Zac!

sax · Post: # 960983Post **sax** » Fri 23 Jul 2010 10:28pm

He is a F**KEN DUD!
LIABILITY!

Ralphy · Post: # 960991Post **Ralphy** » Fri 23 Jul 2010 10:32pm

sax wrote:He is a F**KEN DUD!
LIABILITY!

Think....Goose....silvagni, either of them would be a hell of alot better.

BonoRocks · Post: # 961008Post **BonoRocks** » Fri 23 Jul 2010 10:53pm

oh but come on most of these guys wanted him in a wet grand final ahead of one of the hardest players to kick a goal against of the last decade

why do people only figure this out now, lets hope our coach soon does..

continually gets lost. Should be told go for the ball not worry about your man..

sax · Post: # 961016Post **sax** » Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:04pm

I have always said he's a DUD! NEVER thought any different!

Ralphy · Post: # 961019Post **Ralphy** » Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:05pm

sax wrote:I have always said he's a DUD! NEVER thought any different!

sorry i thought it since we drafted him over silvagni....

johnpeterbudgefanclub · Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:05pm

Ironically as I recall Tyson Goldsack was offered up as part of the Ball trade. Pretty handy player and happy we didnt part with him.

wasaintsfan · Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:08pm

good work supporting

saintsareprettygoodhey · Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:09pm

sax,

you are a 'f***** dud liability'

do not need supporters like you

piss off

BonoRocks · Post: # 961055Post **BonoRocks** » Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:24pm

johnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:Ironically as I recall Tyson Goldsack was offered up as part of the Ball trade. Pretty handy player and happy we didnt part with him.

we looked a whole lot better when zac was running round in the two's

degruch · Post: # 961092Post **degruch** » Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:37pm

Ralphy wrote:
sax wrote:He is a F**KEN DUD!
LIABILITY!
Think....Goose....silvagni, either of them would be a hell of alot better.

Both regularly out injured...that'd be handy.

satchmo · Post: # 961096Post **satchmo** » Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:40pm

johnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:Ironically as I recall Tyson Goldsack was offered up as part of the Ball trade. Pretty handy player and happy we didnt part with him.

So are we.

Of course piggy malthouse said he wouldn't trade any good players. So maybe he was proven wrong about goldsack?

kosifantutti23 · Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:42pm

saintsareprettygoodhey wrote:sax,

you are a 'f***** dud liability'

do not need supporters like you

piss off

Good call.

I can never be analytical after watching live but I thought Buddy's goals came from letting the Hawks run free in the midfield or cr@p 50m penalties.

sax · Post: # 961100Post **sax** » Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:42pm

saintsareprettygoodhey wrote:sax,

you are a 'f***** dud liability'

do not need supporters like you

piss off

How long have you been a supporter D**kHEAD! I'm able to have an oppinion, this is it! If I think a bloke is a Dud, I'll say it! I'm not a selector, it doesn't come down to me, so back in you're box, pissant!
I don't hate the bloke, I just think we can do better!
I've been a member for 20 years, so how am I a dud liability, Pleb? Tell me!

Joffa 5 · Post: # 961109Post **Joffa 5** » Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:46pm

Zac's game was ok IMO

bigred · Post: # 961112Post **bigred** » Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:47pm

20 years...... Is that all?

sax · Post: # 961114Post **sax** » Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:48pm

bigred wrote:20 years...... Is that all?

I'm only 26!

degruch · Post: # 961116Post **degruch** » Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:48pm

Joffa 5 wrote:Zac's game was ok IMO

Still watching the reply, but looks OK to me too. Standard whipping boy thread.

nuttsy · Post: # 961117Post **nuttsy** » Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:49pm

Zac played a great game on fishlips, the midfield let him down

Joffa 5 · Post: # 961126Post **Joffa 5** » Fri 23 Jul 2010 11:56pm

that free when he spoiled franklin was pathetic

Verdun66 · Post: # 961130Post **Verdun66** » Sat 24 Jul 2010 12:03am

I thought he did ok. Who would do better on Buddy? Thought he did some terrific things, like the time he came back with a second and third effort. The free when he spoiled Buddy on the lead was 'tiggy touchwood' in the extreme.

nuttsy · Post: # 961145Post **nuttsy** » Sat 24 Jul 2010 12:13am

from where I was sitting it looked ok. I've noticed that buddy has a habit of throwing his arms back when running forward to milk the free

Thinline · Post: # 961153Post **Thinline** » Sat 24 Jul 2010 12:16am

Case of B grade Commodore against A+ grade rocket ship.

Zac toiled. Won some small battles, lost several bigger ones. Big deal.

philtee · Post: # 961159Post **philtee** » Sat 24 Jul 2010 12:18am

Zac was OK.

3rd generation saint · Sat 24 Jul 2010 12:38am

Zac did alright, Buddy got two charities, Zac beat him on several occasions one on one.
Actually think Zac's last three games he has shown signs of last years forms.
But yes we could have Goose, sadly injured indefinetly, so Buddy would have had field day there and Silvangi, injured two and doubt even fit he would have faired any better.
Of course we could bring Max out of retirement, but that isn't going to happen.

mad saint guy · Sat 24 Jul 2010 12:40am

Tonight was probably Zac's best performance for the year. He usually beat Franklin one-on-one though was penalised for a brilliant contest which gifted Franklin a goal. There were a couple of occasions where Dawson was a bit loose but that kind of performance will definitely keep him in the side.

Zac!

Zac!

Re: Zac!

Re: Zac!