Kosi replacement?

bobmurray · Post: # 897350Post **bobmurray** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 10:33pm

maverick wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:
skeptic wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:It will be Gardiner, no brainer
If it's Gardiner then obviously a Full Forward is irrelevant in today's footy...
me thinks he means Gardiner to the ruck, McEvoy forward
Clearly, thanks skeptic, have t explain thinmgs S L O W L Y to some people....

MCEvoy got smashed in the ruck tonight, but as a forward he is the perfect backup to Kosi....

plus there is very little else...
Yep,,,, making the gist of your post clear shouldn't be so taxing...
There you go, now we agree....

We don't agree...i'll say it SLOWLY if it helps

saintsRrising · Sat 27 Mar 2010 10:34pm

Ben is not slower than Kosi

maverick · Post: # 897356Post **maverick** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 10:36pm

bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:
skeptic wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:It will be Gardiner, no brainer
If it's Gardiner then obviously a Full Forward is irrelevant in today's footy...
me thinks he means Gardiner to the ruck, McEvoy forward
Clearly, thanks skeptic, have t explain thinmgs S L O W L Y to some people....

MCEvoy got smashed in the ruck tonight, but as a forward he is the perfect backup to Kosi....

plus there is very little else...
Yep,,,, making the gist of your post clear shouldn't be so taxing...
There you go, now we agree....
We don't agree...i'll say it SLOWLY if it helps

So we agree again, wow...

bobmurray · Post: # 897358Post **bobmurray** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 10:38pm

maverick wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:
skeptic wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:It will be Gardiner, no brainer
If it's Gardiner then obviously a Full Forward is irrelevant in today's footy...
me thinks he means Gardiner to the ruck, McEvoy forward
Clearly, thanks skeptic, have t explain thinmgs S L O W L Y to some people....

MCEvoy got smashed in the ruck tonight, but as a forward he is the perfect backup to Kosi....

plus there is very little else...
Yep,,,, making the gist of your post clear shouldn't be so taxing...
There you go, now we agree....
We don't agree...i'll say it SLOWLY if it helps
So we agree again, wow...

Oh no..i've found another one who is a sandwich short of a picnic.....

how did i become a magnet for nupties....

maverick · Post: # 897365Post **maverick** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 10:40pm

bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:
skeptic wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:It will be Gardiner, no brainer
If it's Gardiner then obviously a Full Forward is irrelevant in today's footy...
me thinks he means Gardiner to the ruck, McEvoy forward
Clearly, thanks skeptic, have t explain thinmgs S L O W L Y to some people....

MCEvoy got smashed in the ruck tonight, but as a forward he is the perfect backup to Kosi....

plus there is very little else...
Yep,,,, making the gist of your post clear shouldn't be so taxing...
There you go, now we agree....
We don't agree...i'll say it SLOWLY if it helps
So we agree again, wow...
Oh no..i've found another one who is a sandwich short of a picnic.....

how did i become a magnet for nupties....

I wonder

bobmurray · Post: # 897372Post **bobmurray** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 10:42pm

maverick wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:
skeptic wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
maverick wrote:It will be Gardiner, no brainer
If it's Gardiner then obviously a Full Forward is irrelevant in today's footy...
me thinks he means Gardiner to the ruck, McEvoy forward
Clearly, thanks skeptic, have t explain thinmgs S L O W L Y to some people....

MCEvoy got smashed in the ruck tonight, but as a forward he is the perfect backup to Kosi....

plus there is very little else...
Yep,,,, making the gist of your post clear shouldn't be so taxing...
There you go, now we agree....
We don't agree...i'll say it SLOWLY if it helps
So we agree again, wow...
Oh no..i've found another one who is a sandwich short of a picnic.....

how did i become a magnet for nupties....
I wonder

at least you aren't on your own...

Finna · Post: # 897381Post **Finna** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 10:45pm

I am so sick of these commentators carrying on about Kosi's bump.
They've already given him a month!

bergsone · Post: # 897383Post **bergsone** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 10:46pm

maverick wrote:
bergsone wrote:IMO cant see us playing king,Gardiner and macca in thesame side,reckon we look slow as it is
Wouldn't have thought it was any slower than King, Gardiner and Kosi....

