WB 18 frees to STK 8
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5786 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
I actually thought the umpiring last night was OK...OK in comparison to our games against Sydney, Collingwood & Port where I believe we were Royally rogered.
Seemed to last night that for 3 & a half quarters the Dogs were first in for the ball & we were reactionary hence some undisciplined frees.
That said, I agree with the comments regarding the Hall run down & I was particularly angry when Armo laid a very good tackle near the end of the second term I think, on the boundary, and should have been rewarded with a shot at goal.
Seemed to last night that for 3 & a half quarters the Dogs were first in for the ball & we were reactionary hence some undisciplined frees.
That said, I agree with the comments regarding the Hall run down & I was particularly angry when Armo laid a very good tackle near the end of the second term I think, on the boundary, and should have been rewarded with a shot at goal.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 8:38pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
i remember another one with milne where he marks the ball, is going to play on BUT hasn't ran over the mark and is tackled - probably the incident alluded to earlier where he got a handball away - and gets pinged for holding the ball.
Happened against Port too.
I thought if the umpire hasnt called play on (pretty easy to tell since they are miked up) then the man in possession can not be tackled.
Happened against Port too.
I thought if the umpire hasnt called play on (pretty easy to tell since they are miked up) then the man in possession can not be tackled.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Tue 11 Apr 2006 9:45pm
- Location: Tassies Wild West
- Been thanked: 1 time
The actual rules, and the correct enforcement of the rules are poles apart for the Tip Rat and Schnadzo at the moment i'm afraid.awesome_days wrote:i remember another one with milne where he marks the ball, is going to play on BUT hasn't ran over the mark and is tackled - probably the incident alluded to earlier where he got a handball away - and gets pinged for holding the ball.
Happened against Port too.
I thought if the umpire hasnt called play on (pretty easy to tell since they are miked up) then the man in possession can not be tackled.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 9:37pm
Last week was right and i am not sure what you are talking about for this week.BallBanger wrote:Do you still think the deliberate point against Port last week was ok or do you think the ump made a mistake yesterday?plugger66 wrote:Yep the umpires lost us this game.
Maybe the poor umps are not real sure?
Wow - took you a long time to come to the defence.plugger66 wrote:Yep the umpires lost us this game.
The umpires didn't lose us the game but they were definately inconsistant and very poor on friday night.
Seems to be different intrepretations depending on how they feel.
But of course, in your eyes they are perfect and any critisism can NEVER be allowed.
And we are talking about umpiring, dont come back with how many mistakes did players make, it has nothing to do with them.
Umpires were very poor and incredibly inconsistant and only an apologist or a fool would argue otherwise.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
this week? really? i wouldn't have thought so. saints were second to the ball for half the night and paid for that. i thought the umpiring was pretty good, with the exception of milne and schneider having some bad luck.joffaboy wrote:Umpires were very poor and incredibly inconsistant and only an apologist or a fool would argue otherwise.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 9:37pm
I also thought this decision was correct..rule brought in to stop time wasting not rushing behinds when under perceived pressure but now McLaren paid one to Franklin for walking ball through when under the slightest of defensive perception.plugger66 wrote:Last week was right and i am not sure what you are talking about for this week.BallBanger wrote:Do you still think the deliberate point against Port last week was ok or do you think the ump made a mistake yesterday?plugger66 wrote:Yep the umpires lost us this game.
Maybe the poor umps are not real sure?
Some commentators are saying McLaren was correct and the Port decision incorrect...
Surely the players need to know what they are allowed to do and umpired accordingly
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Tue 11 Apr 2006 9:45pm
- Location: Tassies Wild West
- Been thanked: 1 time
Oh,it's only bad luck ...........well hopefully their luck changes.bergholt wrote:this week? really? i wouldn't have thought so. saints were second to the ball for half the night and paid for that. i thought the umpiring was pretty good, with the exception of milne and schneider having some bad luck.joffaboy wrote:Umpires were very poor and incredibly inconsistant and only an apologist or a fool would argue otherwise.
A certain umpire that may or may not be mentioned above is related to my husband! The umpires' dad is a one eyed bulldogs supporter as was this umpire and is also good friends with Brad Johnson. You have to wonder how do you put your team bias completely aside when umpiring, it must be hard!!ace wrote:Troy Pannell must be furious with his team mates.
If only they had provided him some more help with one sided decisions he could have had two corrupt victories over St Kilda in a row.
