Guess this weeks ins and outs

iwantmeseats · Thu 15 Apr 2010 4:28pm

Raph in for a foward role ? Were screwed if try and pull off stuff like that.

Half bank flanker, if anything at all.

Solar · Post: # 907138Post **Solar** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 4:35pm

iwantmeseats wrote:Raph in for a foward role ? Were screwed if try and pull off stuff like that.

Half bank flanker, if anything at all.

just for fun watch the qualifying final of last yer against the pies. Raph was more then handy down forward and finds space very well and creates opportunities forward of the centre

meher baba · Post: # 907140Post **meher baba** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 4:38pm

Solar wrote:
iwantmeseats wrote:Raph in for a foward role ? Were screwed if try and pull off stuff like that.

Half bank flanker, if anything at all.
just for fun watch the qualifying final of last yer against the pies. Raph was more then handy down forward and finds space very well and creates opportunities forward of the centre

Yep, but IMO he isn't tall enough to do the job when Kosi isn't there. If Kosi wasn't out, then Raph could be considered: but who among the other 21 would you drop for him (perhaps Peake, but he's going pretty well)?

I'm not a particularly huge Schneider fan, but I don't understand why anyone thinks he ought to be dropped.

Solar · Post: # 907144Post **Solar** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 4:45pm

meher baba wrote:
Solar wrote:
iwantmeseats wrote:Raph in for a foward role ? Were screwed if try and pull off stuff like that.

Half bank flanker, if anything at all.
just for fun watch the qualifying final of last yer against the pies. Raph was more then handy down forward and finds space very well and creates opportunities forward of the centre

Yep, but IMO he isn't tall enough to do the job when Kosi isn't there. If Kosi wasn't out, then Raph could be considered: but who among the other 21 would you drop for him (perhaps Peake, but he's going pretty well)?

I'm not a particularly huge Schneider fan, but I don't understand why anyone thinks he ought to be dropped.

hence why those who want raph forward would like stanley selected this week to add some height down there and then have kosi with him the week after

iwantmeseats · Thu 15 Apr 2010 4:49pm

Solar wrote:
iwantmeseats wrote:Raph in for a foward role ? Were screwed if try and pull off stuff like that.

Half bank flanker, if anything at all.
just for fun watch the qualifying final of last yer against the pies. Raph was more then handy down forward and finds space very well and creates opportunities forward of the centre

Ok thats one game, and since then?

As mentioned, we need height down there, especially this week with no Kosi. We have plenty of mids/smalls to kick goals, they just have to actually do it!

Solar · Post: # 907149Post **Solar** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 4:55pm

iwantmeseats wrote:
Solar wrote:
iwantmeseats wrote:Raph in for a foward role ? Were screwed if try and pull off stuff like that.

Half bank flanker, if anything at all.
just for fun watch the qualifying final of last yer against the pies. Raph was more then handy down forward and finds space very well and creates opportunities forward of the centre
Ok thats one game, and since then?

As mentioned, we need height down there, especially this week with no Kosi. We have plenty of mids/smalls to kick goals, they just have to actually do it!

well he has only played 2 more games for the club since then. If you wrote what some of us who want clarke to come in as a forward has argued and thats for him to share the forward line with stanley or fisher. He also allows us to be flexible in throwing him back and a backman like chips up forward.

We actually have few mids, I would worry if you call mini, schneider and milne as mediums. Hence why we need to bring in two.

But knowing rossy he will brng in raph to play back and chips as a forward.

bigcarl · Post: # 907194Post **bigcarl** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 6:22pm

plugger66 wrote:Ins today

Stanley
Eddy
Clarke
Steven

you're good

Ralphy · Post: # 907196Post **Ralphy** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 6:24pm

bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Ins today

Stanley
Eddy
Clarke
Steven
you're good

Doesnt he work for the afl , always gets the INS right.

stinger · Post: # 907197Post **stinger** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 6:24pm

plugger66 wrote:Ins today

Stanley
Eddy
Clarke
Steven

Out
Rooy

Final change
In Stanley
out Rooy

you were spot on....

