Five saints called in Lovett case

[saintbrat]

About Lovett.

He never played for St Kilda, he just took our money.

He is more of an ex-Bomber than an ex-Saint. It's a shame we keep getting our club's name associated with him.

I hope this case galvanises the group.

he is already paid out- would I believe never play for us again..... too much water under the bridge.. there were more than the one issue

[Milan Faletic]

About Lovett.

He never played for St Kilda, he just took our money.

He is more of an ex-Bomber than an ex-Saint. It's a shame we keep getting our club's name associated with him.

I hope this case galvanises the group.

he is already paid out- would I believe never play for us again..... too much water under the bridge.. there were more than the one issue

Sorry SB, edited my post as you quoted me. I agree with you. Just saw the report on the news too.

[AlpineStars]

Thats exactly what piss's me off on the news they say "former St Kilda player"

What about "Former AFL star"?

or

"Former Essendon and St Kilda player"

or

Former AFL star who was given glowing character references by the Essendon Football club personal.

[Dr Spaceman]

Thats exactly what piss's me off on the news they say "former St Kilda player"

What about "Former AFL star"?

or

"Former Essendon and St Kilda player"

or

Former AFL star who was given glowing character references by the Essendon Football club personal.

In the 1992 pre season draft, Tim Watson was recruited by West Coast. He never played a game for the club.

I patiently wait for the day he is referred to as ex Eagle player Tim Watson!

[Cairnsman]

About Lovett.

He never played for St Kilda, he just took our money.

He is more of an ex-Bomber than an ex-Saint. It's a shame we keep getting our club's name associated with him.

I hope this case galvanises the group.

EXCELLENT POINT!

[saintspremiers]

I just hope the prick has a long time to behind bars to think about what he has allegedly done....which would vindicate our decision to sack him.

[plugger66]

I just hope the prick has a long time to behind bars to think about what he has allegedly done....which would vindicate our decision to sack him.

I hope he gets time if he did it. I dont want him to get time if he didnt just to vindicate our decision to sack him.

[lendog heaven]

Thats exactly what piss's me off on the news they say "former St Kilda player"

What about "Former AFL star"?

or

"Former Essendon and St Kilda player"

or

Former AFL star who was given glowing character references by the Essendon Football club personal.

what abt 'former Ess player and Stk recruit'?

[Moccha]

I just hope the prick has a long time to behind bars to think about what he has allegedly done....which would vindicate our decision to sack him.

I hope he gets time if he did it. I dont want him to get time if he didnt just to vindicate our decision to sack him.

Good point but most would still like him to be put away for no reason

[GrumpyOne]

I just hope the prick has a long time to behind bars to think about what he has allegedly done....which would vindicate our decision to sack him.

I hope he gets time if he did it. I dont want him to get time if he didnt just to vindicate our decision to sack him.

Good point but most would still like him to be put away for no reason

We all should let the legal process run its course.

Prognostications on a footy forum are just basically stabs in the dark.

[ChicagoSaint]

I just hope the prick has a long time to behind bars to think about what he has allegedly done....which would vindicate our decision to sack him.

I hope he gets time if he did it. I dont want him to get time if he didnt just to vindicate our decision to sack him.

Good point but most would still like him to be put away for no reason

We all should let the legal process run its course.

Prognostications on a footy forum are just basically stabs in the dark.

Lovett 'raped sleeping woman'

Is that a majority?

[Dr Spaceman]

Prognostications on a footy forum are just basically stabs in the dark.

Stabs in the dark?

That appears to be what the victim is alleging!

[GrumpyOne]

Prognostications on a footy forum are just basically stabs in the dark.

Stabs in the dark?

That appears to be what the victim is alleging!

On reflection, I should have rephrased that.

[stinger]

I just hope the prick has a long time to behind bars to think about what he has allegedly done....which would vindicate our decision to sack him.

i have a feeling your wish will be granted.......unless the defence plays the race card......which appears to be the direction they are heading.....

[ChicagoSaint]

About Lovett.

He never played for St Kilda, he just took our money.

He is more of an ex-Bomber than an ex-Saint. It's a shame we keep getting our club's name associated with him.

I hope this case galvanises the group.

weak committal, the chick is a no show.
even if it goes to trial it's unlikely that he'll be found guilty on either charge.
even if by some stroke of extra-ordinarily bad luck he gets found guilty it's extremely unlikely that with his character he'll get locked-up.

[saintbrat]

About Lovett.

He never played for St Kilda, he just took our money.

He is more of an ex-Bomber than an ex-Saint. It's a shame we keep getting our club's name associated with him.

I hope this case galvanises the group.

weak committal, the chick is a no show.
even if it goes to trial it's unlikely that he'll be found guilty on either charge.
even if by some stroke of extra-ordinarily bad luck he gets found guilty it's extremely unlikely that with his character he'll get locked-up.

why do you say ' no show'
from what I heard her evidence was given 'in camera ' this morning?

[ChicagoSaint]

About Lovett.

He never played for St Kilda, he just took our money.

He is more of an ex-Bomber than an ex-Saint. It's a shame we keep getting our club's name associated with him.

I hope this case galvanises the group.

weak committal, the chick is a no show.
even if it goes to trial it's unlikely that he'll be found guilty on either charge.
even if by some stroke of extra-ordinarily bad luck he gets found guilty it's extremely unlikely that with his character he'll get locked-up.

why do you say ' no show'
from what I heard her evidence was given 'in camera ' this morning?

trust me man.
if she doesn't turn up at the committal it's her word against his.

[saintbrat]

trust me man.
if she doesn't turn up at the committal it's her word against his.

as I said- I heard she gave evidence this morning- but media were removed...

[stinger]

...c s ,your post doesn't make sense....

[Spinner]

I just hope the prick has a long time to behind bars to think about what he has allegedly done....which would vindicate our decision to sack him.

I hope he gets time if he did it. I dont want him to get time if he didnt just to vindicate our decision to sack him.

Spot f****** on!

[ChicagoSaint]

as I said- I heard she gave evidence this morning- but media were removed...

...c s ,your post doesn't make sense....

what's frustrating is being right all the time in the face of idiots.
cast your mind's forward six months from now and try to think about what the potential outcomes may be, good and bad.
now try to look at the facts of the case? you dont know? well nor do i and nor does anyone other than the accused.
the law is an ass at the end of the day.
it makes no difference whether the accused is guilty or innocent.

[stinger]

as I said- I heard she gave evidence this morning- but media were removed...

...c s ,your post doesn't make sense....

what's frustrating is being right all the time in the face of idiots.
cast your mind's forward six months from now and try to think about what the potential outcomes may be, good and bad.
now try to look at the facts of the case? you dont know? well nor do i and nor does anyone other than the accused.
the law is an ass at the end of the day.
it makes no difference whether the accused is guilty or innocent.

pretty clear to me who the idiot is.....

[ChicagoSaint]

as I said- I heard she gave evidence this morning- but media were removed...

...c s ,your post doesn't make sense....

what's frustrating is being right all the time in the face of idiots.
cast your mind's forward six months from now and try to think about what the potential outcomes may be, good and bad.
now try to look at the facts of the case? you dont know? well nor do i and nor does anyone other than the accused.
the law is an ass at the end of the day.
it makes no difference whether the accused is guilty or innocent.

pretty clear to me who the idiot is.....

believe what you like. the odds of time are somewhere between 120 and 750-to-one

[stinger]

yawn.....

[bigred]

lawl.