Better than Dawson on HallLenny_Hayes7 wrote:Blake full back?? Against Hall? hmm don't think so mate!
No change next week
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Thu 11 Dec 2008 10:00pm
- Location: Melbourne
No need to over react. The group played terrible and ross's press conference said it all. 13 - 7 inside 50's in the last quarter, just couldn't kick a score. Saying that:
Ray for Eddy
Gram for Peake
They are like for like changes in our structure.
Maybe Steven to play the McQualter position in the structure as well but would be surprised to see this.
What about Gwilt on Hall? Would have the athleticism, agility and speed of the mark. Would maybe get out busselled one on one but so would dawson.
Ray for Eddy
Gram for Peake
They are like for like changes in our structure.
Maybe Steven to play the McQualter position in the structure as well but would be surprised to see this.
What about Gwilt on Hall? Would have the athleticism, agility and speed of the mark. Would maybe get out busselled one on one but so would dawson.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
I am with Bev and Clarkie54.
McQualter for Jack Steven. We really need his pace. Apart from that, Eddy and Peake for Ray and Gram, if both fit enough. On top of that, some thought has to be given to our rucks. McEvoy does better around the ground but gets slaughtered in the ruck contests. I dont think big Ben is the answer at this stage.
McQualter for Jack Steven. We really need his pace. Apart from that, Eddy and Peake for Ray and Gram, if both fit enough. On top of that, some thought has to be given to our rucks. McEvoy does better around the ground but gets slaughtered in the ruck contests. I dont think big Ben is the answer at this stage.
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7223
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 516 times
Is Steven significantly faster than McQualter? Not that I have ever noticed.borderbarry wrote:I am with Bev and Clarkie54.
McQualter for Jack Steven. We really need his pace. Apart from that, Eddy and Peake for Ray and Gram, if both fit enough. On top of that, some thought has to be given to our rucks. McEvoy does better around the ground but gets slaughtered in the ruck contests. I dont think big Ben is the answer at this stage.
McQualter had a poor game, but others are ahead of him in the queue to get dropped IMO.
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
- Location: Bayside
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
Really, who?meher baba wrote:Is Steven significantly faster than McQualter? Not that I have ever noticed.borderbarry wrote:I am with Bev and Clarkie54.
McQualter for Jack Steven. We really need his pace. Apart from that, Eddy and Peake for Ray and Gram, if both fit enough. On top of that, some thought has to be given to our rucks. McEvoy does better around the ground but gets slaughtered in the ruck contests. I dont think big Ben is the answer at this stage.
McQualter had a poor game, but others are ahead of him in the queue to get dropped IMO.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2540
- Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
- Location: Abiding
- Has thanked: 173 times
- Been thanked: 385 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1521
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 8:38pm
- Been thanked: 25 times
Steven IS significantly faster & more skilled than mini. Reminds me a little of Ablett Jnr, but obviously a long way from getting to that level.meher baba wrote:Is Steven significantly faster than McQualter? Not that I have ever noticed.borderbarry wrote:I am with Bev and Clarkie54.
McQualter for Jack Steven. We really need his pace. Apart from that, Eddy and Peake for Ray and Gram, if both fit enough. On top of that, some thought has to be given to our rucks. McEvoy does better around the ground but gets slaughtered in the ruck contests. I dont think big Ben is the answer at this stage.
McQualter had a poor game, but others are ahead of him in the queue to get dropped IMO.
Mini does have a more mature body, more experience and hardness at the contest, BUT he has not been exhibiting these qualites so far this year...
I would like to see steven in the team, he could come in for mini. But I doubt RL will replace an expereinced, tough defensive small forward with a creative, pacy & skilled attacking on-baller/forward for the dogs game....
Geary should stay in, he is a quality young player, with a lot of upside. Peak would go for gram in my book... Ray....possibly for eddy, though eddy wasn't too bad...
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10799
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 837 times
Eade finally lost patience with Will Minson and dropped him to the VFL last weekend.battye wrote:We were the last team with an unbeaten record to be beaten... just saying
We have a great team, no need for panic at the selection table. Gram and Ray to return, I'd still like to see Stanley come in but that's probably unlikely. King has been doing a good job this year, McEvoy has done nothing to suggest he would be better than King.
Reports indicate that Minson monstered McEvoy in the ruck but McEvoy shaded him around the ground.
McEvoy should not be brought into the St Kilda team until he can win a few ruck hitouts.
He first needs to concentrate on the ball in the ruck duel rather than trying in vain to shove his opponent around before the contest.
If McEvoy or Stanley come into the St Kilda team it must be as a forward target not as ruckmen.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7223
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 516 times
Peake, for one. Raph's performance last night was borderline (although he was quite good against Freo).maverick wrote:Really, who?meher baba wrote:Is Steven significantly faster than McQualter? Not that I have ever noticed.borderbarry wrote:I am with Bev and Clarkie54.
McQualter for Jack Steven. We really need his pace. Apart from that, Eddy and Peake for Ray and Gram, if both fit enough. On top of that, some thought has to be given to our rucks. McEvoy does better around the ground but gets slaughtered in the ruck contests. I dont think big Ben is the answer at this stage.
McQualter had a poor game, but others are ahead of him in the queue to get dropped IMO.
For mine, Armitage - who was excellent against Freo - was extremely disappointing last night, but surely isn't going to be dropped.
McQualter was great last year, and has been ok in the first 4 rounds this year. He was poor last night, so what? He's a regular.
Some of you guys, if you had your way, would have half a dozen changes to the lineup each week.
Does Geelong do that? Did Brisbane do it in 2000-04?
So why do so many of you want to?
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
- Location: Bayside
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
You say there are a number to be dropped before Mini, not me. I think Mini is the one to be replaced. One change for mine, barring injury returns.meher baba wrote:Peake, for one. Raph's performance last night was borderline (although he was quite good against Freo).maverick wrote:Really, who?meher baba wrote:Is Steven significantly faster than McQualter? Not that I have ever noticed.borderbarry wrote:I am with Bev and Clarkie54.
McQualter for Jack Steven. We really need his pace. Apart from that, Eddy and Peake for Ray and Gram, if both fit enough. On top of that, some thought has to be given to our rucks. McEvoy does better around the ground but gets slaughtered in the ruck contests. I dont think big Ben is the answer at this stage.
McQualter had a poor game, but others are ahead of him in the queue to get dropped IMO.
For mine, Armitage - who was excellent against Freo - was extremely disappointing last night, but surely isn't going to be dropped.
McQualter was great last year, and has been ok in the first 4 rounds this year. He was poor last night, so what? He's a regular.
Some of you guys, if you had your way, would have half a dozen changes to the lineup each week.
Does Geelong do that? Did Brisbane do it in 2000-04?
So why do so many of you want to?
Peake, Armo, Geary, Ray, Schneider and Milne are all playing similar type roles but have all been thereabouts in the best players at least once this year. Mini has not for mine. I believe he's lost his way and I think all are providing more at this stage and Steven may be a better bet, at least to have a crack.
Raph, Zac, Kosi, Gwilt, King and other borderlines play different roles to Mini and can't be compared IMO.