18 to 8, how dare his team mates pay 8 frees to St Kilda and why couldn't they have added to those 18 frees to the mongrels.
St Kilda was just a little to good for you tonight Troy.
Why don't you go drown yourself in a beer vat Troy.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Tue 11 Apr 2006 9:45pm
- Location: Tassies Wild West
- Been thanked: 1 time
How does an umpire that may or may not be mentioned above get to umpire that game........Downright flabbergastinatingsaintvic wrote:A certain umpire that may or may not be mentioned above is related to my husband! The umpires' dad is a one eyed bulldogs supporter as was this umpire and is also good friends with Brad Johnson. You have to wonder how do you put your team bias completely aside when umpiring, it must be hard!!ace wrote:Troy Pannell must be furious with his team mates.
If only they had provided him some more help with one sided decisions he could have had two corrupt victories over St Kilda in a row.
18 to 8, how dare his team mates pay 8 frees to St Kilda and why couldn't they have added to those 18 frees to the mongrels.
St Kilda was just a little to good for you tonight Troy.
Why don't you go drown yourself in a beer vat Troy.
Totally agree. The parents of umpires shouldnt follow a side and fancy having a footy friend in a footy industry.35...LEGEND wrote:How does an umpire that may or may not be mentioned above get to umpire that game........Downright flabbergastinatingsaintvic wrote:A certain umpire that may or may not be mentioned above is related to my husband! The umpires' dad is a one eyed bulldogs supporter as was this umpire and is also good friends with Brad Johnson. You have to wonder how do you put your team bias completely aside when umpiring, it must be hard!!ace wrote:Troy Pannell must be furious with his team mates.
If only they had provided him some more help with one sided decisions he could have had two corrupt victories over St Kilda in a row.
18 to 8, how dare his team mates pay 8 frees to St Kilda and why couldn't they have added to those 18 frees to the mongrels.
St Kilda was just a little to good for you tonight Troy.
Why don't you go drown yourself in a beer vat Troy.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Tue 11 Apr 2006 9:45pm
- Location: Tassies Wild West
- Been thanked: 1 time
No you don't.plugger66 wrote:Totally agree. The parents of umpires shouldnt follow a side and fancy having a footy friend in a footy industry.35...LEGEND wrote:How does an umpire that may or may not be mentioned above get to umpire that game........Downright flabbergastinatingsaintvic wrote:A certain umpire that may or may not be mentioned above is related to my husband! The umpires' dad is a one eyed bulldogs supporter as was this umpire and is also good friends with Brad Johnson. You have to wonder how do you put your team bias completely aside when umpiring, it must be hard!!ace wrote:Troy Pannell must be furious with his team mates.
If only they had provided him some more help with one sided decisions he could have had two corrupt victories over St Kilda in a row.
18 to 8, how dare his team mates pay 8 frees to St Kilda and why couldn't they have added to those 18 frees to the mongrels.
St Kilda was just a little to good for you tonight Troy.
Why don't you go drown yourself in a beer vat Troy.
8 games a week, why our's....
So you honestly think that having Johnson as a friend and a parent following a footscray is going to effect his umpiring? Surely you dont think that. Steve McBurney was a mad Sainter and his family still is. Didnt he umpire the most important game of the year last year and did it help us. Every umpire would have had a club before they were umpires so what should the AFL do with them when selecting games?35...LEGEND wrote:No you don't.plugger66 wrote:Totally agree. The parents of umpires shouldnt follow a side and fancy having a footy friend in a footy industry.35...LEGEND wrote:How does an umpire that may or may not be mentioned above get to umpire that game........Downright flabbergastinatingsaintvic wrote:A certain umpire that may or may not be mentioned above is related to my husband! The umpires' dad is a one eyed bulldogs supporter as was this umpire and is also good friends with Brad Johnson. You have to wonder how do you put your team bias completely aside when umpiring, it must be hard!!ace wrote:Troy Pannell must be furious with his team mates.
If only they had provided him some more help with one sided decisions he could have had two corrupt victories over St Kilda in a row.
18 to 8, how dare his team mates pay 8 frees to St Kilda and why couldn't they have added to those 18 frees to the mongrels.
St Kilda was just a little to good for you tonight Troy.
Why don't you go drown yourself in a beer vat Troy.
8 games a week, why our's....
