?? ?- Mick's Message- still shovelling

[saintbrat]

sorry Mick it hasn't helped ................... Or Maybe I am just cynical and he's still trying to dig himself out.
http://www.collingwoodfc.com.au/newsfea ... fault.aspx
News
Mick's message to supporters
Michael Malthouse 7:00 PM Mon 12 April, 2010
Collingwood senior coach Mick Malthouse

‘Mick’s Message’ is normally sent exclusively to Collingwood members each week, but Mick Malthouse expressed his desire for this week’s message to be published on Collingwoodfc.com.au, in conjunction with his email, for the benefit of all Collingwood members and supporters.

Dear members and supporters,

Following my apology for inappropriate comments I made to Stephen Milne, I would like to take this opportunity to inform you of the reasoning behind the initial position I took in the post-match press conference on Friday night.

When asked if I was directing comments at St Kilda players or my own players, I chose the latter option basically under the old code of what happens on the field stays on the field.

I largely took this decision based on my belief that, if I had said I was directing comments at a St Kilda player(s), this would lead to follow up questions such as “who were you talking to?â€

[Thinline]

So in world MM St Kilda's sooking makes a lie not a lie and then a lie again.

Man... The guy is old...TOO old...He's fair dinkum losing it...

Here's a tip Malthouse old son. SHUT UP.

[saintbrat]

Man... The guy is old....

Well Milney did try to tell him that ...

[SaintDebi]

I have a tip for you Mick,

If you "strenuously object to being branded a liar".......

DON'T LIE!!!!

[35...LEGEND]

LIAR

[markp]

[quote]When asked if I was directing comments at St Kilda players or my own players, I chose the latter option basically under the old code of what happens on the field stays on the field.

I largely took this decision based on my belief that, if I had said I was directing comments at a St Kilda player(s), this would lead to follow up questions such as “who were you talking to?â€

[plugger66]

[quote="markp"][quote]When asked if I was directing comments at St Kilda players or my own players, I chose the latter option basically under the old code of what happens on the field stays on the field.

I largely took this decision based on my belief that, if I had said I was directing comments at a St Kilda player(s), this would lead to follow up questions such as “who were you talking to?â€

[markp]

[quote="plugger66"][quote="markp"][quote]When asked if I was directing comments at St Kilda players or my own players, I chose the latter option basically under the old code of what happens on the field stays on the field.

I largely took this decision based on my belief that, if I had said I was directing comments at a St Kilda player(s), this would lead to follow up questions such as “who were you talking to?â€

[Spinner]

Stick to talking about respect you ugly maggot.

You lied, and only apologised because you got caught....So go f*** yourself.

[Jimmy1972]

I hope this explanation, in conjunction with my record and reputation, gives you, the Collingwood supporter, a greater understanding of this situation.

Yep.

You're a fool.

[35...LEGEND]

[quote="markp"][quote="plugger66"][quote="markp"][quote]When asked if I was directing comments at St Kilda players or my own players, I chose the latter option basically under the old code of what happens on the field stays on the field.

I largely took this decision based on my belief that, if I had said I was directing comments at a St Kilda player(s), this would lead to follow up questions such as “who were you talking to?â€

[Bernard Shakey]

[quote="markp"][quote="plugger66"][quote="markp"][quote]When asked if I was directing comments at St Kilda players or my own players, I chose the latter option basically under the old code of what happens on the field stays on the field.

I largely took this decision based on my belief that, if I had said I was directing comments at a St Kilda player(s), this would lead to follow up questions such as “who were you talking to?â€

[iwantmeseats]

bulls*** artist back peddler.

[Saint Bev]

I have a tip for you Mick,

If you "strenuously object to being branded a liar".......

DON'T LIE!!!!

Good call Deb, or maybe just shut up.

[Foz]

I strenuously object to being branded a liar.
Malthouse didn't speak to StKilda players

I strenuously object to being branded a liar.
Heath Shaw and Didak NOT driving car

I strenuously object to being branded a liar.
Hudson gained Didak's phone number through sheer chance

I strenuously object to being branded a liar.
Eddie did NOT call Johnson an overweight pig

I strenuously object to being branded a liar.
Malthouse will be at Collingwood until 2015 as football director!