Solar · Post: # 907198Post **Solar** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 6:25pm

stinger wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Ins today

Stanley
Eddy
Clarke
Steven

Out
Rooy

Final change
In Stanley
out Rooy

you were spot on....

not yet, final teams have not been named

chook23 · Post: # 907206Post **chook23** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 6:29pm

Ralphy wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Ins today

Stanley
Eddy
Clarke
Steven
you're good
Doesnt he work for the afl , always gets the INS right.

Stop pumping him up

Many would have anticipated those ins for this (Sunday) game..........

final side announced late tomorrow.

Solar · Post: # 907208Post **Solar** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 6:31pm

chook23 wrote:
Ralphy wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Ins today

Stanley
Eddy
Clarke
Steven
you're good
Doesnt he work for the afl , always gets the INS right.
Stop pumping him up

Many would have anticipated those ins for a Sunday game..........

final side announced late tomorrow.

yep, no suprises at all

stanley got through a full game so is ahead of pattison. Clarke was BOG so gets in te squad. Rossy loves eddy and steven is the next in line midfielder

Armoooo · Post: # 907209Post **Armoooo** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 6:32pm

chook23 wrote:
Ralphy wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Ins today

Stanley
Eddy
Clarke
Steven
you're good
Doesnt he work for the afl , always gets the INS right.
Stop pumping him up

Many would have anticipated those ins for a Sunday game..........

final side announced late tomorrow.

But Plugger is VERY VERY good at putting 2 and 2 together...

Solar · Post: # 907212Post **Solar** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 6:33pm

Armoooo wrote:
chook23 wrote:
Ralphy wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Ins today

Stanley
Eddy
Clarke
Steven
you're good
Doesnt he work for the afl , always gets the INS right.
Stop pumping him up

Many would have anticipated those ins for a Sunday game..........

final side announced late tomorrow.
But Plugger is VERY VERY good at putting 2 and 2 together...

totally agree, gun of a guy, adds so much to the forum... gotta love the p66!

chook23 · Post: # 907215Post **chook23** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 6:33pm

Armoooo wrote:
chook23 wrote:
Ralphy wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Ins today

Stanley
Eddy
Clarke
Steven
you're good
Doesnt he work for the afl , always gets the INS right.
Stop pumping him up

Many would have anticipated those ins for a Sunday game..........

final side announced late tomorrow.
But Plugger is VERY VERY good at putting 2 and 2 together...

but his posts would often sugggest he thinks it would be 5.

35...LEGEND · Thu 15 Apr 2010 6:48pm

SaintSimmo wrote:Out: Roo (hamstring) , Schneider (Poor Form)
In: R.Clarke, Steven

Only yourself and I think Schnad's is in ordinary form.....

Maybe we not watching closely enough..

NAB cup form had me quite excited at what lay ahead for him in 2010..

Must be close to a game at Sandy after 3 below average returns.

plugger66 · Post: # 907235Post **plugger66** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 7:31pm

chook23 wrote:
Ralphy wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Ins today

Stanley
Eddy
Clarke
Steven
you're good
Doesnt he work for the afl , always gets the INS right.
Stop pumping him up

Many would have anticipated those ins for this (Sunday) game..........

final side announced late tomorrow.

Yes of course it is a guess and many could have got it right but what really confuses me is your fascination in telling people to stop pumping me up. Surely I cop enough that I can get a little credit even if it is a fluke. Surely you cant be jealous of an anonymous poster.

Saintsfan · Post: # 907248Post **Saintsfan** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 7:54pm

plugger66 wrote:
chook23 wrote:
Ralphy wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Ins today

Stanley
Eddy
Clarke
Steven
you're good
Doesnt he work for the afl , always gets the INS right.
Stop pumping him up

Many would have anticipated those ins for this (Sunday) game..........

final side announced late tomorrow.
Yes of course it is a guess and many could have got it right but what really confuses me is your fascination in telling people to stop pumping me up. Surely I cop enough that I can get a little credit even if it is a fluke. Surely you cant be jealous of an anonymous poster.

