius wrote:Hey saintspremiers....
On second thoughts...
I am looking forward to you calling me a FW face to face.....
Our Next and Only home game in the home and away season...
See you in round 21 and you can tell me face to face that I am a FW...
Looking forward to meeting you...
as for BS...
I have not comprised anything and what about getting a clue before you call another poster a disgrace
Fair Dinkum, there are some idiots on here....
again BS I have not disclosed anything and just why you have called me a disgrace deservers a warning IMO
As far as I'm concerned the OPI should be very interested in your activities. Pretty sad affair when coppers can just look up anything they like about anybody. You are still a disgrace.
Maybe he's in a position to see it as part of his normal work?
You assume that he's not and then state it as a fact?
You have stated on a public internet forum that you have access to prosecution information that is before the courts at the moment. It is clear from earlier posts that you are a serving member of the Victoria Police Force. In my opinion it is a disgrace that you would post that here. Ergo, you are a disgrace.St Fidelius wrote:Well, as I have said all along I have not disclosed anything and for you call me a disgrace is worth a warning... :idea:Bernard Shakey wrote:No you haven't disclosed anything apart from the fact that you have accessed, and advised the world that you have accessed, information that you had no right to access.St Fidelius wrote:Hey saintspremiers....
On second thoughts...
I am looking forward to you calling me a FW face to face.....
Our Next and Only home game in the home and away season...
See you in round 21 and you can tell me face to face that I am a FW...
Looking forward to meeting you...
as for BS...
I have not comprised anything and what about getting a clue before you call another poster a disgrace :idea: :idea: :roll: :roll:
Fair Dinkum, there are some idiots on here....
again BS I have not disclosed anything and just why you have called me a disgrace deservers a warning IMO
As far as I'm concerned the OPI should be very interested in your activities. Pretty sad affair when coppers can just look up anything they like about anybody. You are still a disgrace.
I am in regular contact with the OPI and I have no reason why they "should be very interested in me specificity"
Now just where are you going with this???
Again just who is the person that has labelled me a disgrace, and just what it has stemmed from.???
You call a poster a disgrace and I am the one that wants answers .
I don't like being called a disgrace, and again why have you called me so??
That is your opinion and so be it...Bernard Shakey wrote: If it is part of his normal work, I can assure you he is not entitled to brag about it on a footy forum. I worked for forty years in an environment where I had information on just about every person in this country. If I had disclosed anything at all, I would have been instantly dismissed and subject to criminal charges. He is a disgrace.
Just who is a disgrace.....
You have stated on a public internet forum that you have access to prosecution information that is before the courts at the moment. It is clear from earlier posts that you are a serving member of the Victoria Police Force. In my opinion it is a disgrace that you would post that here. Ergo, you are a disgrace.
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
If you continue in this attacking manor I will love to see you warned....Bernard Shakey wrote:You have stated on a public internet forum that you have access to prosecution information that is before the courts at the moment. It is clear from earlier posts that you are a serving member of the Victoria Police Force. In my opinion it is a disgrace that you would post that here. Ergo, you are a disgrace.St Fidelius wrote:Well, as I have said all along I have not disclosed anything and for you call me a disgrace is worth a warning...Bernard Shakey wrote:No you haven't disclosed anything apart from the fact that you have accessed, and advised the world that you have accessed, information that you had no right to access.St Fidelius wrote:Hey saintspremiers....
On second thoughts...
I am looking forward to you calling me a FW face to face.....
Our Next and Only home game in the home and away season...
See you in round 21 and you can tell me face to face that I am a FW...
Looking forward to meeting you...
as for BS...
I have not comprised anything and what about getting a clue before you call another poster a disgrace
Fair Dinkum, there are some idiots on here....
again BS I have not disclosed anything and just why you have called me a disgrace deservers a warning IMO
As far as I'm concerned the OPI should be very interested in your activities. Pretty sad affair when coppers can just look up anything they like about anybody. You are still a disgrace.
