zac out this week

SainterK · Post: # 935390Post **SainterK** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 4:01pm

Of course everyone is entitled to an opinion....

I just think someone who thinks an injury to one of our players is the best news of the year, probably has a very different one to most on here.

Especially when reports are that Roo is running laps and close to returning, that doesn't rate highly on your best news for the year radar?

Moods · Post: # 935391Post **Moods** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 4:02pm

Aussie Bears wrote:or Dawson not playing again. Opinions not allowed anymore?

Not opinions that just slag off at our players without any backing.

Griggsy · Post: # 935394Post **Griggsy** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 4:03pm

I doubt it is as easy as 'you're out, you're in'. Ross will make his decision based on who he can matchup on who.

But seeing as the Tigers only had 4 goal kickers in their win he may take the risk of a more attacking player.

J.Riewoldt had 4, Blake to him?
B.Nason(the guy with the dreads) had 3 ..
Nahas 2
Tambling 1

Lots of smalls so armo might get the call.

Aussie Bears · Tue 01 Jun 2010 4:16pm

I never said the injury was the best news, just Zac not playing.

You don't wish an injury on anyone.

Very sensitive.

I await bagging in due course.

Whilst on the topic of Jokes:

A man meets a friend and sees that his friend's car is total write-off and covered with leaves, grass, branches, dirt and blood.He asks his friend "What's happened to your car ?" "Well," the friend responds, "I ran over Hayden Ballantyne".
"OK," says the man, "that explains the blood. But what about the leaves, the grass, the branches and the dirt?" "Well, he tried to escape through the park."

Aussie Bears · Tue 01 Jun 2010 4:18pm

Stillwaiting wrote:
Aussie Bears wrote:Best news of the year
Idiot

Your mum doesn't think so

Ghost Like · Post: # 935420Post **Ghost Like** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 4:44pm

May make for an interesting selection meeting, I believe the following will be considered:

Simpkin (rookie listed?)
J. Smith
Dempster

Depening on how consevative or experimental Ross wishes to be this could be an excellent opportunity for someone.

degruch · Post: # 935423Post **degruch** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 4:49pm

Aussie Bears wrote:
Stillwaiting wrote:
Aussie Bears wrote:Best news of the year
Idiot
Your mum doesn't think so

That gag doesn't work so well without the sexual inuendo.

dals_da_bomb · Tue 01 Jun 2010 4:52pm

[quote="bigred"]f*** me Facebook will eat itself.[/quote]

Im not happy he has been injured. I think it would of been a good week to let him have a run around in the seconds..

thank god im a young lady.. because what i am fighting back posting - regarding potential player replacement is terrible..

bergholt · Post: # 935426Post **bergholt** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 4:54pm

plugger66 wrote:There are a few options for this week but sadly we havent got a tall to replace Zac so they are going to have to regig the backline slightly. Because of this i think Geary may get a go as he is a backman even though a small but that will not hurt against the Tigers.

The other options are Heyne, Armo, Steven and Smith. I think Steven and Smith are ther least likely so it is either Heyne or Armo if they dont go with Geary.

i thought we were one tall too many in the backline last week anyway, hence jimmy having to go forward, which isn't his best spot. with zac out we can have a settled back six (jb, bakes, chips, gilbo, raph, jimmy).

i'd expect armo or geary to slip into the same roles they've played a bit this year, but would be very happy to see a smith get a run.

markp · Post: # 935427Post **markp** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 4:55pm

degruch wrote:
Aussie Bears wrote:
Stillwaiting wrote:
Aussie Bears wrote:Best news of the year
Idiot
Your mum doesn't think so
That gag doesn't work so well without the sexual inuendo.

Your mum agrees.

degruch · Post: # 935429Post **degruch** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 4:56pm

markp wrote:
degruch wrote:
Aussie Bears wrote:
Stillwaiting wrote:
Aussie Bears wrote:Best news of the year
Idiot
Your mum doesn't think so
That gag doesn't work so well without the sexual inuendo.
Your mum agrees.

...and your sister.

markp · Post: # 935449Post **markp** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 5:50pm

degruch wrote:
markp wrote:
degruch wrote:
Aussie Bears wrote:
Stillwaiting wrote:
Aussie Bears wrote:Best news of the year
Idiot
Your mum doesn't think so
That gag doesn't work so well without the sexual inuendo.
Your mum agrees.
...and your sister.

You're good... Mr Miyage, black belt karate good.

mrkiss · Post: # 935450Post **mrkiss** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 5:54pm

why not give #49 stephen g a game looked good in night series and looked ok on tv on saturday

SaintTom · Post: # 935452Post **SaintTom** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 6:06pm

Not good news at all. I was really hoping that Zac might get some confidence up, and the structure might really start to settle before we had to play Freo and then Geelong. Having said that, (and I know that people are going to say 'Well you clearly haven't been to see Sandy', and they'd be right) looking at the one defender at Sandy who has consistently been named among the best players is Tommy Walsh. New to the game or not, if you're consistently among the best players then you've got a better reason to be picked than someone who has played all their life but isn't in the best?

The problem obviously being Rookie elevation which I admit I know very little about, however I had this idea in my mind that we were allowed one rookie elevation, then another after the mid season break?

bergsone · Post: # 935461Post **bergsone** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 6:27pm

Ghost Like wrote:May make for an interesting selection meeting, I believe the following will be considered:

Simpkin (rookie listed?)
J. Smith
Dempster

Depening on how consevative or experimental Ross wishes to be this could be an excellent opportunity for someone.

love to simpkin make it,but is he ready yet?

saint58 · Post: # 935465Post **saint58** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 6:33pm

Go Sainters Go wrote:Move Kosi to CHB and bring in Cahill to FF.

Interesting moves Cahill scored 3 goals for sandy res on saturday and like stanley his form is a bit up and down but like stanly iam sure he would be ok at ff he is big and can mark dont know much else about him if he is anygood below the knees.

As for kosi well it might just rejuvinate him what have we got to lose.

GrumpyOne · Post: # 935468Post **GrumpyOne** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 6:47pm

saint58 wrote: Interesting moves Cahill scored 3 goals for sandy res on saturday and like stanley his form is a bit up and down but like stanly iam sure he would be ok at ff he is big and can mark dont know much else about him if he is anygood below the knees.

Not much below or above the knees, I'm afraid.

3 goals for Sandy Reserves is barely a ringing endorsement.

spert · Post: # 935512Post **spert** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 7:48pm

Get Kosi to Full back, see if he can get the pill, I dunno how much longer RL is going to carry him.

saint64 · Post: # 935542Post **saint64** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 8:21pm

Pattison would have to be a chance against his old team

skeptic · Post: # 935577Post **skeptic** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 9:11pm

only positive is that Dawson will pbly be be forced to make his way back into the team through the ressies.

I'm not a huge Dawson critic but do feel he's been out of form for the majority of the season and would like to see him play a game or 2 in the ressies, get his confidence back up

St Ick · Post: # 935585Post **St Ick** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 9:31pm

spert wrote:Get Kosi to Full back, see if he can get the pill, I dunno how much longer RL is going to carry him.

He's hardly being carried, no he is not winning games off his own boot - but at least he is getting hands to the ball and giving our small forwards an opportunity.

bigred · Post: # 935608Post **bigred** » Tue 01 Jun 2010 10:42pm

Can we get off mothers please....

Cos' I just got off yours.

bada ching.