Stanley
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Sun 01 May 2005 11:20pm
stanley
Have to give these young guys a chance to get a feel for the game - he presented well and gave us a target. He will get better with experience. Think Zac would have to go out before Rhys - his judgement seems way off - maybe some time in the reserves will help his confidence.
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7087
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
Liked having the balance with another tall option permanently forward. If Stanley wasn't there, McEvoy was. He presented, took a few marks, had a hand in a couple of goals and could've snared a couple himself. Solid debut in challenging conditions. I'd love to see how he goes in the next couple of weeks against ordinary opposition and in better weather.
Once he gets a feel for the pace of the game, rids himself of the early nerves and feels comfortable with the team structures he should be quite handy. I loved that our midfield was confident enough in our forwards to kick it long and quickly in the second half. And if it didn't pay off we had a full defence to counter the oppositon rebound.
Once he gets a feel for the pace of the game, rids himself of the early nerves and feels comfortable with the team structures he should be quite handy. I loved that our midfield was confident enough in our forwards to kick it long and quickly in the second half. And if it didn't pay off we had a full defence to counter the oppositon rebound.
- Statsman
- Club Player
- Posts: 1775
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:46pm
- Location: Aisle 37, Level 1, Telstra Dome
If Stanley earns his stripes and Kosi eventually returns to form, is there enough room in our forward line long term for Roo, Kosi and Stanley? We've had Roo, Kosi and the G-Train in the past. Could this new triple tower forward line work?
None of them fits the mould of a mid-sized 3rd marking forward, but both Roo and Stanley are mobile enough to be good at ground level and apply forward pressure without the football.
If not, is Stanley playing to move past Kosi in the pecking order?
None of them fits the mould of a mid-sized 3rd marking forward, but both Roo and Stanley are mobile enough to be good at ground level and apply forward pressure without the football.
If not, is Stanley playing to move past Kosi in the pecking order?
"Ask not what your teammates can do for you. Ask what you can do for your teammates." - Earvin 'Magic' Johnson
I think there is room for all three, certainly. But it's a bit early to talk about that yet, let Stanley score a goal firstStatsman wrote:If Stanley earns his stripes and Kosi eventually returns to form, is there enough room in our forward line long term for Roo, Kosi and Stanley? We've had Roo, Kosi and the G-Train in the past. Could this new triple tower forward line work?
None of them fits the mould of a mid-sized 3rd marking forward, but both Roo and Stanley are mobile enough to be good at ground level and apply forward pressure without the football.
If not, is Stanley playing to move past Kosi in the pecking order?
Feature article: KFC's "Double Down" burger!
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
A long way to go but they arent going to play 3 talls in the forward line.Statsman wrote:If Stanley earns his stripes and Kosi eventually returns to form, is there enough room in our forward line long term for Roo, Kosi and Stanley? We've had Roo, Kosi and the G-Train in the past. Could this new triple tower forward line work?
None of them fits the mould of a mid-sized 3rd marking forward, but both Roo and Stanley are mobile enough to be good at ground level and apply forward pressure without the football.
If not, is Stanley playing to move past Kosi in the pecking order?
plugger66 wrote:A long way to go but they arent going to play 3 talls in the forward line.Statsman wrote:If Stanley earns his stripes and Kosi eventually returns to form, is there enough room in our forward line long term for Roo, Kosi and Stanley? We've had Roo, Kosi and the G-Train in the past. Could this new triple tower forward line work?
None of them fits the mould of a mid-sized 3rd marking forward, but both Roo and Stanley are mobile enough to be good at ground level and apply forward pressure without the football.
If not, is Stanley playing to move past Kosi in the pecking order?
Rhys Stanley is a long way off overtaking Kosi.
STRENGTH THROUGH LOYALTY.
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
- Statsman
- Club Player
- Posts: 1775
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:46pm
- Location: Aisle 37, Level 1, Telstra Dome
I admit I was putting the cart a mile before the horse, but just throwing it out there. It would certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons if Stanley does cement his place in the side (having scored a goal first of course).battye wrote:I think there is room for all three, certainly. But it's a bit early to talk about that yet, let Stanley score a goal first
"Ask not what your teammates can do for you. Ask what you can do for your teammates." - Earvin 'Magic' Johnson
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
I think Stanley did ok in his first game.
That last bit of play of his with the mark and quick hanball to Dal was all class.
You would like more...but early days yet.
One of the best things about playing Stanley was that our backline was "intact" again.
After that the next best thing is it gave us multiple tall targets including the ruckmen. When there are 2 talls forwar it makes it easier for a ruckman to drift forward.
I hope they keep him in next game.
That last bit of play of his with the mark and quick hanball to Dal was all class.
You would like more...but early days yet.
One of the best things about playing Stanley was that our backline was "intact" again.
After that the next best thing is it gave us multiple tall targets including the ruckmen. When there are 2 talls forwar it makes it easier for a ruckman to drift forward.
I hope they keep him in next game.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
- thequarry
- Club Player
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Fri 06 Jul 2007 1:17am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 2 times
Yep. And he was more than willing to push forward and provide an option further up the ground, allowing talls (who are more adept at playing forward, and also none of whom we've needed to dismantle the backline in throwing up there) to remain forward.saintsRrising wrote:One of the best things about playing Stanley was that our backline was "intact" again.
After that the next best thing is it gave us multiple tall targets including the ruckmen. When there are 2 talls forwar it makes it easier for a ruckman to drift forward.
I hope they keep him in next game.
I really do hope he stays in the side.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Stanley looks like he is being used in a similar role to Rooey - that is, as a wingman who can pump the ball inside 50, but also going forward a bit as a goal kicker. (but obviously only a fraction of Roo's output at the moment!).
Was great that it enabled Fisher to go down back.