If the Filthy cap fits...

[markp]

[quote="35...LEGEND"][quote="markp"][quote="plugger66"][quote="markp"][quote]When asked if I was directing comments at St Kilda players or my own players, I chose the latter option basically under the old code of what happens on the field stays on the field.

I largely took this decision based on my belief that, if I had said I was directing comments at a St Kilda player(s), this would lead to follow up questions such as “who were you talking to?â€

[saint patrick]

LIAR..LIAR..PANTS ON FIRE

Wouldn't that be a great chant from 40,000 members in round 16..after we smash them

[joffaboy]

Still a liar.

If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, good chance it is a Collingwood coach that is a LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[The Fireman]

Just thank God he still coaching the Skunks.

[Hurricane]

I never had a high opinion of Malthouse but this entire saga makes my opinion of him fall to about the same place as whale crap sits.

He holds himself up as a moral and upstanding gentleman of the game when nothing could be further from the truth.

First of all theis "code" bulls***, if there was such a "code" it surley would dictate that some sledges are off limits, yes Milney apparently called Mick "old" so Mick decided to return fire with a disgusting comment, how very mature. Second his "I streniously object to being called a liar" comment, If he didnt want to be called a liar he shouldnt have lied, own up to your mistake instead of trying to explain it away through garbage statements and your president.

Honestly there are sewage plants that are less full of s*** than Mr Malthouse.

BANG BANG

[Bernard Shakey]

I never had a high opinion of Malthouse but this entire saga makes my opinion of him fall to about the same place as whale crap sits.

He holds himself up as a moral and upstanding gentleman of the game when nothing could be further from the truth.

First of all theis "code" bulls***, if there was such a "code" it surley would dictate that some sledges are off limits, yes Milney apparently called Mick "old" so Mick decided to return fire with a disgusting comment, how very mature. Second his "I streniously object to being called a liar" comment, If he didnt want to be called a liar he shouldnt have lied, own up to your mistake instead of trying to explain it away through garbage statements and your president.

Honestly there are sewage plants that are less full of s*** than Mr Malthouse.

BANG BANG

Milney called him a "f...... old c...", which is true, but a bit more than just calling him old.

Was Mick's comment more disgusting than Milney's?

I don't know. It depends on your sensitivities.

The fact that Malthouse is the senior coach of an AFL club is the difference.

He should have been fined $50,000.

[VietNam_Saint]

sorry Mick it hasn't helped ................... Or Maybe I am just cynical and he's still trying to dig himself out

Couldn't dig his way out with an excavator !

Mick truly is home at Collingweird with the rest of the unwashed trailer trash.

[Hurricane]

I never had a high opinion of Malthouse but this entire saga makes my opinion of him fall to about the same place as whale crap sits.

He holds himself up as a moral and upstanding gentleman of the game when nothing could be further from the truth.

First of all theis "code" bulls***, if there was such a "code" it surley would dictate that some sledges are off limits, yes Milney apparently called Mick "old" so Mick decided to return fire with a disgusting comment, how very mature. Second his "I streniously object to being called a liar" comment, If he didnt want to be called a liar he shouldnt have lied, own up to your mistake instead of trying to explain it away through garbage statements and your president.

Honestly there are sewage plants that are less full of s*** than Mr Malthouse.

BANG BANG

Milney called him a "f...... old c...", which is true, but a bit more than just calling him old.

Was Mick's comment more disgusting than Milney's?

I don't know. It depends on your sensitivities.

The fact that Malthouse is the senior coach of an AFL club is the difference.

He should have been fined $50,000.

Well the word c..t is a pretty volatile word but IMHO "rapist" is way over the line.

I call my mates c..t ( as in whats up you crazy c..t) I would NEVER call them rapist

BANG BANG

[degruch]

"...we obviously made it very difficult for ourselves through really poor kicking for goal. Against a good side you can’t afford to do this. We are absolutely intent on rectifying this...".

Almost makes it sound as if they had a choice in the matter!?! Pressure Mick, that's what made your team kick so badly, pressure. Watch the replay and write an article on how many easy kicks at goal your players had...you couldn't smash that out of the Saints, no matter how many snipers you put on the field.

[Moccha]

should be Mixed message not Mick's message