.Former St Kilda footballer Andrew Lovett has been charged with a second count of rape
well almost- was never really a St Kilda Footballer
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
.Former St Kilda footballer Andrew Lovett has been charged with a second count of rape
Isn't that a pain in the a...saintbrat wrote:Finally reported correctly.Former St Kilda footballer Andrew Lovett has been charged with a second count of rape
well almost- was never really a St Kilda Footballer
It annoys me too. The guy has not played a game with us.Dr Spaceman wrote:Isn't that a pain in the a...saintbrat wrote:Finally reported correctly.Former St Kilda footballer Andrew Lovett has been charged with a second count of rape
well almost- was never really a St Kilda Footballer
The Official AFL Statistics will show that Andrew Lovett played 88 games of AFL, of which 88 were for the Essendon Football Club.
And yet through this whole distasteful saga he will continue to be referred to as a former Saints player.
It may be technically correct but it leaves a very poor taste in one's mouth!!!
One charge is bad enough, but now two.bigred wrote:Anyone else get the feeling that he is in some serious barney rubble?
Eastern wrote:Could be in more poo than the ducks out Werribbee way !!bigred wrote:Anyone else get the feeling that he is in some serious barney rubble?
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
happened with the same women same night...Milan Faletic wrote:One charge is bad enough, but now two.bigred wrote:Anyone else get the feeling that he is in some serious barney rubble?
I know it's still "alleged" but it doesn't look great for him and rightly so if he is found guilty.
Quick question-Did the first alleged incident happen while he was at Essendon? I'm sure this has been answered already but just curious.
Exactly.Solar wrote:happened with the same women same night...Milan Faletic wrote:One charge is bad enough, but now two.bigred wrote:Anyone else get the feeling that he is in some serious barney rubble?
I know it's still "alleged" but it doesn't look great for him and rightly so if he is found guilty.
Quick question-Did the first alleged incident happen while he was at Essendon? I'm sure this has been answered already but just curious.
part of me says perhaps their first rape charge is not strong and thus give them the back up.
Almost.plugger66 wrote:Exactly.Solar wrote:happened with the same women same night...Milan Faletic wrote:One charge is bad enough, but now two.bigred wrote:Anyone else get the feeling that he is in some serious barney rubble?
I know it's still "alleged" but it doesn't look great for him and rightly so if he is found guilty.
Quick question-Did the first alleged incident happen while he was at Essendon? I'm sure this has been answered already but just curious.
part of me says perhaps their first rape charge is not strong and thus give them the back up.
Interesting. A hypothetical...suppose he is found not guilty of the charges...and suppose the Tribunal found in his favour....does any one know if the Tribunal has the power to order the club to re-instate lovett at the club..???plugger66 wrote:Exactly.Solar wrote:happened with the same women same night...Milan Faletic wrote:One charge is bad enough, but now two.bigred wrote:Anyone else get the feeling that he is in some serious barney rubble?
I know it's still "alleged" but it doesn't look great for him and rightly so if he is found guilty.
Quick question-Did the first alleged incident happen while he was at Essendon? I'm sure this has been answered already but just curious.
part of me says perhaps their first rape charge is not strong and thus give them the back up.
I have my doubts on this....Solar wrote:happened with the same women same night...Milan Faletic wrote:One charge is bad enough, but now two.bigred wrote:Anyone else get the feeling that he is in some serious barney rubble?
I know it's still "alleged" but it doesn't look great for him and rightly so if he is found guilty.
Quick question-Did the first alleged incident happen while he was at Essendon? I'm sure this has been answered already but just curious.
part of me says perhaps their first rape charge is not strong and thus give them the back up.
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
I don't think so.Solar wrote:happened with the same women same night...Milan Faletic wrote:One charge is bad enough, but now two.bigred wrote:Anyone else get the feeling that he is in some serious barney rubble?
I know it's still "alleged" but it doesn't look great for him and rightly so if he is found guilty.
Quick question-Did the first alleged incident happen while he was at Essendon? I'm sure this has been answered already but just curious.
part of me says perhaps their first rape charge is not strong and thus give them the back up.
I use the word 'allegedly' very loosely as he has not been convicted yet, but I am sure you will concur that it ain't looking good for him! However, until he is convicted in a court of law, it is still 'allegedly'.GrumpyOne wrote: It is still "allegedly" at the moment. And as for roughing women up, he definately is not Robinson Crusoe there. After all, a convicted women basher is to be elected to the AFL Hall of Fame this year.
Bit of a long bow don't you think?GrumpyOne wrote: BTW, I notice that a guy in the US is just getting out of prison after serving 30 years for raping an 11yo girl. DNA has proved he didn't do it, proving that not all allegations are true.
What does my statement say about me? Does it say that I have a VERY low threshold for serious violent abuse against anyone, especially this type of abuse against women? Think your comments say more about you than me, don't you?GrumpyOne wrote: Your statement says more about you than Lovett.
Yep, dangerous topic and I'm staying clear of it too.Bernard Shakey wrote:I don't think so.Solar wrote:happened with the same women same night...Milan Faletic wrote:One charge is bad enough, but now two.bigred wrote:Anyone else get the feeling that he is in some serious barney rubble?
I know it's still "alleged" but it doesn't look great for him and rightly so if he is found guilty.