Also interesting that Kosi wasn't used in the ruck at all, and neither was Stanley....both of which are ruck options if need be.
Was great that it enabled Fisher to go down back.
Also interesting that Kosi wasn't used in the ruck at all, and neither was Stanley....both of which are ruck options if need be.
Lyon also felt that debutant Rhys Stanley did enough to impress with nine possessions, three entries inside 50 and three marks.
"We knew when we drafted him that he was capable of that, but it's been a while coming," Lyon said.
"He took a couple of nice marks and was a big presence.
"For Rhys Stanley to come to Subiaco in his first game as a 202cm super-athlete was really exciting for the St Kilda supporters. He's one to watch."
A quote from Ross Lyon on the AFL website about Stanley.
"We knew when we drafted him that he was capable of that, but it's been a while coming," Lyon said.
"He took a couple of nice marks and was a big presence.
"For Rhys Stanley to come to Subiaco in his first game as a 202cm super-athlete was really exciting for the St Kilda supporters. He's one to watch."
A quote from Ross Lyon on the AFL website about Stanley.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
Amen. I feel so much better with Fisher in the backline.saintspremiers wrote:Stanley looks like he is being used in a similar role to Rooey - that is, as a wingman who can pump the ball inside 50, but also going forward a bit as a goal kicker. (but obviously only a fraction of Roo's output at the moment!).
Was great that it enabled Fisher to go down back.
Also interesting that Kosi wasn't used in the ruck at all, and neither was Stanley....both of which are ruck options if need be.
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
For a first game he was pretty good.
Got his hands to a lot of ball.
Will go better at Jihad with the roof closed.
Ross should teel Rhys - "You're IN for the next two games"
Then re-assess him after that.
Got his hands to a lot of ball.
Will go better at Jihad with the roof closed.
Ross should teel Rhys - "You're IN for the next two games"
Then re-assess him after that.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Fri 18 May 2007 11:13am
- Been thanked: 7 times
The most important thing it did by playing him it gave us back some sort of structure in the forward line, without depleteing the backline. I don't think Ross would have plyed him had Grammy not gone down for four weeks.Stanley will certainly will be a player in the future. I reckon we keep in in the forward line, who knows he may blossom a lot quicker than we think. I Ithink he will end up a gun...........
And the president said " I did not have sex with that woman"
And our former president said " Football is like golf"
Go Sainters !!!!!
And our former president said " Football is like golf"
Go Sainters !!!!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18653
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 872 times
Re: Stanley
for what its worth i have been saying since roo went down that rhys should play chf . two tall marking forwards takes preassure off kosi, straightens us up, is mobile and athletic, good second efforts,helps us keep our structure .ithought his 1st game was good and he will only improve the more he plays.we were less predictable today going forward and rhs ony creates more crumbs for the likes of milne ,mini and shcneids.imo i reckon thats why those blokes have been struggling to find the ball .clarky449 wrote:Do you think he did enough?
I thought he presented well especially early on. I would like to see him next week.
Certainly did enough to keep his spot next week. BUT, wait til you see him in the ruck, that's his go. And Cox is not the sort of opponent you want to give the kid on debut.
Apart from Natanui (and maybe Kruezer), there's not many other ruckman out there with his agility, skill level and speed at 200+cm.
And with Big Mac taking some nice grabs up forward to assist Kosi, I'd be playing him as a ruckman this week. Crows don't have any ruckman of note, and none that can really hurt Stanley with aggression and size.
Don't forget Stanley's better games at Sandy have been in the ruck, not as a key forward.
Great debut from the kid............has all the ingredients to make it big.........just needs game time and experience at this level.........and some patience from supporters, including me!
Apart from Natanui (and maybe Kruezer), there's not many other ruckman out there with his agility, skill level and speed at 200+cm.
And with Big Mac taking some nice grabs up forward to assist Kosi, I'd be playing him as a ruckman this week. Crows don't have any ruckman of note, and none that can really hurt Stanley with aggression and size.
Don't forget Stanley's better games at Sandy have been in the ruck, not as a key forward.
Great debut from the kid............has all the ingredients to make it big.........just needs game time and experience at this level.........and some patience from supporters, including me!
agree about his ruck work, uses his leap really well to keep his body away from the larger rucks and once the ball hits the ground he is a extra midfielder in the mould of ryder/nic nat.SB10 wrote:Certainly did enough to keep his spot next week. BUT, wait til you see him in the ruck, that's his go. And Cox is not the sort of opponent you want to give the kid on debut.
Apart from Natanui (and maybe Kruezer), there's not many other ruckman out there with his agility, skill level and speed at 200+cm.
And with Big Mac taking some nice grabs up forward to assist Kosi, I'd be playing him as a ruckman this week. Crows don't have any ruckman of note, and none that can really hurt Stanley with aggression and size.
Don't forget Stanley's better games at Sandy have been in the ruck, not as a key forward.
Great debut from the kid............has all the ingredients to make it big.........just needs game time and experience at this level.........and some patience from supporters, including me!
But he played his role, thats all we wanted. Allowed us to settle the backline and run the ball better from half back. Keep both him and heyne in for the next two weeks at least. We are slowly developing a forward line in time for rooey to slot back in.
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
agree. really dont know what the other posters have been smoking saying he should only be used as a FF or a ruck. bizarre. hes under sized and under strengthed for both and would get monstored in the wrestle. just let the kid have a run at it FFS.saintspremiers wrote:Stanley looks like he is being used in a similar role to Rooey - that is, as a wingman who can pump the ball inside 50, but also going forward a bit as a goal kicker. (but obviously only a fraction of Roo's output at the moment!).
Was great that it enabled Fisher to go down back.
Also interesting that Kosi wasn't used in the ruck at all, and neither was Stanley....both of which are ruck options if need be.