That was NOT Saints Footy
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6348
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1129 times
That was NOT Saints Footy
Personally - I want to see the Trademark scores for that round. In fact the team goes on about their trademark scores so often - I would love for them to front the crowd and explain what they thought of that game.
Before I get jumped on:
- I dont think losing will hurt us - It MUST hurt the Bulldogs next week!
- we need to find a quality target up forward (and I know that the conditions were not right for big men tonight, but that last mark was shocking - hands in the wrong place - not positioned, I would still play him next week - but better be a blinder)
- the game against Freo took A LOT from us!
- More TEAM less self next week (Mini Milney was right next to you in the square)
Before I get jumped on:
- I dont think losing will hurt us - It MUST hurt the Bulldogs next week!
- we need to find a quality target up forward (and I know that the conditions were not right for big men tonight, but that last mark was shocking - hands in the wrong place - not positioned, I would still play him next week - but better be a blinder)
- the game against Freo took A LOT from us!
- More TEAM less self next week (Mini Milney was right next to you in the square)
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 719 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
Disagree.. Saints Footy was there. The players worked hard, defensive set-ups etc were there, tackling was there...Port hardly scored etc..
But we butchered the ball...and Kosi and a few others spilled some very gettable marks.
Port applied very good pressure and quitea few off our players had poor disposal s under the pressure.
But we butchered the ball...and Kosi and a few others spilled some very gettable marks.
Port applied very good pressure and quitea few off our players had poor disposal s under the pressure.
Last edited by saintsRrising on Sat 24 Apr 2010 11:50pm, edited 1 time in total.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- Lenny_Hayes7
- Club Player
- Posts: 514
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:59pm
- Location: Home
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 719 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
- Lenny_Hayes7
- Club Player
- Posts: 514
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:59pm
- Location: Home
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
Agree that we did work hard.saintsRrising wrote:Disagree.. Saints Footy was there. The players worked hard, defensive set-ups etc were there, tackling was there...Port hardly scored etc..
But we butchered the ball...and Kosi and a few others spilled some very gettable marks.
Port applied very good pressure and quitea few off our players had poor disposal s under the pressure.
I think we were off tonight after a tough game against Freo, but as for Kosi......have to bite my tongue on that one.
Rodan was excellent.
We lost, we learn, we move on.
Re: That was NOT Saints Footy
Trademark scores:Sainter_Dad wrote:
Personally - I want to see the Trademark scores for that round. In fact the team goes on about their trademark scores so often - I would love for them to front the crowd and explain what they thought of that game.
Before I get jumped on:
- I dont think losing will hurt us - It MUST hurt the Bulldogs next week!
- we need to find a quality target up forward (and I know that the conditions were not right for big men tonight, but that last mark was shocking - hands in the wrong place - not positioned, I would still play him next week - but better be a blinder)
- the game against Freo took A LOT from us!
- More TEAM less self next week (Mini Milney was right next to you in the square)
Disposals -16
Marks -19
Tackles were Even
Cont. Possessions -1
Disposal Efficiency 71.64 to 71.59 our way
CLANGERS 50 to 35 OUR WAY
MARKS INSIDE 50 WERE 10 to 3 THEIR WAY
Centre Clearances +1
Clearances overall Even
Looking at that I reckon our trademarks stats were fine. Poor disposals, poor forward line and goals from counter attacks cost us.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
Re: That was NOT Saints Footy
That stat says it all for me when we only lose by 10 points.clarkie54 wrote: MARKS INSIDE 50 WERE 10 to 3 THEIR WAY