Put my money on Kosi in a 4 way sprint,go for Stanley to replace Kosi IF the need be,anyway interesting selection next week

bobmurray · Post: # 897385Post **bobmurray** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 10:47pm

Finna wrote:I am so sick of these commentators carrying on about Kosi's bump.
They've already given him a month!

They have to concentrate on the slightest incident..most of them are ex football players...they aren't that smart....once they have something to focus on they have to milk it to it's death.........wankers...

Bernard Shakey · Sat 27 Mar 2010 11:06pm

He did run past the ball and collect the head.

Will probably get a week or two as will Hille.

SainterK · Post: # 897418Post **SainterK** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 11:08pm

Bernard Shakey wrote:He did run past the ball and collect the head.

Will probably get a week or two as will Hille.

Agree, they were similar...

chook23 · Post: # 897431Post **chook23** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 11:18pm

more likely 3

linz · Post: # 897435Post **linz** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 11:23pm

1 week for that at most imo. At least he DID something.

Goose is king · Sat 27 Mar 2010 11:26pm

Ran past the ball, took his eyes off the ball and made contact to the head. 2 weeks minimum for mine.

Stanley.

Legendary · Post: # 897443Post **Legendary** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 11:28pm

Has carryover points.

2 weeks (would have been 1 for a good record).

Common sense? Shouldn't face any penalty.

SainterK · Post: # 897444Post **SainterK** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 11:29pm

North are going to be down a tall in Petrie, might think outside the box a little for this week?

Dr Spaceman · Sat 27 Mar 2010 11:31pm

Goose is king wrote:Ran past the ball, took his eyes off the ball and made contact to the head. 2 weeks minimum for mine.

Well if you run past the ball you naturally take your eyes off the ball (unless you can turn your head 180 degrees like that chick in The Exorcist

)

Let's not make it sound like he did too many things wrong!

PaulieGa · Post: # 897475Post **PaulieGa** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 11:53pm

I think the difference to this one and Lloyd's one is that if Kosi had have gone for the ball he would have collected BJ. It's a pity they didnt have a camra angle from behind to show if he deviated his course after he saw BJ going for the ball.

plugger66 · Post: # 897480Post **plugger66** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 11:56pm

I refuse to read what people said about this but he is getting 2-4 weeks and anyone thinking otherwise needs to get go to OPSM for eye replacement. Having said that it was just Kosi being excited and nothing malice in it.

maverick · Post: # 897483Post **maverick** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 11:57pm

plugger66 wrote:I refuse to read what people said about this but he is getting 2-4 weeks and anyone thinking otherwise needs to get go to OPSM for eye replacement. Having said that it was just Kosi being excited and nothing malice in it.

No need to readit, pretty much the consensus, unless of course we get the judiciary that Barry got in 2005...

Griggsy · Post: # 897487Post **Griggsy** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 11:58pm

Considering how low Malceski was, and how tall kosi is. arm tucked in the entire time, ball in play. For a saint it means 4weeks. Should be 1max with the points. I wouldnt appeal though, tends to hurt us more.

bigcarl · Post: # 897488Post **bigcarl** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 11:58pm

plugger66 wrote:I refuse to read what people said about this but he is getting 2-4 weeks and anyone thinking otherwise needs to get go to OPSM for eye replacement. Having said that it was just Kosi being excited and nothing malice in it.

correct.

Saintersss · Sat 27 Mar 2010 11:59pm

plugger66 wrote:I refuse to read what people said about this but he is getting 2-4 weeks and anyone thinking otherwise needs to get go to OPSM for eye replacement. Having said that it was just Kosi being excited and nothing malice in it.

Agree 100%.

Basically if you are taller than the opponent you can't bump without getting significant head contact. And head contact = suspension. Its stupid, but thats the rules.

plugger66 · Post: # 897492Post **plugger66** » Sat 27 Mar 2010 11:59pm

Griggsy wrote:Considering how low Malceski was, and how tall kosi is. arm tucked in the entire time, ball in play. For a saint it means 4weeks. Should be 1max with the points. I wouldnt appeal though, tends to hurt us more.

Please learn the rule.

bobmurray · Post: # 897670Post **bobmurray** » Sun 28 Mar 2010 11:06am

plugger66 wrote:I refuse to read what people said about this but he is getting 2-4 weeks and anyone thinking otherwise needs to get go to OPSM for eye replacement. Having said that it was just Kosi being excited and nothing malice in it.

When did OPSM move into the EYE replacement business...Does it work....