Cheney two seperate hits on BJ

backit · Post: # 952279Post **backit** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 6:48pm

No 25 Cheney has had two seperate hits on BJ, one in the guts when BJ went for a mark, very late and paid a 50, then jumped off the ground straight into BJ when he was going for a mark no eyes for teh ball and another 50.

Over to the MRP because they are deemed as late, a strike, no eyes for the ball and off the ground.

Minimum 4 weeks for both (2 weeks each)

undecided · Post: # 952282Post **undecided** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 6:56pm

Should be 4-5 but will get 0

F_Q_F · Post: # 952283Post **F_Q_F** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 6:56pm

Dirty little pr1ck.

Done it to him twice deliberately after Goddard has taken a mark. Second one he had no intention other than to try and hurt Goddard, you could see him look at BJ as he jumped into him.

At least Melbourne is stupid enough not to realise you never want an angry BJ.

wasaintsfan · Sun 04 Jul 2010 6:56pm

no case to answer
just an excuse to wipe out baker

now lets worry about the game!

mullet · Post: # 952289Post **mullet** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 7:01pm

[quote="wasaintsfan"]no case to answer
just an excuse to wipe out baker

now lets worry about the game![/quote

Yep unfortunately you are right. Next week it will all die down and everyone will forget about cracking down on nigglers. The afl must be wrapped that barlow broke his leg as this has put baker off front page.

Did laugh though that it is not good for football what baker did, but we are all enduring replay after replay of a poor guy breaking his leg.

backit · Post: # 952290Post **backit** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 7:01pm

Needs to be noted just to confirm there are two sets of rules the Bakes rules and the rest rules.

Griggsy · Post: # 952292Post **Griggsy** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 7:03pm

I heard the 2nd one on MMM, Only person who believed it was a 50m penalty was Billy Brownless, he tried to explain why but they still didnt get it.

Moccha · Post: # 952293Post **Moccha** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 7:04pm

I agree. We as supporters should make as much noise as possible when these blatant charges occur. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Ralphy · Post: # 952295Post **Ralphy** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 7:05pm

Griggsy wrote:I heard the 2nd one on MMM, Only person who believed it was a 50m penalty was Billy Brownless, he tried to explain why but they still didnt get it.

was complete crap should be 2 week's

markinUSA · Post: # 952296Post **markinUSA** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 7:05pm

I think they just regard Goddard as so good, their only strategy was to bash him.

mullet · Post: # 952297Post **mullet** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 7:05pm

Moccha wrote:I agree. We as supporters should make as much noise as possible when these blatant charges occur. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

AFL dont listen to the supporters

backit · Post: # 952299Post **backit** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 7:08pm

mullet wrote:
Moccha wrote:I agree. We as supporters should make as much noise as possible when these blatant charges occur. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
AFL dont listen to the supporters

Yes they do you just ask them

python · Post: # 952301Post **python** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 7:13pm

Im assuming after the first hit the doctors would have looked at Goddard. Therefore Cheney would have to assume that Goddard was playing on injured, and obviously all AFL players are expected to know the medical diagnosis. So the second hit he should be in a lot of trouble, if the MRP are consistent.

mullet · Post: # 952305Post **mullet** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 7:19pm

python wrote:Im assuming after the first hit the doctors would have looked at Goddard. Therefore Cheney would have to assume that Goddard was playing on injured, and obviously all AFL players are expected to know the medical diagnosis. So the second hit he should be in a lot of trouble, if the MRP are consistent.

Interesting precedent isnt it. Theoretically a player could pretend to hurt themselves, go off , bandage something and then if they get hit there, that player gets reported. And the first player may not even be injured

battye · Post: # 952401Post **battye** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 9:14pm

No 25 Cheney has had two seperate hits on BJ, one in the guts when BJ went for a mark, very late and paid a 50, then jumped off the ground straight into BJ when he was going for a mark no eyes for teh ball and another 50.

Over to the MRP because they are deemed as late, a strike, no eyes for the ball and off the ground.

Minimum 4 weeks for both (2 weeks each)

Goddard to get rubbed out for running into Cheney's (potentially) injured hand.

Saint Bev · Post: # 952500Post **Saint Bev** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 10:14pm

Should get 4 minimum, but its St Kilda, so won't even be cited

backit · Post: # 952549Post **backit** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 11:25pm

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/st-kilda-s ... -zvqc.html

Take a look at the photo attached to this story, shows that dog hitting the head of BJ.

saintDal · Post: # 952561Post **saintDal** » Sun 04 Jul 2010 11:42pm

backit wrote:http://www.theage.com.au/afl/st-kilda-s ... -zvqc.html

Take a look at the photo attached to this story, shows that dog hitting the head of BJ.

Love the caption for that photo.

Brendon Goddard of the Saints is tackled by Kyle Cheney of the Demons during the round 14 match at Etihad Stadium.

Thats some tackle

Bernard Shakey · Mon 05 Jul 2010 12:12am

Moccha wrote:I agree. We as supporters should make as much noise as possible when these blatant charges occur. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Shhh! They might find more charges against Bakes.

gringo · Post: # 952747Post **gringo** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 1:43pm

Steven Baker charged by the match review panel, in that he willfully aided Cheney in psychic manipulation to bring disrepute to the game. 42 matches reduced to 48 for a guilty plea.

ThePunter · Post: # 952749Post **ThePunter** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 1:48pm

Two charges, just over 200 activation points reduced to under 200 with early plea, he misses one week with large carryover point total.

TazzieSaintGirl83 · Mon 05 Jul 2010 1:51pm

That caption is a crack up, didnt know you were allowed to tackle with your elbows to you opponents head!

ace · Post: # 952756Post **ace** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 2:00pm

backit wrote:http://www.theage.com.au/afl/st-kilda-s ... -zvqc.html

Take a look at the photo attached to this story, shows that dog hitting the head of BJ.

Clearly no contact made, even Adrian Anderson can see that.
Will probably instruct Mark Fraser and the MRP accordingly.

But Goodard could be cited for attempted tripping because Goddard has his leg out.

Saint Bev · Post: # 952759Post **Saint Bev** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 2:05pm

Goddard cited for getting his head in the way, plays for St Kilda, 22 weeks.

cowboy18 · Post: # 952763Post **cowboy18** » Mon 05 Jul 2010 2:25pm

Saint Bev wrote:Goddard cited for getting his head in the way, plays for St Kilda, 22 weeks.

It gets worse, they've just cited BJ.

Brendan Goddard, St Kilda, has been charged with a level three fashion offence during the round 14 match between St Kilda and Melbourne played at Etihad Stadium on Sunday July 4, 2010.

In summary, his previous poor record and red hair means that his two-game sanction must remain at two games, even with an early plea.

His boots were assessed as unmanly (three points), inappropriately laced (one point) and twin tone (two points). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a level three offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has an existing bad record of four matches suspended within the last three years, increasing the penalty by 50 per cent to 337.50 demerit points and a three-match sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to 253.13 points and a two-match sanction.

Take the two.