options up forward?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
options up forward?
just a few options. anyone think we should bring stanley in for roo next week for the freo game? or try someone like gwilt up forward?
21 years old, proud member since 1998!
-
remboy
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2135
- Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
- Location: Rockville
- Has thanked: 597 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
While I believe a mix of rotating Goddard, Gwilt , Monti through the forward line can be effective, we need a genuine key forward down there that can give us a presence. Not sure if Stanley's a better option than McEvoy but we need someone over 6 foot down there.
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
would like to see stanely get a game. Will be an interesting structure until kosi getsback. Even then we do need that second key forward.
Will keep at it but raph as a forward is so worth a go!
Would like to keep jimmy down back
Will keep at it but raph as a forward is so worth a go!
Would like to keep jimmy down back
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
-
st_Trav_ofWA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8886
- Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
Re: options up forward?
i dont think moving Gwilt is the right thing to do .. he is finally fitting into a definate role and he is gaining confidence in that role so i dont think moving him from that role will benifit the team or Gwilty ...danners wrote:just a few options. anyone think we should bring stanley in for roo next week for the freo game? or try someone like gwilt up forward?
honestly safe option is move gardy and BJ forward next week and bring in Big Mac and King to ruck ... a more risky/experimental option is brin in a Stanley , Lynch or Heyne in for Roo and see how they go .... the compleatly out of this world option is send the not ready Irish man out there .....
from past experiances... RL will prob go with the safe option
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
-
gringo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
I would persist with S, Fisher up front, Gwilts going well, we need Goddard around the ground and he can run forward to rest anyway. Fisher is a strong mark, fast and despite what the stats might say i think he always looks good from set shots. He is still going to be unfit from his time off injured and it is a way to build him up slowly.
Stanley is a riskier proposition as he looked a bit overwhelmed when he was in the NAB final. Good for guys like him or Lynch to get in there and have a go if it does happen. If it wasn't Freo and Dogs coming up the younger guys probably would get a run.
Stanley is a riskier proposition as he looked a bit overwhelmed when he was in the NAB final. Good for guys like him or Lynch to get in there and have a go if it does happen. If it wasn't Freo and Dogs coming up the younger guys probably would get a run.
-
yipper
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3967
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 8:18am
- Location: Gippsland
- Been thanked: 10 times
Absolutely he did. He was sitting in the grandstand behind me in the NAB cup final!!!gringo wrote:I would persist with S, Fisher up front, Gwilts going well, we need Goddard around the ground and he can run forward to rest anyway. Fisher is a strong mark, fast and despite what the stats might say i think he always looks good from set shots. He is still going to be unfit from his time off injured and it is a way to build him up slowly.
Stanley is a riskier proposition as he looked a bit overwhelmed when he was in the NAB final. Good for guys like him or Lynch to get in there and have a go if it does happen. If it wasn't Freo and Dogs coming up the younger guys probably would get a run.
I want to stand for something. I'm a loyal person and I think at the end of my career it will be great to look back and know that I'm a St Kilda person for life.
- Nick Riewoldt. May 19th 2009.
- Nick Riewoldt. May 19th 2009.
-
st_Trav_ofWA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8886
- Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
having said that thou the dockers are not the best defencive unit and with ??? over tarrant's fitness maybe a good game to test the younger guys agains a young Freo sidegringo wrote:I would persist with S, Fisher up front, Gwilts going well, we need Goddard around the ground and he can run forward to rest anyway. Fisher is a strong mark, fast and despite what the stats might say i think he always looks good from set shots. He is still going to be unfit from his time off injured and it is a way to build him up slowly.
Stanley is a riskier proposition as he looked a bit overwhelmed when he was in the NAB final. Good for guys like him or Lynch to get in there and have a go if it does happen. If it wasn't Freo and Dogs coming up the younger guys probably would get a run.
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
-
st_Trav_ofWA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8886
- Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
oh i can see it now 40000 posts after the game complaining how hes no Roo and how he shouldnt be in the best 22 and a 1000 posts on why we should delist him .....Solar wrote:would like to see stanely get a game. Will be an interesting structure until kosi getsback. Even then we do need that second key forward.