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Tue 11 Apr 2006 9:45pm
- Location: Tassies Wild West
- Been thanked: 1 time
so you don't agree.that's fineplugger66 wrote:So you honestly think that having Johnson as a friend and a parent following a footscray is going to effect his umpiring? Surely you dont think that. Steve McBurney was a mad Sainter and his family still is. Didnt he umpire the most important game of the year last year and did it help us. Every umpire would have had a club before they were umpires so what should the AFL do with them when selecting games?35...LEGEND wrote:No you don't.plugger66 wrote:Totally agree. The parents of umpires shouldnt follow a side and fancy having a footy friend in a footy industry.35...LEGEND wrote:How does an umpire that may or may not be mentioned above get to umpire that game........Downright flabbergastinatingsaintvic wrote:A certain umpire that may or may not be mentioned above is related to my husband! The umpires' dad is a one eyed bulldogs supporter as was this umpire and is also good friends with Brad Johnson. You have to wonder how do you put your team bias completely aside when umpiring, it must be hard!!ace wrote:Troy Pannell must be furious with his team mates.
If only they had provided him some more help with one sided decisions he could have had two corrupt victories over St Kilda in a row.
18 to 8, how dare his team mates pay 8 frees to St Kilda and why couldn't they have added to those 18 frees to the mongrels.
St Kilda was just a little to good for you tonight Troy.
Why don't you go drown yourself in a beer vat Troy.
8 games a week, why our's....
His dad,one eyed...himself,one eyed and good mates with smiley.
I don't like it,sorry.
So how were the umpires Fri night... IYO.
Dont know as i wasnt there. Looked alright on TV but i had a few beers. What about McBurney doing the GF last year and all the other umpires who umpire sides they previously followed. What would you like the AFL to do about that?35...LEGEND wrote:so you don't agree.that's fineplugger66 wrote:So you honestly think that having Johnson as a friend and a parent following a footscray is going to effect his umpiring? Surely you dont think that. Steve McBurney was a mad Sainter and his family still is. Didnt he umpire the most important game of the year last year and did it help us. Every umpire would have had a club before they were umpires so what should the AFL do with them when selecting games?35...LEGEND wrote:No you don't.plugger66 wrote:Totally agree. The parents of umpires shouldnt follow a side and fancy having a footy friend in a footy industry.35...LEGEND wrote:How does an umpire that may or may not be mentioned above get to umpire that game........Downright flabbergastinatingsaintvic wrote:A certain umpire that may or may not be mentioned above is related to my husband! The umpires' dad is a one eyed bulldogs supporter as was this umpire and is also good friends with Brad Johnson. You have to wonder how do you put your team bias completely aside when umpiring, it must be hard!!ace wrote:Troy Pannell must be furious with his team mates.
If only they had provided him some more help with one sided decisions he could have had two corrupt victories over St Kilda in a row.
18 to 8, how dare his team mates pay 8 frees to St Kilda and why couldn't they have added to those 18 frees to the mongrels.
St Kilda was just a little to good for you tonight Troy.
Why don't you go drown yourself in a beer vat Troy.
8 games a week, why our's....
His dad,one eyed...himself,one eyed and good mates with smiley.
I don't like it,sorry.
So how were the umpires Fri night... IYO.
Sorry dont understand what that has to do with umpires who have followed AFL sides previously.Mr Magic wrote:Maybe what the Geisch has just done with McLaren - publicly 'flogged' him.
Publicly castigated adn dropped for this week (at least).
Seems that in this case, 'they're only humans' and 'they just make mistakes' doesn't cut it?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Tue 11 Apr 2006 9:45pm
- Location: Tassies Wild West
- Been thanked: 1 time
I had a few beer's too,but i could still see well enough to know it was utter crap.plugger66 wrote:Dont know as i wasnt there. Looked alright on TV but i had a few beers. What about McBurney doing the GF last year and all the other umpires who umpire sides they previously followed. What would you like the AFL to do about that?35...LEGEND wrote:so you don't agree.that's fineplugger66 wrote:So you honestly think that having Johnson as a friend and a parent following a footscray is going to effect his umpiring? Surely you dont think that. Steve McBurney was a mad Sainter and his family still is. Didnt he umpire the most important game of the year last year and did it help us. Every umpire would have had a club before they were umpires so what should the AFL do with them when selecting games?35...LEGEND wrote:No you don't.plugger66 wrote:Totally agree. The parents of umpires shouldnt follow a side and fancy having a footy friend in a footy industry.35...LEGEND wrote:How does an umpire that may or may not be mentioned above get to umpire that game........Downright flabbergastinatingsaintvic wrote:A certain umpire that may or may not be mentioned above is related to my husband! The umpires' dad is a one eyed bulldogs supporter as was this umpire and is also good friends with Brad Johnson. You have to wonder how do you put your team bias completely aside when umpiring, it must be hard!!ace wrote:Troy Pannell must be furious with his team mates.