I am in regular contact with the OPI and I have no reason why they "should be very interested in me specificity"
Now just where are you going with this???
Again just who is the person that has labelled me a disgrace, and just what it has stemmed from.???
You call a poster a disgrace and I am the one that wants answers .
I don't like being called a disgrace, and again why have you called me so??
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
St Fid I must agree with BS. If you do have access to this information the last place you should be mentioning anything about the case is on here. If you dont have access you are just big noting yourself. Either way you shouldnt be saying anything on here. An no amount of yelling at each other makes you right.St Fidelius wrote:If you continue in this attacking manor I will love to see you warned....Bernard Shakey wrote:You have stated on a public internet forum that you have access to prosecution information that is before the courts at the moment. It is clear from earlier posts that you are a serving member of the Victoria Police Force. In my opinion it is a disgrace that you would post that here. Ergo, you are a disgrace.St Fidelius wrote:Well, as I have said all along I have not disclosed anything and for you call me a disgrace is worth a warning...Bernard Shakey wrote:No you haven't disclosed anything apart from the fact that you have accessed, and advised the world that you have accessed, information that you had no right to access.St Fidelius wrote:Hey saintspremiers....
On second thoughts...
I am looking forward to you calling me a FW face to face.....
Our Next and Only home game in the home and away season...
See you in round 21 and you can tell me face to face that I am a FW...
Looking forward to meeting you...
as for BS...
I have not comprised anything and what about getting a clue before you call another poster a disgrace
Fair Dinkum, there are some idiots on here....
again BS I have not disclosed anything and just why you have called me a disgrace deservers a warning IMO
As far as I'm concerned the OPI should be very interested in your activities. Pretty sad affair when coppers can just look up anything they like about anybody. You are still a disgrace.
I am in regular contact with the OPI and I have no reason why they "should be very interested in me specificity"
Now just where are you going with this???
Again just who is the person that has labelled me a disgrace, and just what it has stemmed from.???
You call a poster a disgrace and I am the one that wants answers .
I don't like being called a disgrace, and again why have you called me so??
this is about the third time you have called me a "disgrace" and I believe it's without justification
You have continued with the same vein thought his thread...
and have been a proven wanker when it comes to challenge via PM
BS = ZERO
GrumpyOne wrote: St Kilda hung Lovett out to try in no uncertain terms. It was plain the players never wanted him and found the reason to get rid of him. They forced the club's hand.
Only two people really know what happened... the girl and Lovett. Neither come out shining in this sorry story.
Lovett's career is now f***ed, and he has yet to be found guilty.
good on SEN for backing us...bigred wrote:Anyone else rather annoyed with the way the club has been portrayed in the Herald Sun this morning?
Please tell me you don't drive... or vote.ace wrote:Innocent or guilty Lovett's name has been trashed through the media.
At the same time the name of his accuser and her friend has been suppressed by the courts.
But the need for justice to be seen to be done demands that Lovett's name not be suppressed from reporting.
An interesting example of equality before the law.
If Lovett were to be found innocent would the court order that his accuser's name be equally trashed by the media with at least equal time and equal prominence.
Me thinks not.
The law is a law unto itself.
Not unusual, in fact, probably typical...and the courts would be full of cases like this. Rape accusations always warrant further investigation, unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on what side of the bench you're sitting) further investigation finds something to the tune of 60% are false. Ah, booze and sex, what a great combo...the courts would be empty otherwise!Thinline wrote:As an aside, I'm gobsmacked it's got past committal. Drunk people, confusion, unwitnessed, wildly different accounts...But what do I know...
Agree.Thinline wrote:To be honest, I'm extraordinarily impressed with (reportedly) how all the witness players handled themselves in a horrible situation.
It seems they all showed tremendous maturity. I'm not sure I would have been so level-headed with a noggin full of grog.
As an aside, I'm gobsmacked it's got past committal. Drunk people, confusion, unwitnessed, wildly different accounts...But what do I know...