You homo

Leo.J · Post: # 907250Post **Leo.J** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 7:59pm

Saintsfan wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
chook23 wrote:
Ralphy wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Ins today

Stanley
Eddy
Clarke
Steven
you're good
Doesnt he work for the afl , always gets the INS right.
Stop pumping him up

Many would have anticipated those ins for this (Sunday) game..........

final side announced late tomorrow.
Yes of course it is a guess and many could have got it right but what really confuses me is your fascination in telling people to stop pumping me up. Surely I cop enough that I can get a little credit even if it is a fluke. Surely you cant be jealous of an anonymous poster.
You homo

Is that you Milney?

Saintsfan · Post: # 907259Post **Saintsfan** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 8:27pm

Leo.J wrote:
Saintsfan wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
chook23 wrote:
Ralphy wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Ins today

Stanley
Eddy
Clarke
Steven
you're good
Doesnt he work for the afl , always gets the INS right.
Stop pumping him up

Many would have anticipated those ins for this (Sunday) game..........

final side announced late tomorrow.
Yes of course it is a guess and many could have got it right but what really confuses me is your fascination in telling people to stop pumping me up. Surely I cop enough that I can get a little credit even if it is a fluke. Surely you cant be jealous of an anonymous poster.
You homo
Is that you Milney?

Have a go homo

chook23 · Post: # 907260Post **chook23** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 8:28pm

plugger66 wrote:
chook23 wrote:
Ralphy wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Ins today

Stanley
Eddy
Clarke
Steven
you're good
Doesnt he work for the afl , always gets the INS right.
Stop pumping him up

Many would have anticipated those ins for this (Sunday) game..........

final side announced late tomorrow.
Yes of course it is a guess and many could have got it right but what really confuses me is your fascination in telling people to stop pumping me up. Surely I cop enough that I can get a little credit even if it is a fluke. Surely you cant be jealous of an anonymous poster.

Amazing response given how many posts/threads you comment on especially in a sarcastic tone etc etc.........a bit back and you don't like it.

Just making a point.

Leo.J · Post: # 907262Post **Leo.J** » Thu 15 Apr 2010 8:33pm

Saintsfan wrote:
Leo.J wrote:
Saintsfan wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
chook23 wrote:
Ralphy wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Ins today

Stanley
Eddy
Clarke
Steven
you're good
Doesnt he work for the afl , always gets the INS right.
Stop pumping him up

Many would have anticipated those ins for this (Sunday) game..........

final side announced late tomorrow.
Yes of course it is a guess and many could have got it right but what really confuses me is your fascination in telling people to stop pumping me up. Surely I cop enough that I can get a little credit even if it is a fluke. Surely you cant be jealous of an anonymous poster.
You homo
Is that you Milney?
Have a go homo

That'll cost you $3000.

Bernard Shakey · Thu 15 Apr 2010 10:29pm

Raph will be the in!

walski · Post: # 907361Post **walski** » Fri 16 Apr 2010 12:25am

saintsRrising wrote:Out: Malthouse's Reputation
In: Saint's Resolve

Good call saintsRrising!

Made me smile

Saintsfan · Post: # 907368Post **Saintsfan** » Fri 16 Apr 2010 1:02am

Bernard Shakey wrote:Raph will be the in!

I really hope not. With Riewoldt obviously out gives Raph more responsibility and apart from the odd game where he does well he often fails and has numerous brain fades per match.

Some are quick to write him off and some are quick to revert to the few games he has done well. There is no real balance between the two.

I for one will be dissapointed if he comes in

Guess this weeks ins and outs

Re: Guess this weeks ins and outs

Re: Guess this weeks ins and outs

Re: Guess this weeks ins and outs

Re: Guess this weeks ins and outs

Re: Guess this weeks ins and outs

Re: Guess this weeks ins and outs

Re: Guess this weeks ins and outs

Re: Guess this weeks ins and outs

Re: Guess this weeks ins and outs

Re: Guess this weeks ins and outs

Re: Guess this weeks ins and outs

Re: Guess this weeks ins and outs

Re: Guess this weeks ins and outs

Re: Guess this weeks ins and outs

Re: Guess this weeks ins and outs