Quick question-Did the first alleged incident happen while he was at Essendon? I'm sure this has been answered already but just curious.
part of me says perhaps their first rape charge is not strong and thus give them the back up.
Both charges are on the same night. I will say no more.
Yep...Milan Faletic wrote:Yep, dangerous topic and I'm staying clear of it too.Bernard Shakey wrote:I don't think so.Solar wrote:happened with the same women same night...Milan Faletic wrote:One charge is bad enough, but now two.bigred wrote:Anyone else get the feeling that he is in some serious barney rubble?
I know it's still "alleged" but it doesn't look great for him and rightly so if he is found guilty.
Quick question-Did the first alleged incident happen while he was at Essendon? I'm sure this has been answered already but just curious.
part of me says perhaps their first rape charge is not strong and thus give them the back up.
Both charges are on the same night. I will say no more.
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
Totally agree and I would go so far as to say no one on here knows what happened. Just people thinking or pretending they know.St Fidelius wrote:Yep...Milan Faletic wrote:Yep, dangerous topic and I'm staying clear of it too.Bernard Shakey wrote:I don't think so.Solar wrote:happened with the same women same night...Milan Faletic wrote:One charge is bad enough, but now two.bigred wrote:Anyone else get the feeling that he is in some serious barney rubble?
I know it's still "alleged" but it doesn't look great for him and rightly so if he is found guilty.
Quick question-Did the first alleged incident happen while he was at Essendon? I'm sure this has been answered already but just curious.
part of me says perhaps their first rape charge is not strong and thus give them the back up.
Both charges are on the same night. I will say no more.
dangerous topic and I just feel that some on here are just speculating and again I have serious doubts on the legitimacy of what has been stated.
enough said on just pure speculation IMO. Some here know a little more but can't say much, but some on here post things that are just pure speculation.....
What does my statement say about me?saint75 wrote:What does my statement say about me? Does it say that I have a VERY low threshold for serious violent abuse against anyone, especially this type of abuse against women? Think your comments say more about you than me, don't you?I wish the filthy little pig would retreat back into the hole he crawled out of.
What a clever little dicky bird you are. Go to the top of the class! You have managed to cut and paste 2 paragraphs from several posts. You have won a gold star for your computer skills.GrumpyOne wrote:What does my statement say about me?saint75 wrote:What does my statement say about me? Does it say that I have a VERY low threshold for serious violent abuse against anyone, especially this type of abuse against women? Think your comments say more about you than me, don't you?I wish the filthy little pig would retreat back into the hole he crawled out of.
You are a cabbage.
Does it say that I have a VERY low threshold for serious violent abuse against anyone, especially this type of abuse against women?
No, it does not even mention it.
Think your comments say more about you than me, don't you?
Only that I don't like cabbage.
of course, just musing out loud.St Fidelius wrote:Yep...Milan Faletic wrote:Yep, dangerous topic and I'm staying clear of it too.Bernard Shakey wrote:I don't think so.Solar wrote:happened with the same women same night...Milan Faletic wrote:One charge is bad enough, but now two.bigred wrote:Anyone else get the feeling that he is in some serious barney rubble?
I know it's still "alleged" but it doesn't look great for him and rightly so if he is found guilty.
Quick question-Did the first alleged incident happen while he was at Essendon? I'm sure this has been answered already but just curious.
part of me says perhaps their first rape charge is not strong and thus give them the back up.
Both charges are on the same night. I will say no more.
dangerous topic and I just feel that some on here are just speculating and again I have serious doubts on the legitimacy of what has been stated.
enough said on just pure speculation IMO. Some here know a little more but can't say much, but some on here post things that are just pure speculation.....
Solar wrote:of course, just musing out loud.St Fidelius wrote:Yep...Milan Faletic wrote:Yep, dangerous topic and I'm staying clear of it too.Bernard Shakey wrote:I don't think so.Solar wrote:happened with the same women same night...Milan Faletic wrote:One charge is bad enough, but now two.bigred wrote:Anyone else get the feeling that he is in some serious barney rubble?
I know it's still "alleged" but it doesn't look great for him and rightly so if he is found guilty.
Quick question-Did the first alleged incident happen while he was at Essendon? I'm sure this has been answered already but just curious.
part of me says perhaps their first rape charge is not strong and thus give them the back up.
Both charges are on the same night. I will say no more.
dangerous topic and I just feel that some on here are just speculating and again I have serious doubts on the legitimacy of what has been stated.
enough said on just pure speculation IMO. Some here know a little more but can't say much, but some on here post things that are just pure speculation.....
Just in case anybody forgets....saint75 wrote:What a clever little dicky bird you are. Go to the top of the class! You have managed to cut and paste 2 paragraphs from several posts. You have won a gold star for your computer skills.GrumpyOne wrote:What does my statement say about me?saint75 wrote:What does my statement say about me? Does it say that I have a VERY low threshold for serious violent abuse against anyone, especially this type of abuse against women? Think your comments say more about you than me, don't you?I wish the filthy little pig would retreat back into the hole he crawled out of.
You are a cabbage.
Does it say that I have a VERY low threshold for serious violent abuse against anyone, especially this type of abuse against women?
No, it does not even mention it.
Think your comments say more about you than me, don't you?
Only that I don't like cabbage.
Name calling though? Usually used as a last resort by those who do not have a valid response or comeback when challenged.
I wish the filthy little pig would retreat back into the hole he crawled out of.