If only they had provided him some more help with one sided decisions he could have had two corrupt victories over St Kilda in a row.
18 to 8, how dare his team mates pay 8 frees to St Kilda and why couldn't they have added to those 18 frees to the mongrels.
St Kilda was just a little to good for you tonight Troy.
Why don't you go drown yourself in a beer vat Troy.
8 games a week, why our's....
His dad,one eyed...himself,one eyed and good mates with smiley.
I don't like it,sorry.
So how were the umpires Fri night... IYO.
As for McBurney.......same thing.Every attempt should be made to ensure
it don't happen.
But if he was the best goin around last year and had the ability to check his bias at the front gate,then fair enough.
By the way which umpire is the one that followed the dogs and was he the one who gave them more frees than us?35...LEGEND wrote:I had a few beer's too,but i could still see well enough to know it was utter crap.plugger66 wrote:Dont know as i wasnt there. Looked alright on TV but i had a few beers. What about McBurney doing the GF last year and all the other umpires who umpire sides they previously followed. What would you like the AFL to do about that?35...LEGEND wrote:so you don't agree.that's fineplugger66 wrote:So you honestly think that having Johnson as a friend and a parent following a footscray is going to effect his umpiring? Surely you dont think that. Steve McBurney was a mad Sainter and his family still is. Didnt he umpire the most important game of the year last year and did it help us. Every umpire would have had a club before they were umpires so what should the AFL do with them when selecting games?35...LEGEND wrote:No you don't.plugger66 wrote:Totally agree. The parents of umpires shouldnt follow a side and fancy having a footy friend in a footy industry.35...LEGEND wrote:How does an umpire that may or may not be mentioned above get to umpire that game........Downright flabbergastinatingsaintvic wrote:A certain umpire that may or may not be mentioned above is related to my husband! The umpires' dad is a one eyed bulldogs supporter as was this umpire and is also good friends with Brad Johnson. You have to wonder how do you put your team bias completely aside when umpiring, it must be hard!!ace wrote:Troy Pannell must be furious with his team mates.
If only they had provided him some more help with one sided decisions he could have had two corrupt victories over St Kilda in a row.
18 to 8, how dare his team mates pay 8 frees to St Kilda and why couldn't they have added to those 18 frees to the mongrels.
St Kilda was just a little to good for you tonight Troy.
Why don't you go drown yourself in a beer vat Troy.
8 games a week, why our's....
His dad,one eyed...himself,one eyed and good mates with smiley.
I don't like it,sorry.
So how were the umpires Fri night... IYO.
As for McBurney.......same thing.Every attempt should be made to ensure
it don't happen.
But if he was the best goin around last year and had the ability to check his bias at the front gate,then fair enough.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Tue 11 Apr 2006 9:45pm
- Location: Tassies Wild West
- Been thanked: 1 time
an umpire who has an obvious love of all thing's doggie umpired that game.plugger66 wrote:By the way which umpire is the one that followed the dogs and was he the one who gave them more frees than us?35...LEGEND wrote:I had a few beer's too,but i could still see well enough to know it was utter crap.plugger66 wrote:Dont know as i wasnt there. Looked alright on TV but i had a few beers. What about McBurney doing the GF last year and all the other umpires who umpire sides they previously followed. What would you like the AFL to do about that?35...LEGEND wrote:so you don't agree.that's fineplugger66 wrote:So you honestly think that having Johnson as a friend and a parent following a footscray is going to effect his umpiring? Surely you dont think that. Steve McBurney was a mad Sainter and his family still is. Didnt he umpire the most important game of the year last year and did it help us. Every umpire would have had a club before they were umpires so what should the AFL do with them when selecting games?35...LEGEND wrote:No you don't.plugger66 wrote:Totally agree. The parents of umpires shouldnt follow a side and fancy having a footy friend in a footy industry.35...LEGEND wrote:How does an umpire that may or may not be mentioned above get to umpire that game........Downright flabbergastinatingsaintvic wrote:A certain umpire that may or may not be mentioned above is related to my husband! The umpires' dad is a one eyed bulldogs supporter as was this umpire and is also good friends with Brad Johnson. You have to wonder how do you put your team bias completely aside when umpiring, it must be hard!!ace wrote:Troy Pannell must be furious with his team mates.