Will keep at it but raph as a forward is so worth a go!
Would like to keep jimmy down back
i dont think the resident whipers of the offical boy need any more reasons to whip away
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
-
saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
-
ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10800
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 837 times
Your performance in that final was pathetic Yipper.yipper wrote:Absolutely he did. He was sitting in the grandstand behind me in the NAB cup final!!!gringo wrote:I would persist with S, Fisher up front, Gwilts going well, we need Goddard around the ground and he can run forward to rest anyway. Fisher is a strong mark, fast and despite what the stats might say i think he always looks good from set shots. He is still going to be unfit from his time off injured and it is a way to build him up slowly.
Stanley is a riskier proposition as he looked a bit overwhelmed when he was in the NAB final. Good for guys like him or Lynch to get in there and have a go if it does happen. If it wasn't Freo and Dogs coming up the younger guys probably would get a run.
No contested possessions, come to think of it no possessions at all, just like Stanley.
The two of you should hang your heads in shame.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
yipper
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3967
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 8:18am
- Location: Gippsland
- Been thanked: 10 times
Indeed. We just could not get near it actually!!!ace wrote:Your performance in that final was pathetic Yipper.yipper wrote:Absolutely he did. He was sitting in the grandstand behind me in the NAB cup final!!!gringo wrote:I would persist with S, Fisher up front, Gwilts going well, we need Goddard around the ground and he can run forward to rest anyway. Fisher is a strong mark, fast and despite what the stats might say i think he always looks good from set shots. He is still going to be unfit from his time off injured and it is a way to build him up slowly.
Stanley is a riskier proposition as he looked a bit overwhelmed when he was in the NAB final. Good for guys like him or Lynch to get in there and have a go if it does happen. If it wasn't Freo and Dogs coming up the younger guys probably would get a run.
No contested possessions, come to think of it no possessions at all, just like Stanley.
The two of you should hang your heads in shame.
I want to stand for something. I'm a loyal person and I think at the end of my career it will be great to look back and know that I'm a St Kilda person for life.
- Nick Riewoldt. May 19th 2009.
- Nick Riewoldt. May 19th 2009.
-
Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11242
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
-
SaintSimmo
- Club Player
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Thu 11 Dec 2008 10:00pm
- Location: Melbourne
That will not happen but even if it does they still have to drop someone for raph.SaintSimmo wrote:To cover gwilt, who will play at CHF next week.plugger66 wrote:For who? They will just about certainly play a tall for Rooy so who does Raph come in for?Bernard Shakey wrote:If Raph has a good one for Sandy tomorrow, he will be in next week.
-
SaintSimmo
- Club Player
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Thu 11 Dec 2008 10:00pm
- Location: Melbourne
read thisplugger66 wrote:That will not happen but even if it does they still have to drop someone for raph.SaintSimmo wrote:To cover gwilt, who will play at CHF next week.plugger66 wrote:For who? They will just about certainly play a tall for Rooy so who does Raph come in for?Bernard Shakey wrote:If Raph has a good one for Sandy tomorrow, he will be in next week.
http://www.saintsational.com/forum/view ... hp?t=60529
Sainter for life.
Well King aint getting dropped for a start.SaintSimmo wrote:read thisplugger66 wrote:That will not happen but even if it does they still have to drop someone for raph.SaintSimmo wrote:To cover gwilt, who will play at CHF next week.plugger66 wrote:For who? They will just about certainly play a tall for Rooy so who does Raph come in for?Bernard Shakey wrote:If Raph has a good one for Sandy tomorrow, he will be in next week.
http://www.saintsational.com/forum/view ... hp?t=60529
-
Unforgiven
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3258
- Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005 9:48pm
- Location: Full Forward
-
degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
'Just about certainly'...but not certainly. I think it'll be more about alternative plays than alternative Roo's.plugger66 wrote:For who? They will just about certainly play a tall for Rooy so who does Raph come in for?Bernard Shakey wrote:If Raph has a good one for Sandy tomorrow, he will be in next week.