If only they had provided him some more help with one sided decisions he could have had two corrupt victories over St Kilda in a row.
18 to 8, how dare his team mates pay 8 frees to St Kilda and why couldn't they have added to those 18 frees to the mongrels.
St Kilda was just a little to good for you tonight Troy.
Why don't you go drown yourself in a beer vat Troy.
8 games a week, why our's....
His dad,one eyed...himself,one eyed and good mates with smiley.
I don't like it,sorry.
So how were the umpires Fri night... IYO.
As for McBurney.......same thing.Every attempt should be made to ensure
it don't happen.
But if he was the best goin around last year and had the ability to check his bias at the front gate,then fair enough.
A couple or even 1 BS decision could have cost us dearly.
As it was there were bloody plenty,but we prevailed,against the odd's.
Don't know who the dog supporter is,Don't care who the dog supporter is,i think it's wrong.
Fix it please.
You dont even know who it is. He may have been the best umpire out there. I for one couldnt care who they followed previously as long as they do the job properly.35...LEGEND wrote:an umpire who has an obvious love of all thing's doggie umpired that game.plugger66 wrote:By the way which umpire is the one that followed the dogs and was he the one who gave them more frees than us?35...LEGEND wrote:I had a few beer's too,but i could still see well enough to know it was utter crap.plugger66 wrote:Dont know as i wasnt there. Looked alright on TV but i had a few beers. What about McBurney doing the GF last year and all the other umpires who umpire sides they previously followed. What would you like the AFL to do about that?35...LEGEND wrote:so you don't agree.that's fineplugger66 wrote:So you honestly think that having Johnson as a friend and a parent following a footscray is going to effect his umpiring? Surely you dont think that. Steve McBurney was a mad Sainter and his family still is. Didnt he umpire the most important game of the year last year and did it help us. Every umpire would have had a club before they were umpires so what should the AFL do with them when selecting games?35...LEGEND wrote:No you don't.plugger66 wrote:Totally agree. The parents of umpires shouldnt follow a side and fancy having a footy friend in a footy industry.35...LEGEND wrote:How does an umpire that may or may not be mentioned above get to umpire that game........Downright flabbergastinatingsaintvic wrote:A certain umpire that may or may not be mentioned above is related to my husband! The umpires' dad is a one eyed bulldogs supporter as was this umpire and is also good friends with Brad Johnson. You have to wonder how do you put your team bias completely aside when umpiring, it must be hard!!ace wrote:Troy Pannell must be furious with his team mates.
If only they had provided him some more help with one sided decisions he could have had two corrupt victories over St Kilda in a row.
18 to 8, how dare his team mates pay 8 frees to St Kilda and why couldn't they have added to those 18 frees to the mongrels.
St Kilda was just a little to good for you tonight Troy.
Why don't you go drown yourself in a beer vat Troy.
8 games a week, why our's....
His dad,one eyed...himself,one eyed and good mates with smiley.
I don't like it,sorry.
So how were the umpires Fri night... IYO.
As for McBurney.......same thing.Every attempt should be made to ensure
it don't happen.
But if he was the best goin around last year and had the ability to check his bias at the front gate,then fair enough.
A couple or even 1 BS decision could have cost us dearly.
As it was there were bloody plenty,but we prevailed,against the odd's.
Don't know who the dog supporter is,Don't care who the dog supporter is,i think it's wrong.
Fix it please.
Maybe you are right though. Maybe an umpire has so much bias they are prepared to wreck their career just to give one or two wrong decisions.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12799
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 812 times
- Been thanked: 434 times
Didn't you ask what the AFL could do?plugger66 wrote:Sorry dont understand what that has to do with umpires who have followed AFL sides previously.Mr Magic wrote:Maybe what the Geisch has just done with McLaren - publicly 'flogged' him.
Publicly castigated adn dropped for this week (at least).
Seems that in this case, 'they're only humans' and 'they just make mistakes' doesn't cut it?
I was just offering a suggestion.